43 Pages

Slides15

Course: FACULTY 2008, Fall 2008
School: Catholic
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 1501

Document Preview

Constitutional Comparative Law The Indian Constitution: Origins and Structure Class 15: October 14, 2008 India: Compare to Canada, U.S., Germany Very populous: more than 1 billion Slightly over 1/3 size of U.S. Enormous linguistic, ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity Diversity: 24 official languages Can anyone name any of these? Diversity: 24 official languages (see Part XVII Constitution) Hindi is...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> District of Columbia >> Catholic >> FACULTY 2008

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Constitutional Comparative Law The Indian Constitution: Origins and Structure Class 15: October 14, 2008 India: Compare to Canada, U.S., Germany Very populous: more than 1 billion Slightly over 1/3 size of U.S. Enormous linguistic, ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity Diversity: 24 official languages Can anyone name any of these? Diversity: 24 official languages (see Part XVII Constitution) Hindi is the national language and is spoken as the main language of 30% of the population English is the language of political and commercial communication. It has associate status. Authoritative text of legislation is English (art. 348(1)). Supreme Court official language is English (art. 348(1)). 22 other official languages (see Eighth Schedule): 22 other official languages Asamese, Bengali, Bodo, Docri, Gondi, Gujarati, Kannada, Kashmiri, Konkani, Malayalam, Maithili, Manipuri, Marathi, Nepali, Oriya, Punjabi, Sanskrit, Santali, Sinchi, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu Over 1600 languages and dialects are spoken in India Diversity: Many religions and ethnicities Diversity: Many religions and ethnicities Hindu 80.5%, Muslim 13.4%, Christian 2.3%, Sikh 1.9%, Buddist 1.1%, Jain .4% other .5% (2001 census) Every major religion is represented More than 2,000 ethnic groups Caste system What are castes? Are they legal? What significance do they have in modern Indian society? Caste system Hindu, Muslim, and Christian castes Many castes (3,000) and subcastes (25,000) Jati and varna 4 basic varnas: Brahminspriests, Kshatryas warriors, Vaishyastraders, Shudraslaborers Some view castes as a function of karma, but others see some mobility between castes Dalits K.R. Narayanan, President of India 19972002, a Dalit Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Chairman of Constituent Assembly Drafting Committee for the Constitution (see Art. 17 abolishing untouchability) Your book discusses dalits as untouchables Dalits Sometimes called untouchables or (by Gandhi harijan (this is now considered patronizing) Dalit is the most politically correct name now still controversial Divided into subgroups Formerly required to do the most menial jobs in society Have suffered much discrimination Status of dalit has been officially abolished under Art. 17 of the Constitution Constitution provides for social and economic uplift of Dalits who remain Hindu via affirmative action for Scheduled Castes (around 24% of population) and Tribes (around 8% of population) (e.g. reserved seats in Parliament) Nonetheless, discrimination persists in society Art. 17 Article 17. Abolition of Untouchability. -"Untouchability" is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of "Untouchability" shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law. Article 46. Promotion of educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other weaker sections. (A Directive Principle) The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation. Origins of Indian Constitution Compare these to the other constitutions we have studied Indian Independence from Britain Achieved after a century of violent and non-violent protests (e.g. 1857 mutiny, Gandhis campaign of civil disobedience (starting around 1918), Boses Indian National Army (starting in 1942), non violent Quit India movement (1942) Indian Independence from Britain 1935 Government of India Act (enacted by UK Parliament) Members of provincial legislatures elected Constituent Assembly (in which All Indian National Congress initially had 69% of seats) 1947 Indian Independence Act (UK statute) Partition Indian Independence from Britain: Partition India became a Dominion (independent nation) on August 15, 1947 (Independence Day) after a traumatic event, Partition into India and Pakistan Migration of around 15 million people Terrible violence: between 200,000 and 1 million deaths Indian Independence from Britain After Partition, Congress had 82% of representation in Constituent Assembly Constitution drafted between 1946 and 1949 Draft published in Jan. 1948. People of India could proposed amendments. Nearly 8,000 proposed; 2,473 discussed. Some provisions came into force on November 23, 1949 when CA adopted it and president Prasad signed it. The rest came into force on January 26, 1950 Is the Indian Constitution older or younger than the German Basic Law? First PM Nehru signing Indian Constitution Jan 24, 1950 He was a member of the Constituent Assembly Indian Independence from Britain Is the Indian Constitution older or younger than the German Basic Law? Younger -- German basic law adopted on May 23, 1949 Main Features Parliamentary Government (next slides) Federalism (next Mondays class) Bill of Rights Fundamental Rights (Oct. 22 class) arts. 12-35 Directive Principles borrowed from Ireland: not enforceable but fundamental to governance arts. 36-51 Separation of Powers (next Mondays class) Amendment see art. 368 Judicial Review (tomorrows class) Indian Parliament Bicameral: House of the People and Council of States must Legislation be passed by both Houses with presidential assent House of the People Lok Sabha Directly elected lower house Elected every 5 years by all over 18 (President can dissolve earlier if no party has majority) There have been 14 Lok Sabhas since 1952 (14th formed May 2004) 545 members (some seats reserved for Scheduled Castes and Tribes) (Art. 81) Must introduce money bills Lok Sabha Current ruling coalition after 2004 elections is United Progressive Alliance led by Indian National Congress Party and supported by Left Front Council of States Rajya Sabha 1/3 of 250 members elected every two years Members of Rajya Sabha are elected by the elected members of State Legislative Assemblies in accordance with the system of proportional representation by means of single transferable vote. Unlike U.S. Senate, states do not have equal representation in Rajya Sabha President of India Head of State Largely ceremonial role Appoints as Prime Minister leader of majority party in Lok Sabha Real executive authority is vested in Council of Ministers (responsible to the Lok Sabha) (inference from Art. 74) Pratiba Patil Elected in 2007 President Elected for 5 year term by electoral college consisting of elected members of both houses of Parliament and elected members of the State Legislative Assemblies (Vidhan Sabha) by a method of proportional representation. Prime Minister Most powerful politician in India Effectively head of government Must be a member of Parliament Selects the Council of Ministers (formally appointed by president) Advises president on appointments, dissolving Lok Sabha, emergencies Dr Manmohan Singh First Sikh PM and first Member of Rajya Sabha Amendment How can the Indian Constitution be amended? Amendment How can the Indian Constitution be amended? Ways: i. Most provisions bill passed by 2/3 of members of both Houses of Parliament present and voting (and absolute majority of them) ii. Small number of provisions: simple majority (arts. 3, 4, 11, 105(3), 120, 196(3), 345, 348) iii. Some require special majorities AND no less than of state legislatures (eg election of President, executive power of Union and of states; Union judiciary . . . ) How many times has the Indian Constitution been amended? Limits on amendment What does art. 13(2) provide? Art 13(2) The state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges [the Fundamental Rights]. . . and any law made in contravention of this clause shall be void Does this clause limit amendment? Golak Nath v. Punjab (1967) Challenge to 17th Amendment Act 1964 6-5 majority prospectively overruled prior decisions and held that A 368 did not give Parliament the power to amend (it only set out the procedure). An amendment was a law subject to A 13(2) and could not abrogate any Fundamental Right Big change from literalist, positivist interpretation to acknowledgment of Supreme Courts law making function But took a literalist approach to art. 13(2) to reach decision Keshvanand Bharat v. Kerala (1973) Challenge to 24th, 25th, 26th Amendments Overrules Golak Nath denying Parliament the power to amend fundamental rgihts A 368 contained power (eve...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Comparative Constitutional LawClass 16: The Supreme Court of India October 15, 2008Specialization Compare the Supreme Court of India with the Supreme Courts of the U.S. and Canada as well as the German FCCHow Many Indian Supreme Court Judges ar
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Comparative Constitutional LawClass 18 Crisis Management in the Indian Constitutional SystemEmergency Powers War Powers in Article I and II of US Constittution POGG power in s. 91 of the BNA Act of 1867Indian Constitution National Emergency (
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Comparative Constitutional LawClass 19: Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles October 27 2008Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution Where are these found?Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution Where are these found? Part II
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Comparative Constitutional LawClass 21 November 3, 2008 South Africa: Origins and Structure of its Constitutional SystemSouth Africa Slightly less than twice the size of the State of Texas Population: over 44 million AIDS rate over 20% Republi
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Comparative Constitutional LawClass 21 November 5, 2008 South Africa: Origins and Structure of its Constitutional System; the SA Constitutional CourtHistory of ApartheidNelson Mandela Member of Thembu (Xhosa) royal family Became active in the
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAWFall 2008Instructor: Susanna Fischer Office: Phone: E-mail: Room 412 202-319-5568 fischer@law.eduTWEN Site: Copyright Law, Fall 2008 Class meets from 6:20 to 7:35 p.m. on Mondays and Wednesdays in Room 208READING LISTImportant Inf
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008: CLASS 1Professor Fischer Introduction to Copyright August 18, 2008Welcome! Totally Online Course For course materials go to TWEN And http:/faculty.cua.edu/fischer/ (click on Copyright Law Fall 2008 for links to Home Pa
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008: CLASS 2Professor Fischer Introduction to Copyright 2: Historical Background AUGUST 20, 2008Authors Rights Concepts Are Very Ancient 6th century: St. Columba and King Diarmid : To every cow her calfCopyright is Technolo
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 CLASS 3August 25, 2008Wrap-Up: Historical Trends in Copyright Law 1. Progressive expansion of copyrightable subject matter 2. Expansion of duration 3. Growing U.S. participation in international copyright system 4. Stea
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL FALL 2008 CLASS 4 COPYRIGHTABILITY IColumbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer August 27, 2008Wrap-Up Rationale underlying copyright law (e.g. utilitarian, natural right, personhood) will affect
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008Class 5 September 3, 2008 FixationWRAP-UP ORIGINALITY REQUIREMENTOriginality Requirement 17 U.S.C. 102(a) Copyright protection subsists in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression . . . .
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 6: September 8 2008 Idea-Expression DichotomyCopyright Case: Dont Mess with J.K. RowlingWarner Bros. Entertanment Inc./J.K. Rowling v. RDR Books, 07 Civ. 9667 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) (halte
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008: CLASS 7THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Sept. 10, 2008WRAP UP: Baker v. Selden Baker v. Selden copying for purposes of use as opposed to explanation cannot be copyright infringement. We considered extent to which this
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 8: September 15, 2008Trivia Question Name two Supreme Court justices who, as federal appeals court justices, wrote two of the opinions assigned for today.WRAP-UP:
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 CLASS 9PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA September 17, 2008CLASS OUTLINE Goals for this Class 1. To be able to analyze the copyrightability fo compilations after Feist 2. Goal for this class: To be abl
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 CLASS 10PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA September 22 2008CLASS OUTLINE 1. Wrap-Up Points 2. Goals for this class: A. To be able to analyze the copyrightability of pictorial, graphic, and sculptural w
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Sept 29 2008WRAP-Up: copyrightability of PGS PGS that is a useful article is protectable only if it has aesthetic features that are separable from its utilitarian aspects
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW : FALL 2008PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA October 1, 2008WRAP UP Characters are copyrightable outside of the story in which they occur if (2d Cir., 7th Cir.) they meet Nichols specificity test or (perhaps 9th)
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA OCT 6 2008HUGE EXCEPTION TO COPYRIGHTABILITY: GOVERNMENT WORKSAUTHORSHIP 3 possible philosophical concepts of authorship: A. Conception of the work B. Execution of the Wor
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Copyright Law: Fall 2008 Professor Susanna FischerCLASS of October 8, 2008 Joint WorksCopyright Ownership: Work for Hire Wrap Up Exception to general rule that person who actually creates a work is the author who owns copyright in that work 2
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Copyright Law: Fall 2008 Professor Susanna FischerCLASS 17 October 15, 2008WRAP-UP: TRANSFER Copyright is a bundle of rights under the 1976 statute, which recognizes the concept of divisibility (see s. 201(d)(2) Exclusive licensees but not nonex
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Copyright Law: Fall 2008 Professor Susanna FischerCLASS of October 20, 2008 Copyright Duration, Renewal, TerminationLittle Quiz (take 5 minutes) What is the copyright duration for a work published with copyright notice in 1910 under the 1976 Act?
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
Copyright Law: Fall 2008 Professor Susanna FischerCLASS of October 22, 2008 Copyright Renewal, TerminationWRAP-UP: DURATION PROVISIONS Published and unpublished works created on or after 1/1/78: s. 302, 305 Unpublished works created but not publ
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT FALL 2008Formalities IREVIEW OF TERMINATION Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2008)Formalities U.S. very stringent pre 1976 Act (effective 1/1/1978) and 1988 BCIA (came into effect 3/1/1989) What are the pros and
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. FischerOct 28, 2008WRAP UP: FORMALITIES 1 Publication NoticeWRAP UP: TEST FOR GENERAL PUBLICATION In MLK case p. 391 of CB 1. If tangible copies of the work a
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. FischerClass 22 Infringement November 3, 2008WRAP-UP: FORMALITIES Historical trend: reduction in importance in formalities, especially notice and publicationINFR
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 23 November 5, 2008WRAP-UP POINTS: INFRINGEMENT To sustain an action for infringement, copyright owner must prove 1. Ownership of valid copyright 2.
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer November 10, 2008WRAP-UP POINTS: MECHANICAL LICENSE Section 115 of the Copyright Act is a limitation on the scope of the reproduction and distribution right
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer November 17, 2008Makeup Class on DMCA 6:10-7:35 in Room 220 on Tuesday November 18Written Exercise 2 Due November 24 for comments Model answer will be d
Catholic - FACULTY - 2008
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 27: November 19, 2008WRAP-UP PERFORMANCE RIGHTS Only specific types of work Performance must be public No general performance right for sound record
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
WELCOME TO CIVIL PROCEDURE!Prof. Susanna Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America 202-319-5568 fischer@law.edu Class 1: 8/22/200502/04/09COURSE WEBPAGEhttp:/faculty.cua.edu/fischer/ CLICK ON CIVIL PROCEDURE 2005 Cours
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 CLASS 2 (8/24/2005) INTRODUCTION TO CIVIL PROCEDUREColumbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer02/04/09WRAP-UP OF CLASS 1 OF 8/25/03 Purpose of the FRCP: (just, speedy, inexpensive resolu
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 CLASS 3 (8/26/2005)STAGES AND ESSENTIAL CONCEPTS OF A CIVIL ACTIONColumbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer02/04/09WRAP-UP OF CLASS 2 of August 24 2005 Important concepts: Difference
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 4 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION I Federal Question JurisdictionProfessor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Aug. 29, 20055. VENUEEven if there is personal jurisdiction, there is a further questi
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & FFall 2005 August 31 2005 Class 5 Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Diversity and AlienageWRAP UP You should understand one major type of limited subject matter jurisdiction of a federal court: federal question jurisdictio
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & FFall 2005 Class 6 Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Diversity and Alienage Introduction to Personal JurisdictionCUA recommendations for donations for Hurricane Relief Mail Checks To: Catholic Charities USA 2005 Hurricane
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & FFall 2005 Class 7 Personal Jurisdiction September 7 2005Hurricane Katrina Day of Prayer and Communion 8 p.m., Campus-wide Prayer Vigil, Columbus School of Law, Knights of Columbus Courtyard 9 p.m., Eucharistic Adora
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & FCLASS 8 September 9, 2005WRAP-UP Difference between personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. Constitutional basis for personal jurisdiction (can be narrowed by statute) Historical shift in a
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & FCLASS 9 September 12, 2005WRAP-UP You should know when a civil action is commenced and why it matters (Rule 3) We learned what a pleading is (Rule 7(a) and the various types of pleadings in civil actions
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION FCLASS 10 September 14, 2005WRAP UP You should know: 1. What service of process is, and what is the purpose for service. 2. Requirements for TIME, DOCUMENTS, IDENTITY OF PROCESS SERVER, MANNER OF SERVICE for in
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & FClass 11 Pre-Answer Motions to Dismiss Friday September 16 2005Thinking Ahead to the Final Exam IRAC Remember to cite the relevant RULE for each ISSUE, ANALYZE by explaining fully how the rule applies to the facts,
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
Civil Procedure Sections C & F Fall 2005Class 12 September 19 2005 PLEADING More on Pre-Answer Motions, The AnswerWrap-Up: Pre-Answer Motions12(b), 12(c), 12(e), 12(f) One way to respond to a pleading containing claims (Complaint, Counterclaim,
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION F CLASS 13Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 21, 2005P.E. 9What is in an Answer? Notice Pleading applies Admissions 8(b) Denials 8(d) General Denial/Specific Denial
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 26, 2005A Comparison of federal and state law on relation back - MAHow does the applicable Massachusetts law in Christopher v. Duffy diffe
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 16Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 28, 2005NON-COMPLIANCE WITH FRCP 11(b FRCP Rule 11(c ) Attorney, law firm and/or party may be SANCTIONED! Sanctions are discretionaryRU
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America September 30, 2005CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS CONFIRMED Senate votes 78-22 to confirmCONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY 1921-2005 Federal district judgean
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
Justice Miers?l This morning at 8 a.m., President Bush announced he was nominating White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the United States Supreme CourtCIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 18Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of Ame
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 19Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 5, 2005WRAP UP: Relation of thirdparty claims to original claiml Can a D make a third-party claim under FRCP 14 that is unrelated to the c
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 20 DISCOVERY IProfessor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 7, 2005PRACTICE EXERCISE 13l There is a Model Answer for this Practice Exercise.DISCOVERYl What is the purpose of discovery
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & FCLASS 21 DISCOVERY II October 11, 2005REVIEW - WHAT MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH DISCOVERY?FRCP 26(b): Unless other limits by court order, any matter that 1. Is RELEVANT to the CLAIM OR DEFENSE of any party, or
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & FCLASS 22 DISCOVERY IIIWRAP UP: AUTOMATIC DISCLOSURESDiffer from other discovery techniques in that must be provided automatically without any request from opposing party 3 types: outset of case, pretria
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & FCLASS 23 DISCOVERY IVWRAP UP: AUTOMATIC DISCLOSURESDiffer from other discovery techniques in that must be provided automatically without any request from opposing party 3 types: outset of case, pretrial
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & FCLASS 24 DISCOVERY VTai Shan has been named!WRAP UP: DISCOVERY TECHNIQUESWe learned about two additional discovery techniques: depositions and document requests Parties and non parties can be deposed Docu
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 25Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 19, 2005SUMMARY JUDGMENTWhat is the purpose of including the summary judgment procedure in the FRCP?obtaining summary judgment?obtaini
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 27Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 24, 2005WRAP UP: SUMMARY JUDGMENTForm of pretrial adjudication Shifting burdens of production on motion depending on whether moving party
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 28Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 24, 2005CIVIIL JURY TRIALSProcedure at trialCIVIL JURY TRIALSAfter choosing a jury, the procedure is usually as follows (depends on loc
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 29Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 28, 2005WRAP UP: JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER JURIESRIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN CIVIL ACTIONSU.S. CONSTITUTION SEVENTH AMENDMENTIn suits at com
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
Civil Procedure 2005Class 28: Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Aggregation and Supplemental Jurisdiction Oct. 31, 2005 HAPPY HALLOWEEN!A New Supreme Court Nominee Samuel Alito Judge on U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitTENSION BETWEEN Li
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
Civil Procedure 2005Class 31: Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Supplemental Jurisdiction II, Removal Nov. 2, 2005TENSION BETWEEN Liberal joinder rules Subject matter jurisdiction requirement GAVE RISE TO SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTIONSUPPLEMENTAL JURIS
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
Civil Procedure 2005Class 32: Removal, Personal Jurisdiction II Nov. 4, 200528 U.S.C. sect. 1367(d) This is a tolling provision What is its effect? What is the reason for this tolling provision? Is it constitutional?28 U.S.C. sect. 1367(d)
Catholic - FACULTY - 2005
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 33Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America November 7, 2005VOLKSWAGEN V. WOODSONPLAINTIFFS citizenship for the purposes of diversityWORLD-WIDE VOLKSWAGENDEFENDANTSho are the defendants?