24 Pages

sf1ac

Course: LIB 2, Fall 2008
School: Michigan
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 12776

Document Preview

C. Appendix Data Collection and Processing Procedures CONTENTS Enumeration and Residence Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Puerto Rico . . . ....

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Michigan >> Michigan >> LIB 2

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
C. Appendix Data Collection and Processing Procedures CONTENTS Enumeration and Residence Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Puerto Rico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Major Components of the Census 2000 Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Master Address File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Public Outreach and Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Questionnaire Mailout/Mailback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collecting Data on Populations Living in Nontraditional Households . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collecting Long Form Data to Meet Federal Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retrieving and Processing the Data From Returned Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Matching and Unduplication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Geographic Database Development TIGER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Field Offices and Staffing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Data Collection: Basic Enumeration Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Special Populations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telecommunications Support and Automated Data Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal in 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Data Dissemination Through the Internet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Evaluation and Preparation for 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENUMERATION AND RESIDENCE RULES In accordance with census practice dating back to the first U.S. census in 1790, each person was to be enumerated as an inhabitant of his or her usual residence in Census 2000. Usual residence is the place where the person lives and sleeps most of the time. This place is not necessarily the same as the persons legal residence or voting residence. In the vast majority of cases, however, the use of these different bases of classification would produce substantially the same statistics, although there might be appreciable differences for a few areas. The implementation of this practice has resulted in the establishment of rules for certain categories of people whose usual place of residence is not immediately apparent. Furthermore, this practice means that people were not always counted as residents of the place where they happened to be staying on Census Day (April 1, 2000). United States Enumeration rules. Each person whose usual residence was in the United States was to be included in the census, without regard to the persons legal status or citizenship. As in previous censuses, people specifically excluded from the census were citizens of foreign countries temporarily traveling or visiting in the United States who had not established a residence. Americans temporarily overseas were to be enumerated at their usual residence in the United States. With some exceptions, Americans with a usual residence outside the United States were not enumerated in Census 2000. U.S. military personnel and federal civilian employees stationed outside the United States and their dependents living with them, are included in the population counts for the 50 states for purposes of Congressional apportionment but are excluded from all other tabulations for states and their subdivisions. The counts of overseas U.S. military personnel, Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Page C1 C1 C3 C4 C4 C5 C6 C7 C7 C7 C7 C8 C8 C9 C11 C13 C13 C13 C14 C14 C14 C1 federal civilian employees, and their dependents were obtained from administrative records maintained by the employing federal departments and agencies. Other Americans living overseas who were not affiliated with the U.S. government were not included in the census. Residence rules. Each person included in the census was to be counted at his or her usual residence the place where he or she lives and sleeps most of the time. If a person had no usual residence, the person was to be counted where he or she was staying on Census Day. People temporarily away from their usual residence, such as on a vacation or business trip, were to be counted at their usual residence. People who moved around Census Day were counted at the place they considered to be their usual residence. Armed forces personnel in the United States. Members of the U.S. Armed Forces were counted at their usual residence (the place where they lived and slept most of the time), whether it was on or off the military installation. Family members of armed forces personnel were counted at their usual residence (for example, with the armed forces person or at another location). Personnel assigned to each Navy and Coast Guard vessel with a U.S. homeport were given the opportunity to report an onshore residence where they usually stayed when they were off the ship. Those who reported an onshore residence were counted there; those who did not were counted at their vessels homeport. Personnel on U.S. flag merchant vessels. Crews of U.S. flag merchant vessels docked in a U.S. port, sailing from one U.S. port to another U.S. port, or sailing from a U.S. port to a Puerto Rico port were counted at their usual onshore residence if they reported one. Those who did not were counted as residents of the ship and were attributed as follows: The U.S. port, if the vessel was docked there on Census Day. The port of departure, if the ship was sailing from one U.S. port to another U.S. port, or from a U.S. port to a Puerto Rico port. Crews of U.S. merchant ships docked in a foreign port (including the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam), sailing from one foreign port to another foreign port, sailing from a U.S. port to a foreign port, or sailing from a foreign port to a U.S. port were not included in the census. People away at school. College students were counted as residents of the area in which they were living while attending college, as they have been since the 1950 census. Children in boarding schools below the college level were counted at their parental home. People in institutions. People under formally authorized, supervised care or custody, such as in federal or state prisons; local jails; federal detention centers; juvenile institutions; nursing or convalescent homes for the aged or dependent; or homes, schools, hospitals, or wards for the physically handicapped, mentally retarded, or mentally ill; or in drug/alcohol recovery facilities were counted at these places. People in general hospitals. People in general hospitals or wards (including Veterans Affairs hospitals) on Census Day were counted at their usual residence. Newborn babies were counted at the residence where they would be living. People in shelters. People staying on Census Day at emergency or transitional shelters with sleeping facilities for people without housing, such as for abused women or runaway or neglected youth, were counted at the shelter. People with multiple residences. People who lived at more than one residence during the week, month, or year were counted at the place where they lived most of the time. For example, commuter workers living away part of the week while working were counted at the residence where they stayed most of the week. Likewise, people who lived in one state but spent the winter in another state with a warmer climate (snowbirds) were to be counted at the residence where they lived most of the year. C2 Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 People away from their usual residence on Census Day. Temporary, migrant, or seasonal workers who did not report a usual U.S. residence elsewhere were counted as residents of the place where they were on Census Day. In some areas, natural disasters (hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding, and so forth) displaced households from their usual place of residence. If these people reported a destroyed or damaged residence as their usual residence, they were counted at that location. People away from their usual residence were counted by means of interviews with other members of their families, resident managers, or neighbors. Puerto Rico Enumeration rules. Each person whose usual residence was in Puerto Rico was to be included in the census, without regard to the persons legal status or citizenship. As in previous censuses, people specifically excluded from the census were citizens of foreign countries temporarily traveling or visiting in Puerto Rico who had not established a residence. Americans usually living in Puerto Rico but temporarily overseas were to be enumerated at their usual residence in Puerto Rico. Americans with a usual residence outside Puerto Rico were not counted as part of the Puerto Rico resident population. Residence rules. Each person included in the census was to be counted at his or her usual residence the place where he or she lives and sleeps most of the time. If a person had no usual residence, the person was to be counted where he or she was staying on Census Day. People temporarily away from their usual residence were to be counted at their usual residence. People who moved around Census Day were counted at the place they considered to be their usual residence. Armed forces personnel in Puerto Rico. Members of the U.S. Armed Forces were counted at their usual residence (the place where they lived and slept most of the time), whether it was on or off the military installation. Family members of armed forces personnel were counted at their usual residence (for example, with the armed forces person or at another location). Personnel assigned to each Navy and Coast Guard vessel with a Puerto Rico homeport were given the opportunity to report an onshore residence where they usually stayed when they were off the ship. Those who reported an onshore residence were counted there; those who did not were counted at their vessels homeport. Personnel on U.S. flag merchant vessels. Crews of U.S. flag merchant vessels docked in a Puerto Rico port, sailing from one Puerto Rico port to another Puerto Rico port, or sailing from a Puerto Rico port to a U.S. port were counted at their usual onshore residence if they reported one. Those who did not were counted as residents of the ship and were attributed as follows: The Puerto Rico port if the vessel was docked there on Census Day. The port of departure if the ship was sailing from one Puerto Rico port to another Puerto Rico port or from a Puerto Rico port to a U.S. port. Crews of U.S. merchant ships docked in a foreign port (including the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam), sailing from a Puerto Rico port to a foreign port, or sailing from a foreign port to a Puerto Rico port were not included in the census. People away at school. College students were counted as residents of the area in which they were living while attending college, as they have been since the 1950 census. Children in boarding schools below the college level were counted at their parental home. People in institutions. People under formally authorized, supervised care or custody, such as in federal or state prisons; local jails; federal detention centers; juvenile institutions; nursing or convalescent homes for the aged or dependent; or homes, schools, hospitals, or wards for the physically handicapped, mentally retarded, or mentally ill; or in drug/alcohol recovery facilities were counted at these places. Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 C3 People in general hospitals. People in general hospitals or wards (including Veterans Affairs hospitals) on Census Day were counted at their usual residence. Newborn babies were counted at the residence where they would be living. People in shelters. People staying on Census Day at emergency or transitional shelters with sleeping facilities for people without housing, such as for abused women or runaway or neglected youth, were counted at the shelter. People with multiple residences. People who lived at more than one residence during the week, month, or year were counted at the place where they lived most of the time. For example, commuter workers living away part of the week while working were counted at the residence where they stayed most of the week. People away from their usual residence on Census Day. Temporary, migrant, or seasonal workers who did not report a usual Puerto Rico residence elsewhere were counted as residents of the place where they were on Census Day. In some areas, natural disasters (hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding, and so forth) displaced households from their usual place of residence. If these people reported a destroyed or damaged residence as their usual residence, they were counted at that location. People away from their usual residence were counted by means of interviews with other members of their families, resident managers, or neighbors. MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE CENSUS 2000 PLAN The Census Bureau prepared the Census 2000 plan to ensure the most accurate decennial census legally possible. This plan included data collection from 100 percent of households and housing units. In addition, the plan included an extensive statistical operation to measure and correct overall and differential coverage of U.S. residents in Census 2000. This operation consisted of a scientific sample of approximately 300,000 housing units and used regional groupings to generate corrected counts. To ensure that Census 2000 will be both more accurate and more costeffective than the 1990 Census, the Census Bureau reviewed its procedures with input from a wide array of experts. In addition, the Census Bureau and Department of Commerce officials held more than 100 briefings for the members of Congress and their staff on the plan for Census 2000. The result has been an innovative departure from past practices that substantially increased overall accuracy and addressed the differential undercount of children, renters, and minorities. At the same time, the new methods of enumeration saved money and delivered results more quickly. The major components of the plan for Census 2000 included: 1. The Master Address File To conduct Census 2000, the Census Bureau needed to identify and locate an estimated 118 million housing units in the Nation. The Census Bureau accomplished this goal by developing and maintaining the Master Address File (MAF). This vital operation took place with the assistance of the U.S. Postal Service (USPS); other federal agencies; tribal, state and local governments; community organizations; and by an intensive canvass of selected areas. The resulting file was more comprehensive than ever before. In 1990, the Census Bureau relied on address lists purchased from vendors. As these lists were originally generated for marketing purposes, they proved to be less accurate in low-income areas. As a result, during the 1990 census, housing units were missed often enough to contribute notably to the undercount problem. Plans for Census 2000 were designed to address weaknesses found in the 1990 address list. The Census 2000 MAF started with the USPS address list, a list that does not discriminate against certain areas because of their marketing potential. Partnerships with state and local officials, community organizations, and tribal governments also played an important role in making sure the MAF is accurate; the local officials who knew the areas best helped develop the MAF. Finally, the Bureau made intensive efforts to create address lists in rural areas well in advance of the census. C4 Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 City-style addresses. The USPS uses the term city-style for an address such as 123 Main Street, even though such an address may occur in small towns and increasingly along country roads. In areas where the USPS delivers mail primarily to city-style addresses, the Census Bureau created the MAF by combining addresses from the 1990 Census Address Control File with those addresses in the USPS Delivery Sequence File (DSF). The DSF is a national file of individual delivery point addresses. As part of a cooperative agreement, the USPS provided the Census Bureau with updated DSFs on a regular basis. The Bureau then located these addresses in its computer mapping system called TIGER (Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing). If an address could not be located, the location was researched and resolved through an office operation or through assistance from local partners. As a result of this research, the Bureau identified new features and corrected and added address ranges to the TIGER database. Noncity-style addresses. In late 1998 and early 1999, the Census Bureau launched a comprehensive effort to canvass areas where most residences did not have city-style addresses. Over 30,000 canvassers visited approximately 22 million residences without a street address to enter their locations in the TIGER system. The combination of innovative use of computer data and technology along with these visits allowed the Bureau to construct the most accurate address list ever, giving field enumerators more time to meet other challenges presented by the 2000 count. Remote areas. In a few extremely remote and sparsely settled areas, census enumerators created the address list at the time of the initial census data collection while canvassing their assignment area and picking up or completing unaddressed questionnaires that the USPS previously had delivered to each household. Nontraditional living quarters. A separate operation built an inventory of all facilities that were not traditional living quarters; for example, prisons and hospitals. The Bureau interviewed an official at each location using a Facility Questionnaire. The responses to the questionnaire identified each group quarters and any housing units associated with the location. The Bureau classified each group quarters and its associated housing units at the location according to whether they would be enumerated as part of special place enumeration or through regular enumeration. The Bureau added these group quarters and housing units to the MAF and linked them to the TIGER database. Local government partnerships. The Bureau relied on local knowledge to build the MAF. State, local, and tribal governments; regional and metropolitan planning agencies; and related nongovernmental organizations were encouraged to submit locally developed and maintained city-style address lists to the Census Bureau to enhance the MAF. The Bureau matched the local lists both to the MAF and TIGER database and verified the status of each newly identified address through ongoing matches to updated address information from the USPS, other independent sources, and its own field operations. The Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) program was a partnership that allowed local and tribal governments to designate a liaison to review the portion of the MAF that covered their jurisdiction to help ensure its completeness. After processing the LUCA input, the Census Bureau provided feedback on the status of the adds, deletes, and corrections of addresses to the liaisons. The updated address list then was used to deliver census questionnaires. 2. Public Outreach and Marketing In 1990, the mail response rate dropped in spite of the Census Bureaus support of a public service announcement (PSA) effort that aired donated advertisements. Part of this drop was caused by the Bureaus inability to ensure that PSAs were broadcast at optimum times and in appropriate markets. An evaluation of the 1990 PSA campaign noted that the ads were seldom placed at optimal times because decisions about when to air PSAs rested with local radio and television stations. Sixty percent of the U.S. population received 91 percent of the census advertising impact; 40 percent received only 9 percent. Based on its studies of prior outreach campaigns, the Bureau concluded that the professional control of a paid media campaign would produce the best results. Census 2000 launched a vigorous public outreach campaign to educate everyone about the importance of being counted. Among the improvements in public outreach and marketing were: Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 C5 Partnerships/targeted community outreach. The Census Bureau built partnerships with local and tribal governments, businesses, and community groups to get the word out, to endorse the census, and to encourage constituents to respond. Beginning in 1996 and expanding in 1998, the Bureau hired government and community specialists to build relationships with local community and service-based organizations, focusing on groups representing traditionally undercounted populations. The Bureau deployed an extensive outreach program to reach schools, public sector employees, American Indians, and religious organizations. Businesses, nonprofit groups, and labor organizations also were asked to endorse participation and to publicize the census through employee newsletters, inserts with paychecks, and through communications with members and local chapters. Direct mail. The census questionnaire and related materials delivered to individual addresses carried the same themes and messages as the overall campaign. Public relations. The Census Bureau used public meetings and the news media to inform the public about the value of the census and to encourage response. Communications specialists were assigned to each field office to perform media outreach, to respond to media inquiries, and to coordinate the dissemination of the Census 2000 message. In many communities, the Census Bureau established local broadcaster/news director committees to emphasize Census 2000 to television viewers and radio listeners through broadcast segments and editorials in newspapers. Paid advertising. The Census Bureau planned a targeted campaign to reach everyone through ads in newspapers, magazines, billboards, posters, radio, and television. A private advertising firm designed and implemented the Census 2000 advertising campaign. The Census Bureau conducted a first-ever paid advertising campaign, including a national media campaign aimed at increasing mail response. The campaign included advertising directed at raising mail response rates among historically undercounted populations, with special messages targeted to hard-toenumerate populations. Advertising also focused on encouraging cooperation during the nonresponse follow-up procedures. Media public relations. The Census Bureau assigned media specialists to the regional census centers to cultivate local press contacts and respond to local media inquiries. Promotion and special events. A variety of special events, including parades, athletic events and public services television documentaries were cosponsored by state, local, and tribal governments and by community organizations and businesses to motivate people to respond. More ways to respond. In 2000, in addition to mailing the census questionnaires, the Census Bureau made the forms available in stores and malls, in civic or community centers, in schools, and in other locations frequented by the public. A well-publicized, toll-free telephone number was available for those who wished to respond to the census by telephone. People also had the option to respond to the short form via the Internet. Multiple languages. In 2000, as in all prior decennial censuses, questionnaires were in English (the Census Bureau has made Spanish-language questionnaires available in the past). However, for the first time in a decennial census, households had the option to request and receive questionnaires in five other languages (Spanish, Chinese, Korean, Tagalog, and Vietnamese). In addition, questionnaire assistance booklets were available in 49 languages. 3. Questionnaire Mailout/Mailback In Census 2000, the questionnaire mailout/mailback system was the primary means of censustaking, as it has been since 1970. The short form was delivered to approximately 83 percent of all housing units. The short form asked only the basic population and housing questions, while the long form included additional questions on the characteristics of each person and of the housing unit. The long form was delivered to a sample of approximately 17 percent of all housing units. USPS letter carriers delivered questionnaires to the vast majority of housing units that had citystyle addresses. In areas without such addresses, enumerators hand delivered addressed census questionnaires to each housing unit. In very remote or sparsely populated areas, enumerators visited each housing unit and picked up or completed unaddressed questionnaires that the USPS previously delivered to each unit. C6 Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 4. Collecting Data on Populations Living in Nontraditional Households During a decennial census, the Census Bureau not only counts people living in houses and apartments, but also must count people who live in group quarters and other nontraditional housing units, as well as people with no usual residence. These units include nursing homes, group homes, college dormitories, migrant and seasonal farm worker camps, military barracks or installations, American Indian reservations, and remote areas in Alaska. Some of the methods that were used for these special populations are listed below: The Census Bureau designed an operation for Census 2000 called Service-Based Enumeration (SBE) to improve the count of individuals who might not be included through standard enumeration methods. The SBE operation was conducted in selected service locations, such as shelters and soup kitchens, and at targeted outdoor locations. Another special operation counted highly transient individuals living at recreational vehicle campgrounds and parks, commercial or public campgrounds, marinas, and even workers quarters at fairs and carnivals. The Census Bureau worked with tribal officials to select the appropriate data collection methodologies for American Indian reservations. Remote areas of Alaska, often accessible only by small airplanes, snowmobiles, four wheeldrive vehicles, or dogsleds, were enumerated beginning in mid-February. This special timing permitted travel to these areas while conditions are most favorable. The Census Bureau worked with the Department of Defense and the U.S. Coast Guard to count individuals living on military installations, and with the U.S. Maritime Administration to identify maritime vessels for enumeration. 5. Collecting Long Form Data to Meet Federal Requirements The census is the only data gathering effort that collects the same information from enough people to get comparable data for every geographic area in the United States. The Census Bureau has used the long form on a sample basis since 1940 to collect more data, while reducing overall respondent burden. The Census 2000 long form asked questions addressing the same 7 subjects that appeared on the short form, plus an additional 27 subjects which were either specifically required by law to be included in the census or were required in order to implement other federal programs. 6. Retrieving and Processing the Data From the Returned Forms The Census Bureau contracted with the private sector to secure the best available data capture technology. This technology allowed the Census Bureau to control, manage, and process Census 2000 data more efficiently. The Census 2000 Data Capture System has been a complex network of operational controls and processing routines. The Census Bureau recorded a full electronic image of many of the questionnaires, sorted mail-return questionnaires automatically, used optical mark recognition for all check-box items, and used optical character recognition to capture write-in character based data items. The system allowed the Census Bureau to reduce the logistical burdens associated with handling large volumes of paper questionnaires. Once forms were checked in, prepared, and scanned, all subsequent operations were accomplished using the electronic image and data capture. 7. Matching and Unduplication One of the main goals of Census 2000 was to make it simpler for people to be counted by having census forms available in public locations and providing multiple language translations. Responses also were accepted over the telephone and, for the short form only, on the Internet. These options made it easier for everyone to be counted, but increased the possibility of multiple responses for a given person and household. Advances in computer technology in the areas of computer storage, retrieval, and matching, along with image capture and recognition, gave the Census Bureau the flexibility to provide multiple response options without incurring undue risk to Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 C7 the accuracy of the resulting census data. Unduplication of multiple responses in past censuses required massive clerical operations. Modern technology allowed the Census Bureau to spot and eliminate multiple responses from the same household. 8. Geographic Database DevelopmentTIGER The Census Bureaus TIGER (Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing) system provided the geographic structure for the control of the data collection, tabulation, and dissemination operations for Census 2000. The TIGER system links each living quarter to a spatial location, each location to a specific geographic area, and each geographic area to the correct name or number and attributes. The database constantly changes; for example, when new streets are built and the names and address ranges of existing streets change. To ensure that the TIGER database is complete and correct, the Census Bureau works with other federal agencies; state, local and tribal governments; and other public and private groups to update both its inventory of geographic features and its depiction of the boundaries, names, and attributes of the various geographic entities for which the Census Bureau tabulates data. The Census Bureau obtains updates to the features in the TIGER system, including associated address ranges, from its various address list improvement activities, from partnership efforts like the Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) program, from digital files provided by some local and tribal governments, and from local and tribal governments in response to a preview of the census map of their jurisdictions. As a part of updating the TIGER system, the Census Bureau conducted boundary surveys in 1998 and 1999 to determine the boundaries that were in effect on January 1, 2000, which were the official Census 2000 boundaries for functioning governments. The Census Bureau also relied on other programs to update the TIGER boundaries data, including a program that allowed local or tribal officials to review proposed Census 2000 boundaries a program that allowed local and tribal participants the opportunity to delineate Census 2000 participant statistical areas (block groups, census county divisions, census designated places, and census tracts) and additional programs that offered participants the opportunity to identify other areas for which the Census Bureau would tabulate data (for example, traffic analysis zones). 9. Field Offices and Staffing The Census Bureau opened a national network of temporary offices from which employees collected and processed the data for Census 2000. Establishing the office network required, for most offices, the leasing of office space, purchasing furniture and equipment, purchasing and installing computer hardware and software, and establishing voice and data line connections. The plan for the office structure included: 12 Regional Census Centers (RCCs). Through a network of Census Field Offices, the RCCs managed all census field data collections operations, address listings, and address list enhancement for city-style address areas; coordinated the LUCA program; produced maps; updated TIGER; worked with local participants in the Public Law 94171 Redistricting Data Program; and recruited temporary staff. 402 Census Field Offices (CFOs). Opened in September 1998, these offices helped with address listing; conducted local recruiting; and performed clerical review of completed field address listing work. 520 Local Census Offices (LCOs). These offices produced enumerator maps and assignments; conducted local recruiting; conducted outreach and promotion; conducted group quarters and service-based enumeration activities; conducted update/leave and list/enumerate operations; conducted nonresponse follow-up, coverage improvement follow-up, and address verifications; and performed the block canvass operations. 3 New Data Capture Centers (DCCs). These centers checked in mail returns, prepared questionnaires, and conducted data capture. 1 National Processing Center (NPC). In addition to performing the functions of a Data Processing Center, it processed address listing data and performed coding of questionnaire data. C8 Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 To conduct a successful Census 2000, the Census Bureau recruited and tested hundreds of thousands of applicants for a wide range of positions, such as local census office managers, enumerators, partnership specialists, media specialists, and clerks. This required an extraordinary recruiting effort throughout the country. Every job applicant was required to pass a written test and was screened for criminal history. Applicants selected for employment had to take an oath of office and sign an affidavit agreeing not to disclose census information. Many factors converged to present the Census Bureau with unprecedented challenges in hiring, retraining, and training the necessary employees for Census 2000. To address this challenge, the Census Bureau implemented several new approaches: Innovative methods of setting pay and incentives. Expanding the potential labor force by working with other federal agencies and state agencies to reduce barriers presented by various income transfer programs, and encouraging recipients of these programs to work for the Census Bureau. Consistent with these efforts, the Census Bureau hired more welfare-to-work employees than any other federal agency. Earlier and expanded training for enumerators. 10. Data Collection: Basic Enumeration Strategy To ensure that the Census Bureau obtained a completed questionnaire from every household, or as close to that as possible, the Census Bureau developed a ten-part, integrated enumeration strategy. The first part of this strategy ensured that a questionnaire was delivered to every housing unit, by one of three data collection methods: Mailout/mailback. U.S. Postal Service delivered questionnaires to every city style housing unit with a street name and house number. Update/leave. Census enumerators delivered questionnaires to housing units without street names and house numbers to be mailed back, mainly in rural areas, and corrected and updated the address list and maps for any additions or errors. List/enumerate. In remote and sparsely populated areas, enumerators visited every housing unit and completed the enumeration as delivered. The second part of this strategy provided people with assistance, as needed, to complete and return their questionnaires. Telephone questionnaire assistance (TQA). The Census Bureau operated a toll-free TQA system, in English, Spanish, and several other languages, providing automated touchtone answers to common questions, personal operator answers to those requesting it, and special service for the hearing impaired to assist them in completing a short form. Callers also could request a questionnaire. Internet. Respondents were able to access an Internet Web site to both receive assistance and, for short forms, submit their responses. Questionnaire assistance centers. The Census Bureau opened Walk-In Questionnaire Assistance Centers in convenient locations to assist respondents with filling out questionnaires in person. Bilingual staff was available in these centers. Questionnaire assistance guides. languages. Questionnaire Assistance Guides were available in 49 The third part of this strategy provided a means for people who believed they had not received a questionnaire or were not included on one. Part of this operation was targeted to members of historically undercounted groups. The major element of this operation was the distribution of Be Counted Questionnaires. The Census Bureau distributed these questionnaires at public locations, such as Walk-In Questionnaire Assistance Centers and some public and private facilities, staffed with bilingual competencies when appropriate. These forms were available in English, Spanish, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Tagalog. Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 C9 The fourth part of this strategy was designed to enumerate people who did not live in traditional housing units, including group quarters situations, such as nursing homes and college dormitories; people living in migrant farm worker camps, on boats, on military installations; and federal employees living overseas. This part of the strategy was expanded further because the Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal results indicated that, compared to 1990, many more people did not live in traditional housing units. Group quarters enumeration. This operation identified the location of all group living quarters and made advance visits to each group quarter. Census staff listed all residents in April 2000 and distributed questionnaire packets. Transient night operation. Transient Night enumerated people living a mobile lifestyle by visiting and interviewing people at racetracks, commercial or public campgrounds and those for recreational vehicles, fairs and carnivals, and marinas. Remote Alaska enumeration. This operation sent out enumerators to deliver and complete questionnaires for people living in outlying or remote settlements in Alaska. Domestic military/maritime enumeration. The Census Bureau, in cooperation with the Department of Defense and U.S. Coast Guard, identified living quarters and housing units on military installations and ships assigned to a U.S. home port and used appropriate enumeration methods. Overseas enumeration. The Census Bureau, in cooperation with the Department of Defense and other departments, counted federal employees assigned overseas (including members of the armed forces) and their dependents, for apportionment purposes. The fifth part of this strategy targeted people with no usual residence or address. This operation was conducted at selective service locations, such as shelters and soup kitchens and nonsheltered outdoor locations. The sixth part of this strategy deployed special data collection methods to improve cooperation and enumeration in certain hard-to-enumerate areas. Regional Census Centers used the planning database and their knowledge of local conditions to identify appropriate areas for targeted methods. A team of enumerators then went to targeted areas, such as areas with high concentrations of multiunit buildings, safety concerns or low enumerator production rates, and conducted team enumerations. Mail response rates and maps were available to local and tribal officials so they could work with Census Bureau staff to identify low-response areas and implement additional outreach and publicity efforts and targeted enumeration efforts. In partnership with local and tribal governments and community-based organizations, local census offices established Walk-In Questionnaire Assistance Centers in locations, such as community centers and large apartment buildings, to provide assistance in English, Spanish, and other and foreign languages. The Be Counted Program made unaddressed questionnaires available in the Walk-In Assistance Centers and other locations. Letters were mailed to managers of large multiunit structures and gated communities informing them of upcoming census operations. In preidentified census blocks, census enumerators canvassed the blocks, updated the address list, and delivered and completed census questionnaires for all housing units. In preidentified blocks originally classified as Mailout/Mailback areas, enumerators delivered the questionnaire and updated the address list (Urban Update/Leave). The seventh part of this strategy, coverage-edit and telephone follow-up, reviewed completed questionnaires for potential missing, incomplete, or inconsistent data. C10 Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Coverage edit. The Census Bureau checked completed questionnaires for discrepancies between the number of persons reported and the number of persons for whom information was provided, forms returned where population count was blank, and forms for certain households that contained complex living arrangements. Follow-up. Telephone clerks contacted and reinterviewed the households with discrepancies identified after mail returns were data captured; field staff resolved discrepancies found on enumerator returned questionnaires. Content edit. Computer operations identified missing or incomplete responses to population or housing units and used statistical imputation to complete the information. The eighth part of this strategy, nonresponse follow-up (NRFU), was the effort to secure a response in Census 2000 from every housing unit and resident. One hundred percent of nonresponding households were followed up. In the initial period, the Census Bureau used reminder publicity urging people to return their questionnaires. Following the period of mail response, nonresponding households were identified and listed. Enumerators visited all nonresponding addresses to obtain a completed questionnaire for each household. In mailout/mailback areas, enumerators also followed up 100 percent of housing units identified as nonexistent or vacant by the U.S. Postal Service. In update/leave enumerators areas, followed up 100 percent of housing units where the Census Bureau was unable to deliver questionnaires. The Census Bureau conducted quality assurance checks of NRFU to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the operations. The ninth part of strategy involved additional operations to improve the coverage of Census 2000. In mailout/mailback areas, enumerators revisited addresses for which questionnaires were returned in NRFU reporting the housing unit as vacant or delete and which were not initially identified by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable as addressed. In update/leave areas, enumerators revisited addresses for which a questionnaire was returned as vacant or nonexistent in NRFU, but the questionnaire was not returned as undeliverable during the update/leave operation. In both mailout/mailback and update/leave areas, mail returns checked in but not data captured were rechecked and, if necessary, revisited. The tenth part of this strategy was unduplication, which involved reviewing and selecting person information when more than one questionnaire data set was reported for a single address. Dress Rehearsal results showed that the multiple ways in which people could respond to the census increased the possibility of more than one response being submitted for a given person or household. Automated matching technologies allowed the Census Bureau to resolve situations where more than one form was received for an address. 11. Special Populations American Indian and Alaska Native Areas and Hawaiian Home Lands The Census Bureau based its strategy for enumerating the populations in the American Indian and Alaska Native Areas (AIANAs) and Hawaiian home lands on building partnerships for: Address list development. The Census Bureau used U.S. Postal Services Delivery Sequence Files in AIANAs and Hawaiian home lands where there were city-style addresses. In other areas, the Census enumerators used the update/leave method where a form is left with the respondent for return by mail. In more remote areas, the census enumerator actually delivered the Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 C11 form and conducted the census interview all in one visit. Tribal governments had an opportunity to participate in the LUCA program. The Census Bureau worked with tribal officials to select the appropriate data collection methodology for each area. Geographic programs. There were many programs available to review and define geographic areas (see Appendix A for more details). Marketing. Census Bureau staff and tribal liaisons compiled lists of available media for paid advertising and promotion. The Census Bureau also enlisted the help of tribal liaisons and locally established Complete Count Committees to assist with promotional activities. Field operations. The Census Bureau worked with tribal governments to assist in all levels of field operations, including training local staff in cultural awareness, assisting in recruiting efforts, and identifying locations for census questionnaire assistance centers. Data dissemination. While most data were processed in the same way as data for rest of the nation, the Census Bureau worked with tribal governments to meet their data needs. Puerto Rico The Census 2000 operations in Puerto Rico were comparable to activities in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The Census Bureau worked in partnership with the government of Puerto Rico to ensure that Census 2000 data met the federal legal requirements. Build partnerships at every stage of the process. The Census Bureau entered a Memorandum of Agreement with the governor of Puerto Rico which outlined mutual roles and responsibilities. In consultation with the government of Puerto Rico, census questionnaire content was developed to meet the legislative and programmatic needs of Puerto Rico. A separate advertisement and promotion campaign was conducted in Puerto Rico to build awareness of the census and boost participation. Address list development allowed Puerto Rico to participate in the LUCA program. Census questionnaires. Census questionnaires were readily available in Spanish and also in English, if requested. In Puerto Rico, only update/leave method was used to distribute questionnaires. However, questionnaires also were placed in Walk-In Questionnaire Assistance Centers and other locations identified through consultation with local partners. Use of technology. The Census Bureau made use of the same technological advances that were used in the United States. Many operations performed clerically in 1990 were automated. Data users have access to Census 2000 data products through the Internet using the American FactFinder (AFF) system. The AFF offers a separate user interface utilizing the Spanish language for Census 2000 Puerto Rico data. Special techniques to improve coverage. The update/leave methodology for census data collection was used for the first time in Puerto Rico. Census enumerators updated the Master Address File for Puerto Rico while delivering questionnaires. Respondents had the opportunity to complete the census questionnaires and return them by mail. Island Areas The Census Bureau conducted the Census 2000 operations in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands (collectively referred to as the Island Areas) in partnerships with the government of each area. These partnerships ensured that Census 2000 data met federal legal requirements, as well as the specific needs of each area. The Census 2000 operations in the Island Areas were built around the following: Data collection. Data collection in the Island Areas used the list/enumerate method. This decision was based on recommendations from Island Area representatives and an analysis of the various data collection methodologies. Unlike stateside list/enumerate procedures, the Census Bureau delivered Advance Census Reports before the list/enumerate operation and asked respondents to complete the form and hold it for enumerator to pick up. C12 Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Build partnerships at every stage of the process. The Census Bureau developed and signed a Memorandum of Agreement with the governor of each Island Area that outlined mutual roles and responsibilities. In consultation with the governments of the Island Areas, census questionnaire content was developed to meet the legislative and programmatic needs of each Island Area. A separate advertisement and promotion campaign was developed for each Island Area to build awareness of the census and boost participation. Census questionnaires. Census questionnaires and other forms were readily available to respondents in convenient locations identified through consultation with local partners. Use of technology. The Census Bureau made greater use of the telephone to provide assistance to respondents with questions about Census 2000. Data users have access to Census 2000 data and products through the Internet using the American FactFinder system. 12. Telecommunications Support and Automated Data Processing Using dedicated links and other secure lines, the Census 2000 telecommunications network linked all census offices including: Census Headquarters in Suitland, Maryland, the 520 Local Census Offices, the 12 Regional Census Offices, the 12 Regional Census Centers, the Puerto Rico Area Office, the Maryland Computer Center in Bowie, the National Processing Center in Jeffersonville, Indiana, and the three contracted Data Capture Centers (Phoenix, AZ, Pomona, CA, and Essex, MD). The Census Bureau also established communication links with planned commercial telephone centers to assist with the Telephone Questionnaire Assistance program and the coverage edit follow-up program. The use of electronic imaging reduced the logistical and staffing requirements of handling large volumes of paper questionnaires. Some components of data capture were performed by privatesector partners. The Census Bureau used commercially available advanced hardware and software rather than limiting itself to creating in-house solutions. The most significant features of the Data Capture System included (1) work divided among four centers, (2) full electronic imaging and processing of questionnaires, (3) automated sorting of mailed responses, (4) optical mark recognition for check-box data, (5) optical character recognition for write-in data with automated processes to resolve difficult cases, and (6) quality assurance checks. 13. Quality Assurance To detect, correct, and minimize performance errors in critical census operations, the Census Bureau developed individual quality assurance plans for all activities that could contribute to errors in outcome, such as misprinted census forms, inaccurate maps or address lists, faulty intelligent character recognition, inadequate training of enumerators, and miskeyed entries. 14. The Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal in 1998 A good dress rehearsal is crucial to a successful census, and the key to any dress rehearsal is making it as much like the actual event as possible. The Census Bureau conducted Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal in three sites: Sacramento, California; Columbia, South Carolina along with 11 surrounding counties in north central South Carolina; and the Menominee American Indian Reservation in northeastern Wisconsin. Since the summer of 1996, the Census Bureau worked closely with local officials and community-based organizations in each of the three sites to plan and build the various infrastructures needed to ensure a successful dress rehearsal. These joint activities included refining the geographic database, building and refining the address list, and working with community and tribal organizations to plan effective outreach and promotion efforts. Also, the Census Bureau recruited staff in all three sites to complete address list development and verification. The dress rehearsal allowed for a thorough demonstration of the most critical procedures for Census 2000. These procedures included address list development; marketing and promotion; and data collection, processing, and tabulation. The dress rehearsal plan also demonstrated the use of statistical sampling in four major census operations: nonresponse follow-up, housing units designated as undeliverable as addressed by the U.S. Postal Service, integrated coverage measurement (ICM), and the long form survey. Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 C13 15. Data Dissemination Through the Internet The census provides a wealth of data that researchers, businesses, and government agencies are eager to use. Taking advantage of modern computer and Internet capabilities, the Census Bureau planned to make data from Census 2000 more readily available than any previous decennial census data. The Census 2000 data are tabulated using the Data Products Production (DPP) system and disseminated using the American FactFinder (AFF) system on the Internet, in addition to CD-ROMs and DVDs. The AFF provides an interactive electronic system to allow data users to access data products, documents, and online help, as well as to build custom data products. The Census Bureau solicited the advice and recommendations of data users throughout the planning, design, and testing stages of the AFF system (initially known as the Data Access and Dissemination System (DADS)). The system is accessible to the widest possible array of users through the Internet and all available intermediaries, including the nearly 1,800 data centers and affiliates, the 1,400 Federal Depository libraries and other libraries, universities, and private organizations. It also allows users to create customized products, such as tables, charts, graphs, and maps for census geographic areas of their choice, and access metadata that provide documentation and explanatory information for data subjects and geographic areas. 16. Evaluation and Preparation for 2010 After the completion of Census 2000, the Census Bureau plans to conduct a variety of post census evaluation studies, as it has after all the previous censuses. These studies will help data users, both within and outside the Census Bureau, to assess the data and plan for the 2010 Census. The evaluation studies generally rely on demographic analysis, statistical methods, and ethnographic analyses. GLOSSARY 100-Percent Data Information based on a limited number of basic population and housing questions collected from both the short form and the long form for every inhabitant and housing unit in the United States. 100-Percent Edited Detail File (HEDF) Files composed of individual records of information on people and housing units for the 100percent census data items from the census questionnaires. Estimation is included in these files. These files are used for tabulation purposes and are not released to the public. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.) The Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.) is a survey designed to measure the undercount/overcount of the census. The A.C.E. was designed to assess the size and characteristics of the population missed or double-counted in Census 2000, similar to the originally planned Integrated Coverage Measurement (ICM) Survey. Advance Notice Letter/Reminder Card (ANL/RC) These are part of the questionnaire mailing strategy. In every area except list/enumerate, the Census Bureau sends an advance notice letter to every mailout address to alert households that the census form will be sent to them soon. Reminder Card is a postcard that is sent to addresses on the decennial Master Address File (see definition below) to remind respondents to return their census questionnaires or to thank them if they already have. All addresses in mailout/mailback areas receive a postcard. The Census Bureau also mails these postcards to postal patrons in update/leave areas. American FactFinder (AFF) An electronic system for access and dissemination of Census Bureau data. The system is available through the Internet and offers prepackaged data products and the ability to build custom products. The system serves as the vehicle for accessing and disseminating data from Census 2000 (as well as economic censuses and the American Community Survey). The system was formerly known as the Data Access and Dissemination System (DADS). C14 Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Apportionment Apportionment is the process of dividing up the 435 memberships, or seats, in the House of Representatives among the 50 states. The Census Bureau has a dual responsibility in this connection. It conducts the census at 10-year intervals. At the conclusion of each census, the Census Bureau uses the results for calculating the number of House memberships each state is entitled to have. The latter process is the initial use of the basic results of each census. Be Counted Enumeration and Be Counted Form The Be Counted enumeration procedure targets areas that are traditionally undercounted. Unaddressed census questionnaires (Be Counted forms) are placed at selected sites where people who believe they were not counted can pick them up, complete them, and mail them to the Census Bureau. The sites are in targeted areas that local governments and community groups, in conjunction with the Census Bureau, identify as traditionally undercounted. Census 2000 Publicity Office (C2PO) An office at the Census Bureau which developed, implemented, and coordinated an integrated marketing program for Census 2000, including paid advertising, direct mail, public relations, partnerships, and local outreach. Census Address List Improvement Act of 1994 See Program for Address List Supplementation (PALS) below. Census Edited File (CEF) This file contains the 100-percent edited characteristics/records for all households and people in the census. The edits include consistency edits and imputation for items or persons where the data are insufficient. See descriptions for 100-percent data and census unedited file. Census Information Center (CIC) The Census Information Center Program (CIC) is the community-based component of the Census Bureaus data dissemination network. While census data are readily available on CD-ROM, the Census Bureaus Web site on the Internet, in its 12 Regional Offices, 1,400 Federal Depository Libraries, and 1,800 state and local government agencies participating in the State Data Center Program, the CICs provide access to local communities that might not have access through these traditional channels. CICs goal is to provide efficient access to Census Bureau data and data products to organizations representing populations that have been traditionally undercounted in censuses and surveys. Census Unedited File (CUF) A file created by merging the control file for the decennial master address file with the decennial response file of unedited data after the primary selection algorithm has been applied. This file contains the final housing unit and person counts. It is used to generate apportionment data as well as related raw or unedited census data. Computer-Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) A method of data collection consisting of the interviewer asking questions displayed on a laptop computer screen and entering the answers directly into the computer. Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) A method of data collection using telephone interviews in which the questions to be asked are displayed on a computer screen and responses are entered directly into the computer. Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 C15 Confidentiality The guarantee made by law (Title 13, United States Code) to individuals who provide census information regarding nondisclosure of that information to others. Confidentiality Edit The name for the Census 2000 disclosure avoidance procedure. Coverage Edit/Coverage Edit Follow-Up (CEFU) An edit performed on the mailback census response universe. Census staff make telephone calls to resolve forms that are incomplete or have other coverage discrepancies, such as a difference between the number of people reported in that household and the number of people for whom census information was provided on the form. This edit includes the large household follow-up. Coverage Improvement Adjustment This phrase was included in the table outlines and the technical documentation before the review, analysis, and recommendation on whether to adjust Census 2000 data for coverage improvement was completed. As the data are not adjusted, a zero (0) will appear. This phrase does not refer to any other outreach or collection operations which were introduced to improve coverage in Census 2000. Coverage Improvement Follow-Up (CIFU) A procedure for the traditional census in which housing units with conflicting status information are followed up. Data Access and Dissemination System (DADS) The system is now known as the American FactFinder (AFF). Data Capture Center (DCC) A decentralized facility that checks in questionnaires returned by mail, creates images of all questionnaire pages, and converts data to computer readable format. The DCCs also perform other computer processing activities, including automated questionnaire edits, work flow management, and data storage. There is one permanent DCC, the National Processing Center in Jeffersonville, Indiana. For Census 2000, the Census Bureau set up three temporary DCCs. The temporary facilities were provided and operated by a private contractor through the Data Capture Services contract. Data Capture System 2000 (DCS 2000) The DCS 2000 is a data capture system that is used to capture information from census forms. For Census 2000, this system processed more than 150 million incoming forms, digitally captured and processed billions of bits of information on the forms, converted automatically the image of the form to text-based data, and edited/repaired data that the system was unable to decipher automatically. Decennial Census The census of population and housing, taken by the Census Bureau in years ending in 0 (zero). Article I of the Constitution requires that a census be taken every 10 years for the purpose of reapportioning the U.S. House of Representatives. Decennial Master Address File (DMAF) The decennial version of the Master Address File has features for controlling and tracking the long- and short-term operations and programs of the Census 2000. The DMAF contains the processing status information to support document mailouts; data capture progress control, tracking, and reporting; and field enumeration processes (notably follow-ups). The DMAF is limited to addresses that the Census Bureau has successfully linked to the TIGER database. See Master Address File. C16 Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Decennial Response File (DRF) Contains every response to the census from all sources. The primary selection algorithm is applied to this file to unduplicate people between multiple returns for a housing unit and to determine the housing unit record and the people to include at the housing unit. The DRF is then combined with the Decennial Master Address File to create the census unedited file (CUF). Delivery Sequence File (DSF) A computerized file containing all delivery point addresses serviced by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). The USPS updates the DSF continuously as its letter carriers identify addresses for new delivery points or changes in the status of existing addresses. Demographic Analysis (DA) A method the Census Bureau uses to measure coverage at the national level. It differs from survey coverage estimates, such as Post-Enumeration Survey, Integrated Coverage Measurement, or Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation, in that it does not rely on case-by-case matching of census records. To produce an estimate of the total population, DA relies on administrative records to provide estimates of births, deaths, immigration, and emigration. DA provides estimates on the national level only. Derived Measures Census data products include various derived measures, such as medians, means, and percentages, as well as certain rates and ratios. Derived measures that round to less than 0.1 are normally indicated as 0. Disclosure Avoidance (DA) Statistical methods used in the tabulation of data prior to releasing data products to ensure the confidentiality of responses. Dual-System Estimation (DSE) The estimation methodology used for the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.). This operation uses a geographic sample of block clusters to find people missed by the census or A.C.E. and any errors from the census. The information is then processed using computer matching, clerical matching, and field follow-up to resolve discrepancies. Family A group of two or more people who reside together and who are related by birth, marriage, or adoption. Geocoding A code assigned to identify a geographic entity; to assign an address (such as housing unit, business, industry, farm) to the full set of geographic code(s) applicable to the location of that address on the surface of Earth. Group Quarters A facility where people live that is not a typical household-type living arrangement. The Census Bureau classifies all individuals not living in households as living in group quarters. There are two types of group quarters institutional (for example, correctional facilities, nursing homes, and mental hospitals) and noninstitutional (for example, college dormitories, military bases and ships, hotels, motels, rooming houses, group homes, missions, shelters, and flophouses). Heterogeneity Heterogeneity occurs when blocks of housing units assigned to sampling strata or groupings are not similar in terms of the likelihood of being included or missed by the census. Heterogeneity creates difficulty for the small area estimation process because the correction factor gets applied to all people with the specified characteristic in that sampling poststratum, even through some of them do not actually have the coverage characteristics. Data Collection and Processing Procedures U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 C17 Homogeneity The assumption of homogeneity expects that all people in a particular sampling stratum or grouping will be very much alike in terms of their likelihood of being included or missed by the census. The grouping of people in a particular stratum is called poststratum, such as all White, non-Hispanic male renters ages 18-22 in a rural area. A lack of homogeneity in a particular sample block is not an error, but it does create difficulty for the small area estimation process. This happens because the correction factor gets applied to all people with the specified characteristic in that poststratum, even though some of them do not exhibit the same coverage characteristics. Household Household refers to all of the people who occupy a housing unit. Housing Unit A housing unit is a house, an apartment, a mobile home or trailer, a group of rooms, or a single room occupied as a separate living quarters, or if vacant, intended for occupancy as a separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other individuals in the building and which have direct access from outside the building or through a common hall. For vacant units, the criteria of separateness and direct access are applied to the intended occupants whenever possible. Imputation When information is missing or inconsistent, the Census Bureau uses a method called imputation to assign values. Imputation relies on the statistical principle of homogeneity, or the tendency of households within a small geographic area to be similar in most characteristics. For example, the value of rented is likely to be imputed for a housing unit not reporting on owner/renter status in a neighborhood with multiunits or apartments where other respondents reported rented on the census questionnaire. In past censuses, when the occupancy status or the number of residents was not known for a housing unit, this information was imputed. Internet Questionnaire Assistance (IQA) An operation which allows respondents to use the Census Bureaus Internet site to (1) ask questions and r...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Michigan - LIB - 1
Appendix D. QuestionnaireU.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of the CensusDCThis is the official form for all the people at this address. It is quick and easy, and your answers are protected by law. Complete the Census and help your community ge
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix D. QuestionnaireU.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of the CensusDCThis is the official form for all the people at this address. It is quick and easy, and your answers are protected by law. Complete the Census and help your community ge
Michigan - LIB - 1
Appendix E. Data Products and User AssistancePage E1 E3 E4 E4Census 2000 Data Products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maps and Geographic Pro
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix E. Data Products and User AssistancePage E1 E3 E4 E4Census 2000 Data Products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maps and Geographic Pro
Michigan - LIB - 1
Appendix F. MapsCONTENTS Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Map Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix F. MapsCONTENTS Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Map Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2
Public Use Microdata SamplesUsing PDQ Explore SoftwareGrace York University of Michigan Library May 20042000 Census Data Tabulations Summary Files 1-4, Equal Employment Opportunity, School District Data, and Work Flow data are TABULATED data Am
Michigan - LIB - 2
Public Use Microdata SamplesUsing PDQ Explore SoftwareGrace York University of Michigan Library December 2003Public Use Microdata Samples Copies of the original questionnaires with identifying information edited out Create your own cross tabula
Michigan - LIB - 2
-Listing of Geographic Correlations Total Pop, 2000 census 627 21574 157 461 785 9144 4613 4838 225 11555 29376 9275 2803 11304 198 114024 287 2285 1573 526 1111 757 2011 19837 placefp to puma5 alloc factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1
Michigan - LIB - 2
-Listing of Geographic Correlations Pop, 2000 puma5 census 00100 157 198 2148 879 997 205 1791 339 4323 7010 1105 8154 1929 6293 5549 1081 2126 214 2959 1769 1187 727 State puma5 to FIPS Postal placefp state Code alloc factor 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
Michigan - LIB - 2
Listing of Geographic Correlations Total Pop, 2000 census 11719 9862 105665 31314 23110 17269 8746 56755 110157 15998 162453 45787 137985 51104 26090 26448 38543 31252 64753 14273 38520 27472 1499 county to puma5 alloc factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Michigan - LIB - 2
Public Use Microdata Sample2000 Census of Population and HousingTechnical Documentation2000PUMS/10-US (RV)Issued December 2003U.S. Department of CommerceEconomics and Statistics AdministrationU.S. CENSUS BUREAUFor additional information
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Public Use Microdata Sample2000 Census of Population and HousingTechnical Documentation2000PUMS/10-US (RV)Issued December 2003U.S. Department of CommerceEconomics and Statistics AdministrationU.S. CENSUS BUREAUFor additional information
Michigan - LIB - 2
Chapter 1. AbstractCITATION U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census of Population and Housing, Public Use Microdata Sample, United States: Technical Documentation, 2003. TYPE OF FILE Microdata SUBJECT CONTENT Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) files contain
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Chapter 1. AbstractCITATION U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census of Population and Housing, Public Use Microdata Sample, United States: Technical Documentation, 2003. TYPE OF FILE Microdata SUBJECT CONTENT Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) files contain
Michigan - LIB - 2
Chapter 2. IntroductionOVERVIEW Public use microdata sample files are ASCII files which contain individual records of the characteristics for a sample of people and housing units. Information which could identify a household or an individual is excl
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Chapter 2. IntroductionOVERVIEW Public use microdata sample files are ASCII files which contain individual records of the characteristics for a sample of people and housing units. Information which could identify a household or an individual is excl
Michigan - LIB - 2
Chapter 3. How To Use This FileINTRODUCTION This chapter serves as a guide for data users to both the data files and the technical documentation. Novice users trying to understand how to use the documentation and the file should read this chapter fi
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Chapter 3. How To Use This FileINTRODUCTION This chapter serves as a guide for data users to both the data files and the technical documentation. Novice users trying to understand how to use the documentation and the file should read this chapter fi
Michigan - LIB - 2
Chapter 4. Accuracy of the Microdata Sample EstimatesINTRODUCTION The data contained in this product are based on the Census 2000 sample. The data summarized from these files are estimates of the actual figures that would have been obtained from a c
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Chapter 4. Accuracy of the Microdata Sample EstimatesINTRODUCTION The data contained in this product are based on the Census 2000 sample. The data summarized from these files are estimates of the actual figures that would have been obtained from a c
Michigan - LIB - 2
Chapter 5. Sample Design and EstimationPRODUCING ESTIMATES OR TABULATIONS To produce estimates or tabulations of 100 percent characteristics from the PUMS files, simply add the weights of all persons or housing units that possess the characteristic
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Chapter 5. Sample Design and EstimationPRODUCING ESTIMATES OR TABULATIONS To produce estimates or tabulations of 100 percent characteristics from the PUMS files, simply add the weights of all persons or housing units that possess the characteristic
Michigan - LIB - 2
Chapter 6. Data DictionaryCONTENTS Indexes Page Alphabetical Index by Variable Name. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-1 Housing Unit Record . . . . . . . . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2
Chapter 7. Data Dictionary (5-Percent)CONTENTS Indexes PageAlphabetical Index by Variable Name. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-1 Housing Unit Record . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Chapter 7. Data Dictionary (5-Percent)CONTENTS Indexes PageAlphabetical Index by Variable Name. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-1 Housing Unit Record . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2
Chapter 8. User UpdatesUser updates supply data users with additional or corrected information that becomes available after the technical documentation and files are prepared. They are issued as Data Notes, Geography Notes, and Technical Documentati
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Chapter 8. User UpdatesUser updates supply data users with additional or corrected information that becomes available after the technical documentation and files are prepared. They are issued as Data Notes, Geography Notes, and Technical Documentati
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix B. Definitions of Subject CharacteristicsCONTENTS POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Ability to Speak English (See Language Spoken at Home and Ability to Speak English) . . . . . . Adopted Son/Daughter (See Household Type and Relationship). . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix C. Data Collection and Processing ProceduresCONTENTS Enumeration and Residence Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United States . . . . . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix D. QuestionnaireU.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of the CensusDCThis is the official form for all the people at this address. It is quick and easy, and your answers are protected by law. Complete the Census and help your community get
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Appendix D. QuestionnaireU.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of the CensusDCThis is the official form for all the people at this address. It is quick and easy, and your answers are protected by law. Complete the Census and help your community get
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix E. Data Products and User AssistancePage Census 2000 Data Products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Census 2000 Maps and Geographic Prod
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Appendix E. Data Products and User AssistancePage Census 2000 Data Products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Census 2000 Maps and Geographic Prod
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Appendix F. MapsCONTENTS Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Map Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix H. Topcoded Variables and Corresponding State Means for Values at and Above the Topcode for the Housing Record and Person RecordTable 1. Topcoded Variables for the 1-Percent PUMS Housing RecordStatesTopcode: United States. . . . . . . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Appendix H. Topcoded Variables and Corresponding State Means for Values at and Above the Topcode for the Housing Record and Person RecordTable 1. Topcoded Variables for the 1-Percent PUMS Housing RecordStatesTopcode: United States. . . . . . . . . . .
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix I. Total Unweighted and Weighted Population and Housing CountsControl Counts for the 1-Percent PUMS FilesTotal housing unweighted Total (includes population pseudo-housing unweighted units)44487 6422 51901 26978 338725 43135 34118 7786 5770 15
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Appendix I. Total Unweighted and Weighted Population and Housing CountsControl Counts for the 1-Percent PUMS FilesTotal housing unweighted Total (includes population pseudo-housing unweighted units)44487 6422 51901 26978 338725 43135 34118 7786 5770 15
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix J. Equivalency FilesThe Equivalency Files are available in each state subdirectory at http:/www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/PUMS/OnePercent. http:/www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/PUMS/FivePercent.Equivalency FileU.S. Census Bur
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Appendix J. Equivalency FilesThe Equivalency Files are available in each state subdirectory at http:/www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/PUMS/OnePercent. http:/www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/PUMS/FivePercent.Equivalency FileU.S. Census Bur
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix K. Relationship Between Super-PUMAs of Migration (MIGPUMA1) and Super-PUMAs (PUMA1)State code (FIPS) State name Super-PUMA of Migration (MIGPUMA1) 01100 01200 01300 01400 01500 01600 01700 02100 04100 04200 04300 04400 05100 05200 05300 054
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Appendix K. Relationship Between Super-PUMAs of Migration (MIGPUMA1) and Super-PUMAs (PUMA1)State code (FIPS) State name Super-PUMA of Migration (MIGPUMA1) 01100 01200 01300 01400 01500 01600 01700 02100 04100 04200 04300 04400 05100 05200 05300 054
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix L. Relationship Between Super-PUMAs of Place of Work (POWPUMA1) and Super-PUMAs (PUMA1)State code (FIPS) 01 State name Place of work Super-PUMA (POWPUMA1) 01100 01200 01300 01400 01500 01600 01700 02100 04100 04200 04300 04400 05100 05200 0
Michigan - LIB - 2000
Appendix L. Relationship Between Super-PUMAs of Place of Work (POWPUMA1) and Super-PUMAs (PUMA1)State code (FIPS) 01 State name Place of work Super-PUMA (POWPUMA1) 01100 01200 01300 01400 01500 01600 01700 02100 04100 04200 04300 04400 05100 05200 0
Michigan - LIB - 2
Appendix M. Relationship Between PUMAs of Migration (MIGPUMA5) and PUMAs (PUMA5)State code (FIPS) 01 State name Alabama PUMA of Migration (MIGPUMA5) 00100 00290 00400 00500 00600 00700 00800 00900 01000 01100 01200 01300 01400 01500 01600 01700 0180
Michigan - LIB - 2
ANN ARBOR AND DETROIT HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD DATAThis guide lists maps and census data for the cities of Detroit and Ann Arbor at the subcity level. A list of census questions, 1790-2000 is available at: http:/www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/census2/censub
Michigan - LIB - 2
POPULATION AND HOUSING ITEMS ON THE GENERAL CENSUS SCHEDULES 1790-2000 Compiled by Grace York, University of Michigan Library, March 2002See methodology and acknowledgements at end of table. 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 19
Michigan - LIB - 2
POPULATION AND HOUSING ITEMS ON THE GENERAL CENSUS SCHEDULES 1790-2000 Compiled by Grace York, University of Michigan Library, March 2002See methodology and acknowledgements at end of table. 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 19
Michigan - EECS - 588
Security: What is computer security: collection of tools and techniques designed to protect data and thwart hackers Network security: protecting data during transmission No firm boundary between them: computer viruses may first compromise computer se
Michigan - EECS - 588
(Continuation from Lecture 2) Review CBC mode. Why protect IV? - Consider the decryption function above. Changing IV causes predictable changes in P0. Discuss the example of a general giving one of two commands: "withdraw" or "attack" in P0, represen
Michigan - EECS - 588
Stream ciphers, hashing (message digests), MAC -Periodic stream cipher: key stream k repeats. Is Caesar cipher a stream cipher? (Yes) Is it periodic? Yes. (i repeats)One-time pad: stream cipher, butnot periodic.RC4: stream cipher, but not perio
Michigan - EECS - 588
HMAC: HMAC(k,M) = H[(K+ XOR opad) | H[(K+ XOR IPAD) | M] K+ = K padded with zeros to the left so that it results in b bits in length for the XOR ipad = 00110110 (36 Hex) repeated b/8 times opad = 01011100 (5C) repeated b/8 times. H can be MD5, SHA1,
Michigan - EECS - 588
My notes on the Timing attacks on SSH paper -Author: Atul Prakash This paper is about collecting timing interval between keystrokes and using that to infer the characters being typed for the password. SSH protocol used to send password characters as
Michigan - EECS - 588
CPOL: High-Performance Policy EvaluationKevin Borders Xin Zhao Atul Prakash University of MichiganACM CCS 2005Overview Motivation: Why High-Performance? Current Solutions CPOL Design Evaluation of CPOL vs. Other Solutions Conclusion and Futu
Michigan - EECS - 588
Virology 101M. Douglas McIlroy Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974ABSTRACT There is nothing mysterious about computer viruses. A working, but easily observable, virus can be written in a few lines of code. Although particular virus att
Michigan - EECS - 588
The Symantec Enterprise Papers Volume XXXUnderstanding and Managing Polymorphic Viruses.Table of ContentsIntroduction The Evolution of Polymorphic Viruses 1 1Simple Viruses Encrypted Viruses Polymorphic VirusesThe Scale of the Problem Polymor
Michigan - EECS - 182
UNIVERSITYOFMICHIGAN INFORMATICS CharlesSeverance InstallingPython IncreasinglyanumberofSchoolofInformationandEECScoursesareusingPythonasaprogramming language.Pythonisviewedasagoodcombinationofeaseofuseandpowerfulcapabilities.Pythonis oftenusedtodo
Michigan - UMD - 442101
Argus II Building 400 South Fourth Street Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4816 Phone: (734) 615-0643 Fax: (734) 936-1913 Email: WorkConnections@umich.edu www.umich.edu,/-connectAUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE PATIENT INFORMATIONFor Office Use Only: Information: Pic
Michigan - UMD - 442101
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-/W3C/DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional/EN" "http:/www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http:/www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equ
Michigan - UR - 22
Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineering Michigan Engineerin