Documents Found!
As seen in
Less Work, Better Grades
Join
Course Hero
Access
best resources
Ace
your classes
Ace your courses with Course Hero!
|
|
|
Limited, unformatted preview (showing 63 of 3211 words):
...Center Design for American Urban Landscape Design Brief, Number 8/ July 2003 Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity Ann Forsyth, Director November 2003 Design Briefs Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity Ann Forsyth, Director Overview Density is a controversial term. Increased density is feared by those who imagine ugly buildings, overshadowed open space, parking problems, and irresponsible residents....
Study Smarter, Score Higher
Here are the top 5 related documents
...Design Center for American Urban Landscape
Design Brief, Number 12 / April 2004
Picturing the Landscape: A Guide to Aerial Photography
Frank Fitzgerald, Research Fellow
All images Design Center for American Urban Landscape
Design Briefs
Picturi...
...Transforming the Near Northside
Summary of Action Plan and Implementation
From Action Plan for Redevelopment of the Sumner Field, Glenwood, Lyndale and Olson Public Housing Developments and Adjacent land in Minneapolis, December 31, 1997
in accordan...
...Community Design: A toolkit for building physical activity into daily life
Metropolitan Design Center, 1 Rapson Hall, 89 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0109, www.designcenter.umn.edu Ann Forsyth 2005 Revised Version
Ann Forsyth, Metropolit...
Document Content (unformatted)
Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, homework solutions, papers, exam answer keys and textbook solutions.
Center Design for American Urban Landscape Design Brief, Number 8/ July 2003 Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity Ann Forsyth, Director November 2003 Design Briefs Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity Ann Forsyth, Director Overview Density is a controversial term. Increased density is feared by those who imagine ugly buildings, overshadowed open space, parking problems, and irresponsible residents. It is promoted by those who value urbane streetscapes, efficient infrastructure supply, walkable neighborhoods, and increased housing options. However, within these debates is a surprising lack of clarity about what counts when considering density, and about how to measure it. This design brief outlines a number of general considerations in measuring density and then proposes twenty measures that quantify different aspects of place such as residential population and dwelling density, and the intensity of building on a site. Some of the measures are easy to use in practice, and some more difficult. All focus on residential areas. While some can be applied to other kinds of uses of land the translation is not always direct. Indicators of density in mixed use environments are particularly lacking. Key Points Density is a number of units--people, dwellings, trees, square feet of building--in a given land area. Density varies greatly depending on the base land area used in the density calculation. The parcel or site density is almost always higher than the neighborhood density, because at a neighborhood scale much land is included in the base land area calculation that does not have houses. Population density depends on both dwelling unit density and household size. Given a certain dwelling unit density, the population density will be lower with small households such as empty nesters than with large families with several children. Intensity of building development is measured with several physical indicators related to how much built area there is on the site. Most measure building bulk and are quite crude. More important issues of design quality are much more difficult to quantify. For more detail, supporting facts, and references read on..... 2 Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Briefs Terminology Density is a much used term. At its simplest, density is a number of units in a given area. However, there are no agreed-upon standard definitions of density, rather each location and profession has come up with an idiosyncratic view. A key area of difference and confusion is in the base land area calculation what is included and what is excluded to make density figures truly comparable. Is it only the site or the entire neighborhood? This is the key dimension of variation in the range of density definitions in Part A of the working definitions section of this paper. Practically it results in a huge variation in density as can be seen below in the table. These densities are for a hypothetical site set in an area where each residential area has the same site density in dwelling units (DUs) per acre but different density definitions lead to very different measures. (The different kinds of density are explained in the next section.) residential densities across these wider areas. These more inclusive densities are important measures and have much to say about such issues as the overall walkability of the site. Given these figures, however, if an overall aim is to achieve a city density of 4 dwelling units per acre then the site density will need to be much greater. Similarly, household size affects population density. An area with a site density of 10 DUs per acre may have a site population density of 15 people per acre in an area full of empty nesters and seniors, or a site population density of 35 people per acre in an area with many households with children or extended families. This makes a great deal of difference in terms of how many people are present to support community facilities. However, it is much harder for governments to regulate household size as opposed to dwelling numbers so most policy discussions focus on densities of dwelling units. One area of confusion is between density and other related terms. On one side are physical measures of the intensity of use of land including measures of building bulk and coverage. A number of such measures are listed in Part B of the working definitions section. These measures say something about how big the buildings are, although they are only rough measures. Table: Comparison of Density Measures for the Same Location Site density Block density Net residential density Net neighborhood density 10 DUs per acre 8 DUs per acre 10 DUs per acre 6 DUs per acre Gross neighborhood density 5 DUs per acre City density Metropolitan density 4 DUs per acre 3 DUs per acre The difference between these numbers is that as the base land area being considered increases there are more and more nonresidential uses added into the calculation. These nonresidential uses such as offices and open space have residential densities of zero and thus lower average Large setbacks are not always attractive. Large areas devoted to the automobile can also force the neighborhood and city level densities down, even when the residentialPhoto: DCAUL areas have many dwellings on a small amount of land. Design Center for American Urban Landscape 3 Design Briefs areas, excludes certain uses. Gross densities do not have such exclusions. However, as is obvious from the set of working definitions there are a number of net and gross density definitions and so what area is being considered needs to be specified. Saying net or gross is not enough. While people often talk about low, medium, and high densities there are no agreed upon standards for what constitutes high, medium, and low densities. A high density in Minneapolis might be medium or even low density in Paris or Singapore. Often people confuse density with building type and assume, for example, that detached houses are lower density than attached housing types. While this is generally true it is not always the case. A high-rise tower with large units set on a park-like site may be lower density than a set of detached houses on small lots. A larger question is that of perceived density (Rapoport 1975). Perceived density is not highly related to actual density but is profoundly affected by landscaping, aesthetics, noise, and building type. Often, when people say an area is dense, they base this assessment on a perception that a development is ugly, has little vegetation, and has caused parking problems for neighbors, rather than a count of the actual number of units per acre. Design can make an enormous difference to perceived density. Finally, some people associate higher densities with social and economic characteristics such as renter and low-income households, and high crime neighborhoods. They may misperceive densities because of this, underestimating the densities of more affluent areas with larger numbers of owners. The definitions in this paper will help add clarity to such discussions. Photo: Ann Forsyth Beacon Bill in Boston is an area where high lot coverage and small setbacks combine to make a high quality environment. Many of the most charming environments in the world have buildings with small setbacks, high building coverage, and relatively small distances between buildings. More open space is not necessarily better, particularly when such open space is poorly designed. Another area of confusion is the issue of crowding, which is a perception that there are too many people (Churchman 1999). However, in housing studies crowding is generally operationalized as the number of people per room, per bedroom, or square foot. Obviously density and crowding are not the same and are not even related. It is possible to live at very high density in a spacious apartment with no crowding, and conversely it is possible to live in a detached farm house that is crowded in terms of having many people per room. In addition there is unclear terminology even when it appears to be specific. Net density refers to densities where the base land area calculation focuses only on the parcel or, if covering a larger 4 Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Briefs Working Definitions A range of potential density definitions is outlined below, based on a review of the work in the reference list, general knowledge of density calculations used in urban design regulations, and unique measures developed for Design Center projects. (See the http:// www.designcenter.umn.edu for examples.) The ones most used by the Design Center are marked with an * . Those developed by the Design Center are indicated although it is likely that these definitions have been created earlier by others and we welcome correspondence indicating those uses. We will cite them in subsequent editions of this paper. Many of these density measures are simple to calculate but some are quite difficult and need a large team of workers. parcel density. However, it does include the sidewalk area and so will deliver a slightly lower density number than a site/parcel density (Design Center). Neighborhood 4. Net Neighborhood Residential Dwelling/Population Density (NNRDD/NNRPD): DU or RP divided by total land area devoted to residential facilities. This is a calculation that involves defining both a neighborhood and residential land within that neighborhood. Unless there is a truly compelling reason to choose another unit, the neighborhood should be a census tract or a city-delineated neighborhood and should be clearly defined; typically these will be in the 100-500 acre ranges. Care must be taken in assigning land to residential uses rather than, say, recreation--the key is to find equivalent elements in different residential designs. In lower density areas the base land calculation typically includes dwelling lots/yards, driveways, private gardens, and ancillary structures e.g. garages. In higher density designs the equivalent base area includes private access drives, resident parking, play spaces, gardens, and landscaped areas adjacent to and related to the residential use. Excluded are the following areas if not directly beneath a dwelling: commercial and industrial areas, shops, commercial garages, public playgrounds, parks/ undeveloped vacant land, vacant unsuitable land, schools, churches, public streets, public parking spaces. This calculation is relatively simple using GIS but difficult otherwise. This definition is adapted from Alexander (1993) who has an even more detailed list of exclusions. 5. Net Neighborhood Residential Building Type Density (NNRBTD). Density calculation very similar to definition number 4 but counts only the dwellings of one type in a neighborhood e.g. townhouses and the land area associated with that type. This is a relatively simple calculation using GIS, if the appropriate data exist, and like other Part A. Dwelling unit (DU)/residential population (RP) densities Parcel or block densities (all net densities) *1. Parcel Density (PD): DUs or RP divided by total site/parcel area (all uses). This is often used by developers. It is easy to calculate with GIS but also fairly simple by hand if there is only one parcel. However, since parcel boundaries are not always visible on the ground this form of density can be hard to calculate from physical observations. *2. Block Density (BD): DUs or RP divided by block area measured to the curb. This is relatively easy to measure from aerial photos and census data, and reflects a unit that is part of the experience of place, the block (Design Center). However, if the block is not surrounded by roads, for example where it abuts open space, the boundaries can be less clear. 3. Part Block Density (parcel approximation) (PBD): DUs or RP divided by a clear subset of the block area measured to the curb. Sometimes the parcel boundaries are not highly visible and so a partblock density is a useful approximation for a Design Center for American Urban Landscape 5 Design Briefs densities in this list can be calculated for dwelling units or residential population (Design Center). 6. Net Neighborhood Density (NND): DU or RP divided by the neighborhood area with the base land area calculated to exclude city-wide uses in the neighborhood. Neighborhoods should be defined as in #4. Included in the neighborhood land area are residential land, streets, and neighborhood type uses schools, parks, churches/synagogues/ temples etc. and neighborhood shopping. Excluded are city-wide businesses, public uses, high schools and colleges, major arterials, major regional parks, and vacant and unusable land. These exclusions can be difficult to calculate (adapted from Alexander 1993). This is different to the Net Residential Densities in that it includes other neighborhood uses while still excluding uses seen as regional. *7. Gross Neighborhood Density (GND)/Gross Census Tract Density (GCTD): DU or RP divided by the total neighborhood area. The total neighborhood area should be defined as in density definition number 4 but in this case there are no exclusions. This is easy to calculate although it may be skewed by regional uses such as regional parks. The Gross Census Tract Density is particularly useful as it is available across the United States from Census information and does not rely on local data. City and larger such density figures. This is also a gross density. 10. Net Residential Density at City or Metropolitan Level: DU or RP divided by residential land at a City or larger level. This kind of calculation is possible using large Geographical information System databases. The presence of housing in mixed use areas makes it complicated in areas with a large percentage of such areas. Part B. Built area intensity measures at parcel or block level 11. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Built floor area on all floors divided by the parcel area. This calculation is often based on actual usable floor area rather than footprint area that includes wall thickness. However, this varies from municipality to municipality. 12. Building Site Coverage Area of ground floor footprint of building divided by the parcel area. This measure indicates the amount of open space left on the site. *13. Building Block Coverage Area of ground floor footprints of buildings divided by the block area measured to the curb. This is a calculation that can Back to back distance Block curb Side to side distance 8. City Density (CD): DU or RP divided by the entire developed area of the city or town. In built out local government areas this is in practical terms the entire city. On the urban edge, it includes only developed land, a more complex calculation (adapted from Alexander 1993). This is a gross density. 9. Metropolitan Density (MD): DU or RP for US Census Metropolitan Statistical Area divided by total land area. This calculation includes undeveloped areas which will lower the overall figures, but is nationally comparable. The US Census prepares Front parcel setback Parcel boundary Front curb setback Density and building intensity factors on a simplified block. 6 Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Briefs be done when the parcel boundaries are not known. It also reflects the actual experience of an environment better than parcel by parcel calculations. *14. Impervious Surface Parcel Coverage Area of ground floor building footprint plus paved parking lots, drives, sidewalks, paths, decks and other buildings divided by site or parcel area. This measure indicates the area of land that has been built upon or paved but does not easily take account of porous paving systems or decks designed for water infiltration. *15. Impervious Surface Block Coverage--Calculation as for number 14 but using the block as the base land area. 16. Building Height in feet for parcel. 17. Front Parcel Setback in feet for parcel. This is the distance from the front facade of the building to the front property line. It is a measure of building intensity. It is a typical measure in zoning regulations. 18. Front Curb Setback in feet, with the setback of each building from the curb averaged by building over a block. This is a rough measure of the experience of the setback as it includes the sidewalk and planting strip area (boulevards in Twin Cities terminology). 19. Side to side distance between buildings, measured in feet and averaged across a block. This is another rough measure of building bulk. 20. Back to back distance between buildings, measured in feet and averaged across a block. people per room. This paper is meant to provide a starting place for examining measures of density and building intensity from their physical base and to clearly distinguish these from separate but related measures of housing mix, crowding, or social and economic characteristics. Density and Intensity Measure Summary * Relatively difficult to calculate due to exclusions ** Easily calculated from field observations and measurements from aerial photos supplemented with web-accessible census data *** Easily calculated using GIS parcel level database, including assessors data and/or census data and TIGER line files 1. Parcel Density *** 2. Block Density** 3. Part Block Density (parcel approximation)** 4. Net Neighborhood Residential Dwelling/ Population Density *** 5. Net Neighborhood Residential Building Type Density*** 6. Net Neighborhood Density* 7. Gross Neighborhood Density** 8. City Density*** 9. Metropolitan Density (MD)*** 10. Residential Density at City or Metropolitan Scale*** 11. Floor Area Ratio*** 12. Building Site Coverage*** 13. Building Block Coverage** 14. Impervious Surface Parcel Coverage*** 15. Impervious Surface Block Coverage** 16. Building Height** 17. Front Parcel Setback*** 18. Front Curb Setback** 19. Side to side distance*** 20. Back to back distance*** Other measures There are a number of other potential measures of density, and even more of perceived density. For example, the proportion of detached or single family homes in relation to other housing types will affect the perception of density, even though this proportion is calculated on a base of housing units and not land areas. Similarly, measures of crowding are typically based on Design Center for American Urban Landscape 7 Design Briefs Fine Print Facts Some of the most talked about density definitions of the 1990s were the density thresholds for designation as priority funding areas (PFAs) under the State of Maryland s smart growth regulations. Under these regulations, the state would place infrastructure only in areas that reached certain densities. Specifically, they had to be planned for 2.0 units per net residential acre (excluding public recreation, habitat, wetlands, and public open space) in existing areas with sewer or water. For greenfield or peripheral sites, this is raised to 3.5 units per net acre excluding those same public uses (Maryland Office of Planning 1997). References Alexander, Ernest. 1993. Density Measures: A Review and Analysis. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 10, 3: 181-202. Churchman, Arza. 1999. Disentangling the Concept of Density. Journal of Planning Literature 13, 4: 389-411. Forsyth, Ann. 2003. Density. In Encyclopedia of the City. Roger Caves ed. New York: Routledge. Maryland Office of Planning. 1997. Designating Maryland s growth models and guidelines: smart growth, designating priority funding areas. Retrieved from http://www.mdp.state.md.us/ INFO/download/pfa.pdf Newman, Peter and Jeffrey Kenworthy. 2000. Cities and Sustainability. Washington, DC: Island Press. Rapoport, Amos. 1984. Toward a Redefinition of Density. Environment and Behavior 7, 2: 7-32. Design Center for American Urban Landscape 1 Rapson Hall 89 Church Street Minneapolis, MN 55455 612.625.9000 www.designcenter.umn.edu Funding for this project came from a variety of sources including the McKnight Foundation. 2003 Design Center for American Urban Landscape (DCAUL) College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture University of Minnesota Permission is granted for nonprofit education purposes for reproduction of all or part of written material or images, except that reprinted with permission from other sources. Acknowledgment is required and the Design Center requests two copies of any material thus produced. The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. 8 Design Center for American Urban Landscape
Find millions of documents here - Study Guides, Homework Solutions, Papers, Exam Answer Keys and more.
Course Hero has millions of course related materials that will enable you to learn better,
faster and get an A in all your courses.
Below is a small sample set of documents:
Below is a small sample set of documents:
Minnesota >> DESIGNCENT >> 10 (Fall, 2008)
Metropolitan Design Center Design Brief, Number 10/ December 2004 Making Difference in the Suburbs John Archer 2003-2004 Design Center Faculty Fellow Professor and Chair, Department of Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature, University of Min...
Minnesota >> DESIGNCENT >> 2 (Fall, 2008)
Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Brief, Number 2/ August 2003 The Diversity of Green Spaces Regina Bonsignore, Research Fellow This design brief is part of a series entitled Taking Notice: Green Spaces in Urbanized Settings with a ...
Minnesota >> DESIGNCENT >> 3 (Fall, 2008)
Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Brief, Number 3/ August 2003 Urban Green Space: Effects on Water and Climate Photo: DCAUL Regina Bonsignore, Research Fellow This design brief is part of a series entitled Taking Notice: Green Spac...
Minnesota >> DESIGNCENT >> 4 (Fall, 2008)
Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Brief, Number 4/ June 2003 People and Urban Green Areas: Perception and Use Photo: Ann Forsyth Ann Forsyth, Director This design brief is part of a series entitled Taking Notice: Green Spaces in Ur...
Minnesota >> DESIGNCENT >> 5 (Fall, 2008)
Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Brief, Number 5/ September 2003 Plant and Animal Communities in Urban Green Spaces Aerial Photo Illustrating Small Patch or Corridor in Developed Area Frank Fitzgerald, Research Fellow This design ...
Minnesota >> DESIGNCENT >> 6 (Fall, 2008)
Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Brief, Number 6/ August 2003, rev. November 2003 Mapping Green Spaces in the Center of the Twin Cities Region Jason Zimmerman, Research Fellow with Regina Bonsignore, Frank Fitzgerald, and Ann Forsy...
Minnesota >> DESIGNCENT >> 1 (Fall, 2008)
Design Center for American Urban Landscape Technical Paper Series, Number 1/ November 2003 Mapping Green Spaces in the Center of the Twin Cities Region: Technical Paper Jason Zimmerman, Research Fellow with Regina Bonsignore, Frank Fitzgerald, and ...
Minnesota >> M >> 1195 (Fall, 2008)
6/2008 Cropland Rental Rates for Minnesota Counties Prepared by: Gary Hachfeld, Regional Extension Educator, Mankato William Lazarus, University of Minnesota Extension Economist, Farm Management Dale Nordquist and Rann Loppnow, Center for Farm Finan...
Minnesota >> DEV-LAC >> 0708 (Fall, 2008)
Learning Abroad Center, University of Minnesota Language Fees Room & Board International Health Insurance Fall Semester Spring Semester $6,590 $4,361 $2,0...
Minnesota >> PPD >> 2000 (Fall, 2008)
Policy Title Policy Statement Reason for Policy Procedures Forms/Instructions Additional Contacts ADDITIONAL DETAILS Definitions Responsibilities Appendices FAQ Related Information History Effective: Month, Year Last Updated: Month, Year Responsible ...
Minnesota >> WWW3 >> 07317 (Fall, 2008)
WW07317 Reviewed 2008 Growing Garlic in Minnesota www.extension.umn.edu Copyright 2008 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. Carl Rosen, Department of Soil, Water, and Climate Roger Becker, Department of Agronomy and Plant G...
Minnesota >> EXTENSION >> 1003 (Fall, 2008)
Cockroaches Jeffrey Hahn, Assistant Extension Specialist, Department of Entomology Mark Ascerno, Department Head, Department of Entomology There are four kinds of cockroaches that can infest homes in Minnesota, including German cockroach, brownbande...
Minnesota >> EXTENSION >> 1022 (Fall, 2008)
PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF BED BUGS IN RESIDENCES: INFORMATION FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TENANTS Dr. Stephen A. Kells, Assistant Professor and Jeff Hahn, Extension Professor Department of Entomology University of Minnesota August 23, 2006 Bed bugs, Cimex lec...
Minnesota >> EXTENSION >> 1018 (Fall, 2008)
DK1018 - Revised 2006 Silverfish and Firebrats in Homes Jeffrey Hahn and Stephen A. Kells www.extension.umn.edu __ Copyright 2006 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. Importance Silverfish and firebrats are primarily nuisa...
Minnesota >> ACADEMIC >> 052506 (Fall, 2008)
Key Points The University Northside Partnership Community Meeting May 25, 2006 - 6:30 a.m. - 8:30 p.m. Shiloh Temple The information on the next 13 pages is from consultants notes. Much of it is paraphrased and intended to represent the intent of wh...
Minnesota >> ACADEMIC >> 051606 (Fall, 2008)
Key Points The University Northside Partnership Community Meeting May 16, 2006 - 6:30 a.m. - 8:30 p.m. North Commons Park The information on the next 17 pages is from consultants notes. Much of it is paraphrased and intended to represent the intent ...
Minnesota >> ACADEMIC >> 051306 (Fall, 2008)
Key Points The University Northside Partnership Community Meeting May 13, 2006 - 10:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. Rainbow Terrace The information on the next 9 pages is from consultants notes. Much of it is paraphrased and intended to represent the intent of...
Minnesota >> ACADEMIC >> 050906 (Fall, 2008)
Key Points The University Northside Partnership Community Meeting May 9, 2006 - 6:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. - Lucy Laney Elementary School The information on the next 6 pages is from consultants notes. Much of it is paraphrased and intended to represent th...
Minnesota >> SF >> 051407 (Fall, 2008)
# * 69 68 I # 70 I # I # I # 71 80 78 62 7 8 12 I # Minnesota Stream Flow Report 5/14/2007 THIS MAP IS BASED ON PROVISIONAL STREAM GAGE DATA # * 79 # * 67 I # I # # * 63 I # I # I # 65 75 I # 74 73 76 I # I # 77 I # I # 61 59 66 ...
Minnesota >> EDUCATION >> 26 (Fall, 2008)
CEED* RESPONSE TO MEDIA COVERAGE OF ARE THERE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF EARLY CHILD CARE ?1 March 26, 2007 Background Media coverage of a recent study from NICHD Early Child Care and Youth Development1 has sounded the alarm about the relation between ear...
Minnesota >> UMABROAD >> 0708 (Fall, 2008)
Learning Abroad Center, University of Minnesota Language Fees Room & Board International Health Insurance Fall Semester Spring Semester $6,590 $4,361 $2,0...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 1011 (Fall, 2008)
Chapter 22 Evolution Charles Darwin 1859 On the Origin of Species by Natural selection Synthesis Biological issues about organisms Two major points Species evolved from ancestors Natural selection Fish wars History Historical and social context Eart...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 2006 (Fall, 2008)
Chapter 22 Evolution Charles Darwin 1859 On the Origin of Species by Natural selection Synthesis Biological issues about organisms Two major points Species evolved from ancestors Natural selection Fish wars History Historical and social context Eart...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 1011 (Fall, 2008)
Evolution of populations Population genetics Mechanism of natural selection Little known about inheritance Genetic transmission Mendel not discovered until 1900 Either / or Not polygenic 1930s PG emerged Emphasized genetic variation within pops Impor...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 2006 (Fall, 2008)
Evolution of populations Population genetics Mechanism of natural selection Little known about inheritance Genetic transmission Mendel not discovered until 1900 Either / or Not polygenic 1930s PG emerged Emphasized genetic variation within pops Impor...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 1011 (Fall, 2008)
Origin of species Anagenesis (phyletic evolution) Cladogenesis (branching evolution) What is a species Kind or appearance (Latin) Linnaeus taxonomy Moderns tax+gene+func+behav Biological species 1942 Ernst Mayr Biological species concept Largest ...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 2006 (Fall, 2008)
Origin of species Anagenesis (phyletic evolution) Cladogenesis (branching evolution) What is a species Kind or appearance (Latin) Linnaeus taxonomy Moderns tax+gene+func+behav Biological species 1942 Ernst Mayr Biological species concept Largest ...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 1011 (Fall, 2008)
Phylogeny- evo hist of a species or related group of species Systematics - study of bio div in an evo context Recon of phylogeny Bio div reflects past episodes of speciation and macro evolution Encompasses the ID and class of species (taxonomy) in se...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 2006 (Fall, 2008)
Phylogeny- evo hist of a species or related group of species Systematics - study of bio div in an evo context Recon of phylogeny Bio div reflects past episodes of speciation and macro evolution Encompasses the ID and class of species (taxonomy) in se...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 1011 (Fall, 2008)
Behavioral Ecology what an animal does and how it does it Proximate causes Mechanistic Environmental stimuli Genetic mechanisms Physiological mechanisms Ultimate causes evolutionary significance for a behavior why ns favors this behavior What Is Be...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 2006 (Fall, 2008)
Behavioral Ecology what an animal does and how it does it Proximate causes Mechanistic Environmental stimuli Genetic mechanisms Physiological mechanisms Ultimate causes evolutionary significance for a behavior why ns favors this behavior What Is Be...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 1011 (Fall, 2008)
PopulationEcology population groupofindividualsofasinglespecies occupythesamegeneralarea characteristics interactionsbetweenindividualsandtheirenvironment Boundaries Size density Hardtocountallindividuals Estimatepopulations Geography Spacinganddis...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 2006 (Fall, 2008)
PopulationEcology population groupofindividualsofasinglespecies occupythesamegeneralarea characteristics interactionsbetweenindividualsandtheirenvironment Boundaries Size density Hardtocountallindividuals Estimatepopulations Geography Spacinganddis...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 1011 (Fall, 2008)
Community Ecology community assemblage of species close enough for potential interaction. Variables species richness Number of species Relative abundance individualistic hypothesis community as a chance assemblage of species found in the same area...
Minnesota >> BIO >> 2006 (Fall, 2008)
Community Ecology community assemblage of species close enough for potential interaction. Variables species richness Number of species Relative abundance individualistic hypothesis community as a chance assemblage of species found in the same area...
Minnesota >> ENTOMOLOGY >> 2003 (Fall, 2008)
NOTE Varietal Resistance to Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Minnesota Strawberries and Control with ~ifenthrin\' Suzanne J. Wold and W. D. Hutchison2 Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell A...
Minnesota >> APEC >> 1 (Fall, 2008)
Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Animal Agriculture in Minnesota Final Technical Working Paper on Topics D, E External Costs Submitted to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board June 29, 2001 Pro...
Minnesota >> APEC >> 2 (Fall, 2008)
Final TWP, Economics of Animal Agriculture July 2001 II. Current Situation and Recent History: Geographic Distribution and Size of Enterprise in Minnesota Animal Agriculture Overview Number of Farms, Farm Size, Tenure, Marketing, Farm Income Farms...
Minnesota >> APEC >> 3 (Fall, 2008)
Final TWP, Economics of Animal Agriculture July 2001 IV. Phosphorus Balance in Minnesota Feedlot Permitting by Joseph G. Schimmel, Richard A. Levins, and Dennis R. Keeney Introduction The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency began issuing feedlot pe...
Minnesota >> APEC >> 4 (Fall, 2008)
Final TWP, Economics of Animal Agriculture July 2001 III. Forces Affecting Structural Change In the Minnesota Livestock Industry by William F. Lazarus EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Four over-riding forces that seem evident from this discussion are: 1) inform...
Minnesota >> APEC >> 51 (Fall, 2008)
Final TWP, Economics of Animal Agriculture July 2001 V-1. Literature Review Update: Industry Structure and Competitiveness, and Profitability and Economic Viability by William F. Lazarus List of Tables TABLE 1. CHANGES IN THE MINNESOTA LIVESTOCK I...
Minnesota >> APEC >> 52 (Fall, 2008)
V-2. Literature Review Update: Regional Economic Impacts of Animal Agriculture by George W. Morse and Steffanie Guess-Murphy TABLE OF SECTION V-2 CONTENTS SUMMARY OF NEW LITERATURE ADDED . 289 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS . 289 CRITICAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION...
Minnesota >> APEC >> 53 (Fall, 2008)
Section V-3. Literature Review Update: External Costs and Benefits by Carl V. Phillips INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY OF NEW LITERATURE ADDED This document is an update of the 1999 literature review on External Costs and Benefits that dealt with pollution and...
Minnesota >> BLOG >> 2 (Fall, 2006)
...
Minnesota >> CEHD >> 027 (Fall, 2008)
Curriculum Vitae Daheia Julina Barr-Anderson, PhD, MSPH I certify that the following is an accurate representation of my curriculum vitae. _ Signature _ Date Current Appointment: Assistant Professor Contact Information: University of Minnesota Col...
Minnesota >> CEHD >> 1 (Fall, 2008)
Building Literacy Early Skills Lead to Reading As parents, care providers and policy makers we all want children to learn to read. But how do we make this possible? Sue Bredekamp, a child development expert, offers a unique way to understand and enh...
Minnesota >> CEHD >> 2 (Fall, 2008)
Building Literacy Early Environments Build Skills that Lead to Reading How did the literacy gap become so wide in the first place? Why are some children ready to dive into the printed page with confidence and curiosity yet others are lost when it co...
Minnesota >> BLOG >> 045 (Fall, 2008)
SECTION IV: NHGIS Practices and Standards ID Structures: In NHGIS we employ a formal naming structure for data items, variables, and nCubes as well as most of their subelements. This is essential for quick identification of file type and for relating...
Minnesota >> EXTENSION >> 07 (Fall, 2008)
A Farm Bill for the Future: The Safety Net Kent Olson Applied Economics University of Minnesota One of the biggest discussions in the debate over the next farm bill is the safety net for farm income. To allow farmers to adapt best to a changing futur...
Minnesota >> EXTENSION >> 08 (Fall, 2008)
WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO EARN A LIVING ON THE FARM? Prepared By: Gary A. Hachfeld Extension Educator Extension Regional Office, Mankato Ag Business Management Information / Data Source: Extension Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management Associati...
Minnesota >> EXTENSION >> 2006 (Fall, 2008)
Southern Minnesota Cash Rental Rates Data Source: FINBIN Data Base from Adult Farm Management Records Information compiled by David Bau Regional Extension Educator Ag Business Management August 2006 Data lists actual rents paid from 1996 through 2005...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
ANTHROPOLOGY MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Up to 4 credits of D may be used to meet the major requirements if offset by a sufficient number of higher grades to meet the minimum requirement of a 2.33 cumulative GPA in all courses included in the major. St...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
ART HISTORY MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D may not be used to meet the major requirements. Required courses may not be taken S-N unless offered S-N only. Total required credits = 46 Required Art History courses ArtH 1101 Principle...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
STUDIO ART MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D may not be used to meet the major requirements. Required Courses may not be taken SN unless offered S-N only. Total credits required = 52 Basic Studio Recommended in the Freshman Year. Un...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
BIOLOGY MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Required courses may not be taken S-N unless offered S-N only. Up to 5 credits of coursework with the grade of D may be used to meet the major requirements if offset by an equivalent number of credits of A or B. All ...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
CHEMISTRY MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Up to 8 credits of coursework with a grade of D may be used to meet the major requirements if offset by an equivalent number of credits with grades of A or B. Required courses may not be taken S-N unless offered S-...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
COMPUTER SCIENCE MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 No more than two courses with a grade of D, offset by an equivalent number of credits of A or B grades, may be used to meet the requirements for a computer science major. A 2.0 GPA in the major is required. ...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
ECONOMICS MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Grades of D in Econ 1111-1112, Math 1101, and Stat 1601 may not be used to meet major requirements. Up to 4 credits of other economics coursework with a grade of D may be used to meet major requirements if offset b...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
ENGLISH MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Up to 4 credits of coursework with a grade of D may be used to meet the major requirements. Total credits required = 40 Credits Prerequisite Courses Engl 1011 College Writing or Equivalent (not counted in 40-credit t...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
EUROPEAN STUDIES MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Language Proficiency: Complete Fren 2002, Ger 2002, or Span 2002 or demonstrate proficiency through intermediate in one of the following language sequences through intermediate. (Equivalent proficiency in Eu...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
FRENCH MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D or S may not be used to meet the major requirements. Up to one cross-listed French course taught in English may be counted toward the major, provided that students complete written work for th...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
GERMAN MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D may not be used to meet the major requirements. Credits required = 40 Ger 2001 Ger 2002 Ger 2011 Ger 3011 Ger 3101 Ger 3102 Intermediate German I Intermediate German II: Culture and Civilizati...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
HISTORY MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D may not be used to meet the major requirements. Students should develop a coherent program of study in consultation with their major adviser. Total required credits = 37 Credits Complete one ...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
LATIN AMERICAN AREA STUDIES MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D may not be used to meet the major requirements. Minimum required credits = 30 Requirements: LAAS majors must enroll though the LAAS coordinator (cholledl@morris.umn.edu) P...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
LAHS MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D+ or lower may not be used to meet the major requirements. Students will develop a coherent program of study in consultation with their major advisors generally no later than spring semester of t...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
MANAGEMENT MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 I Financial Management Courses with grades of D in Mgmt 2101-2102, Econ 1111-1112, Math 1101, or Stat 1601 may not be used to meet the major requirements. Up to 4 credits of other management coursework with a grad...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
MANAGEMENT MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 III Organizations and Human Resources Courses with grades of D in Mgmt 2101-2102, Econ 1111-1112, Math 1101, or Stat 1601 may not be used to meet the major requirements. Up to 4 credits of other management coursew...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
MANAGEMENT MINOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D in Mgmt 2101-2102 or Econ 1111-1112 may not be used to meet the major requirements. Up to 4 credits of other management coursework with a grade of D may be used to meet major requirements ...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
MATHEMATICS MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Up to 6 credits of coursework with a grade of D may be used to meet the major requirement, if offset by an equivalent number of credits of A or B. Required courses may not be taken S-N unless offered S-N only. To...
Minnesota >> MORRIS >> 2005 (Fall, 2008)
MUSIC MAJOR WORKSHEET 2005-2007 Courses with grades of D may not be used to meet the major requirements. Required courses may not be taken S-N unless offered S-N only. Total required credits = 38 7 enrollments in Mus 0100, Concert Attendance Piano P...
What are you waiting for?