29 Pages

Camerini 5

Course: BIOL 97, Fall 2008
School: UC Irvine
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 2323

Document Preview

5: Lecture Features of protein synthesis; posttranslational processing Today, we will discuss the following: 1. Elongation 2. Termination 3. Fidelity in protein synthesis 4. Energetics of prokaryotic translation 5. Suppressor mutants 6. Eukaryotic translation 1. Antibiotic inhibition of protein synthesis 2. Movie on translation! 3. Regulation of protein synthesis (if time permits) 1 Elongation Three distinct...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> California >> UC Irvine >> BIOL 97

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
5: Lecture Features of protein synthesis; posttranslational processing Today, we will discuss the following: 1. Elongation 2. Termination 3. Fidelity in protein synthesis 4. Energetics of prokaryotic translation 5. Suppressor mutants 6. Eukaryotic translation 1. Antibiotic inhibition of protein synthesis 2. Movie on translation! 3. Regulation of protein synthesis (if time permits) 1 Elongation Three distinct steps to add one amino acid to the growing polypeptide chain. Occurs many times per polypeptide, the number depends on the number of mRNA codons or amino acids in the protein The Elongation Cycle is similar in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Fast: 15-20 amino acids added per second Accurate: 1 mistake every ~10,000 amino acids 2 Schematic of chain elongation in prokaryotes 1. Committing step: EFTu/GTP/AA-tRNA binds to A-site (one phosphate bond broken) 2. Peptide bond formation catalyzed by the 23S rRNA, part of the 50S subunit. The polypeptide chain is transferred from the P-site tRNA to the A-site tRNA. 3. Translocation: movement of peptidyl-tRNA from the Asite to the P-site; and simultaneous transfer of free tRNA from P-site to Esite; movement down one codon driven by EF-G entry into A-site displacing peptidyl-tRNA(one more 3 phosphate bond broken). Termination Occurs at stop codons: UAG = Amber UAA = Ochre UGA = Opal/Umber Does not depend on Stop tRNAs. Stop codons bind release factors. Soluble release factors: RF1 responds to UAA or UAG RF2 responds to UAA or UGA RF3, a GTPase (like EF-Tu and binds in a similar A-site location) RF1/RF2 interact with RF3-GTP, have shapes similar to EF-Tu-GTP-AA-tRNAAA and EF-G, bind to the A-site. Like EF-G, GTP hydrolysis drives the movement of the terminal mRNA codon into the P-site, moving the last tRNA into the E-site and off the ribosome. At the same time, the polypeptide chain is released after hydrolysis of the tRNA-peptide bond. Due to similar structure (molecular mimicry), EF-G and the release factors compete for the A-site. In eukaryotes, only a single release factor, eRF, is necessary. It recognizes all three STOP codons and interacts with GTP. 4 Schematic of chain termination Ribosome stalls when it encounters Stop Entry of appropriate release factor dimer; RF3 carries GTP to the A-site Release factor promotes hydrolysis of polypeptide from the peptidyl-tRNA in the P-site GTP hydrolysis causes release of RF-1, RF-3 and the last free tRNA present in the ribosome 5 EF-Tu structure in GDP vs. GTP bound state EF-Tu:GDP (open) EF-Tu:GtP (compact) 6 EF-Tu and kinetic proofreading What gives rise to specificity in the loading of AA-tRNAs into the A-site? Energy of one GTP bond. How? Kinetic proofreading: there are many EF-Tu:GTP:AA-tRNA (ternary) complexes in the cell. But, for a particular ribosome sitting on a particular codon, we need the right AA-tRNA. If codon and anticodon are not complementary, the ternary complex comes right out of the A-site. If the codon and anticodon base-pair, interaction is stabilized resulting in increased time in the A-site, breakdown of the GTP bond, and then release of EF-Tu: GDP (EF-Tu: GDP cant bind to tRNA and doesnt fit in the Asite). Also, induced fit caused by base-pairing squeezes the ternary complex down into the A-site, causing hydrolysis of GTP. If the fit is right, the AA-tRNA is locked in the A-site. 7 Molecular mimicry of EF-G and EF-Tu:GTP:AA-tRNA 8 Coupled transcription and translation in prokaryotes At 37oC, rate of translation in E. coli = 15 AA/sec. Rate of transcription is ~45 nucleotides/sec. Transcription and translation are coupled! (Not so in eukaryotes because these processes occur in different places) Dr. Hamkalos demonstration that transcription and translation are coupled in E. coli. 9 Energetics of prokaryotic protein synthesis Energy cost for synthesis of a prokaryotic protein with N ami no acids: 2N ATPs to charge tRNA (ATP -> AMP + PP -> AMP + 2Pi) 1 GTP for initiation (IF2) N-1 GTPs to position tRNA for N-1 peptide bonds (EF-Tu) N-1 GTPs for N-1 translocation steps (EF-G) 1 GTP for termination (RF-3) ==== 4N A total of 4 high energy phosphate bonds is cleaved per AA. Each ATP or GTP generates ~40 kJ/mol. Each peptide bond costs ~160 kJ/mol in the cell, yet an uncatalyzed chemical reaction to form a peptide bond costs only ~20 kJ/mol. Why is it so costly to make a peptide bond on a ribosome? T he excess energy is used for generating an accurate, defined polypeptide seque nce, not a random one or a combination of multiple possibilities. As stated abo ve, the fidelity is due to two mechanisms: 1. Proofreading before aminoacyl adenylate intermediate is attached to tRNA. 2. Kinetic proofreading before peptide bond formation. Each major step in protein synthesis, except peptide bond formation itself, involves hydrolysis of GTP to GDP. 10 Nonsense suppression and suppressor tRNAs Stop codons: UAG Amber UAA Ochre UGA Opal/Umber Originally defined Amber, Ochre and Opal suppressors as E. coli mutants that would allow T4 phage rII locus nonsense mutants to grow. Crick and Brenner used these mutants to discover the Stop codons. But how do these nonsense suppressor mutants work? Stop codons dont bind to AA-tRNAs in the A-site, they bind to release factors (RFs). Suppressor mutants are due to mutations in tRNA genes, in the anticodon region. They mask the Stop codons and prevent premature termination (of the nonsense mutants). 11 Examples of nonsense suppressor tRNAs Mutation in the anticodon of a tRNA so that it can recognize a Stop codon (e.g. Amber). Example: mutation of uncommon (recall codon bias) TyrtRNATyr. Mutation in the anticodon does not alter recognition by the cognate tRNA synthetase. Tyr is inserted at Amber Stop codons. AA-tRNA tRNATyr Sup-tRNATyr Anticodon GUA CUA Result Inserts Tyr at UAC codon Inserts Tyr at UAG codon Another example: mutation in the anticodon of an uncommon Trp tRNA gene so that it will base-pair with Amber Stop codons. But Trp AA-tRNA synthetase doesnt recognize this mutant tRNA. It is recognized by GlntRNA synthetase which adds glutamine to this mutant tRNA. Gln is added at Amber Stop codons. AA-tRNA tRNATrp Sup-tRNATrp Anticodon CAA CUA Result Inserts Trp at UUG codon Inserts Gln at UAG codon 12 Translation in Eukaryotes In prokaryotes, we have a Shine-Dalgarno sequence to align the ribosome onto the correct AUG codon. Dont have S-D sequences in eukaryotes. But, we have a 5 7-Methyl GTP cap, poly-A & Kozak sequence: Both 7-Methyl GTP cap and poly-A tail are added post-transcriptionally. Both the cap and the tail are involved in orienting the mRNA, and the cap is important for orienting the ribosome on the correct AUG codon. 13 5 TOP sequence in some eukaryotic mRNAs About 100-200 eukaryotic mRNAs have a 5 Terminal Oligo-Pyrimidine sequence rather than a 5 7-Methyl GTP cap. All ribosomal protein mRNAs have 5 TOP sequence as do some of the elongation factor mRNAs. Very important for translation of proteins involved in translation and cell growth. TOP sequence is found in very short 5 untranslated regions (UTR), a stretch of 6-12 pyrimidines. In quiescent cells, only 20-30% of TOP-containing mRNAs are found on polysomes, but in activated cells, 70-80% of these are found on polysomes. this So, is a regulated form of translation of a specific subset of mRNAs! Dont know much about exactly how ribosome recognizes TOP sequences, but involves phosphorylated S6 (small subunit) protein. Specialized 14 proteins involved in cell growth! Overview of eukaryotic initiation Eukaryotic initiation occurs in three steps. Numerous initiation factors, recognize the 5 7-Methyl GTP cap. There are many steps in which translational regulation occurs (more on this next time). 15 Eukaryotic initiation Step 1: 43S pre-initiation complex formation Association of Met-tRNAiMet with eIF2. eIF2 is charged with GTP by eIF2B. This is the ternary complex: Met-tRNAiMet-eIF2-GTP. eIF1A and eIF3 release the 60S subunit from a free assembled ribosome by associating with the 40S subunit. The ternary complex binds to the eIF1A/eIF3/40S subunit to form the 43S preinitiation complex. Note: mRNA is not bound at this stage and does not direct the formation of the 43S preinitiation complex. Distinct from the formation of the prokaryotic 30S preinitiation complex, because there is no Shine-Dalgarno sequence. 16 eIF2 charging: the eIF2B cycle eIF2 is charged with GTP by eIF2B eIF2B is a GTP exchange factor, thus it exchanges GTP for GDP on eIF2. To recycle charged eIF2B, it is itself phosphorylated by a kinase that exchanges a high energy phosphate on ATP. Well come back to this next time in our discussion of translational regulation. 17 Eukaryotic initiation, Step 2: formation of the 48S preinitiation complex This step accomplishes binding and orientation of the mRNA to the preinitiation complex. It does so by the formation of a cap-binding complex (AKA eIF4F). eIF4F = eIF4A + eIF4E + eIF4G. eIF4E activity is blocked by 4E-BP (eIF4E binding protein). eIF4F binds first to the 5 cap, then poly-A binding protein (Pab1p) binds to the poly-A tail and to eIF4G, which acts as a scaffold to bind the 40S subunit. eIF4F has helicase activity, so in addition to promoting assembly of the 48S preinitiation complex, it unwinds the mRNA to promote efficient translation (RNAs often have complex 2o and 3o 18 structures). Eukaryotic initiation, Step 3: formation of the 80S initiation complex Achieved by binding of the 60S ribosomal subunit with the 48S preinitiation complex composed of the 40S subunit and the mRNA positioned at the correct initiator codon. Transient scanning of the mRNA on the 48S pre-initiation complex occurs in search for AUG codon (usually 40-150 bases 3 of the cap). Translation doesnt necessarily start at the first AUG encountered; the pre-initiation complex searches for the best AUG (closest to the Kozak consensus). Once the correct AUG is found, GTP is hydrolyzed from the ternary complex (eIF2:GTP:Met-tRNAiMet). This causes release of all of the initiation factors and tight binding of the 40S and 60S subunits. In this state, the initiation complex has the mRNA situated appropriately with the MettRNAiMet in the P-site and the A-site awaiting elongation. 19 Eukaryotic translation: elongation Very similar to elongation in prokaryotes. Two elongation factors involved: EF1 = EF1A + EF1B (EF1B and EF1B ) EF2 EF1A works like EF-Tu. Binds GTP and shuttles AA-tRNAs to the A-site EF1B works like EF-Ts. Exchange factor for charging EF1A with GTP. EF2 works and looks like EF-G: charged with GTP, involved in ribosomal translocation 20 Eukaryotic translation: termination Only one release factor in eukaryotes, comprised of two 55 kDa subunits eRF binds the A-site of the ribosome in a GTP-dependent manner. Upon binding, promotes: 1. Hydrolysis of peptide bond on the tRNA in the P-site 2. Release of deacylated tRNA 3. mRNA release Process requires energy provided by GTP bound to eRF. 21 Antibiotic inhibition of protein synthesis Antibiotics: inhibitors of cell growth (cytostatic) or cell survival (cytotoxic). Derived from fungi or bacteria (they likely produce it to combat competitors for limited resources in nature). Many antibiotics target protein synthesis because it is so crucial to cell growth and survival. In many cases, they selectively block either prokaryotic or eukaryotic translation. 22 Prokaryotic inhibitors Streptomycin: affects 30S function At high [strep], is cytotoxic because it poisons 70S preinitiation complexes At low [strep], is cytostatic; induces misreading of codons. Cells not dead, but lots of non-functional proteins. Puromycin: Binds to A-site (both prokaryotic and eukaryotic). Looks like AA-tRNAAA, and causes aberrant peptidyl-transferase reaction. Results in premature chain termination. Some others hoamphic ihi s petal sf ra on s u un l r e o n bt nl i p tran se i d e bi t rtr cn onh i t n o ain ba a su un h om i i i t r sl t a a bs a co bi t Fusi c d ihbt t n o ain b pe ent the sscia oF a G da i ci n ii r sl t a rv i g sa co n id t oi on a fa G D froi o me a m r so m b Te c cill ii bnd g f an a aa tri ne i h t i i o a n bs n io c l m t RN to o oma si a ib r s lt e 23 Eukaryotic protein synthesis inhibitors Puromycin Cycloheximide: inhibits peptidyl transferase on 60S subunit. Cytotoxic or cytostatic. Diptheria Toxin: inactivates eEF2 via ADP ribosylation. Very few molecules can kill cells! Ricin: produced by castor bean Ricinus communis. Two chains: B chain allows for cell entry, A chain is the toxin. Enzymatic activity attacks the 28S rRNA (in the 60S subunit), thereby eliminating peptidyl-transferase activity. A single A-chain molecule can inactivate 50,000 ribosomes! 24 Antibiotic resistance genes Note that many unicellular organisms have antibiotic resistance genes. One example is the hygromycin resistance gene hphr. Hyg is an aminoglycosidic antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus. The hphr gene is a kinase and inactivates the antibiotic by phosphorylating it. 25 Translational regulation Prokaryotes: 1) Shine-Dalgarno sequence (100X change in translation rate) 2) Attenuation Eukaryotes: 1) mRNA masking, antisense and RNAi 2) Regulation of initiation In eukaryotes, there are many places in which translation can be regulated 26 mRNA and translational regulation 1. mRNA masking: mRNA binding proteins prevent initiation. Major form of regulation during early embryonic development. 2. Antisense RNA: short segment of RNA, complementary to mRNA, that forms double stranded RNA (dsRNA) which cannot be translated by ribosome. 3. RNAi: RNA interference or gene silencing. Short RNA molecules bind to mRNA, create short stretches of dsRNA, activates special RNAases. We can mimic RNAi effect in the lab by introduction of short synthetic RNA into cells. siRNA base-pairs with target mRNA, causing its destruction. May also be useful therapeutically. 27 Inactivation of eIF2 via phosphorylation Phosphorylation of eIF2 by eIF2a kinase inhibits translation; Phospho-eIF2 binds too tightly to eIF2B (the charging partner) which is limiting in cells. Cells run out of eIF2B for charging eIF2 with GTP, so translation initiation halts. 28 Growth factor regulation of translation GF signaling activates mTOR 1. mTOR phosphorylates 4E-BP. This frees eIF4E and allows translation to initiate. 2. mTOR activates S6 kinase, leading to the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6. Phospho-S6 promotes translation of 5 TOP containing mRNAs. 29
Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

UC Irvine - BIOL - 97
Bio Sci 99: Part II Regulation of Gene Expression Prof. Ingrid Ruf iruf@uci.edu (please put reference to Bio 99 in subject) 3236 McGaugh Hall Office Hours: Fridays 11 am - noon, or by appointmentCENTRAL DOGMARegulation of Gene Expression Intro and Over
UC Irvine - BIOL - 97
Main Points: Lecture 1Elements of a promoter: -35 and -10 regions, site of transcription initiation, importance of DNA sequence and spacing between elements Prok. RNAP: subunits, sigma factor as specificity factor, core vs. holoenzyme Termination of tran
UC Irvine - BIOL - 97
Main Points: Lecture 2Different sigma factors recognize different consensus recognition sites in promoter, allows utilization of different promoters and transcription of different genes under different conditions Constitutive vs. regulated expression: ho
UC Irvine - BIOL - 97
Main Points: Lecture 7 Assembly and role of GTFs What does a minimal eukaryotic pol II promoter look like? Phosphorylation of CTD of Pol II TBP as a universal factor Characteristics of Pol I and III promoters PPE and common txn factorsTranscriptionFactor
UC Irvine - BIOL - 99
1BIO SCI 99 Problem Set #3 Zoran Rakonjac Monday 11am Section 1. What experiments or observations eliminated the possibility that the genetic code was a three-letter overlapping code? What experiment or observation eliminated the possibility that there ar
Binghamton - ACCT - 575
Shu-Ya Peng Tax Assignment 2Explanation 1: Clark and Lois Kent can claim both May & Billy, Jr., as dependent because of the qualifying child test. They meet the relationship test because they are Loiss children, they meet the Abode Test because they live
Binghamton - ACCT - 575
Chapter Two Problem Solutions7. Income tax Reg. 1. 702 1 (a) (8)Type of Regulation Related Code Section Regulation Number Regulation Paragraph Regulation Subparagraph 9. p. 2-6 In many Code sections, Congress has given to the Secretary or his delegate t
Binghamton - ACCT - 575
Chapter 4GrossIncome: ConceptsandInclusionsIndividual Income TaxesCopyright 2009 Cengage Learning Individual Income Taxes C4-1 C4-Gross Income (slide 1 of 3) Definition: Gross income includes all income from whatever source derived, unless specifical
Binghamton - ACCT - 575
Chapter 2WorkingwiththeTaxLawIndividual Income TaxesCopyright 2009 Cengage Learning Individual Income Taxes C2-1 C2-Statutory Sources of Tax Law(slide 1 of 2) Internal Revenue Code Codification of the Federal tax law provisions in a logical sequenc
Binghamton - ACCT - 575
1 Deductions are disallowed unless allowed by a specific provision in the tax law.status: correct (1.0) correct: true your answer: true feedback: Correct. 2 Generally, a closely-held family corporation cannot take a deduction for a salary paid to a famil
Binghamton - ACCT - 540
Shu-Ya Peng Student Assigned Article Summary IV - U.S. Is Said to Be Urging New Mergers in Banking Article Summary The Treasury plan to have a new package to encourage banks to buy or merge with rivals. With the credit crisis, many banks open to sell them
Binghamton - ACCT - 540
Shu-Ya Peng Student Assigned Article Summary: The Financial Crisis: Bailout Politics Article Summary: No matter which candidate wins the White House, he will face dire economic situation and huge budget deficit. For this fiscal year, the deficit hit 454.8
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
Part 1Cross Sectional DataSimple Linear Regression Model Chapter 2 Multiple Regression Analysis Chapters 3 and 4 Advanced Regression Topics Chapter 6 Dummy Variables Chapter 7 Note: Appendices A, B, and C are additional review if needed.1. The Simple R
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
3. Multiple Regression Analysis: Estimation-Although bivariate linear regressions are sometimes useful, they are often unrealistic -SLR.4, that all factors affecting y are uncorrelated with x, is often violated -MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS allows us to
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
3.2OLSFittedValuesandResidualsafterobtainingOLSestimates,wecanthen obtainfittedorpredictedvaluesfory: yi = 0 + 1 xi1 + 2 xi 2 + . + k xik(3.20)givenouractualandpredictedvaluesfory,asin thesimpleregressioncasewecanobtain residuals: u = y y (3.21)i i i
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
5.ConsistencyWecannotalwaysachieveunbiasednessof estimators. Forexample,hatisnotanunbiased estimatorof Itisonlyconsistent Whereunbiasednesscannotbeachieved, consistencyistheminimumrequirementforan estimator ConsistencyrequiresMLR.1throughMLR.4,as wellasn
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
6.4PredictionWehavealreadyseenhowtomake predictionsaboutourdependentvariable usingourOLSestimatesandvaluesfor ourindependentvariables However,theseestimatesaresubjectto samplingvariation aconfidenceintervalisthereforeoften preferabletoapointestimateAssu
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
Oftenitisdesiroustoknowiftwodifferentgroups followthesameordifferentregressionfunctions OnewaytotestthisistouseDVstoallowfor ALLdifferentinterceptsandslopesforthetwo groups,andtestifallDVterms=0:7.4DVsandGroupsy = 0 + 1 x1 + 2 x2 + . + k xk + 0 DV + 1 D
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
Wehavealreadyseenthathomoskedasticity existswhentheerrortermsvariance,conditional onallxvariables,isconstant: Homoskedasticityfailsifthevarianceoftheerror termvariesinthesample(ie:varieswiththex variables) WeusedHomoskedasticityforttests,Ftest, andconfide
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
Beforetheexistenceofheteroskedasticityrobust statistics,oneneededtoknowtheformof heteroskedasticity HetwasthencorrectedusingWEIGHTED LEASTSQUARES(WLS) Thismethodisstillusefultoday,asif heteroskedasticitycanbecorrectlymodeled, WLSbecomesmoreefficientthanOL
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
10. Basic Regressions with Times Series Data10.1 The Nature of Time Series Data 10.2 Examples of Time Series Regression Models 10.3 Finite Sample Properties of OLS Under Classical Assumptions 10.4 Functional Form, Dummy Variables, and Index Numbers 10.5
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
Whereascrosssectionaldataneeded3 assumptionstomakeOLSunbiased,time seriesdataneedsonly2 Althoughthethirdassumptionismuch stronger Ifweomitavalidvariable,wecausebiasedas seenandcalculatedinChapter3 Nowallthatremainsistoderiveassumptions thatallowustotestth
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
Chapter10coveredOLSpropertiesforfinite (small)sampletimeseriesdata IfourChapter10assumptionsfail,weneedto derivelargesampletimeseriesdataOLS properties forexample,ifstrictexogeneityfails(TS.3)10FurtherTimeSeriesOLSIssuesUnfortunatelylargesampleanalysisi
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 399
Thefollowingautocorrelationcorrectionrequires allourregressorstobestrictlyexogenous inparticular,weshouldhavenolagged explanatoryvariables AssumethatourerrortermsfollowAR(1)SERIAL CORRELATION: assumingfromhereoninthateverythingis conditionalonX,wecancalcu
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 299
1.4InterestRates Interestratesareimportantineconomics, astheyshowtheopportunitycostofa project. Differentinterestratesapplytodifferent situations. Differentinterestratesareavailableto differentpeople.1.4InterestRateExamples(Sept05) BankofCanadaRate:2.75%
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 299
2.2.2 ElasticitiesWe have already seen how the derivative, or the slope, can change as x and y change -even if a slope is constant, changes can have different impacts at different points -For example, given a linear demand for Xbox 360s, a $100 price inc
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 299
2.A Optimization It can be argued that economists are involved in three practical areas: 1) Analyze what has happened 2) Specify where an economy is now 3) Advise on future decisions To achieve the third goal, often an economist must know what the best re
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 299
Chapter3StatisticalReview Thischapterwillconductabriefreviewof statisticalconcepts.ItisNOTareplacement forastatisticscourse.Conceptswillinclude:Models Randomandnonrandomvariables Probabilities ExpectedValues Variance DistributionsandTables(Normal,t,F,ch
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 299
TimeSeries,CrossSectional&Pooled Data 1.TimeSeriesDataOnelocationsdataacrosstime Yearly,monthly,quarterly(everythree months),weekly,daily,etc. ie:CanadianGDP,Enronstockvalue, yourheight,UofAtuition,worldpop.TimeSeries,CrossSectional&Pooled Data 2.CrossS
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 281
Econ 281Intermediate MicroeconomicsConsumer Behavior Theory of Production and Cost Various Market StructuresLorne Priemaza, M.A. Lorne.priemaza@ualberta.caVarious material courtesy of Katharine Rockette and Wiley & Sons INC.Chapter 1What is economic
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 281
Chapter 5 The Theory of Demand Thus far we have studied supply and demand and their equilibrium In this chapter we will see how the demand curve arises out of consumer theory Shifts in demand will be dissected and consumer choices will be investigated fu
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 281
Theindividualsdemandcurvecanbeseenastheindividualswillingnesstopaycurve.Ontheotherhand,theindividualmustonlyactuallypaythe marketpricefor(all)theunitsconsumed. Forexample,youmaybewillingtopay$40forahaircut,but uponarrivingatthestylist,discoverthatthepri
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 281
Isoquants Regions of ProductionDue to the law of diminishing marginal returns, increasing one input will eventually decrease total output When this occurs, in order to maintain a level of output (stay on the same isoquant), the other input will have to i
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 281
Chapter 7: Costs and Cost MinimizationConsumers purchase GOODS to maximize their utility. This consumption depends upon a consumers INCOME and the PRICE of the goods Firms purchase INPUTS to produce OUTPUT This output depends upon the firms FUNDS and the
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 281
Chapter 8: Cost CurvesIn the long run, a firms costs equal zero when zero production is undertaken As production (Q) increases, the firm must use more inputs, thus increasing its cost By minimizing costs, a firms long run cost curve is as follows:1KQ1
University of Alberta - ECON - ECON 281
Ch 12: Capturing SurplusAny firm with market power (such as a monopolist) has an incentive to capture (obtain) consumer surplus in order to increase its profits Consumer surplus can be captured though: -Price Discrimination -Tie-Ins -Advertising -Often c
Delaware - SOCI - 301
Delaware - SOCI - 301
Delaware - SOCI - 301
Delaware - SOCI - 301
Delaware - SOCI - 301
Delaware - SOCI - 301
Oregon State - ECON - 202
Washington - IE - 315
Chapter 2Section 2-1 2-1. Sample average:x=i =1 xi nn=i =1 xi 1212=673.1 = 56.09 12Sample standard deviation:i =1 xi = 673.1012i =1 22 xi =3916812s=n x i n i =1 2 xi i =1 n n 1=39168 ( 673.10) 212
Washington - IE - 315
Chapter 2Section 2-1 2-1. Sample average:12x=i =1 xi nn=i =1 xi 1212=673.1 = 56.09 12Sample standard deviation:i =1 xi = 673.10i =1 22 xi =3916812s=n x i n i =1 2 xi i =1 n n 1=39168 (673.10)212 = 1
Washington - IE - 315
Chapter 3 Section 3-2 3-1. Continuous 3-2. Discrete 3-3. Continuous 3-4. Discrete 3-5. Discrete 3-6. Continuous 3-7. Discrete Section 3-3 3-8. a) Engineers with at least 36 months of full-time employment. b) Samples of cement blocks with compressive stren
Washington - EE - 453
Washington - EE - 453
Washington - EE - 453
Washington - IE - 315
Section 3-10 3-117. a) E(X) = 300(0.4) = 120, V(X) = 300(0.4)(0.6) = 72 and X = Then, P ( X 90) P Z 72 .90 120 = P ( Z 3.54) = 0.0002 72 70 120 90 120 = P(5.89 < Z 3.54) <Z b) P (70 < X 90) P 72 72 = 0.0002 0 = 0.0002 3-1
Washington - IE - 315
CHAPTER 4 Section 4-2 2n Xi 1 2n 1 X1 = E i =1 = E Xi = ( 2 n ) = E 2n 2 n i =1 2 n 4-1.()E X2()n Xi 1 n 1 = E i =1 = E X i = ( n ) = , n n i =1 n X1 and X2 are unbiased estimators of .The varia
Washington - IE - 315
CHAPTER 5 Section 5-2 5-1. a) 1) The parameter of interest is the difference in fill volume, 1 2 2) H0 : 1 2 = 0 or 1 = 2 3) H1 : 1 2 0 or 1 2 4) = 0.05 5) The test statistic is z0 = ( x1 x2 ) 02 1 2 +2 n1 n 26) Reject H0 if z0 < z/
Washington - IE - 315
CHAPTER 6 Note to Instructor: For computer exercises, the procedure Regression under Stat in Minitab can be used for the regression analysis except for computing confidence intervals on the regressor variables.Sections 6-2 6-1. a) The regression eq
Washington - IE - 315
CHAPTER 7 Notes to the Instructor: The normal probability plots are constructed in Minitab using the command Normality Test under Basic Statistics. The analysis of variance is carried out using ANOVA under Stat in Minitab. In cases where there are ex
Washington - IE - 315
Chapter 8Note to the Instructor: Some of the revised control charts provided in the solutions retain the removed points only as place holders. Other revised control charts have been created by removing the out-of-control point from the worksheet and
Washington - EE - 453
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION DESIGN PROCEDURE PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION, AND ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Washington - EE - 453
Topic focus on how protection failures lead to cascading failures and blackouts. Hidden Failure Model looks promising An approach for modeling the protection system in transmission network reliability evaluation When protection systems are out of ord
Washington - EE - 453
Lower Limit Mean8.17 0.4 0.3 0.76 8.15 0.44 0.2 0.67Upper Limit 6.79 0.38 0.27 0.72 9.55 0.42 0.33 0.81 Upper Limit 7.51 0.43 0.19 0.65 8.79 0.45 0.22 0.69Variance5.32 0.08 0.11 0.17 6.38 0.12 0.19 0.23Short Players 1.38 PTS 0.02 FG% 0.03 3P%
Washington - EE - 453
Unit IRF9520 MTP3055 LM311 MUR420 .1uF ceramic cap 10uF, 50V cap 100uF, 35V cap 1000uF, 25V cap LM555 SG3524 7805 5V reg 7808C 8V reg GAL22V10 100k 3/4 turn pot 50K 3/4 turn pot 1kohm resistor 10kohm resistorCost/Unit ($) 1.50 1.00 0.60 0.80 0.20 0
Washington - EE - 453
Integrated Power System Vulnerability Analysis Considering Protection FailuresXingbinYu,Studenr Member, IEEE, and Chanan Singh, Fellow, IEEEAbstract-Protection system failure is one of the main causes of cascading outages. This paper proposes an
Washington - EE - 453
Time A B C V7 0.100000000E-04 0.200000000E-04 0.300000000E-04 0.400000000E-04 0.500000000E-04 0.600000000E-04 0.700000000E-04 0.800000000E-04 0.900000000E-04 0.100000000E-03 0.110000000E-03 0.120000000E-03 0.130000000E-03 0.140000000E-03 0.150000000E