Nair Sanjay [e-mail] CSCI 5771, Fall 2005 IV&V HW #3 Evaluation of Quality Report (LCO Draft) 21 Oct 2005
1. OCD Quality review 1.1. Tab 1 (Areas of Concern Log)
1. No individual quality report has been submitted. No way to figure out who is the contributor to a particular defect. 2. Exit criteria field is empty. Review should clearly specify the exit criteria. 3. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 4. Activity field should be Agile Internal Review instead of Agile independent Review. 5. Date returned to QAT is empty. 6. Author of the QR document is also names as a reviewer. Remove this name from the list of reviewers. 7. Page number is displayed in the middle of the page (in big bold letters). Remove this page number from here. 8. Location information field is not consistent. Sometimes the location is identified by the section number, other times it is identified by page numbers. Also, concerns are not organized by sections (they are random). Make sure that the concern log is consistent so that the reviewer can review this document quickly. 9. It is not clear why item 22 is a concern. Provide more details.
1.2.
Tab 2 (Areas of Concern Log Contd)
1. No Information is filled out.
1.3.
Tab 3 (Problem List Cover)
1. Review # field is incorrect. It should be OCD-2. 2. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 3. Module identified is incorrect. 4. Type of review should be Agile internal review. 5. Number of option issues and Comments are not filled out. 6. Activity of defect injection field is empty. 7. Comment field is not filled out.
Page 1 of 8
8. Most of the fields are not filled out for the last two items. 9. All concerns listed in the concern log (Tab 1) are not addressed here.
1.4.
Tab 4 (Problem List Cover Contd)
1. No Information is filled out.
1.5.
Tab 5 (Review Results Summary)
1. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 2. Module identified is incorrect. 3. Number of participants field value is 6. Author of the document should not be reviewing his/her work. The number of participants should be less than 6.
Page 2 of 8
2. SSRD Quality review 2.1. Tab 1 (Areas of Concern Log)
1. No individual quality report has been submitted. No way to figure out who is the contributor to a particular defect. 2. Exit criteria field is empty. Review should clearly specify the exit criteria. 3. Review # field is incorrect. It should be SSRD-1. 4. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 5. Activity field should be Agile Internal Review instead of Agile independent Review. 6. Date returned to QAT is empty. 7. Author of the QR document is also names as a reviewer. Remove this name from the list of reviewers. 8. Page number is displayed in the middle of the page (in big bold letters). Remove this page number from here. 9. Location information field is not consistent. Sometimes the location is identified by the section number, other times it is identified by page numbers. Also, concerns are not organized by sections (they are random). Make sure that the concern log is consistent so that the reviewer can review this document quickly. 10. Item #3 listed in the concern log is not clear. A unique id is already assigned to each System Interface Requirements. 11. Item #10 listed in the concern log is only applicable to table 20 (not 21).
2.2.
Tab 2 (Areas of Concern Log Contd)
1. No Information is filled out.
2.3.
Tab 3 (Problem List Cover)
1. Review # field is incorrect. It should be SSRD-1. 2. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 3. Module identified is incorrect. 4. Type of review should be Agile internal review. 5. Number of option issues field is not filled out. 6. D/I field is empty. 7. Item 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 are marked as fixed. But, they are not fixed in the SSRD after review document. 8. Activity of defect injection field is filled incorrectly. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 9. Comments are not descriptive.
Page 3 of 8
2.4.
Tab 4 (Problem List Cover Contd)
1. No Information is filled out.
2.5.
Tab 5 (Review Results Summary)
1. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 2. Module identified is incorrect. 3. Number of participants field value is 6. Author of the document not should be reviewing his/her work. The number of participants should be less than 6.
Page 4 of 8
3. SSAD Quality review 3.1. Tab 1 (Areas of Concern Log)
1. No individual quality report has been submitted. No way to figure out who is the contributor to a particular defect. 2. Exit criteria field is empty. Review should clearly specify the exit criteria. 3. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 4. Activity field should be Agile Internal Review instead of Agile independent Review. 5. Date returned to QAT is N/A. It should be the date when the "Author" has finished recording defect/issue determination. 6. Author of the QR document is also names as a reviewer. Remove this name from the list of reviewers. 7. Page number is displayed in the middle of the page (in big bold letters). Remove this page number from here. 8. Concerns are not sorted by section numbers (they are random). Make sure that the concern log is sorted by section numbers so that the reviewer can review this document quickly. 9. Items 25 and 26 are not clear. Clearly specify the concern instead of a question. 10.
3.2.
Tab 2 (Areas of Concern Log Contd)
1. No Information is filled out.
3.3.
Tab 3 (Problem List Cover)
1. Review # field is incorrect. It should be SSAD-1. 2. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 3. Module identified is incorrect. 4. Type of review should be Agile internal review. 5. Number of option issues field is not filled out. 6. D/I field is empty. 7. Location field is not filled out for every entry. 8. Item 1, 2 and 3 are marked as fixed. But, they are not fixed in the SSRD after review document. 9. Items 4, 5, 7and 7-34 from the concern log are not listed in problem list cover. 10. Comments are not descriptive.
Page 5 of 8
3.4.
Tab 4 (Problem List Cover Contd)
1. No Information is filled out.
3.5.
Tab 5 (Review Results Summary)
1. Project name is incorrect (it should be Team10. Refer to Agile_Artifacts_Review_FieldDesc04v1.xls). 2. Module identified is incorrect. 3. Number of participants field value is 6. Author of the document should not be reviewing his/her work. The number of participants should be less than 6. 4. Problem list cover date is 10/11/2005 while the review results date is 10/10/2005. Provide the correct review date here. 5. Documents other than SSAD are listed here even though their concern logs are missing.
Page 6 of 8
4. UML Quality review 4.1. Tab 1 (Areas of Concern Log)
1. No individual quality report has been submitted. No way to figure out who is the contributor to a particular defect. 2. Exit criteria field is empty. Review should...