3 Pages

M24.0708.DraftMemoChap5&6FY8

Course: INSTR 0708, Fall 2009
School: Wisconsin
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 1546

Document Preview

1, June 2007 (Via E-Mail Only) DRAFT #4 BUDGET SUBMISSION DUE DATE Large Schools & Colleges (A-07, A-17, A-19, A-34, A-40, A-48, A-53, A-55, A-87) XXX Other Budget Units MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJ: Deans and Directors Darrell Bazzell The 2007-08 Unclassified Compensation Plan - Phase II XXX Attached to this memorandum you will find Chapter 5 of the annual budget instructions, which provides detailed...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Wisconsin >> Wisconsin >> INSTR 0708

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
1, June 2007 (Via E-Mail Only) DRAFT #4 BUDGET SUBMISSION DUE DATE Large Schools & Colleges (A-07, A-17, A-19, A-34, A-40, A-48, A-53, A-55, A-87) XXX Other Budget Units MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJ: Deans and Directors Darrell Bazzell The 2007-08 Unclassified Compensation Plan - Phase II XXX Attached to this memorandum you will find Chapter 5 of the annual budget instructions, which provides detailed guidelines for implementation of the 2007-08 unclassified compensation plan, as well as several other documents which will provide further guidance for this phase of the budget process. It is anticipated that the compensation plan that will be proposed by the Office of State Employment Relations (OSER) will provide authority to increase annualized salaries for 2007-08 by an amount equal to X.XX percent of the salaries of all continuing unclassified staff. However, the Joint Committee on Employment Relations (JCOER) has not yet scheduled a meeting to act on a compensation plan. We are hopeful that they will meet in June and approve the X.XX percent level. Consequently, we want to move ahead with finalizing this last phase of the budget process by establishing salary increases that we believe will be consistent with the anticipated OSER plan. If modifications to the plan are later required, we will provide additional instructions at that time. We are assuming that faculty and academic staff minima and Category A maxima will be increased by approximately X.XX percent over the levels that were effective for 2006-07. All budgeted and nonbudgeted positions must be at or above these new minima. If an unclassified staff member's current full-time rate is below the 2007-08 minimum, the salary must be at least increased to the new minimum with merit funds. The salary minima for Research Associates and Research Interns have also been increased by approximately X.XX % for 2007-08. You should bear in mind the following institutional policies regarding merit distribution. The Faculty Senate, with the full support of the Chancellor, Provost, and Deans, has established the policy that "Colleges, schools, departments, and programs, as appropriate to their respective missions, should allocate at least 20% of the annual merit pool to reward excellence in teaching (Faculty Document 976a dated February 1, 1993). In addition, each college should allocate a portion of the Dean's special merit pool to faculty members who have maintained a record of teaching excellence." You do not have to account, by individual, how much of this total amount each received; however, at the end of the merit process you may need to be able to identify those faculty and instructional academic staff whose performance award significantly reflects teaching excellence. Vice Chancellor for Administration University of Wisconsin-Madison 500 Lincoln Drive Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1380 608/262-9943 FAX: 608/263-7449 100 Bascom Hall Budget Officers June 1, 2007 Page 2 The Board of Regents adopted a resolution which includes a guideline that solid performers should receive not less than one-third of the total compensation plan. This does not imply or require an acrossthe-board increase for each individual who receives a "satisfactory" assessment. Rather it reflects a policy that those individuals who have made positive, but not necessarily exceptional, contributions should not be excluded from pay plan increases. This will ensure that exceptional performers are not rewarded exclusively at the expense of the solid performers. This requirement applies only to those who were employed long enough to have their performance fairly assessed. Those who cannot be fairly assessed are eligible for increases at the discretion of the department/division. The university has the authority to determine merit and assign increases without regard to fund, but you may not move compensation plan increase authority between the academic staff and faculty without prior approval and only in exceptional circumstances. In addition, average salary increase percentages for eligible men and eligible women must be approximately equal. This requirement pertains separately to both faculty and academic staff. Any variance requires the prior approval of the Academic Personnel Office. Chapter 5 provides detailed instructions for awarding the X.XX percent compensation plan increases for the unclassified staff. The primary limitation, as in previous years, is that the all-funds total of the compensation plan increases may not exceed X.XX percent of the continuing staff identified in the budget. Please note the merit requirements for appointments that have received a base salary adjustment. The requirements are listed in Chapter 5, Section II.F.3. The requirement for at least an average percent increase (X.XX%) includes all faculty promotions, academic staff promotions, market and individual equity adjustments. Merit of at least X.XX% is required for proposed major change in duties and group adjustments. equity As in past years, you may be required to submit a short narrative that provides justification for large pay plan increases. It is not necessary to submit that information with your budget material but adequate documentation should be kept in the Dean's office or at the department level. The unclassified staff detail (Form 2A) should reflect employee status as of July 1 (A pay basis) or the start of Semester I (C pay basis). Base salary changes, which are effective on or before July 1 (or Semester I), should be shown. Merit increases, proposed base adjustments, and faculty promotional adjustments will be automatically loaded into appointment system. (If the increase is already reflected in the appointment system, it will not be duplicated.) This load applies only to rate changes. It does not include title changes. Therefore, you will need to enter all title changes into the appointment system. The load of the pay plan increases to the appointment system is schedule to occur XXX XX. The changes will be copied to the payroll system and used for the XXXXXXXX check sheets for all appointments. Detailed information on the load to payroll and the projected XXXXXXXXX retroactive payments for annual pay basis appointments will be provided by Payroll Services. Faculty and academic staff should not be informed of their new rates until JOCER has approved the pay plan, the budget has been passed and the review of the proposed salaries has been completed by UW System and the Board of Regents. The release of that information is tentatively schedule for XXXX XX. The Academic Personnel Office will distribute sample salary notification letters and provide the official salary release date. If you have situations where you feel that it is important to inform an individual immediately of his or her proposed rate, or to make a multi-year commitment, discuss the matter with Steve Lund prior to talking with the individual. Please keep in mind that you must rebalance your budget submission for all GPR funds. The final budget submission by activity should be equal to your Phase I activity totals adjusted by the actual pay plan increase distributed to each activity. Other funds that have a specific allocation must be rebalanced to Phase I levels. These include Funds 128, 129, 131, 136, 165, 166, and 528. Rebalancing is not required for Funds 133, 144, and 161, as those adjustments will be handled at a campus level. Also keep in mind that the salary increase for 2007-08 cannot move a base salary above the UW System salary range maximum for the assigned title. In addition, unclassified staff who are currently paid above the UW System academic staff 2007-08 maximum for their assigned title and salary grade can receive a salary increase of X.XX% (half of the amount by which the salary ranges have been adjusted). This does not apply to appointments that are limited by an extraordinary salary range maximum. Budget Officers June 1, 2007 Page 3 Teleprocessing transacti...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Wisconsin - INSTR - 0809
February 22, 2008 (Via E-Mail Only) BUDGET SUBMISSION DUE DATE Large Schools & Colleges(A-07, A-17, A-19, A-34, A-40, A-48, A-53, A-55, A-87)April 11Other Budget Units MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJ: Deans and Directors Darrell Bazzell The 2008-09 An
Wisconsin - BIENN - 0709
ATTACHMENT 12007-09 Unclassified Pay Plan Recommendations BUSINESS, FINANCE, AND AUDIT COMMITTEE Resolution: Whereas, pursuant to s.230.12(3)(e) Wis. Stats., the Regents are charged with the responsibility to recommend to the Director, Office of St
Wisconsin - INSTR - 0506
2005-06 Allocation of Research Assistant Stipend Increase University of Wisconsin - Madison Fund 101(1)(2)Budget Unit -A-07 A-10 A-19 A-34 A-37 A-45 A-48 A-53 A-54 A-56 A-87Unit Name -Agricultural & Life Sci International Studies College of E
Wisconsin - INSTR - 0809
November 28, 2007MEMO TO:Margaret Tennessen Robert Bolles Sherry Lloyd Jeff Sailor Dave Rieves Drew R. Wielgus Jordon Hanson Alex Gallagher (SSFC) Ron AmersonTroy Suski Donna Halleran Ray Lux John Jentz Mark L. Schmidt Lisa Learish Gestina Sewe
Wisconsin - INSTR - 0708
December 04, 2007 (Via E-Mail Only) BUDGET SUBMISSION DUE DATELarge Schools & Colleges(A-07, A-17, A-19, A-34, A-40, A-48, A-53, A-55, A-87)December 17Other Budget UnitsDecember 14MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJ: Deans and Directors Darrell Bazze
Wisconsin - INSTR - 0708
March 12, 2007 (Via E-Mail Only) BUDGET SUBMISSION DUE DATE Large Schools & Colleges (A-07, A-17, A-19, A-34. A-40, A-48, A53, A-55, A-87) Other Budget Units MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Re: Deans, Directors and Budget Officers Darrell Bazzell The 2007-08 An
Wisconsin - INSTR - 0809
May 27, 2008(Via E-Mail Only)MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJ: Deans and Directors Darrell Bazzell REVISED 2008-09 Unclassified Compensation PlanOn May 27, 2008 the Joint Committee on Employment Relations approved a REVISED 2008-09 Unclassified Pay Pl
Wisconsin - BIENN - 0305
2003-05 BIENNIAL BUDGET REDUCTION EXERCISEThis information responds to Department of Administration instructions to submit a reduced base budget plan for 95% of the UW System's GPR budget base less debt service (plus student financial aid). Table On
Wisconsin - INSTR - 0708
November 20, 2006MEMO TO:Margaret Tennessen Alice Gustafson Donna Halleran Ray Lux Jeff Sailor Dave Rieves Drew R. Wielgus Lisa Learish Zach Frey (SSFC) Ron AmersonTroy Suski Robert Bolles Sherry Lloyd Dwayne Sackman John Jentz Mark L. Schmidt
Wisconsin - ECON - 102
Practice questions 3 1. An increase in net exports that results from a change in the price level in the United States: a. Will shift the aggregate demand curve to the right. b. Will shift the aggregate demand curve to the left. c. Will not cause the
Wisconsin - ECON - 102
Economics 102 Spring 2008 Answers to Homework #3 Due March 31, 2008 On your homework please include at the top of the first page your name, TA name, and the section number for the discussion section you attend. All homeworks should be legible and nea
Wisconsin - ECON - 101
Economics 101 Fall 2000 Practice Questions #6 Goal: Review basic concepts: Marginal Physical Product, Marginal Revenue Product, Marginal Labor cost. Learn how to use demand and supply curves to determine the equilibrium wage and employment in a com
Wisconsin - ECON - 102
Economics 102 Spring 2000 Homework #3 Due 3/27/00Student Name: ID#: T.A. Name: Sec. Code:Note: If asked to graph please use 1/4" graph paper. Label this paper with your name, id#, T.A. name, and the number of your discussion section. If you need
Michigan State University - PHY - 251
EXPERIMENT 11The Spring Hooke's Law and OscillationsObjectives To investigate how a spring behaves when it is stretched under the influence of an external force. To verify that this behavior is accurately described by Hooke's Law. Measure the spr
Michigan State University - PHY - 231
CODE - ACGFGE - PHY 232C Introductory Physics II Virtual University(summer 05) 1 Exam 3 Name:CODE - ACGFGE - PHY 232C Introductory Physics II Virtual University(summer 05) 2 Exam 3 Name:Your code is: ACGFGE Put your name here:Keep this exam
Wisconsin - PLDI - 2005
Scalable Statistical Bug IsolationBen Liblit, Mayur Naik, Alice Zheng, Alex Aiken, and Michael Jordan University of Wisconsin, Stanford University, and UC BerkeleyPost-Deployment MonitoringGoal: Measure Reality Where is the black box for softwa
Wisconsin - CS - 640
CS 640 Introduction to Computer NetworksLecture16CS 640Role of data link layer Service offered by layer 1: a stream of bits Service to layer 3: sending & receiving frames To achieve this layer 2 does Framing Error detection (rarely error co
Wisconsin - CS - 752
Hot Set Detection and Hardware Optimization - report for the CS/ECE 752 projectLei Chen & Su Zhang (chenl, zs@cs.wisc.edu)1. Project GoalThis project is to optimize and enhance performance of a superscalar processor. It starts with a baseline sup
Wisconsin - ISCA - 2005
InterconnectionsinMulticoreArchitectures: UnderstandingMechanisms,OverheadsandScalingRakeshKumar(UCSD) VictorZyuban(IBM) DeanTullsen(UCSD)ANaivemethodologyforMulticoreDesignP 0 P 1 P 2 P 3L2_0L2_1L2_2L2_3L2_4L2_5L2_6L2_7Cle
Wisconsin - CS - 525
>% Question 1:> AA = -1 -1 -1 1 -1 2> bb = -3 -1 2> pp = 1 3> T = totbl(-A,-b,-p,-4); x1 x2 1 - x3 = | 1.0000 1.0000 -3.0000 x4 = |
Wisconsin - CL - 1
Math 'Convincing and Proving' Critiquing 'Proofs' Tasks - Set #3 (solutions)Malcolm SwanMathematics EducationUniversity of NottinghamMalcolm.Swan@nottingham.ac.ukJim RidgwaySchool of EducationUniversity of DurhamJim.Ridgway@durham.ac.ukThe aim of thi
Wisconsin - AOS - 100
SOME USEFUL STATION WEATHER SYMBOLSCourtesy of http:/www.hpc.ncep.noaa.govForce: Weight:Mass * Accelleration Mass * Gravitational AccellerationPressure: Supports weight of air above a given area1cm2 weighs 1013g => 1013mb 1m2 weigh
Wisconsin - AOS - 100
AOS 100 / 101: Midterm 1 Review Sheet Midterm: In Class 10/7/05 Weather Discussions: Everyone should know a visible from an infrared satellite image, and how to tell if clouds are high or low. Weather station models: know temperature, dewpoint temper
Wisconsin - AOS - 101
AOS101ClimateChange:IntroductionMarch4/6100heatbudgetofearthandatmosphere 30SPACEBIGPICTURE5812 20ShortwaveATMOSPHERE102 94GROUND72350LongwaveConduction ConvectionLatent HeatGREENHOUSEEFFECT12 58CH4 N2O CO2 H2O 1
Wisconsin - AOS - 101
Climate Change Debate Instructions Section 302: Debate on March 11, Write-Up due March 25 Section 304: Debate on March 13, Write-Up due March 27 In recent years, surface temperatures around the globe have been steadily increasing. The reasons for thi
Wisconsin - AOS - 100
AOS 100 / 101 Lecture summary: 10/03/07Reading: Ahrens 7th Ed., Ch.4, pp.85-107 Ahrens 8th Ed., pp. 518-522, 531-533Scattering: light is scattered by particles (gasses, aerosols, H2) in the atmosphereType of Scattering:Particle
Wisconsin - CL - 1
Chemistry ConcepTestsSample Set #2Arthur EllisDepartment of Chemistry1101 University Ave. Madison WI 53706University of Wisconsin-Madisonemail: ellis@chem.wisc.edu608-262-0421Readers may be familiar with Harvard physicist Eric Mazur's ConcepTests, wh
Drexel - NEW - 04
Information on the New PhD Candidacy Exam (replaces the previous PhD Qualifying Exam)Doctoral Candidate is a status bestowed on a doctoral student who has satisfied a number of requirements specified by the University Office of Graduate Studies. Acc
Drexel - NEW - 04
BIOMED Technical Design Rubric Term 1Course: _ Date: _Student(s): _ 3 - Excellent Identification of the problemScore:The problem has been shown (not just stated) to exist with supporting factual evidence.2 GoodA problem statement has been
Drexel - NEW - 04
School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health SystemsDrexel BIOMEDSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science & Health SystemsBossone Research Enterprise CenterbyBanu Onaral, Director 23 December 2006V 1.0 [MS 041019]School of Biomed
Drexel - NEW - 04
School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health SystemsWelcome toBiomedical EngineeringInformation SessionBossone Research Enterprise CenterbyBanu Onaral, Director August 25, 2006V 1.0 [MS 041019]School of Biomedical Engineering, Sc
Wisconsin - ENGR - 201
8.1-8.4 Coulomb friction (intro. to tribology)Consider a simple experiment where we slowly pull point p:dscale (reads force F) pN Frough surface force, FFNFslipdisplacem ent, dtypical responseRemarkably, the force that produces s
Wisconsin - ENGR - 201
2.7-2.8 Cartesian Vectorsy6/8/06Consider an orthogonal x,y coordinate system, and a vector F in this space.Fxyj iFxyF yj iFxF xRepresentation of vectors in terms of Cartesian componentsUnit vectors:i, j.or.^ ^ i, j
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Nuclear FissionDuderstadt and Hamilton pp. 54-70Fission physicsThe binding energy per nucleon peaks at 8.7 MeV for nuclear mass numbers of about 50. More tightly bound nuclei can be produced by either combining lighter nuclei or inducing heavier
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Reactor criticality, conversion and breedingDuderstadt and Hamilton pp. 83-88Six factor formula assumes thermal reactor characteristicsThermal Neutrons 0.05 eV 0.025 eV 1 eV 100 keV 1 MeVk = fPTNL pPFNLFission neutrons 1 MeVNumber of neutr
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Differential scatteringDuderstadt and Hamilton pp. 34-45Differential scattering cross sectionv v'We want a cross section that describes not only the probability that a neutron scatters, but also contains information about the angle through whic
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Differential scatteringDuderstadt and Hamilton pp. 34-45Differential scattering cross sectionv vWe want a cross section that describes not only the probability that a neutron scatters, but also contains information about the angle through which
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Nuclear motionDuderstadt and Hamilton pp. 45-54Nuclear motion affects cross sectionsExcept at absolute zero, nuclei are in motion and therefore are not stationary targets for neutrons. The cross section energy dependence is really determined by t
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Nuclear Reactions Macroscopic cross sectionsDuderstadt and Hamilton pp 19-23Review of microscopic cross sectionsWe considered a beam of neutrons incident upon a very Thin target to insure that each nucleus in the target would be exposed to the sa
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Nuclear cross section behaviorDuderstadt and Hamilton pp.23-34Two fundamental aspects of neutron cross sections Kinematics of two-particle collisions Conservation of momentum Conservation of energy Dynamics of nuclear reactions Potential sca
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Nuclear Reactions Microscopic cross sectionsDuderstadt and Hamilton pp 3-19Macroscopic to microscopic worldCutaway of PWR pressure vessel and Internals.Nuclear chain reactionNeutron +235U fission products + more neutrons + energyThere ar
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
Elastic scattering and kinematicsDuderstadt and Hamilton pp 39-45Elastic scattering from stationary nucleiUse the laws of conservation of energy and momentum. First write the differential cross section ass ( EP( EE ) dE= Probability that a n
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
NEEP 405 Homework Set # 6 Due March 16 1. 2. 3. 4. D&H 5-29 (a)&(b) D&H 5-30 D&H 5-31 D&H 5-32
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
NEEP 405 Homework Set # 5 Due March 9 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. D&H 5-3 D&H 5-11 D&H 5-13 D&H 5-14 D&H 5-19
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
NEEP 405 Homework Set # 9 Due April 19 1. 2. 3. 4. D&H 8-20 D&H 8-23 D&H 8-26 D&H 8-27
Wisconsin - ENGR - 405
NEEP 405 Homework Set # 7 Due April 5 1. D&H 7-3 2. D&H 7-8 3. D&H 7-11
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
Mirrored Particles NEEP/ECE/Physics 525, Fall 2006 Prof. Carl Sovinec The plots in this document illustrate particle trapping in a magnetic mirror. The magnetic field is found from a concocted (but not unrealistic) axial magnetic-flux distribution,2
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
NEEP/ECE/Physics 525 Homework #8 Fall 2006 Assigned: Thursday, 11/09/06 Due: Thursday, 11/16/06 1. Chen, Problem 4-37. In general, the effect of electron-ion collisions can be built into our fluid model if we add the term me ne (Vi - Ve ) to the righ
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
NEEP/ECE/Physics 525 Homework #7 Fall 2006 Assigned: Thursday, 10/26/06 Due: Tuesday, 11/7/06 1. For this problem, it will be helpful to read Section 4.13 of Chen and refer to Problem 4-13 and its solution. a) Write the dispersion relation for an O-m
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
April 2, 2004 Physics 525 Quiz #2 Due at Class April 12 You may use your notes, textbook, calculator, reference books - anything except your classmates' (or others!) assistance. Most of all use your head and start early! Consider a plasma column (2.0
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
NEEP/ECE/Physics 525 Homework #6 Fall 2006 Assigned: Thursday, 10/19/06 Due: Thursday, 10/26/06 1. Our discussions in class considered electron plasma waves and sound waves as different limits of the electrostatic dispersion relation. In fact, they a
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
NE/ECE/Physics 525 Homework #9 Spring 2008 Assigned: Monday, 4/7/08 Due: Monday, 4/14/08 1. In this problem, we consider ambipolar diffusion for weakly ionized electron-proton plasma in a long cylindrically symmetric column of radius 25 cm. Magnetic
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
Homework #4 Due 3/1/04 Chen Problem 2-15 Chen Problem 2-21
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ECE/NEEP/Physics 525 Introduction to Plasmas Spring Semester 2007Problem Set #2 Due: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1. a) Charged particle drifts - nonuniform magnetic field. The magnetic field strength in the equatorial plane
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
NE/ECE/Physics 525 Homework #3 Spring 2008 Assigned: Friday, 2/8/08 Due: Friday, 2/15/08 1. (10 points) A plasma experiment of length L=0.5 m has uniform magnetic field of magnitude 0.3 T that is pointed in the +z-direction. Spatially varying electri
Wisconsin - ENGR - 525
NEEP/ECE/Physics 525 Homework #9 Fall 2006 Assigned: Thursday, 11/30/06 Due: Thursday, 12/7/06 1. Chen, Problem 5-11. Besides the computations, provide a sketch of the classical diffusivity as a function of radius. 2. Chen, Problem 5-19. Note that th