8 Pages

2005930_r01n_0120333

Course: ISHP 1017, Fall 2009
School: Stanford
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 4078

Document Preview

STATES UNITED DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re INTERSHOP COMMUNICATIONS AG SECURITIES LITIGATION _______________________________________________ This Document Relates To: ) ) ) ) ) ALL ACTIONS. ) _______________________________________________ ) Master File No. C-01-20333-JW CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IF YOU PURCHASED INTERSHOP...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> California >> Stanford >> ISHP 1017

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
STATES UNITED DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re INTERSHOP COMMUNICATIONS AG SECURITIES LITIGATION _______________________________________________ This Document Relates To: ) ) ) ) ) ALL ACTIONS. ) _______________________________________________ ) Master File No. C-01-20333-JW CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IF YOU PURCHASED INTERSHOP COMMUNICATIONS AG (INTERSHOP) AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 29, 2000 AND JANUARY 2, 2001 OR INTERSHOP COMMON STOCK BETWEEN AUGUST 2, 2000 AND JANUARY 2, 2001, YOU COULD GET A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Security and Time Periods: Intershop American Depository Shares (ADS) purchased on the NASDAQ market between September 29, 2000 and January 2, 2001; and Intershop common stock purchased on the Neuer Market between August 2, 2000 and January 2, 2001. Settlement Amount: US$3,151,392.56 in cash plus the possibility of additional payments by Intershop. The settlement amount will increase if on or before January 27, 2006 Intershop merges with or is acquired by another entity or Intershop sells additional amounts of the zero-coupon convertible debt securities with a maturity of December 15, 2008, which it began selling on January 26, 2005 (Bonds). Your recovery will depend on the amount of securities purchased and the timing of your purchases and any sales. Depending on the number and type of eligible securities that participate in the Settlement and when those securities were purchased and sold, the estimated average recovery per ADS will be approximately US$5.14 before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses. Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including danger of no recovery. If the Case Had Not Settled: Continuing with the case could have resulted in dismissal or loss at trial. The two sides do not agree on the amount of money that could have been won if Lead Plaintiffs prevailed at trial. The parties disagree about: (1) the method for determining whether the Intershop securities at issue were artificially inflated during the relevant period; (2) the amount of any such inflation; (3) the extent that various facts alleged by Lead Plaintiffs were materially false or misleading; (4) the extent that various facts alleged by Lead Plaintiffs influenced the trading price of the Intershop securities at issue during the relevant period; and (5) whether the facts alleged were material, false, misleading or otherwise actionable under the securities laws. Attorneys Fees and Expenses: Court-appointed Co-Lead Counsel will ask the Court for attorneys fees of 25% of the Settlement Amount and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses not to exceed US$475,000 to be paid from the Settlement Amount. If the above amounts are requested and approved by the Court, the average cost per ADS will be US$2.055. Co-Lead Counsel have not received any payment for their work investigating the facts, conducting this Litigation and negotiating the Settlement on behalf of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Class. Deadlines: Submit Claim: Request Exclusion: File Objection: January 24, 2006 November 29, 2005 November 29, 2005 December 5, 2005 QUESTIONS? CALL 215-979-1620 OR VISIT: WWW.RG2CLAIMS.COM Court Hearing on Fairness of Settlement: More Information: Claims Administrator: RG/2 Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479 www.rg2claims.com or Co-Lead Counsel: Rick Nelson Shareholder Relations Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 or Ralph Stone Shalov Stone & Bonner LLP 485 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1000 New York, NY 10018 R Your legal rights are affected whether you act or dont act. Read this Notice carefully. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM . . . The only way to get a payment. EXCLUDE YOURSELF . . . . . . Get no payment. This is the only option that allows you to participate in another lawsuit against the Defendants relating to the legal claims in this case. OBJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . You may write to the Court if you don't like this Settlement. GO TO A HEARING . . . . . . . . . You may ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the Settlement. DO NOTHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Get no payment. c These rights and options - and the deadlines to exercise them - are explained in this Notice. c The Court in charge of this case must decide whether to approve the Settlement. Payments will be made if the Court approves the Settlement and, if there are any appeals, after appeals are resolved. Please be patient. BASIC INFORMATION 1. Why Did I Get This Notice Package? You or someone in your family may have purchased Intershop American Depository Shares between September 29, 2000 and January 2, 2001 or purchased Intershop common stock between August 2, 2000 and January 2, 2001. The Court sent you this Notice because you have a right to know about a proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit, and about all of your options, before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves it and after any objections or appeals are resolved, the Claims Administrator appointed by the Court will make the payments that the Settlement allows. This package explains the lawsuit, the Settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them, and how to get them. The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and the case is known as In re Intershop Communications AG Securities Litigation, Master File No. C-01-20333-JW. The people who sued are called the Lead Plaintiffs, and the company and the individuals they sued, Intershop, Stephen Schambach, Wilfried Beeck and Keith Costello, are called the Defendants. Page 2 of 8 2. What Is This Lawsuit About? This case was brought as a class action alleging that the Defendants misled investors about Intershops success in the United States and the acceptance of its products in the United States. Lead Plaintiffs asserted that in truth Defendants knew that Intershops United States sales were poor. On January 2, 2001, Intershop announced it had US$4 million in United States revenues for the previous quarter, as compared to its projected revenues of US$35-US$44 million. Lead Plaintiffs allege that Class Members suffered millions of dollars in damages as a result of the misleading information provided to the market about Intershop. Defendants deny that they did anything wrong. 3. Why Is This a Class Action? In a class action, one or more people called class representatives (in this case the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs, David Wall, Klaus Boeckle, Johann Sievers, Jurgen Fischer, Cristian Alexandrescu and Uwe Geerhard), sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. Here, all these people are called a Class or Class Members. One court resolves the issues for all class members, except for those who exclude themselves from the class. Judge James Ware is in charge of this class action. 4. Why Is There a Settlement? The Court did not decide in favor of Lead Plaintiffs or Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to a settlement. That way, they avoid the cost of a trial, and eligible Class Members who make a valid claim will get compensation. The Lead Plaintiffs and their attorneys think the Settlement is best for all Class Members. WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT To see if you will get money from this Settlement, you first have to determine if you are a Class Member. 5. How Do I Know if I Am Part of the Settlement? The Class includes (a) all persons who purchased Intershop American Depository Shares between September 29, 2000 and January 2, 2001 on the NASDAQ market and (b) all persons who purchased Intershop common stock between August 2, 2000 and January 2, 2001 on the Neuer Market, except those persons and entities that are excluded, as described below. 6. What Are The Exceptions to Being Included? You are not a Class Member if you are one of the Defendants listed in question 1, a member of the immediate family of one of the Individual Defendants listed in question 1, an entity in which any Defendant has a controlling interest, a current or former director or officer of Intershop, a legal representative, heir, successor, or assign of any excluded party. If you sold Intershop American Depository shares between September 29, 2000 and January 2, 2001 or Intershop common stock between August 2, 2000 and January 2, 2001, that alone does not make you a Class Member. You are a Class Member only if you purchased Intershop American Depository Shares between September 29, 2000 and January 2, 2001 or Intershop common stock between August 2, 2000 and January 2, 2001. 7. I'm Still Not Sure if I Am Included. If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can ask for free help. You can call Rick Nelson at 619/2311058 for more information. Or you can fill out and return the claim form described in question 10, to see if you qualify. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS - WHAT YOU GET 8. What Does the Settlement Provide? Defendants have paid US$3,151,392.56 in cash to be divided among all eligible Class Members who send in valid claim forms, after payment of Court-approved attorneys fees and expenses and the costs of claims administration, including the costs of printing and mailing this Notice and the cost of publishing newspaper notice (the Net Settlement Page 3 of 8 QUESTIONS? CALL 215-979-1620 OR VISIT: WWW.RG2CLAIMS.COM Amount). In addition, Defendants have agreed to increase the Settlement Amount if: (a) on or before January 27, 2006, Intershop merges with or is acquired by a company or entity other than a parent, subsidiary or holding company or equivalent entity fully owned by Intershop that is utilized solely to effectuate an internal corporate reorganization or recapitalization, in which event Intershop will increase the Settlement Amount by 2,500,000 (Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Euros); or (b) Intershop consummates the sale of any additional portion of the currently issued but unsold Bonds, in which case it shall increase the Settlement Amount by 20% (twenty percent) of the proceeds that it derives from that portion of its sale of the Bonds, less all costs, expenses and fees incurred in selling that additional portion of the Bonds. Intershop shall not be obligated to increase the Settlement Amount in connection with its issuance and sale of any equity or debt instruments other than the Bonds. Intershop will increase the Settlement Amount within thirty (30) calendar days following the occurrence of such event or events. 9. How Much Will My Payment Be? Your share of the fund will depend on the number of valid claim forms that Class Members send in and how many Intershop American Depository Shares (ADS) or shares of Intershop common stock you purchased during the relevant period and when you bought and sold them. A claim will be calculated as follows: American Depository Shares For Intershop ADSs purchased from September 29, 2000 through December 29, 2000, and (i) sold on or before December 29, 2000, the claim per ADS shall be 10% of the difference between the purchase price per ADS and the sales price per ADS; (ii) sold on January 2, 2001, the claim per ADS shall be the lesser of the purchase price per ADS less the sales price per ADS, or US$103.125 (January 2, 2001 price decline); (iii) held at the close of trading on January 2, 2001, the claim per ADS shall be US$103.125 (January 2, 2001 price decline). (b) For Intershop ADSs purchased on January 2, 2001, the claim per ADS shall be US$0.00. Common Stock (a) 2000, and (i) sold on or before December 29, 2000, the claim per share shall be 10% of the difference between the purchase price per share and the sales price per share; (ii) sold on January 2, 2001, the claim per share shall be the lesser of the purchase price per share less the sales price per share, or 113.727 (January 2, 2001 price decline); (iii) held at the close of trading on January 2, 2001, the claim per share shall be 113.727 (January 2, 2001 price decline). (b) For common shares of Intershop purchased on January 2, 2001, the claim per common share shall be US$0.00. The payment you get will reflect your pro rata share of the Net Settlement Amount. Depending on the number and type of eligible securities that participate in the Settlement and when those shares were purchased and sold, the estimated average payment per ADS will be approximately US$5.14 before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses. The number of claimants send who in claims varies widely from case to case. If fewer than anticipated Class Members send in a claim form, you could get more money. The date of acquisition or sale is the contract or trade date as distinguished from the settlement date. For Class Members who held Intershop securities at the beginning of the Class Period or made multiple purchases or sales during the Class Period, the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method will be applied to such holdings, purchases and sales for purposes of calculating a claim. Under the FIFO method, sales of securities during the Class Period will be matched, in chronological order, first against securities held at the beginning of the Class Period. The remaining sales of securities during the Class Period will then be matched, in chronological order, against securities purchased during the Class Period. A Class Member will be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Amount only if a Class Member had a net loss, after all profits from transactions in Intershop securities during the Class Period are subtracted from all losses. For common shares of Intershop purchased from August 2, 2000 through December 29, (a) Page 4 of 8 HOW YOU GET A PAYMENT - SUBMITTING A CLAIM FORM 10. How Will I Get a Payment? To qualify for payment, you must be an eligible Class Member and you must send in a claim form. A claim form is enclosed with this Notice. Read the instructions carefully, fill out the form, include all the documents the form asks for, sign it, and mail it in the enclosed envelope postmarked no later than January 24, 2006. 11. When Will I Get My Payment? The Court will hold a hearing on December 5, 2005, to decide whether to approve the Settlement. If Judge Ware approves the Settlement, there may be appeals. It is always uncertain whether these appeals can be resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps several years. Everyone who sends in a claim form will be informed of the determination with respect to their claim. Please be patient. 12. What Am I Giving Up to Get a Payment or Stay in the Class? Unless you exclude yourself, you are staying in the Class, and that means that you cannot sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against the Defendants about the same legal issues in this case. It also means that all of the Courts orders will apply to you and legally bind you and you will release your claims in this case against the Defendants. The terms of the release are included in the claim form that is enclosed. EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT If you dont want a payment from this Settlement, and you want to keep the right to sue or continue to sue the Defendants on your own about the same legal issues in this case, then you must take steps to get out of the Class. This is called excluding yourself or is sometimes referred to as opting out of the Class. 13. How Do I Get Out of the Class? To exclude yourself from the Class, you must send a letter by mail stating that you want to be excluded from In re Intershop Communications AG Securities Litigation, Master File No. C-01-20333-JW. You must include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, and the number of Intershop American Depository Shares purchased between September 29, 2000 and January 2, 2001 and the number of shares of Intershop common stock you purchased between August 2, 2000 and January 2, 2001, the number and type of securities sold during these time periods, if any, and the dates of such purchases and sales. You must mail your exclusion request postmarked no later than November 29, 2005 to: Intershop Securities Litigation c/o RG/2 Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479 You cannot exclude yourself on the phone or by e-mail. If you ask to be excluded, you are not eligible to get any settlement payment, and you cannot object to the Settlement. You will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this lawsuit. 14. If I Do Not Exclude Myself, Can I Sue the Defendants for the Same Thing Later? No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue the Defendants for the claims resolved by this Settlement. If you have a pending lawsuit against any of the Defendants, speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. Remember, the exclusion deadline is November 29, 2005. 15. If I Exclude Myself, Can I Get Money from This Settlement? No. If you exclude yourself, do not send in a claim form. But, you may sue, continue to sue, or be part of a different lawsuit against the Defendants. Page 5 of 8 QUESTIONS? CALL 215-979-1620 OR VISIT: WWW.RG2CLAIMS.COM THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU 16. Do I Have a Lawyer in This Case? The Court asked the law firms of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP and Shalov Stone & Bonner LLP to represent you and other Class Members. These lawyers are called Co-Lead Counsel. You will not be charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 17. How Will the Lawyers Be Paid? Co-Lead Counsel will ask the Court for attorneys fees of 25% of the Settlement Amount (an average of US$1.285 per share) and for reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses up to US$475,000 (US$0.77 per share), which were advanced in connection with the Litigation. Such sums as may be approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Amount. Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses. The attorneys fees and expenses requested will be the only payment to Co-Lead Counsel for their efforts in achieving this Settlement and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis. To date, Co-Lead Counsel have not been paid for their services for conducting this Litigation on behalf of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Class nor for their substantial out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested will compensate Co-Lead Counsel for their work in achieving the Settlement Amount and is well within the range of fees awarded to class counsel under similar circumstances in other cases of this type. The Court may award less than this amount. OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT You can tell the Court that you dont agree with the Settlement or some part of it. 18. How Do I Tell the Court that I Don't Like the Settlement? If you are a Class Member, you can object to the Settlement if you dont like any part of it. You can give reasons why you think the Court should not approve it. The Court will consider your views. To object, you must send a letter saying that you object to the Settlement in In re Intershop Communications AG Securities Litigation, Master File No. C-01-20333-JW. Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, the number of Intershop American Depository Shares purchased and sold between September 29, 2000 and January 2, 2001 and the number of shares of Intershop common stock purchased and sold between August 2, 2000 and January 2, 2001, and the reasons you object to the Settlement. Any objection to the Settlement must be mailed or delivered such that it is received by each of the following no later than November 29, 2005: Court: CLERK OF THE COURT UNITED STATES OF DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION United States Courthouse 280 South 1st Street San Jose, CA 95113 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs: Joy Ann Bull LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Page 6 of 8 Counsel for Defendants: D. Anthony Rodriguez MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 19. What's the Difference Betwee...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Minnesota - CHEN - 4601
Some notes on using Matlab to help with process control assignments: First, Id like to note that I havent covered anywhere near all the material. However, Matlabs help files are invaluable, and there are lots of other neat tricks you can learn there.
Lawrence - MATH - 160
Midterm II Study Guide for Calculus IIIDefinitions: In the following, f : Rn R is a function of several variables. 1. The level sets of a function f 2. The partial derivatives of f at a point x 3. The directional derivative of a function f at a po
Stanford - OS - 040525
Status of MC skimmingAndreas Petzold 04/05/25SP5 Conversionalmost all necessary MC converted3*BBbar + continuum new conversion release only available since yesterdayfew signal modes leftSP5 Skimming Statusskimmed: 39.05M B0B0ba
Minnesota - ECON - 4401
Chapter 1An Introduction to International TradeTopics to be Covered Branches of International Economics Characteristics of Countries Characteristics of World Trade Characteristics of U.S. TradeCopyright 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All righ
Neumont - EN - 1964
Supreme Court of Canada Minister of National Revenue v. Irwin, [1964] S.C.R. 662 Date: 1964-10-06 The Minister of National Revenue Appellant; and Joseph S. Irwin Respondent.1964: May 13, 14; 1964: October 6. Present: Cartwright, Abbott, Martland, Ju
Neumont - EN - 1950
Supreme Court of Canada Yeats v. Central Mortgage & Housing Corp., [1950] S.C.R. 513 Date: 1950-06-23 George William Yeats And Pauline Vera Yeats (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Central Mortgage And Housing Corporation (Defendant) Respondent.1950: May
Neumont - EN - 1950
Supreme Court of Canada Yeats v. Central Mortgage & Housing Corp., [1950] S.C.R. 513 Date: 1950-06-23 George William Yeats And Pauline Vera Yeats (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Central Mortgage And Housing Corporation (Defendant) Respondent.1950: May
Neumont - EN - 1963
Supreme Court of Canada The Queen v. Beaman, [1963] S.C.R. 445 Date: 1963-04-01 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant; and Hartley Beaman Respondent1963: February 28, March 1; 1963: April 1. Present: Taschereau, Fauteux, Abbott, Martland and Ritchie JJ. O
Neumont - CSC - 1959
Supreme Court of Canada Prudential Trust Co. et al. v. Olson, [1960] S.C.R. 227 Date: 1959-12-21 Prudential Trust Company Limited and Canadian Williston Minerals Limited (Defendants) Appellants; and Ture Olson and Ruth Marie Olson (Plaintiffs) Respon
Stanford - MSANDE - 310
Yinyu Ye, MS&E, StanfordMS&E310 Lecture Note #021Mathematical PreliminariesYinyu Ye Department of Management Science and Engineering Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.http:/www.stanford.edu/~yyyeYinyu Ye, MS&E, StanfordMS&E3
Stanford - C - 0605151
Minnesota - NEUROSCI - 5540
Clear FormRegistration for NSC 5540, Offered August 24th to August 28th, 2009 STEP 1. Fill in your name in the electronic form directly below and save this document as anew document titled: NSC5540_your last name Name:First Middle ( initial)Las
Minnesota - NEUROSCI - 5540
NSC 5540 COURSE DESCRIPT I O NRegistration is open for NSC 5540, Biomedical Neuroscience. The course dates for 2009 are August 24th to August 28th . This course has been designed to serve any individual who has a professional interest in neuroscienc
Naval Academy - SI - 460
SI460 Computer GraphicsLast name:1. Assume these calls made in an OpenGL/GLUT program:/ How big should we make the GLUT window ? glutInitWindowSize( 256, 256 ); / What part of the GLUT window do we want to use? glViewport( 0, 0, 256, 256 ); / Wh
Naval Academy - SI - 460
OrientationRotation matrix Rotation by an angleabout a coordinate axis, represented as a 33 matrix:cos Rz ( ) = sin 0 sin cos 00 cos R ( ) = 0 0 y sin 1 0 sin 0 1 R ( ) = 0 cos 1 0 x 0 sin 0 cos sin . cos
Allan Hancock College - IMS - 2603
IMS2603 Information Management in OrganisationsLecture 20 Preservation issues for Analog & Digital Materialswww.sims.monash.edu.auRevision Last lecture looked at a variety of file formats, and indicated the difficulties that have assailed the c
Allan Hancock College - IMS - 5002
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Error><Code>InternalError</Code><Message>We encountered an internal error. Please try again.</Message><RequestId>3AB97693B5A10B12</RequestId><HostId>2Y0cnHdDhBn4wlbNax+1eadGcgZ/bm/KLkL0NO+lNr1hJVePkOzevEbN5zsDZ
Virginia Tech - CS - 2604
chromosome 1 AaBbCcDdchromosome 2 EeFfGgHhIiJjchromosome 3 OoNnMmLlKkchromosome 4 PpQqRrreverse 1 a creverse 2 H Hreverse 3 O kreverse 4 q Qprint genome
Neumont - CSC - 1949
Supreme Court of Canada Diggon-Hibben Ltd. v. The King, [1949] S.C.R. 712 Date: 1949-10-04 Diggon-Hibben, Limited Appellant; and His Majesty The King Respondent.1949: February 3, 4; 1949: October 4. Present: Rinfret C.J. and Taschereau, Rand, Estey
Neumont - CSC - 1949
Supreme Court of Canada Atlantic Sugar Refineries v. Minister of National Revenue, [1949] S.C.R. 706 Date: 1949-06-24 Atlantic Sugar Refineries Limited Appellant; and The Minister Of National Revenue Respondent.1949: June 9; 1949: June 24. Present:
Virginia Tech - CS - 3724
Midterm Review CS 3724 Fall 2007The midterm is intended to test your conceptual knowledge of what we have discussed in class during the first half of the semester, and your ability to reason about and apply those concepts. Thus, the most important
Stanford - OHI - 1037
Oaseu+a9QSMD caaneli13231Fri92O 7Re11othf3E4Randall W. Bodner Peter L. Welsh Holly J. Caldwell ROPES & GRAY LLP One International Place Boston, Massachusetts 02 1 1 0-2624 Telephone: (617) 951-7000 Facsimile : (617) 951-7050 Appli
Stanford - LAVA - 1034
Case 3:05-cv-02394-CRBDocument 155Filed 11/15/2007Page 1 of 1Attorney or Party without Attorney:For Court Use OnlyJeff S. Westerman, Esq.Milberg Weiss One California Plaza 300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3900 Los Angeles , CA 90071 FAX No: 2
Stanford - HWP - 1023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI ARELATED CASE ORDE RA Notice of Related Cases has been filed that the following cases are related within the meaning of Civil L .R . 3-12(b) :C-O1-4983-CW Bickel C-02-717-CW Pifko C-02-
Stanford - ALVR - 1037
Case 3 :07-cv-00374- JSWDocument 68Filed 09/18/2007Page 1 of 31 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, present
Stanford - NUKO - 1005
iA 0 88 (Rev. 11/94) Subpoena in a Civil CaseIssued by the UNITED STATESDISTRICTNorthern In reNUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATIONCOURTDISTRICT OF CaliforniaSUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASEV.CASENUMBER:'c97-20471 EAITO:Na
Stanford - CUTR - 1037
Case 3:07-cv-02128-VRWDocument 13Filed 06/22/2007Page 1 of 2UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIARELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judici
ECCD - LEC - 4700
Atoms, electrons and Solids Shell model of an atom negative electron orbiting a positive nucleus QM tells that to minimize total energy the electrons fill up shells. Each orbit in a shell has a specific set of Q numbers Outermost electrons know
Stanford - FIBR - 1006
Docket as of June 10, 1999 [retrieved 7/2/99]Proceedings include all events.2:99cv4822 Chesin & Co Target v. Osicom Tech Inc, et al (Mcx) (Mcx)
Stanford - BMCS - 1012
Docket as of May 20, 1999 [retrieved 6/29/99]Proceedings include all events.4:99cv996 Landry v. BMC Software Inc, et al CLOSED MEMBER
Maryland - CBMG - 688
Molecular Genetics CBMG688I 2009Homework 1, Web resources, due Tuesday, March 31HOMEWORK - Please don't try to write on this sheet! Put your answers on another sheet of paper and turn that in. I encourage you to explore the NCBI site in groups, b
Stanford - EE - 379
EE 379C Advanced Digital Communication Prof. Cio Homework #2 (26 pts) Solutions1. Geometric SNR (a) SN Rm,u = [(N (1 + SN Rn /)1/N 1] n=1 SN Rgeo = [N (SN Rn )]1/N n=1 For 1 + .9D1 channel, SN Rm,u = 9.53 = 9.8dB SN Rgeo = 7.75 = 8.89dB For 1 + .5D
Minnesota - MATH - 5705
MATH 5705 Test 3 (Take Home) Fall 2007 Give complete solutions to the following problems. You will be graded based on the clarity and completeness of your solutions; this includes dening all terminology and notation used. Each problem is worth 10 po
Stanford - MCK - 1004
(\^w z3 4 5 6 78114RICA^K U^D.1 ' ^' ^f n^4i,SRN/^9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CLASS ACTION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28[PROPOSED] ORDER Master File No. 99 -CV-20743 RMW (PVT)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFO
Stanford - TUBMPK - 1038
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 07-61333-CIV-HUCK/O'SULLIVANDENRA MAY, PHILIP MAY STEPHANIE MAY, MICHAEL NEWMAN, SCOTT JAMES, LEONARD GREEN, WENDY GREEN, BRETT FRIEDMAN, LANDON AGOADO, BRIAN NOONAN, TRENTON MARTIN
Butler - MA - 106
MA 106-Answers to Spring 2006 Final ExamPart A. 1. (i) 16 (ii) 9 2 (iii) 1 (iv) -1 (ii) 1 1 - sin t (iii) xsin x cos x ln x + sin x x2. (i) 2 sin(t - 2) cos(t - 2) (iv) 3. (i) 4. 2 x1/n = . x ln x 64 271 41 x[1 + (ln x)2 ](v) 3 sin2 x cos x
Butler - CS - 252
CS-252Laboratory Report Due: Tuesday, April 26, 2005Spring 2005(15 points)Laboratory Assignment #5Carefully Read: Guidelines for Laboratory Groups and Laboratory Reports Partners: Same partners as for Lab 4 IMPORTANT: To earn credit for each
Butler - MA - 125
Math 125 Worksheet 15 SHOW YOUR WORK ON ALL PARTS.Name:_1. The concentration C(t), in milligrams per cubic centimeter, of a particular drug in a patient's bloodstream is given byC (t ) =0.25t t + 4t + 62where t is the number of hours after
Butler - MA - 125
Math 125 Practice Test 4 SHOW WORK ON ALL PARTS!Name:_(8)1. Sketch the graph of the following. Give the exact coordinates of any maximum and minimum points and points of inflection and show how you know that they are. Also, give the exact coordin
Minnesota - ME - 4054
Table of Contentsii
Minnesota - ME - 3331
A First Course in Ther modynamics 2006, F. A. KulackiA First Course in Ther modynamics 2006, F. A. Kulacki Extensive Extensive MASS MASS VOLUME VOLUME ENERGY ENERGYA First Course in Ther modynamics 2006, F. A. Kulackiseiitreporp se
Minnesota - HORK - 0004
Donald Patrick Horkheimer1311 Washington St NE #1 Minneapolis, MN 55413 Phone: (612) 387-0797 E-mail: hork0004 at umn.edu http:/www.me.umn.edu/~hork0004ObjectiveTo work with cutting edge technology in a results driven environmentEducationBache
Minnesota - CSCI - 5105
CSCI 5105 Foundations of Modern Operating SystemsInstructor: Abhishek ChandraCSCI 5105 Spring 2006 Copyright 2005 Abhishek ChandraLast ClassFailure RecoveryCheckpointing Message logging Rebooting2CSCI 5105 Spring 2006 Copyright 2005 Abhi
Minnesota - CSCI - 8271
CSci 8271 Security and Privacy in ComputingLecture 1 IntroductionSpring 2007 Yongdae KimIntroduction Class title Security and Privacy in Computing CSCI 8271 Third offering Experimental This is different from before!Seminar style May need
Minnesota - SENG - 5131
Programming Assignment #1 Due 2/27/2009IntroductionThe programming assignments in this course will involve implementing a volunteer signup application. The primary function of the application is to allow an organization (school, non-profit, busine
Minnesota - SENG - 5131
Programming Assignment #2 Due Date: 3/27/2009Project IntroductionThe second programming assignment will have you add a web user interface to the application data and service layers you created in Assignment #1 for the volunteer signup application.
Minnesota - CSCI - 5802
Lecture 15 - Logic, Sets, and RelationsSpring 2009Topics for Today CSci 5802 Software Engineering IIModeling Introduction What is a model? Why do we model? The basicshttp:/www.umsec.umn.eduSpring 2009Logic Sets RelationsSpring 2009CS
University of South Dakota - PSYC - 707
DraftRecommended Practice - SAE J-2396Revised 12-98 (Not in SAE document format)Definition and Experimental Measures Related to the Specification of Driver Visual Behavior Using Video Based TechniquesForward: This document is intended to be as
Stanford - CS - 262
CS262: Computational GenomicsProblem Set 1: Sequence Alignment and Dynamic ProgrammingDue at the beginning of class on Tuesday, Jan 31. Collaboration is allowed in groups of at most three students, but you must submit separate writeups. Please als
University of South Dakota - CSCI - 470
CSC470: Software Engineering Fall 2003Instructor: Dr. Manuel L. Penaloza Office: McLaury 312, 394-6077 Office hours: Monday 2-3PM, Wednesday 9-11AM, and Friday 2-3PM, or by appointment. e-mail: Manuel.Penaloza@sdsmt.edu URL: http:/www.hpcnet.org/sds
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey - BINF - 5030
Introduction to Image ProcessingImage Processing in general terms, refers to manipulation and analysis of pictorial information. Pictorial information means a two dimensional/ three dimensional visual images. Any operation that acts to improve, corr
University of South Dakota - SCST - 601
Strength Through ScienceEnergy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyDon Richardson Acting DirectorOffice of Biopower and Hydropower TechnologiesApril, 2000 www.eren.doe.govStrength Through ScienceEnergy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyBioenergy
Virginia Tech - ACIS - 5034
CULTURE.'$ CONSE) EN .Ar clltinAustraliaAUdruJ.~-BlIlgium 8mil Can dll hile. ia Q ~o~t RiDt=lImul2l 27244 -24 13302'1-25]411-124S-44 -Ecuador i.nl nel F C't Genuany Gll: I nounGreec~~SI 8-9 4 l5.-164 2-44~ 7251]
Morgan - IEGR - 410
AB 0.0013 0.1741 0.9885 0.1662 0.8760 0.7797 0.3759 0.8376 0.5990 0.5171 0.1475 0.1532 0.7320 0.8347 0.4717 0.1960 0.5313 0.3141 0.2527 0.1138 0.4367 0.1899 0.9315 0.4516 0.1843 0.4945 0.9116 0.1086 0.5451 0.8267 0.6096 0.9200 0.6882 0.7473 0.1316
University of South Dakota - CSC - 324
CSC 324 The University of South Dakota Syllabus for Spring 2009 Time: TTH 9:30 am - 10:50 am, Location: AS 107Instructor's Contact InformationName: Kai Wang Office Location: Arts and Sciences Room 215 Office Hours: (A&S 215) TTH: 11:00 a.m. 14:0
University of South Dakota - CSC - 324
CSC324 Machine OrganizationLecture 1 Kai Wang Computer Science Department University of South Dakotahttp:/www.usd.edu/~Kai.Wang/csc324/csc324.htmlCourse Policy Group Study of Homework Encouraged so you can discuss problems! Ground Rules Writ
University of South Dakota - CSC - 324
Final Assignment: Presentation (10 pts)Students will be divided into 5 groups with 3 students for each group. Each group will pick up one of the following topics, and work together to give a thirty minutes presentation. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) CPU (Dece
University of South Dakota - CSC - 324
CSC324 Machine OrganizationLecture 7-4 Kai Wang Computer Science Department University of South Dakotahttp:/www.usd.edu/~Kai.Wang/csc324/csc324.htmlThe Three Cs in Memory HierarchyQuiz on next Tuesday (Nov. 14) Open BookClass cancelled on n
Minnesota - LARGELECT - 1101
Change in Equilibrium with Multiple Market ShiftersThese are notes about how changes in the market will affect equilibrium (price and quantity). I will first give some examples when only one factor changes (only one curve shifts). Then I will discus
Minnesota - DOCS - 1102
ECONOMICS 1102-29 Spring 2005 University of Minnesota Giles Ward Problems Set 4 Question 1 Introduction to Excel 30Download the data by right clicking on data for HW 4 right clicking the select "save as" enter "HW4". a) Open Excel and open the fil
BYU - IPT - 560
1: Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abil