23 Pages

s08_320_0326

Course: ENGR 320, Fall 2009
School: Wisconsin
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 1763

Document Preview

Analysis Statistical of Output from Terminating Simulations Chapter 6 Last revision December 17, 2006 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 1 of 23 What We'll Do ... Talk about Exam I Homework #7 Project #2 Presentations Review comparing two scenarios Comparing many scenarios via the Arena Process Analyzer (PAN) Searching for an optimal...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Wisconsin >> Wisconsin >> ENGR 320

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Analysis Statistical of Output from Terminating Simulations Chapter 6 Last revision December 17, 2006 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 1 of 23 What We'll Do ... Talk about Exam I Homework #7 Project #2 Presentations Review comparing two scenarios Comparing many scenarios via the Arena Process Analyzer (PAN) Searching for an optimal scenario with OptQuest Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 2 of 23 Overall Result for Exam I ISyE 320 Mid-term Histogram 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 More Slide 3 of 23 Average: 86.35 Median: 87.50 Max: 99 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Projected Letter Grades... This is ONLY AN APPROXIMATION Based on scores so far and weights on syllabus We may not disclose this information Actually this has been increased due to the exam grade adjustment! 10 8 6 4 2 0 A AB B BC C D F Slide 4 of 23 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations What's Coming... Four more homeworks Due on April 2, April 9, April 16, April 23 Individual group advices going on Extra Awards Please email Nana by the end of this week if you have any preferences Count 7.5% of the class grade Evaluated by Peer Students!!! Extra Awards May 7 Project Part II (Due 4/30) Project Presentation (April 21, 23, 28) Exam II Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 5 of 23 Compare Means via Output Analyzer (cont'd.) Output Analyzer is a separate application that operates on .dat files produced by Arena Launch separately from Windows, not from Arena To save output values (Expressions) of entries in Statistic data module (Type = Output) enter filename.dat in Output File column Did for both Total Cost and Percent Rejected Will overwrite these file names next time Either change the names here or out in the operating system before the next run .dat files are binary ... can only be read by Output Analyzer Slide 6 of 23 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Compare Means via Output Analyzer (cont'd.) Start Output Analyzer, open a new data group Basically, a list of .dat files of current interest Can save data group for later use .dgr file extension Add button to select (Open) .dat files for the data group Add data files ... "A" and "B" for the two scenarios Select "Lumped" for Replications field Title, confidence level, accept Paired-t Test, do not Scale Display since two output performance measures have different units Analyze > Compare Means menu option Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 7 of 23 Compare Means via Output Analyzer (cont'd.) Results: Confidence intervals on differences both miss 0 Conclude that there is a (statistically) significant difference on both output performance measures Slide 8 of 23 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Evaluating Many Scenarios with the Process Analyzer (PAN) With (many) more than two scenarios to compare, two problems are Simple mechanics of making many parameter changes, making many runs, keeping track of many output files Statistical methods for drawing reliable, useful conclusions Process Analyzer (PAN) addresses these PAN operates on program (.p) files produced when .doe file is run (or just checked) Start PAN from Arena (Tools > Process Analyzer) or via Windows PAN runs on its own, separate from Arena Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 9 of 23 PAN Scenarios A scenario in PAN is a combination of: A program (.p) file Set of input controls that you choose Chosen from Variables and Resource capacities think ahead You fill in specific numerical values Chosen from automatic Arena outputs or your own Variables Values initially empty ... to be filled in after run(s) Set of output responses that you choose To create a new scenario in PAN, double-click where indicated, get Scenario Properties dialog Specify Name, Tool Tip Text, .p file, controls, responses Values of controls initially as in the model, but you can change them in PAN this is the real utility of PAN Duplicate (right-click, Duplicate) scenarios, then edit for a new one Slide 10 of 23 Think of a scenario as a row Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations PAN Projects and Runs A project in PAN is a collection of scenarios Program files can be the same .p file, or .p files from different model .doe files Controls, responses can be the same or differ across scenarios in a project usually will be mostly the same Think of a project as a collection of scenario rows a table Can save as a PAN (.pan extension) file Select scenarios in project to run (maybe all) PAN runs selected models with specified controls PAN fills in output-response values in table Equivalent to setting up, running them all "by hand" but much easier, faster, less error-prone Slide 11 of 23 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Model 6-5 for PAN Experiments Same as Model 6-4 but remove Output File entries in Statistic module PAN will keep track of outputs itself, so this is faster Stick with 110 replications Name = Base Case Program File = Model 06-05.p (maybe with path) Resources > capacity of Trunk Line User Specified > New Tech 1, New Tech 2, New Tech 3, New Tech All, New Sales Total Cost, Percent Rejected Start PAN, New project, double-click for scenario Six controls all data type Integer Could also do a designed experiment with PAN, for more efficient study of controls' effects, interactions Slide 12 of 23 Responses both from User Specified Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Model 6-5 for PAN Experiments (cont'd.) Experimental (non-base-case) scenarios Suppose get you $1360 more per week for more resources Must spend all $1360 on a single type of resource; could get 13 more trunk lines @ $98 each 4 more of any one of the single-product tech-support people @ $320 each 3 more of the all-product tech-support people @ $360 each 4 more sales people @ $340 each Create six more PAN scenarios Right-click, Duplicate Scenario(s), edit fields See the saved PAN file Experiment 06-05.pan Slide 13 of 23 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Execute scenarios Model 6-5 for PAN Experiments (cont'd.) What to make of all this? Statistical meaningfulness? Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 14 of 23 Statistical Comparisons with PAN Model 6-5 scenarios were made with 110 replications each Better than one replication, but what about statistical validity of comparisons, selection of "the best"? Select Total Cost column, Insert > Chart (or right-click on column, then Insert Chart) or Chart Type: Box and Whisker Next, Total Cost; Next defaults Next, Identify Best Scenarios Smaller is Better, Error Tolerance = 0 (not the default) Show Best Scenarios; Finish Repeat for Percent Rejected Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 15 of 23 Statistical Comparisons with PAN (cont'd.) Vertical boxes: 95% confidence intervals Red scenarios statistically significantly better than blues Numerical values (including c.i. half widths) in chart right click on chart, Chart Options, Data So which scenario is "best"? Criteria disagree. Combine them somehow? More precisely, red scenarios are 95% sure to contain the best one Narrow down red set more replications, or Error Tolerance > 0 More details in text Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 16 of 23 Searching for an Optimal Scenario with OptQuest Scenarios considered via PAN are just a few of many Seek input controls minimizing Total Cost while keeping Percent Rejected 5 Explore all possibilities add resources in any combination New rules: 26 number of trunk lines 50 Total number of new employees of all five types 15 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Slide 17 of 23 Searching for an Optimal Scenario with OptQuest Formulation Formulate as an optimization problem: Objective function is a simulation-model output Minimize Total Cost Subject to 26 MR(Trunk Line) 50 0 New Sales + New Tech 1 + New Tech 2 + New Tech 3 + New Tech All 15 Percent Rejected 5 Constraint on another output Constraints on the input control (decision) variables Reasonable start best acceptable scenario so far No PAN scenarios satisfied Percent Rejected 5, so start with more-resources case earlier (29 trunk lines, 3 new employees of each of five types) Where to go from here? Explore all of feasible sixdimensional space exhaustively? No. For this problem, choice (decision) variables are discrete, so can enumerate that there are 1,356,600 feasible scenarios with 110 replications per scenario, would take two months on 2.1GHz PC Slide 18 of 23 Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 6 Stat. Output Analysis Terminating Simulations Searching for an Optimal Scenario with OptQuest Operation OptQuest searches intelligently for an optimum Like PAN, OptQuest ... runs as a separate application ... can be launched from Arena "takes over" the running of your model asks you to identify input controls, the output (just one) objective allows you to specify constraints on the input controls allows you to s...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Fundamental Simulation ConceptsChapter 2 (Continued)Simulation with Arena, 4th ed. Chapter 2 Fundamental Simulation ConceptsReview and Agenda Advantage and disadvantage of simulation A Simple Processing SystemSeveral Possible Objectives
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Review for Exam IIMay 5, 2008What We'll Do . Today Exam Review Tomorrow Nana's office hour: 1-2:30, 3:30-4:20 Mavis's office hour: 2:30-4:00 Wednesday Exam Day Review for Exam General Advices Warm-up Periods and Run Length Random N
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Lecture 22Simulation Output AnalysisLast Time Verification Validation 2Today Statistical issues Output analysis Determining replications Determining runlengths 3Statistical Analysis of Output Samples generated by running
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Lecture 5Fitting Distributions to Data (continued)AnnouncementsPlease see me after class.If you didn't receive an email from me last week. If you still have problems or questions about registering/switching between/for lecture or lab.[Intr
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Welcome to ISyE 320/321!Introduction to SimulationSystems System facility or process, actual or planned Examples abound . Fast-food restaurant Supermarket Bank operation Airport operations (passengers, security, planes, crews, baggage) Tra
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Lecture 6Simulation BasicsAnnouncementsIIE Industry Meeting w/ AccentureTODAY! 1227 EH, at 7:00 Learn about an IE's role in consulting. Pizza will be served.[Introduction]HomeworkReviewSimulationSummary2Today Submitting homework
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Lecture 15Markov Processes ContinuedAnnouncementsVenkatesh returns to teach lab sections Project 1 Team Evaluations Print from webHomework 5 on web today due Tuesday, April 1, 2003Handin this Thursday 2AnnouncementsProjec
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Further Statistical IssuesChapter 12Last revision August 26, 2006, 2003Simulation with Arena, 4th ed.Chapter 12 Further Statistical IssuesWhat We will DoToday (4/16) Review Non-homogeneous Poisson Process Compound Poisson Process Vari
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Lecture 19Queueing TheoryAnnouncementsNo class Thursday, April 10th for Engineering Expo 2Last TimeQueueing Theory Airport example BirthDeath process 3TodayQueueing Theory Continued M/M/1 examples M/M/1 equation
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320 Simulation and Probabilistic ModelingFall 2002 Time: TR 1:00am - 2:15pm Place: 376 ME Instructor: Mehmet Bozbay Email: bozbay@cae.wisc.edu Office hours: Wednesdays and Fridays 11:15-12:15 ME 275 Matthew John Vischulis Email: mjvischu@students
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320 Simulation and Probabilistic ModelingSummer 2004 Time: MTWR 1:00 PM - 2:15 PM Place: 382 ME Instructor: Mehmet Bozbay Email: mbozbay@wisc.edu Office hours: Mondays and Wednesdays 11:30-12:30 ME 275 Hillier/Lieberman, Introduction to Operation
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Assignment 04(Due Tuesday, March 4, 2003 11am, Weight: 100 points)Poisson and Exponential Problems1. The jobs to be performed on a particular machine arrive according to a Poisson input process with a mean rate of two per hour. Suppose that the m
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320 Summer 2004 Assignment #9 1. A Company needs to replace its high-use photocopying machine. Should thecompany purchase a model similar to the one it currently has or purchase a slightly more expensive one that promises to be 20% faster on jobs
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320 Fall 2002 Assignment #3 due Thursday October 03, 2002 1. One method of estimating the arrival-rate function (t) of a non stationary Poisson arrival process is as follows: Break up the time period of interest into intervals [t0, t1); [t1, t2);.
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320/321September 05, 2002a) Random Variables (RV) When a random experiment is performed, the quantities of interest that are determined by the result of the experiment are known as random variables. - Discrete RV: that can take on at most a cou
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320/321: Simulation and Probabilistic Modeling Fall 2002 (Due October 24, 2002)Group Project 1A.Identify a random phenomenon in the real world that you can model using a continuous random variable. You may choose to observe an arrival or servi
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320 Fall 2002 Assignment #7 due Tuesday November 26, 20021. Problem 17.6.21 a) b) (page 898) 2. Problem 17.6.25 (page 899) 3. Problem 17.7.5 a) b) c) d) (page 901) Extra Credit Problem: Problem 17.6.24 a) b) d) (page 899)
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320 Fall 2002 Assignment #8 due Thursday December 5, 20021. Problem 18.3.2 (page 927) 2. Problem 18.4.12 (page 929) 3. Problem 18.4.15 (page 930) 4. Problem 18.4.18 (page 930)
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320 Summer 2004 Assignment #3 1. One method of estimating the arrival-rate function (t) of a non stationary Poisson arrival process is as follows: Break up the time period of interest into intervals [t0, t1); [t1, t2);. ,not necessarily of equal l
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
IE 320/321 June 21, 2004 Stochastic Processes Models of dynamic systems that are subject to uncertainty. A stochastic process is nothing more than a sequence of random variables ordered by an index set. {Y (t ); t T } The values taken by Y(t) are
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
** ** Formatted Listing of Model: ** C:\Documents and Settings\default\Desktop\assignment04solution.mod **
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Lecture 18Queueing TheoryAnnouncementsHW 5 due today Exam Appeals deadline today Queueing Theory notes on Wendt Course Reserve 2Project 1Overall good job Please see me if I made comments you do not understand Average score ~ 93
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Lecture 16Continuous Time Markov ProcessesAnnouncementsProject 1 Team Evaluations Print from webSee me after class if you were absent and didn't get your test back on TuesdayHandin this today! 2Last TimeAnother Markov chain
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Queueing Theory ExamplesExample 1Two one-barber shops sit side by side. Each can hold a max of 4 people, and any potential customer who finds a shop full will not wait for a haircut. Barber 1 charges $11 per haircut and takes an average of 15 minu
Wisconsin - ENGR - 320
Exam #1March 6, 2002Open Book & Open Notes (100 Points Total)Note: Partial credit will be given if you indicate the correct approach. Also, you do not need to simplify complex mathematical expressions. Please put your name on the top of each p
Wisconsin - ENGR - 575
1What is Six Sigma?A business initiative developed by Motorola in the early 1980's A disciplined approach to improve process quality and improve "bottom line" results using common statistical tools A performance target of 3.4 defects per million o
Wisconsin - ENGR - 575
ISyE 575: Lab and Homework Syllabus Lab 301 - Monday 3:30 pm Lab 302 - Wednesday 9:55 am Lab 303 - Friday 11:00 am Class Website Text Book Website http:/ecow.engr.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/get/ie/575/4steudel/ http:/www.wiley.com/college/montgomeryTA: Tapan
Wisconsin - ENGR - 349
ISyE/PSY 349: Introduction to Human Factors Engineering Instructor: Professor Michael J. Smith, Rm. 2166 ECB Office hours are 1:30-3:00pm Wednesdays. email: mjsmith@engr.wisc.edu TA's: Farheen Khan and Todd Loushine, Rm. 3147 ME Bldg. Lecture meets i
Wisconsin - ENGR - 466
Driving? Maybe You Shouldn't Be Reading This By ROBIN MARANTZ HENIGPublished: July 13, 2004 Correction Appended Am I the only person who still prefers doing things one at a time? My fellow New Yorkers have raised multitasking to an art form. People
Wisconsin - ENGR - 466
IE 466 Midterm Exam Study Questions Summer 2003 1. Why is design an open-ended and ill-structured process? 2. How are the following concepts related to one another: wicked problems, bounded rationality, satisficing, sustainable development? 3. Give e
Wisconsin - ENGR - 655
IE 655-Advanced CAD/CAM MIDTERM EXAMINATION(Take-Home) Total of 100 pointsI have neither given nor received aid on this examination, nor have I concealed any violation of the Honor CodeNAME: _ID#: _Signature, Date: _DUE: Before 11:59:59 pm
Wisconsin - ENGR - 859
X-Originating-IP: [128.104.191.215]From: "Vanessa Rosas" <piolo@hotmail.com> To: caldwell@engr.wisc.eduSubject: Information Value ArticleMIME-Version: 1.0Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 20:24:49 ASTHere is the article I found that talks about some of the info
Wisconsin - ENGR - 859
Successful Technology Implementation Through the Congruence ModelReport by Staci Hermann and Chad Stashek Presented by Dan Kenron Overview Introduction Congruence ModelModel Elements Definition Bringing it all togetherTheo
Wisconsin - ENGR - 859
An Integrated RFID Adoption ModelCombining Institutional Theory with Rationalistic Models of Adoption Agenda RFID Basics RFID Adoption Issues Technology Adoption Rationales Relevant Theories and Models Integrated Model for RFID Adoptio
Wisconsin - ENGR - 859
IE 859: Technology Implementation Spring 2007Professor Ben-Tzion Karsh Thursdays 2:30-5:30 1152 Mechanical Engineering http:/courses.engr.wisc.edu/ecow/get/ie/859/karsh/Contact information: phone: 262-3002, email: bkarsh@engr.wisc.edu, office: 4155
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
1) if we use automatic machines, can we eliminate total process time while calculating the no. of machines required.2) Can we use automatic Lathe for the turn and face & turn and bore operations performed in the second cell. Even if you use auto
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Systematic Facilities PlanningAn Overview & Perspective1SYSTEMATIC FACILITIES PLANNINGsssSystematic: Organized, disciplined rational approach to a problem Facilities: Building, production & material handling equipment, land, access (suppo
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Review of Cellular ManufacturingStrategies and Concepts1STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES FOR MANUFACTURINGREDUCE Manufacturing Cost REDUCE Manufacturing Lead Time Improve QUALITY Improve SERVICE Lower PRICE Increase Market Share ($) Increased PROFITS Incre
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Outline What is assembly line? Concepts of assembly line balancing How to do assembly line balancing Examples05/13/09ISyE510 Facilities PlanningAssembly Line Assembly line is a production method in which the parts are assembled and made in
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
ISYE510 EXAM 2 NOVEMBER 20TH, 2007 Name (print) Student ID 1. Fill in the blanks (a) The 5 types of input information required for a facility planning project are , , ., , and(b) The loading time is 4 hours and the working cycle time is 12 hours
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
STARCELL Simulator GlossaryLOADING AND RUNNING STARCELL SIMWORK.DAT Thedata file containing the simulation runs conditions and the cell configuration/operator assignments. The file contains the information entered using option F3 and F4 in the MAI
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Sample Questions for IE 510 Fall 2002 1. What is the major reason that processing with flow-line workcells can reduce production lead times for component parts by 60%-75% compared to functional layout processing? 2. Cellular Manufacturing (CM) has be
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
ISyE 510 Project description LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PROJECTFALL 2008Liquid crystal displays are no longer only seen in watches, parking meters, gasoline pumps, and calculators, but now are also colorful, high-resolution, low-power consuming and f
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
IE 510 BASIC SIMULATION TERMINOLOGYPROMODEL BASICSA system is an organized group of entities such as people, equipment, methods and parts, which work together toward a specific objective. A simulation model characterizes a system by mathematicall
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Designing Office LayoutAn Overview & Perspective Bex George Thomas1Key concernsSpatial design and layout s Electrical requirements s Lighting s Ergonomicss2Spatial design and layoutEstablish primary and secondary work areas for paper work
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Waiting Line Models (Single Server) The manager of a grocery store in the retirement community of Verona is interested in providing good service to the senior citizens who shop in this store. Presently, the store has a separate check-out counter, ac
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Informal Derivation of Little's Law Graphs are useful for an intuitive proof of Little's Law, to understand the craft skill of cleaning flawed data, and for linking microscopic features of queues (for example, arrival times of individual customers) w
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Midterm Exam October 10, 2002 Same room as lectureSame time as lectureQuestions would be mostly case type questionsSome questions would be numericals and some open endedTopics **Capacity Planning*Cellular Manufacturing*Algorithms for
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Example 1: Badgers Inc produces lawn and garden eqquipment, is designing an assembly line to produce a new fertilizer spreaderUsing the following information on the production process, we have to help the plant manager answer the following questions
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Midterm Exam Take Home Exam Due on December 5, Thursday Quantitative, Essay type and Case StudiesAfter the exam is given out, there will be no help from the instructor or the TATopics **Assembly Lines*Queuing*Material Handling Systems
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
Automatic Machines-Lathe (Turn) ($200,000) No operator required during operation Instantaneous setup Opertor required for loading unloadingMilling M/C ($150,000) Fully automatic high speed fixed bed vertical/hori
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
IE 510 Facilities Planning LAB #3STARCELL Report September 24 - 28, 2001STARCELLD E F IN E W O R K S T A T IO N C O N F IG U R A T IO N S ( # o f m a c h in e ) S IM U L A T E G A E T IN F O R M A T IO N BOUT: P a r t R o u tin g W o r k s ta tio
Wisconsin - ENGR - 510
ISyE 510 DISCUSSION 1 ISyE 510 Facility Planning Lab 1 Manufacturing Cell Formation TA: Li Zeng Email: lzeng1@wisc.edu Definition of a cell: the four perspectivesFALL 2008Resource perspective: A cell is a small group of resources (people and mach
Wisconsin - ENGR - 565
IE565 Ergonomics in Service Spring 2003DATEJanuary 22 January 29 February 5 February 12 February 19 February 26 March 5 March 12 March 17-23 March 26 April 2 April 9 April 16 April 23 April 30 May 7 May 11 - 7:25pmTOPICSIntroduction, issues and
Wisconsin - CASE - 816
Keyboard Usage and CTSPlantiffs v/s Manufacturer (Key Tronic) Risk factors related to keyboard usage Standard flat keyboards > Risk of CTS Keyboard manufacturer > Failure to warn users of risks of using keyboardStatistics From the 37,804 case
Wisconsin - ENGR - 816
Carpal Tunnel SyndromeA review of factors which could be involved in the etiology and a proposed model to analyze itAgenda Statistics Carpal tunnel syndrome Hand anatomy Nerve entrapment process Symptoms, signs and electrodiagnosti
Wisconsin - ENGR - 816
Ergonomic Interventions: A review of case studies found on ErgowebJennifer Wagner April 28, 2004 IE 816Purpose: To summarize "real world" case studies to compare their results with intervention findings in peer reviewed literature (Karsh, Moro, an
Wisconsin - CASE - 816
Samantha Novosad v.s. Honda Motor Co.Product 1982 ATC 200E Honda Responsibility of Kelly Tress Kurt Tress Mike Tress Design of Honda 200E Seat Design Fixed v/s differential rear axleKelly was Unreasonable and Unsafe Neither Kelly nor S
Wisconsin - CASE - 816
Grate/Lock Chock SystemPlaintiffArgument:Product was defective and unreasonably dangerous in designJ.E. Guthrie Injured Worker Worker injured worked for the company Norfolk Southern from March 1992 to June 1999. From June 1996 to February 199
Wisconsin - ENGR - 349
Improving Job and Organizational Design - How Do We Make Work Better?IE 349 Lecture 26Job Characteristics - Why People Work Extrinsic factors that are apart from doing the activity (security) Pay Benefits Location Work environment Intrinsi
Wisconsin - ENGR - 349
Accident Causation: Who Gets Hurt And Why?IE 349 Lecture 21Why Bother With Accidental Injuries? Every year about 150,000 persons die from an acute injury, and millions are hurt. Largest source is medical errors Next largest sources is vehicle