Stereotypes Presentation
37 Pages

Stereotypes Presentation

Course Number: PSY 394, Fall 2009

College/University: University of Texas

Word Count: 1630


Document Preview

Concepts, Stereotypes, and the Totalitarian Ego The Hot-Dog Vendors: Darrell Worthy Tyler Davis Anushka Pai Cindy Stappenbeck Concepts: The building blocks of cognition A concept is: A mental representation of a category. Things that belong together. Concepts can be about objects, people, or behavior Can be accurate or inaccurate. They aren't necessarily what the world is like, they're what we think its...

Unformatted Document Excerpt
Coursehero >> Texas >> University of Texas >> PSY 394

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Stereotypes, Concepts, and the Totalitarian Ego The Hot-Dog Vendors: Darrell Worthy Tyler Davis Anushka Pai Cindy Stappenbeck Concepts: The building blocks of cognition A concept is: A mental representation of a category. Things that belong together. Concepts can be about objects, people, or behavior Can be accurate or inaccurate. They aren't necessarily what the world is like, they're what we think its like. Other than concepts about people, can you think of some concepts that you have, or individuals in American culture hold that are inaccurate? What concepts do: Help us make sense of the world Facilitate communication Classification Inference Guide attention Promote reasoning Have you ever been in a situation where you were conceptless, as in Kunda's example of being baffled by another cultures' practices? How you activate a concept Activation depends on stimulus properties, the context, and the observer Stimulus features. Salience- what stands out What goals you have What has been primed. Priming- a general term for activating a concept used to explain how a concept is activated. Comes in several varieties. More about priming If a concept is primed, it is likely that it will be used to interpret subsequent events. Example- Hearing a talk on a certain phenomenon and then seeing nothing but that phenomenon in your own research. Do you have any of your own? Priming can be subliminal Attitudes and feelings can be primed Chronic accessibility (always primed) Character traits. Example- Chronic paranoia that leads to classifying strangers' behavior as suspicious. Chronic way of classifying others. ExamplePsychiatrists who see ADHD everywhere they turn. Basic level categories Natural level to talk about objects Highest level that someone can create an image of the category as a whole Can be different depending on: Expertise Goals Very flexible Context dependant Impossible to create hierarchies More like a tangled web Not as clear in social psychology Models of representation Social psychologists are not as interested in mapping the architecture as describing its implications Associative network Models Made up of links and nodes Activation spreads to nodes via links Activation gradually decays in activated nodes Activation can only spread so far. It either just peters out or runs into some sort of barrier Our interpretation of events is determined which nodes have been activated. Explains priming phenomena Parallel constraint satisfaction models Connectionist models Involve excitatory and inhibitory links. A node can be activated as well as deactivated. Constrains spreading activation Higher-level concepts are spread out In addition to the phenomena that associative networks can explain, parallel constraint satisfaction models can explain higher level reasoning within the same models as mental representation. Can you think of any phenomena where architecture might be important for social psychologists to think about? Stereotypes Stereotypes Definition "cognitive structures that contain our knowledge, beliefs, and expectations about a social group" These stereotypes guide our expectations about group members and can color our interpretations of their behavior and traits. Stereotype Activation We may activate a group's stereotype automatically, with little awareness and intention. Study by Patricia Devine (1989) Do White Americans activate the stereotype "aggressive" for African Americans automatically? White participants exposed subliminally to words related to African American stereotype, but that weren't directly associated with "aggressive" Stereotype Activation Either presented with 80% or 20% of stereotype words out of 100 Then asked to form an impression of a person who performed a series of ambiguously hostile behaviors (ethnicity not specified) Those who received 80% of primed words rated Donald as more hostile than those with 20% of primed words. Stereotype Activation Devine's finding is disturbing because if we are unaware of these associations, we have no control over them How might this influence our behavior towards different groups of people? Is there a way we can use this information to promote positive associations? Fulfilling a Stereotype As we behave in keeping with a stereotype, we may cause the stereotyped individual to respond in kind, thereby fulfilling the stereotype Stereotype Behavior Of Stereotyped Person Our Behavior Fulfilling a Stereotype White participants exposed subliminally to photos of either African American or white men. Paired with partner to play a word-guessing game Individuals shown African American photos were more aggressive. Partners (not primed with photos) were also more aggressive The behavior of one individual influences the behavior of another. Inhibiting Stereotypes When we want to, we can inhibit a stereotype that would otherwise be activated. An African American man praised white participant's abilities These participants suppressed negative stereotypes to maintain credibility. The opposite also true (negative feedback led to stereotype activation) Do you think we can only inhibit stereotypes when it's for personal gain? Stereotypes on the Rebound Suppressing a thought may make us especially likely to entertain that thought White bear phenomenon A series of studies in Britain focused on stereotypes of skinheads Participants shown photo of skinhead and asked to write a brief description of his typical day Half told to suppress stereotypical assumptions Stereotypes on the Subsequent Rebound tasks revealed that initial suppression of stereotype led to increase in activation and use later on. Word recognition tasks Behavioral tasks Is this really suppression of a stereotype (could it be activation)? Given this finding, should people try to suppress stereotypes? Differing Interpretations The same ambiguous behavior will be interpreted differently for differently stereotyped groups. Does this necessarily reflect prejudice? How might this lead to racial profiling? Is racial profiling useful? Individuating Information People can base their impressions on individuating information when it is there, and ignore stereotypes. John the construction worker vs. John the accountant Who is more aggressive? Stereotypes may influence predictions about a person's trait-related behavior even when individuating information impacts the trait. Who is more likely to engage in working-class aggressive behavior in the future? Ambiguity vs. Unambiguity Stereotypes can determine the meaning we attach to the individuating information. A construction worker or a housewife hits someone who annoys him or her. A construction worker or a housewife decked a neighbor spanked his/her son Most social behavior is ambiguous, how much can individuating information influence impressions? Stereotype Application When our cognitive resources are strained, our impressions of individuals may be especially likely to be colored by our stereotypes. Why do we become more likely to apply our stereotypes to stereotyped individuals when our cognitive capacity is taxed? Should we have people judge crimes without knowledge of race or gender? Motivated Application and Inhibition We may also be more likely to use negative stereotypes if we are motivated to disparage the individual. However, we will only do so if we feel we have a good justification for this. Can we make strides to avoid this when people are in positions of power? The Target's Perspective Attributional Ambiguity- After receiving positive or negative feedback, stigmatized individuals may remain uncertain about their abilities and how they are perceived. So, what clues will people use to regulate behavior? Is it better for the indiv. to remain in this uncertainty or to assume that negative feedback is always because of a negative stereotype? Stereotype Threat Stereotype threat- the fear that one will be reduced to the negative stereotypes of one's group can influence performance. Remedial vs. Honorific Programs Do you think that stereotype threat has an influence in social behaviors? Friendships? Dating? Stereotype Change The Contact Hypothesis Subtyping counterstereotypic individuals Extreme vs. moderate deviations Stereotypes can evolve over time. Is there a way to prevent certain stereotype formations in the first place? Can we change a stereotype we don't want to have? Discussion Questions If you were in a negatively stereotyped group, would there be something you could do in your behavior to decrease the likelihood of being stereotyped? Is it better to socialize with/work with people of your own stereotyped group? Do we stereotype within our groups? The Totalitarian Ego How your ego uses biases in a selfish and manipulative manner Organization of Knowledge Self defined by beliefs, goals, values etc. Desire for unity, consistency, continuity Resist major attitude changes Self uses biases to preserve self-concept Three cognitive biases Egocentricity self as the focus of knowledge Beneffectance responsible for good, but not bad outcomes Cognitive conservatism resistance to cognitive change Egocentricity Past is remembered from our perspective, necessary for autobiographical memories Rogers et al. information is well remembered if considered in relation to ourselves Brenner memory decline for persons preceding or following us Better memory for things related to one's self of social group Beneffectance Take credit for success, deny blame for failure Judging one's contributions to the group Johnson (1967) subjects took credit for good scores, but blamed partner for bad scores Vicarious beneffectance fair weather sports fans Cognitive Conservatism Tendency to preserve existing knowledge structures (including stereotypes) Confirmation bias promotes information that confirms current judgments Snyder & Swann selected questions that were biased toward confirming hypothesis Scientists biased to confirm existing theory Memory search better for info consistent with current belief More Cognitive Conservatism Knew-it-all-along effect Fischhoff subjects first informed of the correct answer claimed to have known it all along Rewrite memories without registering the occurrence of change Fear of change Orwell "to change one's mind, or even one's policy, is a confession of weakness." Why are we afraid to admit that our opinions have changed? Should it be considered `weak' to change one's mind? Do people differ in cognitive conservatism like they do in political conservatism? Scientific Paradigm Does the stability of a scientific paradigm reflect the stability of the ego? Do we shift paradigms with the same reluctance that we change attitudes and let go of stereotypes? Does a stereotypical belief mirror a null hypothesis that requires significant evidence to be rejected? Is it advantageous? Do people gain by possessing these biases? Are people who don't employ biases at a disadvantage? Prolongs the life of an incorrect theory Bandura inflated efficacy expectations may lead to better performance