46 Pages

EE422_Requirements_Analysis

Course: EE 422, Fall 2009
School: Virginia Military...
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 2998

Document Preview

Analysis RA/ Requirements 1/9180 Requirements Analysis Defines: s What the system is to do. s Environment in which the system will exist. s Objectives the system must satisfy. s Desired system requirements and constraints. Does not specify the solution. Freedom of choice must remain with the design teams (IPTs). RA/ 2/9180 Input Concept MNS Customer Req'ts Req'ts Analysis System Level Technical Req'ts System...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Virginia >> Virginia Military Institute >> EE 422

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Analysis RA/ Requirements 1/9180 Requirements Analysis Defines: s What the system is to do. s Environment in which the system will exist. s Objectives the system must satisfy. s Desired system requirements and constraints. Does not specify the solution. Freedom of choice must remain with the design teams (IPTs). RA/ 2/9180 Input Concept MNS Customer Req'ts Req'ts Analysis System Level Technical Req'ts System Level Technical Req'ts Functional Analysis & Allocation (Funct Arch) SE "Big Picture" Synthesis (Design Arch) Output (Specs) Draft System Spec System Spec WBS (System Arch) Draft Program WBS Baseline Review/ (Phase) ASR (CE) System ORD#1 Customer Req'ts change? Draft System Spec Design Arch Mgt Decisions from Tech Reviews Functional Program WBS Draft Contract WBS Program WBS Contract WBS SDR (PD&RR) Draft Performance Specs Sub-System ORD#2 Customer Req'ts change? System Spec Draft Perform. Specs Mgt Decisions from Tech Reviews at CI level System Level Technical Req'ts + + System Spec Performance Specs Draft Detail Specs Allocated PDR/CDR FCA (EMD) Component ORD#3 Customer Req'ts Change? System Spec Performance Specs Draft Detail Specs Mgt Decisions System Level Technical Req'ts + + Draft Extensions Program System, WBS Performance & Detail Contract Specs WBS (TDP) Extensions Product PCA (EMD/ PF/D&OS) RA/ 3/9180 Systems Engineering Process Inputs s Customer needs/objectives/requirements Missions Measures of Effectiveness Environments Constraints (e.g. cost, schedule) Domain Technical Architecture s s s s Technology Base. Output requirements from prior application of SEP. Program decision requirements. Requirements applied through specifications & standards. RA/ 4/9180 Requirements Analysis s Develop System Functional & Performance Requirements Define: What System Must Do How Well It Must Do It Utilization Environment Design Constraints P R O C E S S I N P U T s Performance Requirements Define: Quantity - How many Quality - How Good Coverage - How Far Time Lines - When Availability - How Often Requirements Analysis Requirements Loop Functional Analysis/ Allocation System Analysis and Control (Balance) Verification Design Loop Synthesis s Design Constraints Define: Environmental Conditions or Limits Defense Against Internal or External Threats Contract, Customer or Regulatory Standards PROCESS OUTPUT s Technical Architectural Analysis Characterize baseline requirements in interface terms Identify interfaces that are critical to meeting performance and business needs RA/ 5/9180 Requirements Analysis In conducting Requirements Analysis, the performing activity: assists in refining customer objectives and requirements defines initial performance objectives and refines them into requirements identifies and defines constraints that limit solutions (e.g. missions/operations, utilization environments or adverse impacts on natural and human environments, external interfaces) and defines functional and performance requirements based on customer provided measures of performance The IPT provides the life cycle process's requirements/needs and performs these requirements analysis activities. IEEE 1220-1998 RA/ 6/9180 Types of Requirements / 1 s Customer Requirements Statement of fact and assumptions that define the expectations of the system in terms of mission objectives, environment, constraints, and MOEs. s Functional Requirements The necessary task, action or activity that must be accomplished. s Performance Requirements The extent to which a mission or function must be executed; generally measured in terms of quantity, quality, coverage, timeliness or readiness. s Design Requirements The "build-to," "code to," and "buy to" requirements for products and "how to execute" requirements for processes expressed in technical data packages & technical manuals. RA/ 7/9180 Types of Requirements / 2 s Derived Transformed from higher level requirement. Example: low fuel use requirement drives toward low weight requirement. s Allocated A proportional or divided requirement from higher level requirement. Example: 100 # system with two subsystems or 70 # and 30 # respectively. s s s Quantitative Measured by numbers. Qualitative Measured by yes or no, or on and off, etc. Cost RA/ 8/9180 Development of operational requirements s Requirements - Example / 1 s s s s s s Operational distribution or deployment: Where will the system be utilized? Mission profile or scenario: What must the system do to accomplish its objective? Performance and related parameters: What are the critical system parameters to accomplish mission? Utilization environments: What are the different environments that the various system components will be utilized in? Effectiveness requirements: Given what the system will perform, what level of effectiveness or efficiency must it operate at? Operational Life Cycle: What does the user anticipate will be the useful life for this system? Environment: What environment will the system be expected to operate in an effective manner? RA/ 9/9180 Requirements - Example / 2 Development of supportability requirements: s s s s s s s s Determine level of Openness (e.g. LRU/SRU) Levels of Maintenance determined Establishment of Repair policies Organizational responsibilities established Support criteria established Effectiveness requirements associated with support capability Defining the environment within maintenance and support activities and related transportation, handling, and storage functions Interfaces which support technology insertion User's requirements and operational environment establish a basis for supportability requirements in system design RA/ 10/9180 Balancing Business and Performance Goals s s s Emphasize balance of business goals (e.g., costs, common use, supportability) with technical goals (e.g., functionality, performance, interfaces). Consider cost-performance tradeoffs vs. achieving largest possible reductions in life-cycle costs. Re-evaluate stringency of requirements to consider using open standards for interfaces as performance requirements are balanced (weighed) against business requirements. RA/ 11/9180 s s s s s s Measurable/Verifiable Not defined by words such as excessive, sufficient, resistant, etc. Unambiguous One possible meaning. Complete Contains all mission profiles, operational and maintenance concepts, utilization environments and constraints. The "why" and "what" of the need, not how to do it. Consistent with other requirements. Proper for the level of system hierarchy. Attributes of a Well-Defined Requirement RA/ 12/9180 Requirements Analysis Role Problem (Customer) (Government Developer & Contractor) Requirements Analyses (WHY) Specifications (Contractor) (WHAT) (HOW) (Contractor) Designs RA/ 13/9180 Background General Comments s s s s s s The customer / users have expertise in their product application field. The developers (government & contractor) are not necessarily competent in the operational field of the need. Typically, the need is neither clearly nor completely expressed so as to be directly usable by developers. It is unlikely that developers will be presented with a well defined problem from which they can develop the system specification. Thus, a large amount of effort is necessary to understand the problem and to analyze the need. It is imperative that customers be part of the definition team (IPT). RA/ 14/9180 Requirements Analysis - Risk Areas s s s s It is often easier for the customer to describe a system which solves a problem rather than to describe the problem itself. The customer may believe that a document describing only characteristics of the problem to be solved makes the developer's work more complicated. Often, because of the customer's lack of developer's knowledge, general specs are imposed to channel development efforts. The various customer mission objectives, functions, MOEs and constraints will conflict. Trade studies will be needed to balance the requirements set with respect to cost, schedule, performance and risk. s Changing requirements RA/ 15/9180 Outputs Three Views s Controls Operational How system will serve its users. Key to establishing HOW WELL and UNDER WHAT CONDITION requirements. Inputs Transformed into Outputs Requirements Analysis Outputs s Functional Enablers Focuses on WHAT system must do to produce required operational behavior. Shows required inputs, outputs, states and transformation rules. s Design Focuses on how the system is constructed. Key to establishing the physical interfaces among operators and equipment, and technology requirements. RA/ 16/9180 Operational View Information Documented in an Operational Concept Document: Operational need definition. System operational analyses. Operational sequences / scenarios. Conditions / events to which system should respond. Operational constraints, including MOEs. Identified human roles. Define by job tasks and skill requirements/constraints Training requirements. Identification of operations required to ensure safety. Life cycle process concepts. Include MOEs / MOPs / existing products/services Operational interfaces with other systems. RA/ 17/9180 Functional View Information Documented in a Decision Data Base: Functional Requirements. What system products/life cycle processes must do/accomplish. Functional sequences for accomplishing system objectives. TPM criteria. Functional interface requirements. External, higher-level, or interacting systems, platforms, humans, products. Functional capabilities for planned evolutionary growth. Performance Requirements. Qualitative - how well. Quantitative - how much, capacity. Timeliness or periodicity - how often. RA/ 18/9180 Design View Information Documented in a Decision Data Base: Previously approved specifications / baselines. Interfaces with other systems, platforms, humans, products. Human systems engineering elements. Safety, training, knowledge, skills, abilities. Characteristics of information displays / operator controls. Characterization of operator & support personnel. Characterization of information displays & operator controls. System characteristics Design, technology, & inherent human limitations. Standardized end items / NDI / reusability requirements. Design constraints - project / enterprise / external Design capabilities & capacities for planned evolutionary growth RA/ 19/9180 Software Growth in Aviation Systems CUMULATIVE MILLION LOC OPERATIONAL SOFTWARE VERY HIGH SPEED INTEGRATED CIRCUITS PROCESSORS 2ND GEN FLIGHT CONTROL INTEGRATION SENSOR / WPN FLIGHT CONTROL INTEGRATION Light Helicopter 1 M LOC 1M LONG-BOW APACHE (AH-64 MSIP) 150K LOC APACHE (AH-64) 116K LOC COBRA (AH-1) 10K LOC SOA 154K LOC WIDE FOV HELMETMOUNTED DISPLAY .1M .01M AHIP (CH-58D) 50K LOC COMANCHE INTEGRATED SIGNATURE RAH66 INTEGRATED AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT COCKPIT FLY-BY-WIRE LIGHT FLIGHT CONTROLS REDUCTION 1970s 1980s 1990s RA/ 20/9180 Software Requirement Categories s s s s s s s s s Interfaces Performance Human Systems Integration Safety Failure Detection Self Test Environment Data Base Computer Resources RA/ Requirement 21/9180 Software Goals s s s s s s s s Complete - covers all areas Understandable - not open to interpretation Partitioned - useful work break down structure Maintainable - can be re-written Communicable - everyone can agree Usable - designers understand what is to be done Definitive - thoroughly answers `what' to do Abstract - shows what, not how RA/ 22/9180 Software Requirement Errors s Requirements errors are the most numerous, occurring about 2 to 1 over coding errors Requirements errors are most likely to squeak by tests, and so some 2/3 of requirements errors might go undetected without QA In a recent survey, 40% of the organizations stopped testing at the deadline whether or not they had performed all of their metrics RA/ 23/9180 s s Software Life Cycle Considerations Software development Requirements Analysis Design Code & Unit Test Integration & Test Validation & Documentation Operations & Maintenance Dev $ 5% 25% 10% 50% 10% 5% 22% 10-100 10% 50% 1.5-5.0 Errors Introduced 55% 30% Errors Found 18% 10% Relative Cost of Errors 1.0 1-1.5 B.Boehm, Software Engineering Economics RA/ 24/9180 Software Requirements `Bottom Lines' s It is most important to be clear Every requirement must be testable s RA/ 25/9180 s s s s s s s s s s What are the reasons behind the system development? What are the customer expectations? Who are the users and how do they intend to use the product? What do the users expect of the product? What are their level of expertise? What environmental characteristics does the system have to comply with? What are existing and planned interfaces? What functions will the system perform, expressed in customer language? What are the constraints - hardware, software, economic, procedural - that the system must comply with? What will be the final form of the product - model, prototype, mass production? RA/ 26/9180 Requirements Analysis Questions Controls Requirements Analysis 15 Tasks 1. Customer Expectations 2. Project and Enterprise Constraints 3. External Constraints 4. Operational Scenarios 5. Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) 6. System Boundaries 7. Interfaces 8. Utilization Environments Inputs Transformed into Outputs Requirements Analysis Outputs Enablers 9. Life-Cycle Process Concepts 10. Functional Requirements 11. Performance Requirements 12. Modes of Operation 13. Technical Performance Measures 14. Design Characteristics 15. Human Systems Integration RA/ 27/9180 Requirements Analysis Process From: - Requirements Validation - Functional Verification - Design Verification #1: Define Customer Expectations Requirements Analysis #2: Define Project & Enterprise Constraints #4: Define Operational Scenarios #6: Define System Boundaries To: Functional Analysis #7: Define Interfaces #5: Define Measures of Effectiveness #8: Define Utilization Environments #11: Define Performance Requirements #14: Define Design Characteristics #15: Define Human Systems Integration #9: Define Life-Cycle Process Concepts To: Systems Analysis From: - Systems Analysis - Control #3: Define External Constraints #10: Define Functional Requirements #13: Define Technical Performance Measures #12: Define Modes of Operation Establish Requirements Baseline Operational View Functional View To: Reqts Validation Design View Extracted from IEEE 1220-1998 RA/ 28/9180 Customer Expectations Task 1 Enterprise defines and quantifies expectations. May come from marketing, customer order, recognized market opportunity, direct communications with customer, or requirements from a higher system s What the customer wants the system to accomplish s How well each function should be accomplished s Natural and induced environments in which the product(s) of the system operates or may be used s Constraints (e.g. funding; cost, or price objectives; schedule; technology; non-developmental and reusable items; design characteristics; hours of operation per day; on-off sequences; external interfaces; etc.) RA/ 29/9180 Project & Enterprise Constraints - Task 2 Enterprise identifies and defines constraints impacting design solutions s Project constraints include: Approved specifications and baselines developed from prior applications of the Systems Engineering Process Updated technical and project plans Team assignments and structure Automated tools availability or approval for use Control mechanisms Required metrics for measuring technical progress s Enterprise constraints include: Management decisions from a preceding technical review Enterprise general specifications, standards or guidelines Policies and procedures Domain technologies Established life cycle process capabilities Physical, financial, and human resource allocations to the project RA/ 30/9180 External Constraints Task 3 Enterprise identifies and defines external constraints impacting design solutions or implementation of the Systems Engineering Process activities External constraints include: Public and international laws and regulations Technology base Domain Technical Architecture Industry, international, and other general specifications, standards, and guidelines Human-related specifications, standards, and guidelines Human availability, recruitment, and selection Competitor product capabilities RA/ 31/9180 Operational Scenarios Task 4 Enterprise identifies and defines operational scenarios which scope the anticipated uses of system product(s) For each operational scenario, the enterprise defines: Expected interactions with the environment and other systems Human tasks and task sequences Physical interconnections with interfacing systems, platforms, or products RA/ 32/9180 Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) Task 5 Enterprise defines system effectiveness measures that reflect overall customer expectations and satisfaction Key MOEs include: Performance Safety Operability Usability Reliability Maintainability Time & cost to train Workload Human performance requirements etc. RA/ 33/9180 System Boundaries Task 6 Enterprise defines: Which system elements are under design control of the enterprise and which fall outside of their control and The expected interactions among system elements under design control and external and/or higher-level and interacting systems outside the system boundary (include open systems approaches) RA/ 34/9180 Interfaces Task 7 Enterprise defines the functional and design interfaces to external and/or higher-level and interacting systems, platforms, and/or products in quantitative terms (include open systems approach) Mechanical, electrical, thermal, data, communicationprocedural, human-machine, and other interactions are included RA/ 35/9180 Utilization Environments Task 8 Enterprise defines the environments for each operational scenario. All environmental f...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Cost ContainmentCost Containment/ 1/9180Cost As an Independent Variable (CAIV)DoD 5000.2-R Section 3.3.3ssThe acquisition strategy shall address methodologies to acquire and operate affordable DoD systems by setting aggressive, achievable c
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
DEFINITIONS PLANNING - The Process to Clarify Goals & Identify Methods to Achieve Them. RISK MANAGEMENT - The Process to Identify, Analyze, Prioritize, Mitigate, & Continuously Track Risk Events & Report Status to Decision Authorities.[Resolves Po
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Systems Engineering Process OutputsSEP OUTPUTS/ 1/9180SE Process OutputP R O C E S S I N P U TRequirements Analysis Requirements Loop Functional Analysis/ Allocation Verification Design Loop SynthesisSystem Analysis and Control (Balance)Pro
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Risk Management Open Systems SolutionsRecognizing Open SystemsSpin-On Type Engine Oil FilterWIDE Market Acceptance FEDSPEC F-F-351D ISO/DIS 457214SAE J 1858MILSPEC MIL-F-3623 Proprietary P978679 MILSPEC MS 35802E LOW PRIVATE STANAG 40162
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Trade-Off StudiesTRADE STDY/ 1/9180Trade-Off Studies Part of Systems Analysis & Controls sA formal decision making methodology for IPTs. Conflict resolution & choice during: Requirements Analysis Requirements vs Constraints. Requirements vs
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Planning / Integrating Environmental, Safety, & Health (ESH) ConsiderationsES&H PLNG/ 1/6141ESH: Key Considerationss s s ssGoal: Eliminate, Reduce and Control Impacts Is Environmental Compliance met? Cost Considerations Minimize use of Hazard
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Work Breakdown StructureWBS/ 1/9180WBS - Basic Purposes / 1Organizational:s sRoadmap for concurrent management of program. Provides structure for assigning IP Teams.Business:s sStructure for budgets and cost estimates Collect and analyze
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Work Breakdown StructureTeam Instruction SheetLevel 1*COMMON ELEMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL CATEGORIES* Level 2 PECULIAR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT Level 3 Test & Measurement Equipment Test & Measurement Equip
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13101 GREENING THE GOVERNMENT THROUGH WASTE PREVENTION, RECYCLING, and FEDERAL ACQUISITION By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Solid Waste Disposal
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Functional Analysis & Allocation CASE STUDY INSTRUCTORS GUIDEFUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS / ALLOCATION NOTE FOR THE INSTRUCTOR: This Case Study is a continuation of the Requirements Analysis Case Study. Explain to the students that the Department of Defense
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
The Four Phases of Project Management1 I. Concept Exploration (where alternatives to satisfy needs are assessed)Needs identified - develop new capability, improving existing capability Exploit opportunities to reduce cost and/or exploit performance
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications & Intelligence (C3I)RULES OF THE ROAD A GUIDE FOR LEADING SUCCESSFUL INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAMSNovember 1995Foreword On
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
STATEMENT OF WORKCIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET (CRAF) AEROMEDICAL EVACUATION SHIP SET12 MAY 1988[SELECTED PARAGRAPHS EXTRACTED FOR CLASSROOM USE ONLY]SECTION C - DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS 12 MAY 1988TABLE OF CONTENTS PARA 1. 1.1 1.2 1.
Minnesota - A - 4002
%!PS-Adobe-2.0 %Creator: dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software %Title: pset4.dvi %Pages: 1 %PageOrder: Ascend %BoundingBox: 0 0 612 792 %DocumentFonts: CMBX10 CMR10 CMMI10 CMR8 CMMI8 CMSY8 CMSY10 CMEX10 %EndComments %DVIPSWebPage: (www.r
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
System Reqmnts Review (SRR) Mission Analysis completed Support strategy defined System options decisions completed Design usage defined Sys performance reqmt definitized Manpower sensitivities completedSystem Des Rvw/ Softwre Spec Rvw (SDR/SS
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Some guidance on parts and parts orders Please refrain from taking parts from labs other than the senior design lab. Inform Gary of any department parts/supplies used so he can restock. You must see Gary to order parts. Get your orders in early and b
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Senior Design Class Activities Course Outline Power Point Presentation. Course administration View first half of Pentagon Wars a movie highlighting poor project management. View second half of Pentagon Wars movie. Used the Working in Teams section of
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
STUDENT SURVEY Integrated Product/Process Development Team Selection DataPlease turn-in to your project manager during the first week of class. NAME: _ What do you consider your technical strength?:(circuits, electronics, computers, theory, practice
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Peer/Participant Assessment Form1As a member of a group on a practical exercise, you are asked to individually rate each member of your group. Please enter the group member's name and, on the scale below each question, write in the number which best
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
Grading Sheet for Senior Design, EE422 Final PresentationsTeam Team A Team 1 Grading Topics Poor 0 Deliverable Product Package ? System Design (suitability for purpose) Audio Quality of Display Presentation (quality/organization) Supporting Data Pac
Virginia Military Institute - EE - 422
EE 422 Senior Design Final Clearance Sheet TEAM A TEAM 1 PMs initial below Final Report Web Posted Final Presentation Web Posted All lab equipment returned (stuff borrowed from other labs) All parts ordered for restocking (parts borrowed from profs/l
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #5 (discussion: Feb 23rd) 1. Relaxation time scale Two-body relaxation time scale is given by eq.(3.10.17). Violent relaxation takes place on 3 dynamical time scale, which is of the same order as the orbit velocity; t
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #6 (discussion: Mar 2nd) 1. Galaxy visibility function. Using the following relations between the central galaxy surface brightness (I 0 in units of flux, or 0 in mag), limiting surface brightness of observations (I l
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #7 (discussion: Mar 9th) 1. Motion of a star in a Kuzmin (1956) disk. Gravitational potential of a thin disk is sometimes represented by a Kuzmin formula, (R, z) = R2 -GM , + (a + |z|)2where R is the radial (paralle
WVU - PS - 601
State PCInc1990 PCInc2000 PCInc2003 PCInc2004 Rank2000 Rank2004 Alabama 15,723 23,764 26,505 27,795 44 40 Alaska 22,804 29,867 33,213 34,454 15 13 Arizona 17,005 25,660 27,232 28,442 37 38 Arkansas 14,460 21,925 24,384 25,725 48 49 California 21,638
WVU - PS - 601
Sheet1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <Error><Code>NoSuchKey</Code><Message>The specified key does not exist.</Message><Key>bc18b453fb32f06894dca5Page 1
WVU - PS - 601
AGIBrack No adjusted gross income $1 under $5,000 $5,000 under $10,000 $10,000 under $15,000 $15,000 under $20,000 $20,000 under $25,000 $25,000 under $30,000 $30,000 under $40,000 $40,000 under $50,000 $50,000 under $75,000 $75,000 under $100,000 $1
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #8 (discussion: Mar 23rd) 1. Initial mass function (IMF) or stars. The Salpeter (1955) IMF of stars between 0.2 and 100 M is given by n(M )dM M -2.3 dM , where n(M )dM is the number of stars within interval dM around
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #9 (discussion: Mar 30th) 1. Spiral arms in a Kuzmin disk In problem set #7 you calculated (R), the frequency of the dierential rotation as a function of distance R from the center of the disk, as well as (R), the epi
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #10 (discussion: Apr 6th) 1. Can Type II Supernova expel most of the gas from galaxies? (a) Stars with initial mass above 8M produce supernovae Type II. Using the same Salpeter IMF we had before, calculate the mass of
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #11 (discussion: Apr 13th) 1. Accretion disks around black holes in the AGN We'll calculate the upper limit on the temperature of the inner most portion of the AGN accretion disk. Assume that the radiation coming from
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #12 (discussion: Apr 20th) 1. Gravitational deflection of light Assume that photons are particles of mass m. Using Newtonian mechanics calculate the deflection angle of a photon passing a distance b away from an obje
Minnesota - A - 4002
Ast 4002 Spring 2006 Problem Set #13 (discussion: Apr 27th) 1. Estimating proper sizes of distant galaxies. Calculate the proper (physical) size of a distant spiral galaxy in kpc, from the following observed information: The half width of the 21cm s
Minnesota - A - 4002
PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PS5 ID (10)(10)(10)(10)(15) - *7665 7 10 3 10 13 *3298 1 5 2 1 10 *4416 2 8 3 10 12 *5484 3 4 3 10 9 *8277 6 7 9 10 9 **9624 3 5 3 10 8
Minnesota - A - 4002
AST 4002 SyllabusAstrophysics II, Galactic and Extragalactic Astronomy, Spring 2007 Professor: Liliya L.R. Williams (Physics 353, 624-1084, llrw@astro.umn.edu) Class Times: M T W Th 1:25-2:15pm, Physics 157 Class Web-page: http:/www.astro.umn.edu/ll
Minnesota - A - 4002
%!PS-Adobe-2.0 %Creator: dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software %Title: syllabus.dvi %Pages: 1 %PageOrder: Ascend %BoundingBox: 0 0 612 792 %DocumentFonts: CMBX12 CMBX10 CMR10 CMTT10 CMSY10 CMTI10 %EndComments %DVIPSWebPage: (www.radicale
Rose-Hulman - CSSE - 200930
24 Network Management Network Management9-1Chapter 9 Network ManagementA note on the use of these ppt slides:We're making these slides freely available to all (faculty, students, readers). They're in PowerPoint form so you can add, modify,
Rose-Hulman - CSSE - 200930
24 - Network ManagementNetwork Management9-1Chapter 9 Network Management gA note on the use of these ppt slides:We're making these slides freely available to all ( g y (faculty, students, readers). y ) They're in PowerPoint form so you can a
Harvard - GOV - 2305
Race and Politics Response to Carmines & Stimson and Mendelberg Abby Williamson November 28, 2005 GOV 2305 Response Paper #3 More often than not, race is the "elephant in the room" in discussions of U.S. politics. In their respective works, Carmines
Harvard - GOV - 2305
Clayton Nall Gov 2305 September 26, 2005 Civic Disengagement: Who Is to Blame? The focal point of this week's three readings is Bowling Alone, Robert Putnam's whodunit tale of the decline in American civic engagement. At the center of his heavilyre
GWU - NSAEBB - 107
CSU Long Beach - CECS - 174
CECS 174 Lab Exercise (9/11/03)Objective: Practice debugging in C+ programming. Hardware and Software: Linux system on the Macintosh computers in ECS-306. Procedure: 1. Log in using your CECS login ID and password. 2. Click Go/Applications/Terminal
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
2 1.5 1 0.5 0 16.6 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 16.6 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 16.6 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 16.6 17.34 17.34 17.34061128; Scan dir: backward Segments (Straight and Level Flight Legs)17.3418.0818.821
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %Creator: MATLAB, The Mathworks, Inc. %Title: 061128_ZPD256B01.ps %CreationDate: 11/29/2006 14:02:06 %DocumentNeededFonts: Helvetica %DocumentProcessColors: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black %LanguageLevel: 2 %Pages: (atend) %BoundingBox: (ate
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
2 1.5 1 0.5 0 16.6 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 16.6 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 16.6 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 16.6 17.34 17.34 17.34061128; Scan dir: forward Segments (Straight and Level Flight Legs)17.3418.0818.8219
Brandeis - CS - 155
This folder contains blender files developed for the CS155 Computer Graphicscourse at Brandeis University in the Fall of 2007.The blender files should have licensing terms in the textarea window.
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %Creator: MATLAB, The Mathworks, Inc. %Title: 061128_ZPD256F01.ps %CreationDate: 11/29/2006 14:01:01 %DocumentNeededFonts: Helvetica %DocumentProcessColors: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black %LanguageLevel: 2 %Pages: (atend) %BoundingBox: (ate
SFASU - SPE - 516
Case Study: Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Betty Kildahl, age 84 1. At what age were you diagnosed with Age-related Macular Degeneration? Betty was medically diagnosed between the age of 80-81 yrs. She suspected the disease a few years before
SFASU - SPE - 516
Carol Clayton-Bye LA7- 516 Hand Held Magnifiers 1. near tasks 2. reading a newspaper, reading a booklet, reading a price tag 3. A low vision person can function in a store or with materials that are not available in large print. They can see what the
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
16384 12288 8192 4096 0 -4096 -8192 -12288 -16384 16.6061128; Scan dir: backward Signed ZPD Magnitude (256 point unfiltered), assuming ZPD at Max(IFG) LW band HBB ABB Zenith Earth17.3418.0818.8219.5620.316384 12288 8192 4096 0 -4096 -81
SFASU - SPE - 551
SPE 551 Scenario Material Teaching BrailleCarolann Carolann is a six year old student at Hunt Elementary School in Porter, Texas. She was diagnosed with retinoblastoma at the age of six months, and both eyes have been enucleated. She has participate
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %Creator: MATLAB, The Mathworks, Inc. %Title: 061128_ZPD256B02.ps %CreationDate: 11/29/2006 14:02:06 %DocumentNeededFonts: Helvetica %DocumentProcessColors: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black %LanguageLevel: 2 %Pages: (atend) %BoundingBox: (ate
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
16384 12288 8192 4096 0 4096 8192 12288 16384 16.6061128; Scan dir: forward Signed ZPD Magnitude (256 point unfiltered), assuming ZPD at Max(IFG) LW band HBB ABB Zenith Earth17.3418.0818.8219.5620.316384 12288 8192 4096 0 4096 8192 1228
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %Creator: MATLAB, The Mathworks, Inc. %Title: 061128_ZPD256F02.ps %CreationDate: 11/29/2006 14:01:01 %DocumentNeededFonts: Helvetica %DocumentProcessColors: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black %LanguageLevel: 2 %Pages: (atend) %BoundingBox: (ate
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
16384 12288 8192 4096 0 -4096 -8192 -12288 -16384 16.6061128; Scan dir: backward Signed ZPD Magnitude (256 point unfiltered), assuming fixed ZPD location LW band; ZPD location: 137 of 256 Point Unfiltered IFG HBB ABB Zenith Earth17.3418.0818.
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %Creator: MATLAB, The Mathworks, Inc. %Title: 061128_ZPD256B03.ps %CreationDate: 11/29/2006 14:02:06 %DocumentNeededFonts: Helvetica %DocumentProcessColors: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black %LanguageLevel: 2 %Pages: (atend) %BoundingBox: (ate
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
16384 12288 8192 4096 0 4096 8192 12288 16384 16.6061128; Scan dir: forward Signed ZPD Magnitude (256 point unfiltered), assuming fixed ZPD location LW band; ZPD location: 121 of 256 Point Unfiltered IFG HBB ABB Zenith Earth17.3418.0818.821
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %Creator: MATLAB, The Mathworks, Inc. %Title: 061128_ZPD256F03.ps %CreationDate: 11/29/2006 14:01:01 %DocumentNeededFonts: Helvetica %DocumentProcessColors: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black %LanguageLevel: 2 %Pages: (atend) %BoundingBox: (ate
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
2 1.5 1 0.5x 104061128; Scan dir: backward ZPD256 IFGs @ 16.92 UTC Altitude Time: 16.92 UTC0 16.6 16384 12288 8192 4096 0 4096 8192 12288 16384 0 16 3217.3418.08 LW Band18.8219.5620.3HBB, 17.03 UTC ABB, 16.95 UTC Zenith, 17.03 UTC
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %Creator: MATLAB, The Mathworks, Inc. %Title: 061128_ZPD256B04.ps %CreationDate: 11/29/2006 14:02:07 %DocumentNeededFonts: Helvetica %DocumentProcessColors: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black %LanguageLevel: 2 %Pages: (atend) %BoundingBox: (ate
Wisconsin - SH - 061128
2 1.5 1 0.5x 104061128; Scan dir: forward ZPD256 IFGs @ 16.92 UTC Altitude Time: 16.92 UTC0 16.6 16384 12288 8192 4096 0 -4096 -8192 -12288 -16384 0 16 3217.3418.08 LW Band18.8219.5620.3HBB, 17.03 UTC ABB, 17.03 UTC Zenith, 17.03