Register now to access 7 million high quality study materials (What's Course Hero?) Course Hero is the premier provider of high quality online educational resources. With millions of study documents, online tutors, digital flashcards and free courseware, Course Hero is helping students learn more efficiently and effectively. Whether you're interested in exploring new subjects or mastering key topics for your next exam, Course Hero has the tools you need to achieve your goals.
1 Page
ex6-76
Course: CH 3022, Fall 2009School: Minnesota
Rating:
Document Preview
Sample2 Sample1 12.3 22.7 16 20.1 15.6 17.9 12.4 14.2 21 20.5 18.6 19.5 16.6 20.6 15.8 21.4
Unformatted Document Excerpt
Coursehero >> Minnesota >> Minnesota >> CH 3022Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Sample2
Sample1 12.3 22.7
16 20.1
15.6 17.9
12.4 14.2 21
20.5
18.6 19.5
...
Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more.
Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand
their education.
Below is a small sample set of documents:
Below is a small sample set of documents:
Minnesota - CH - 3022
Mixture1 Mixture2 185 221 192 210 201 215 215 202 170 204 190 196 175 225 172 230 198 214 202 217
Minnesota - CH - 3022
WaterSample Analyst1 Analyst2 1 31.4 28.1 2 37 37.1 3 44 40.6 4 28.8 27.3 5 59.9 58.4 6 37.6 38.9
Minnesota - CH - 3022
Prep1 Prep2 18 14 20 15 9 6 14 12 38 32 26 30 15 9 10 2 25 18 7 3 13 6
Minnesota - CH - 3022
Car SUV Midsize 1 14.23 11.97 2 12.47 11.42 3 14 13.27 4 13.17 9.87 5 27.48 10.12 6 12.42 10.36 7 32.59 12.65 8 12.98 25.23
Minnesota - CH - 3022
avtem logv IT QW VS I2 Q2 V2 Lot 185 3.6 2 6 10 4 1 1 1 176 3.7 2 6 10 4 1 1 2 177 3.6 2 6 11 4 1 0 1 184 3.7 2 6 11 4 1 0 2 178 3.6 2 6 12 4 1 1 1 169 2.4 2 6 12 4 1 1 2 185 3.2 2 7 10
Minnesota - CH - 3022
Obs rpm wear 1 100 23 2 100 23.5 3 100 24.4 4 100 25.2 5 100 25.6 6 100 26.1 7 100 24.8 8 100 25.6 9 120 26.7 10 120 26.1 11 120 25.8 12 120 26.3 13 120 27.2 14 120 27.9 15 120 28.3 16 120 27.4 17 140 28 18 140 28.4 19
Minnesota - CH - 3022
y x w u17 1 1 121 1 2 126 1 3 222 1 4 227 2 1 325 2 2 328 2 3 434 2 4 429 3 1 537 3 2 538 3 3 638 3 4 6
Minnesota - CH - 3022
Dose Drug Response .2 A 2 .2 B 1.8 .2 C 1.3 .4 A 4.3 .4 B 4.1 .4 C 2 .8 A 6.5 .8 B 4.9 .8 C 2.8 1.6 A 8.9 1.6 B 5.7 1.6 C 3.4
Minnesota - CH - 3022
ppm NumAnimals nWithTumors 0 30 0 10 20 2 25 20 2 50 30 7100 30 25200 30 30
Minnesota - CH - 3022
STEER PROTEIN ANIBIO SUPPLEM TIME 1 10 1 3 88 2 10 1 5 82 3 10 1 7 81 4 10 2 3 82 5 10 2 5 83 6 10 2 7 75 7 1
Minnesota - CH - 3022
SALARY NUMEXPL MARGIN IPCOST 29.5 58 19.3999996 10.140000329.2999992 37 17.7000008 9.180000329.7999992 135 20.3999996 6.840000229.2000008 69 20.5 7.590000228.8999996 48 19.1000004 4.9631.7
Minnesota - CH - 3022
SALES TITLES FOOTAGE IBMBASE APLBASE 86.6999969 116 78 362 179 86 122 89 318 197 76.5999985 112 70 306 154 87.5999985 116 79 337 166 90.4000015 122 90 354
Minnesota - CH - 3022
Patient Age Duration Height Weight CardiacIndex WedgePres 1 67 5 172 57 1.6 40 2 45 2 170 67 2.4 25 3 59 8 172.7 102 2.2 39 4 63
George Mason - PRLS - 533
Sky Island Scenic Byway Corridor Management PlanCoronado National ForestUnited States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southwestern RegionCitizen Committee Field Trip to Sky Island Scenic Byway (August 1997).Keith Ashby Boy Scouts of A
George Mason - PRLS - 533
PRLS 533, Visitor Services Syllabus George Mason University Distance Learning ProgramUSFS Instructor Kristen Nelson kristennelson@fs.fed.us (202)205-1406 GMU Professor of Record Ellen Drogen-Rodgers, Ph.D. erodger1@gmu.edu (703)993-2056Course Text
George Mason - PRLS - 533
PRLS 533, Visitor Services Syllabus George Mason University Distance Learning ProgramUSFS Instructor Kristen Nelson kristennelson@fs.fed.us (202)205-1406 GMU Professor of Record Ellen Drogen-Rodgers, Ph.D. erodger1@gmu.edu (703)993-2056Course Text
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Logic 1000a Introduction to Logic Final Examination John Woods December 1999Part OnePlease answer BOTH questions. 1. In a line or two at most define the following a) a fallacy b) a quarrel c) entailment d) the monotonicity of validity e) legal fac
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Logic 1000a Introduction to Logic Final Examination John Woods December 1999Part OnePlease answer BOTH questions. 1.20 marksIn a line or two at most define the following 1. a fallacy 2. a debate 3. validity 4. the monotonicity of validity 5. in
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 4: Deductive Logic1. EntailmentExercise 4.12. Conjunction, Disjunction and NegationExercise 4.23. Conditionals and BiconditionalsExercise 4.34. Testing Arguments for ValidityExercise 4.35. The Truth-tables Test for ValidityExerc
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 10: Arguing in a Circle1. The Fallacy of Begging the Question or Arguing in a CircleExercise 10.12. Sextus' PuzzleExercise 10.23. De Morgan's DefenceExercise 10.3ARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 10: Arg
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 1: ErrataPage 4, line 4: Change "In logic" to "In classical logic"Page 18, line 2: Change "(2) X hunts" to "(2) X hunts for amusement"ARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 1: Errata135
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 2: ErrataPage 32, line 11: Change "not free accept" to "not free to accept"ARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 2: Errata222
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 4: ErrataPage 70, line 1: Change "it has true premisses" to "it has all true premisses"ARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 4: Errata451
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 5: ErrataPage 102: In question 1 (b) the conclusion should be labeled "(C)", not "(P2)"ARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 5: Errata523
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 6: ErrataPage 117: In the box entitled "The Primitive Basis for System P", insert a right parenthesis following the sign " " Page 126: In line 1 of the first offset proof, the first premiss should be 1. [~(B ~A) ~B] ~C Page 139: In quest
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 8: ErrataPage 176: In the second last line before the box entitled "Contraposition", change "create its converse" to "create its contraposition" Page 191: In the second last line of the first paragraph, change "attempt develop" to "attempt t
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 9: ErrataPage 210: In the third line before the box entitled "Bayes' Theorem", change "0.05" to "0.07" Page 210: In the two lines before the box entitled "Bayes' Theorem", change "are only half as likely to shop in your store as are people g
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Chapter 12: ErrataPage 281, line 15: Change "60 percent" to "70 percent"ARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 12: Errata1221
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 1.11. Recall (p. 4) that a proposition is something that is true or false: (a) Yes (f) Yes (b) Yes (g) Yes (c) Yes (h) No (d) No (i) Yes (e) Yes (j) Yes2. Recall (p. 2) that premisses give the evidence offered in support of a conclusion:
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 1.21. (a) To think, a computer would need to be able to understand the meanings of words No computer, whatever its speed or sophistication, will ever be able to understand the meanings of words Therefore, no computer will ever think (b) The
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 1.31. Recall (p. 14) that an argument is an ad baculum if a conclusion is drawn or invited to be drawn on the basis of an appeal to force: (a) Yes (f) No (b) No (g) Yes (c) Yes (h) Yes (d) Yes (i) Yes (e) No (j) Yes2. Recall (p. 14) that
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 2.21. (a) Bill doesn't believe that the means of production should be privately owned [Capitalists believe that the means of production should be privately owned] Therefore, Bill cannot be a capitalist (b) Sue is not answering her phone [If
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 2.31. (a) Ad misericordiam (c) Ad hominem (circumstantial) (e) Ad populum (popularity) (g) Ad misericordiam (i) Ad hominem (circumstantial) 2. (a) Yes (f) Yes 3. -(b) Yes (g) No (c) Yes (h) No (b) Ad hominem (circumstantial) (d) Ad miserico
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 3.11. Note: when evaluating a dialogue, consider each of the following: Are the participants equally matched? What is the goal? Is this a refutation? An instruction argument? An examination argument? Does the questioner ask clear and str
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 3.21. Recall (p. 57) that an argument is an ad ignorantiam if a conclusion is drawn or invited to be drawn on the basis of an appeal to ignorance: (a) Yes (f) Yes (b) Yes (g) Yes (c) Yes (h) Yes (d) Yes (i) Yes (e) Yes (j) Yes2. Recall (p
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 3.31. (a) I am a pacifist I am not a pacifist (c) I am a pacifist I am a loyalist (b) I am a pacifist I am not a pacifist (d) I am a pacifist I am a non-pacifist warmonger(e) I am a pacifist I am not a pacifist and I am a warmonger I am n
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 4.21. (a) False (f) True 2. p T T F F q T F T F (b) False (g) False (p q) T F F F p F F T T (c) False (h) True q F T F T (d) True (i) False (e) False (j) False(p q) F T T Tp v q F T T TPropositional forms (p q) and p v q are equiva
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 4.31. (a) True (f) False 2. p T T F F q T F T F(b) True (g) True pq T F F F p F F T T(c) False (h) True q F T F T p q F F F T(d) True (i) True(e) False (j) False pq T F F T(p q) (p q) T F F TPropositional forms (p q) (p
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 4.41. (a) H = Bill is honest (b) E = Sue is encouraged by the result P = Sue is pleased with the process (c) B = Bill went to the movies S = Sue went to the movies (d) L = Bill was late E = Bill gave an excellent speech (e) L = Bill was lat
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 5.11. Recall (p. 102) that an argument is a uniform substitution instance of a given argument form if the argument can be obtained from the argument form by uniformly substituting propositions for propositional variables: (a) No 2. (a) No 3
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 5.31. (a) No; Yes (d) No; No(b) Yes; No (e) Yes; No(c) Yes; NoARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 5: Formal and Informal Logic522
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 6.31. (a) 1. (A B) (C D) 2. (C D) 3. (A B) 4. (A B) 5. A B 6. B 7. B A 8. A B Premiss Premiss 1, 2 MT 3 Impl 4 DeM 5 Simp 6 Add 7 Com (b) 1. (E B) C 2. D A 3. D (E B) 4. A 5. D 6. E B 7. E B 8. C Premiss Premiss Premiss Pre
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 7.21. (a) Tautology (d) Tautology 2. (a) R-Contingency (d) R-Contingency 3. (a) Valid (e) Valid (i) Valid(b) Tautology (e) Contradiction (b) R-Contingency (e) R-Contradiction (b) Valid (f) Valid (j) Invalid (c) Valid(c) Contingency(c
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 7.41. (a) Valid (b) Invalid (c) Valid (d) Invalid (e) ValidARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 7: Extending Deductive Logic I737
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 7.51. (a) Contingency (d) Contingency 2. (a) Contingency (d) Contingency(b) Tautology (e) Contingency (b) Contingency (e) Contingency(c) Contradiction(c) ContingencyARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 7: E
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 8.41. s = Socrates Wx = x is wise (a) Ws (c) Ws As (e) Ws (x)(Ax Wx) (g) (x)(Ax Ax) (i) (x)(Ax Rx) (k) (x)(Ax (Wx Rx) Ax = x is lives in Athens Sx = x is a Spartan (b) As (d) (x)(Ax Wx) (f) (x)(Ax Sx) (h) (x)(Ax Bx) (j) (x)(Ax
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 9.21. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) 4/52 = 1/13 2/52 = 1/26 40/52 = 10/13 34/52 = 17/26 6/52 = 3/26 (4/52)x(3/51) = 1/221 (4/52)x(2/51) = 2/663(h) [(2/52) + (4/52)] [(2/52) (4/52)] = 19/169 (i) [(2/52) + (12/52)] [(2/52) (12/52)] = 44/1
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 9.31. (a) Secundum quid (b) Gambler's fallacy (c) Post hoc (d) Post hoc (e) Secundum quidARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the FallaciesChapter 9: Inductive Logic930
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 10.11. Recall (pp. 225, 228) that an argument begs the question whenever it illegitimately assumes or presupposes the very proposition that it is supposed to be proving. In the dependency version the conclusion is presupposed in the sense t
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 10.21. (a) p q; or ~q ~p (d) p ~q and r ~s and p v r ; or ~s (g) q s (j) q 2. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Sextus, Yes; De Morgan, Yes Sextus, Yes; De Morgan, No Sextus, Yes; De Morgan, Yes Sextus, Yes; De Morgan, No Sextus, Yes; De Morgan, Yes
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 10.31. (a) Context #1: The bank manager has just met Bill, and has no background information on him Context #2: The bank manager has known Bill as a friend for many years, and knows him to be a very honest fellow, but does not know the exte
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 11.11. (a) The judgment falls outside the expert's sphere of competence (b) Other experts likely disagree (c) The authority does not have special competence in this area, but only glamour, prestige or popularity (d) This judgment involves
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 11.31. (a) Maximally consistent sets (1) {A B, C, B C} (2) {A B, C, A} (3) {A B, B C, A} (4) {C, B C, A} Sets (1) and (2) are the most plausible (b) Maximally consistent sets (1) {A B, C, B C, C D, A} (2) {A B, C, B C, D, A} (3)
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 12.11. Recall (p. 264) that the fallacy of composition occurs whenever reasoning that applies to parts is mistakenly applied to wholes and that the fallacy of division occurs whenever reasoning that applies to wholes is mistakenly applied t
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 12.31. Assuming that the probability of Bill and Sue acting in concert is 60%, it follows that both Bill and Sue should confess since the expected utility of confessing (6.0 years in jail) is higher than that of not confessing (8.6 years in
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 13.11. No, it does not make it impossible for the prosecution to prove its case; to prove its case, the prosecution need not show that there will never be alternative theories of the case, but only that these alternative theories are not pl
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 13.21. Factors to consider that may help counsel discredit Bill's eyewitness testimony include the following: that the emotion of the moment and the terror of seeing the killing may have effected Bill's memory that the shooter's face may
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 14.11. (a) Yes, since truth tables are effective, finite and mechanical (b) No, since although a coin flip is both finite and mechanical, it is not effective (c) No, since although consulting an encyclopedia is finite, it is likely not effe
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 14.21. HINT: Develop a set of commands that are (a) finite (b) effective, and (c) mechanical and that allow the system to check arbitrary wffs for truth-functional validity using the truth-table method described in Chapter 4ARGUMENT: Cri
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 14.31. (a) 1. K K p 2. K K + p 3. K K + p p (b) 1. K K p 2. If K K then (K ) + K + p p p p 3. (K ) + K + p p p (c) 1. If p K * then (K * ) + = K p p p 2. p K * p 3. (K * ) + = K p pARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic and the
Laurentian - LOGI - 200103
Exercise 15.21. (a) Experience (c) Authority (e) Experience, reason (g) Experience, reason, authority (i) Authority (b) Reason (d) Experience (f) Authority (h) Experience, reason (j) Experience, reason, authorityARGUMENT: Critical Thinking, Logic