Wiwchar Michael Notes: Format and style Good points: No real good points as paper did not follow AMC/IEEE at and really had no format Ways to Improve: Use ACM/IEEE format, Make paper much longer and more complete. Content Good points: Good inclusion of a discussion on how the fingerprint is composed of 80% one method and 20% another method. Was interesting to see how this was done and good justification was given for it. Good to see a discussion on compressing the fingerprint and how this was useful. Good discussion on the problems and difficulties faced during the project. Ways to Improve: Although problems were discussed there to needs be more of an explanation on why they existed. Need sections and subsections (follow the structure given to by prof) Tone was too negative and discussed only the failures of the project in a negative way. Need to discuss problems faced in a more optimistic way. Need a background on Javap, etc. Need a discussion how the overall certainty percentage was calculated with ...