19 Pages

security

Course: SCS 95411, Fall 2009
School: ECCD
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 2451

Document Preview

Wolfgang Security Emmerich, 2000 12-1 Outline Security Attacks s Encryption s Higher-level Security Services s s Firewalls Authentication Access Control Non-Repudiation Security Auditing Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 Security Services in Object-Oriented Middleware 12-2 Security Attacks Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-3 1 Motivation More vital/secret data handled by distributed components. s Security:...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> California >> ECCD >> SCS 95411

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Wolfgang Security Emmerich, 2000 12-1 Outline Security Attacks s Encryption s Higher-level Security Services s s Firewalls Authentication Access Control Non-Repudiation Security Auditing Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 Security Services in Object-Oriented Middleware 12-2 Security Attacks Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-3 1 Motivation More vital/secret data handled by distributed components. s Security: protecting data stored in and transferred between distributed components from unauthorised access. s Security is a non-functional requirement that cannot be added as a component but has to be built into all components. s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-4 Why are Distrib. Systems insecure? Distributed components rely on messages sent and received from network s Public Networks are insecure! s Is client component secure? s Is client component who it claims to be? s Are users of calling components really who they claim to be? s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-5 Effects of Insecurity s Confidential Data may be stolen, e.g.: corporate plans. new product designs. medical/financial records (e.g. Access bills....). s Data may be altered, e.g.: finances made to seem better than they are. results of tests, e.g. on drugs, altered. examination results amended (up or down). Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-6 2 Need for Security Loss of confidence: above effects may reduce confidence in systems. s Claims for damages: legal developments may allow someone to sue if data on computer has not been guarded according to best practice. s Loss of privacy: data legally stored on a computer may well be private to the person concerned (e.g. medical/personnel) record. s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-7 Threats Categorisation of attacks (and goals of attacks) that may be made on system. s Four main areas: s s leakage: information leaving system. tampering: unauthorised information altering. resource stealing: illegal use of resources. vandalism: disturbing correct system operation. Used to specify what the system is proof, or secure, against. 12-8 Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 Methods of Attack Eavesdropping: Obtaining message copies without authority. s Masquerading: Using identity of another principle without authority. s Message tampering: Intercepting and altering messages. s Replaying: Storing messages and sending them later. s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-9 3 Infiltration s Launch of attack requires access to the system. Launched by legitimate users. Lauchend after obtaining passwords of known users. s Subtle ways of infiltration: Viruses Worms Trojan horses. Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-10 Encryption Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-11 Introduction Cryptography: encode message data so that it can only be understood by intended recipient. s Romans used it in military communication s Given knowledge of encryption algorithm, brute force attempt: try every possible decoding until valid message is produced. s Computers are good at this! s Modern schemes must be computationally hard to solve to remain secure. s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-12 4 Cryptographic Terminology Plain text: the message before encoding. Cipher text: the message after encoding. s Key: information needed to convert from plain text to cipher text (or vice-versa). s Function: the encryption or decryption algorithm used, in conjunction with key, to encode or decode message. s Key distribution service: trusted service which hands out keys. s s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-13 Encrpytion Encrypting data prevents unauthorised access and modification to the data (i.e. prevents eavesdropping and tampering). s If encrypted data can only be decrypted with a matching key, this can be used to prove sender's identity (i.e prevents masquerading). s Likewise, it can be used to ensure that only intended recipients can use the data. s Two main ways: secret key & public key. s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-14 Secret Keys One key is used to both encrypt and decrypt data s Encryption and decryption functions are often chosen to be the same s Security should not be compromised by making function well-known as security comes from secret keys s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-15 5 Using Secret Keys Sender and recipient exchange keys through some secure, trusted, nonnetwork based means. s Sender encodes message using function and sends, knowing that only the holder of key (the intended recipient) can use it. s Recipient decodes message and knows that only sender could have generated it. s Message can be captured but is of no use. s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-16 Using Secret Keys in Object Request Client A Caller Server B Called Stub AB 2. f(K ,M) -> {M} AB KAB 3. send 1. acquire K Stub 1. acquire K {M} KAB AB 2. receive ) M 3. f -1 (K ,{M} A B KAB -> Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-17 Public Keys Gives 'one-way' security. s Two keys generated, one used with decryption algorithm (private key) and one with encryption algorithm (public key). s Generation of private key, given public key is computationally hard. s Do not need secure key transmission mechanism for key distribution. s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-18 6 Using Public Keys Recipient generates key pair. Public key is published by trusted service. s Sender gets public key, and uses this to encode message. s Receiver decodes message. s Replies can be encoded using sender's public key from the trusted distribution service. s Message can be captured but is of no use. s s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-19 Using Public Keys in Object Request Client A Caller Server B Called Stub 1. acquire KPB 2. f(KPB ,M)-> {M}K 3. send Stub 1. generate (KPB ,KSB ) 2. publish KPB 3. receive 4. g(KSB ,{M}K ) ->M PB PB {M}K PB Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-20 Problem: How to distribute keys? Key distribution by non-networked means is impractical for distributed object systems s Key distribution is a problem for both secret and public keys s Secret keys: Obvious Public keys: How do we know the principal that gives us a public key is who we assume the principal is? s Use trusted key distribution service and secure key distribution protocol! 12-21 Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 7 Needham/Schroeder Protocol Provides a secure way for pairs of components to obtain keys to be used during communication. s Based on an authentication server: s maintains a name and a secret key for each component. can generate keys for peer-to-peer communications. s Secret keys are used for communication with server. 12-22 Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 Needham/Schroeder Protocol s For Secret Keys: Key Distribution Server AS 2: {NC,S,KCS,{KCS,C}KS}KC 3: {KCS,C}KS Client C 4: {NS}KCS 5: {NS-1}KCS Server S 1: C, S, NC Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-23 Needham/Schroeder Protocol s For Public Keys: 1: C, S Key Distribution Server AS 5: {KPC, A}KSAS 4: S,C 2: {KPS, S}KSAS 3: {NC,C}KPS Client C 6: {NC,NS}KPC 7: {NS}KPS Server S Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-24 8 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) Secure Transport between Browser and Web-Server s Also used for object-oriented middleware s Based on RSA public key technology s Client generates secret session key s Client uses public key of server to encrypt session key and transmit it to the server s Session key is used to encrypt any communication between client and server s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-25 Higher-level Security Services Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-26 What's needed for secure requests? Separating public and private networks (firewalls) s Establishing security association between client & server (authentication) s Deciding whether principal may perform this operation (access control) s Making the principal accountable for having requested the operation (auditing) s Protecting request and response from eavesdropping in transit (encryption) s Proving that you have delivered a particular service (non-repudiation) s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-27 9 Firewalls Private Network Firewall Public Network Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-28 Firewalls Firewalls are gateways that tightly control message traffic between private and public networks s Firewalls between distributed objects have to understand the encoding of object requests s Firewalls have to be integrated with the encryption mechanisms used to secure transport s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-29 What is Authentication? Authentication: Proving you are who you claim to be. s In centralised systems: Password check at session start. s In distributed systems: s Use of authentication server or Based on ability to encrypt/decrypt a message (c.f. Needham/Schroeder Protocol) Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-30 10 Principals Humans or system components that are registered in and authentic a to distributed system. s Principal has an identity used for: s Making principal accountable for its actions Obtaining access to a protected component Identifying the originator of a message Identifying who to charge for service provision. 12-31 Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 Credentials s Information the system has about principals: Credentials authenticated attributes unauthenticated (public) attributes identity attributes privilege attributes Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-32 Establishing Security Association s Involves Establishing trust in one another's identities Client authenticating server's identity Server authenticating client's identity Making client credentials available to server Establishing the security context used for protecting requests and replies in transit (e.g. distributing private keys) Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-33 11 Authentication Server s Challenge-Response Protocol and its use for authentication :Client authenticate() challenge() response() credentials() :Authentication Server Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-34 Access Control Basic question addressed by access control: Can this operation be executed for the principal, who requested it? s Relies on authentication: It is assumed that principal and its credentials have been validated s Two forms: s Object invocation access policies Application object access policies Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-35 Object Invocation Access Policies s Access decision functions enforce object invocation access policies: client-side access decision functions and/or server-side access decision functions s Decisions are based on operation to be performed privilege attributes of principal control on principal's privilege attributes (e.g. time valid) server control attributes Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-36 12 Application Access Policies In previous case access control is transparent to client and server objects s In this case client and/or server objects implement access control themselves s Application access policies s can take into account the particular data being accessed can take into account the semantics of request parameters Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-37 Access Control Privilege Attributes s Privilege attributes of principals for access control include: principal's identity roles (related to the principal's job functions) groups (related to organizational structure in which principal is embedded) security clearance capabilities of server objects that the principal is allowed to use others... Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-38 Server Control Attributes s Access Control Lists (ACLs) identifying permitted users by name or privilege attributes Information for label-based schemes s Control attributes are generally shared by groups of operations of an object or even by groups of objects s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-39 13 Non-Repudiation Makes principals accountable for their actions s Irrefutable evidence about events/actions is generated s Used to settle disputes about the occurrence or non-occurrence of an event s Example: Electronic commerce s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-40 Non-Repudiation Service :Client :Adjudicator :Server Non-Repudiation Service Evidence Generation and Verification Evidence Storage and Verification Delivery Authority Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-41 Components of Evidence Depend on non-repudiation policy. s Examples include: s Type of action or event A timestamp obtained from a trusted authority Parameters related to action or event Proof of origin of parameters Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-42 14 Common Types of Evidence s Proof of creation of a message Protects against originator's false denial of having created a message s Proof of receipt of a message Protects against receiver's false denial of having received a message Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-43 Security Auditing Assists in detection of attempted or actual security breaches s By recording details of security relevant events s Writing event details into a log file Generating a security alert Taking other actions s Two levels of auditing system-level application-level Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-44 Security Auditing Policies Potentially a large number of events could be recorded s Security auditing policies restrict the set of events to those that are critical for the particular environment s System auditing policies log all security relevant events, even from security unaware applications s Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-45 15 Security Services in ObjectOriented Middleware Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-46 Security Services CORBA Security service provides most extensive support and implements the principles discussed above s Two levels s Level-1 Security is mandatory for compliance and needs to implement authentication, access control and auditing Level-2 Security is optional and concerns non-repudiation Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 12-47 CORBA Authentication s Credentials are lists of privilege attributes given to a principal: Wolfgang Emmerich, 2000 interface Credentials { Credentials copy(); void destroy(); ... boolean set_privileges( in boolean force_commit, in AttributeList requested_privileges, out AttributeList...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

ECCD - SCS - 95411
Distributed Object Transactions Wolfgang Emmerich, 200011-1OutlineTransaction Principles s Concurrency Control s Two-Phase Commit Protocol s Services for Distributed Object Transactionss CORBA Transaction Service Microsoft Transaction Serv
Virginia Tech - CS - 3204
Overview Project 2: User ProgramsAbdelmounaam RezguiAcknowledgment: The content of some slides is partly taken from Josh Wiseman's presentationObjective: Enable user programs to run and interact with the OS via system calls Directories:userprog/
Virginia Tech - CS - 3204
Slide No. 2The presentation includes following topics: Memory and Access: Under i386 arch., how does Pintos handle the virtual memory, physical memory management and their mappings? Current Status in Pintos: After a successful implementation of Pint
Virginia Tech - CS - 3204
CS 3204 Operating SystemsProject 4 Help Session Godmar BackProject 4 Final Task: Build a simple file system! "Easier than Project 3" But: more lines of code for complete solution Subtasks: Extensible Files Subdirectories Buffer Cache Synch
Stanford - CS - 106
CS106X Spring 2009Handout 38SCS106X Practice Final SolutionJune 2, 2009Solution 1: Recursive Backtracking and the 702 Puzzlebool Solve(Grid<bool>& board) / assume board is initially cleared { return Solve(board, 1); } bool Solve(Grid<int>& b
Pittsburgh - AEI - 10615
Pittsburgh - AEI - 1778
RICA:ehRIBBEAN- PACIFIC ~ EUROPEAN COMMUNITYPublished every two monthsNo 89 JANUARY- FEBRUARY 1985"w: ~CourierACP. EECCONVENTIONLO MEIIITHE EUROPEANCOMMUNITYBElGIUM DENMARK FRANCE GERMANYANTIGUA&BARBUDA BAHAMAS BARBADOSBELIZE BENI
Pittsburgh - AEI - 10996
Imperfect exchange rate pass-through : the role of distribution services and variable demand elasticityWorking Paper Researchby Philippe JeanfilsAugust 2008No 135Working Paper Research seriesImperfect exchange rate pass-through: the role o
University of Leicester - JAN - 92009
NASA Advisory Council Subcommittee RecommendationSubcommittee Name: Planetary Science Chair: Sean Solomon Date of Public Deliberation: 9 January 2009 Date of Transmission to Science Committee: 21 January 2009 Short title of the proposed Recommendati
University of Leicester - JAN - 92009
NASA Advisory Council Subcommittee RecommendationSubcommittee Name: Planetary Science Chair: Sean Solomon Date of Public Deliberation: 9 January 2009 Date of Transmission to Science Committee: 21 January 2009 Short title of the proposed Recommendati
University of Leicester - JAN - 92009
NASA Advisory Council Subcommittee RecommendationSubcommittee Name: Planetary Science Chair: Sean Solomon Date of Public Deliberation: 9 January 2009 Date of Transmission to Science Committee: 21 January 2009 Short title of the proposed Recommendati
University of Leicester - JAN - 92009
NASA Advisory Council Subcommittee RecommendationSubcommittee Name: Planetary Science Chair: Sean Solomon Date of Public Deliberation: 9 January 2009 Date of Transmission to Science Committee: 21 January 2009 Short title of the proposed Recommendati
University of Leicester - JAN - 92009
NASA Advisory Council Subcommittee RecommendationSubcommittee Name: Planetary Science Chair: Sean Solomon Date of Public Deliberation: 9 January 2009 Date of Transmission to Science Committee: 21 January 2009 Short title of the proposed Recommendati
Pittsburgh - PY - 3766
Haag' Theorem and Its Implications for the s Foundations of Quantum Field TheoryJohn Earman and Doreen Fraser Dept. of History and Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Abstract: Although the philosophical literature on
Virginia Tech - HORT - 4744
Some Important Cultivars Used in Grape Production European (Vitis vinifera) Cabernet Sauvignon - small, black berries that mature late in the season; makes an excellent dry wine; one of the top cultivars commercially grown in California and Virginia.
Pittsburgh - AEI - 8715
3-45-6
Stanford - MATH - 175
Mathematics Department Stanford University Math 175 Homework 9 This hw will not be graded; solutions will be posted Tue June 2 1. Prove the claim made in lecture that if f 2 L2 .OEa; b/ then there is a sequence {'k }kD1;2;: of step Rb functions on OE
University of Leicester - PSS - 200810
Small Bodies Assessment Group Planetary Sciences Subcommittee Meeting 2 October 2008 Faith VilasRepresentation at Meetings: Asteroid, Comets, Meteors 2008 Town Hall Meeting 10 July 8:00 PM 40th AAS Division for Planetary Sciences Town Hall Meeting
University of Leicester - PSS - 200806
Small Bodies Assessment Group Planetary Sciences Subcommittee Meeting 23 June 2008 Faith VilasMeetings: Asteroid, Comets, Meteors 2008 Town Hall Meeting 10 July 8:00 PM SBAG Inaugural Meeting 23, 24 September Hilton Washington Hotel 40th AAS Divisi
University of Leicester - PSS - 200803
SMALL BODIES ASSESSMENT GROUP (SBAG) Faith Vilas Planetary Sciences Subcommittee Meeting March 3 - 4, 2008Steering Committee: F. Vilas (Chair) A. Cochran T. McCoy K. Noll M.Sykes H. Weaver W. Bottke P. Weissman MMT Observatory McDonald Observatory
University of Leicester - JAN - 92009
Mars Science LaboratoryProject Status for PSSMcCuistion Meyer CookJanuary 9, 2009MSL AgendaPSS-Mars Science Laboratory Mission overview McCuistion The MSL Science Story Technical Status Replan Status Budget Status and Approval Path Opt
Stanford - C - 0805263
All Fundamental Fermion Masses are "Vile"T. Goldman, B.H.J. McKellar and G.J. Stephenson, Jr.ABSTRACT Dirac bispinors may be decomposed into two Weyl spinors with equal modulus Weyl masses. The natural basis for this decomposition is orthogonal to
FAU - CDA - 4102
Homework 4 DUE On 04/16/09=Using the Mic-1 simulator, provide a program that uses 'shifting'to multiply or divide by powers of 2. Please refer to page 378of the textbook for more details. Your program should ask for a number to input.Pro
FAU - CHAPTER - 4102
FAU - CHAPTER - 4102
Hex 0x10 0x59 0xA7 0x60 0x7E 0x99 0x9B 0x9F 0x84 0x15 0xB6 0x80 0xAC 0x36 0x64 0x13 0x00 0x57 0x5F 0xC4Mnemonic BIPUSH byte DUP GOTO offset IADD IAND IFEQ offset IFLT offset IF ICMPEQ offset IINC varnum const ILOAD varnum INVOKEVIRTUAL disp IOR IRE
FAU - CHAPTER - 4102
Parallel Computer ArchitecturesTanenbaum, Structured Computer Organization, Fifth Edition, (c) 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 0-13-148521-0Parallel Computer Architectures(a) On-chip parallelism. (b) A coprocessor. (c) A multi
FAU - CHAPTER - 4102
WEB SEARCH FOR A PLANET: THE GOOGLE CLUSTER ARCHITECTUREAMENABLE TO EXTENSIVE PARALLELIZATION, GOOGLES WEB SEARCHAPPLICATION LETS DIFFERENT QUERIES RUN ON DIFFERENT PROCESSORS AND, BY PARTITIONING THE OVERALL INDEX, ALSO LETS A SINGLE QUERY USE MUL
FAU - CHAPTER - 4102
HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTINGUsing OpenFabrics InfiniBand for HPC ClustersThe OpenFabrics Alliance was formed to resolve issues with hardware and software interoperability and to deliver open source software for Remote Direct Memory Access fabric tec
Pittsburgh - AEI - 7552
ISSN 1012-2184AUSTRALIAEuropean Commission Directorate General for DevelopmentRue de la Loi, 200 B-l049 BrusselsDistribution: Information Unittel. (+32-2) 299 30 62 fax (+32-2) 299 30 02/25 25 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of t
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
Mars Exploration Program StatusPlanetary Science Subcommittee NASA Advisory CouncilMichael Meyer Mars Exploration Program Lead Scientist 23 June 2008AGENDA Program Status and Recent Accomplishments Science Highlights MEP Next Decade2Mars
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
LEAG Activity ReportPlanetary Sciences SubcommitteeJune 23, 2008Lunar Exploration Roadmap. LEAG Meeting. Lunar Science Conference CxAT-Lunar Interface Commercial Development SummitLunar Exploration RoadmapThe Charge from the NACThe Science C
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
MEPAG Report to the Planetary Science SubcommitteeJohn Mustard, MEPAG ChairMRO HiRISE / U. Arizona / JPL / NASA06/03/20081Very Recent Science Highlights Clay minerals in deltaic deposits and implications for sequestration and preservation o
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
Fran Bagenal University of Colorado ChairOuter Planets Assessment GroupSpring 2008 MeetingBoulder, Colorado March 31-April1 Planetary Science Division - Jim Green (NASA HQ) Radioactive Power Systems - Len Dudzinski (NASA HQ) NOSSE r
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
MSR Planning Presentationto the Planetary Science Subcommittee23 June 2008Lisa May MSR Program Executive Lisa.May@nasa.govMars Sample Return Planning Overview: NASA Planning Community Input International PlanningSpecial Topics: SRF Pla
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
2008 Annual Grading JamboreeGovernment Performance and Results Act Assessment of Science Goals for Planetary ScienceGPRA Science Assessment Process SMD staff prepare proposed science progress narrative, organized by Annual Performance Goals. Div
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
DiscoveryNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNew FrontiersImproving the Life-Cycle Cost Management of Planetary Missions(Finding Summary)Planetary Science DivisionDiscovery/New Frontiers/Lunar Science Program Office June 20080Di
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200806
SMD Cost/Schedule Performance StudySummary OverviewBrad Perry, Cindy BrunoNASA Science Support OfficeMark Jacobs, Monica Doyle, Shawn Hayes Mike Stancati, Wayne Richie, John RogersScience Applications International Corporation (SAIC)March 20
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
Planetary Science Division UpdatePresentation at the Planetary Science SubcommitteeJames L. Green Director, Planetary Science Division October 2, 20081Outline Division Overview - Jim Administration Upcoming Opportunities & Selections Missi
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
Planetary Sciences SubcommitteeOctober 2-3, 2008Doug McCuistion Director, Mars Exploration Program2Memorable Scenes from PhoenixSpacecraft thruster expose water-ice in permafrost Top: Robotic Arm delivers soi l+ice dug from trench to the The
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
MSL Cost Overrun Status and PlansPresentation at the Planetary Science SubcommitteeJames L. Green Director, Planetary Science Division October 2, 20081MSL Overrun Impact on Planetary FY 2009 BudgetQuickTimeTM and a MSL additional costs in FY09
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
VEXAG StatusEllen Stofan PSS Meeting Oct. 1, 2008VEXAG Upcoming EventsNext VEXAG Meeting, LPI, Feb. 25, 2009 Venus-Earth-Mars Comparative Climatology Union Session, Fall AGU (Dec. `08) Venus Flagship STDT study nearing completion Venus Geochemis
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
LEAG Activity ReportPlanetary Sciences SubcommitteeOctober 2, 2008Lunar Exploration Roadmap. LEAG Meeting. Lunar Science ConferenceLEAG Meeting 2008October 28-31, 2008 (won't coincide with LRO launch!). Joint with ILEWG and SRR. Radisson Reso
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
MEPAG Report to the Planetary Science SubcommitteeJack Mustard, MEPAG ChairMRO HiRISE / U. Arizona / JPL / NASA10/2/20081Developments in Mars Exploration Since June PSS Meeting Phoenix mission has achieved many significant science goals
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
Presentation to the PSS NAC Oct. 2-3, 2008 Chip Shearer University of New MexicoOctober 7, 20081CAPTEM's FunctionPlays an important role in the allocation of NASA collected planetary materials. Sponsors of sample science based initiatives & wo
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
Exploring the Moon in the 21st Century: Themes, Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities, 2008(The Lunar Exploration Roadmap)A Community Effort Coordinated by the Lunar Exploration Analysis GroupReport to the PSS, October 2, 2008The
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
R&A Practices in SMDPresentation to Planetary Science Subcommittee Dr. Paul Hertz Chief Scientist, Science Mission Directorate, NASA October 3, 2008R&A Life Cycle Planning Program and mission needs, community input, budget planning Solicitatio
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
FY08 Venus Flagship Study Interim Briefing to NASA HQ by the Venus STDT & Study Team, May 9, 2008Venus Flagship Study: Exploring Earth's Nearest Planetary NeighborPresentation to the Planetary Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council Mark
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationIn-Space Propulsion Technology (ISPT) Project OverviewPlanetary Science Subcommittee Meeting, October 3, 2008David AndersonISPT Project Manager (Acting)www.nasa.gov1National Aeronautics and Space
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
Aerocapture Technology Developments by the In-Space Propulsion ProgramMichelle M. MunkIn-Space Propulsion Aerocapture Managerwww.nasa.govPlanetary Science Subcommittee Meeting | October 3, 20081Outline Introduction to Aerocapture Applicati
University of Leicester - AGENDA - 200810
Outer Planets Flagship Mission StudiesCurt Niebur OPF Program Scientist NASA Headquarters Planetary Science Subcommittee October 3, 2008OverviewNASA is currently finishing a nine month long outer planet flagship mission study which is being cond
Pittsburgh - AEI - 6497
Washington - CHEM - 460
Chemistry 460 Professor Tomikazu SasakiFall, 2004 MWF 12:30 - 1:20 P.M., BAG 261Policies, Procedure and Exam Schedule Professor Tomikazu Sasaki (Room 204H) Office Hours: Monday, Wednesday and Friday: 11:30am - 12:30pm (Room 204H) Text: "Organic S
Washington - CHEM - 142
Pittsburgh - MATH - 0230
PI Y y` H F 6 1 6 4 @ " 76 d 7 4 1 t t $ 6 $ " 1@ d 1 C280!A98!%B!#$2!%VC5%2%#!%B6 0' Y PI H ` X H E H W U Q F r D Y PI H ` Y H F E H W Q G@ D PI H Q Y E F D E Q D H E & D PI H Q F E H E & D t D PI H F E H Q G D I &
Pittsburgh - AEI - 4814
Pittsburgh - AEI - 3324
Pittsburgh - AEI - 1780
The second enlargement of the European CommunityEUROPEAN DOCUMENTATIONPeriodical5/79The second enlargement of the European CommunityManuscript completed in July 1979This publication is also availableISBN 92- 825- 1383ISBN 92- 825- 1384IS
Pittsburgh - AEI - 3712
Stanford - GROUP - 0102
Anthony Berryhill5C ORRECTING THE B LACK -G AY D ISTINCTION IN C URRENT I NTERPRETATIONS OF THE E QUAL P ROTECTION C LAUSEAnthony Berryhillfince the U.S. Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, the African-American experie
Washington University in St. Louis - E - 435
Econ 435 Spring 2009 Problem Set #4 Suggested Solutions1.A decline in investment demand decreases the level of aggregate demand for any level of the exchange rate. Thus, a decline in investment demand causes the DD curve to shift to the left. A t