25 Pages

chapter3Part2_091007

Course: PH 1725, Fall 2009
School: Mt. Marty
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 2455

Document Preview

3 Chapter Part 2 Probability September 11, 2008 Start reading Chapter 4 The goals and skill set apply to Chapter 3 Parts 1 and 2 combined. Goal: All of inferential statistics rests firmly on probability. So these lectures on probability are designed to give you a good working knowledge of the basics of probability. Skill Set: You should be able to solve basic probability problems using the addition and...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> South Dakota >> Mt. Marty >> PH 1725

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
3 Chapter Part 2 Probability September 11, 2008 Start reading Chapter 4 The goals and skill set apply to Chapter 3 Parts 1 and 2 combined. Goal: All of inferential statistics rests firmly on probability. So these lectures on probability are designed to give you a good working knowledge of the basics of probability. Skill Set: You should be able to solve basic probability problems using the addition and multiplication principles and Bayes' Rule. You should know how to calculate and interpret sensitivity, specificity, predictive value of a positive test, and predictive value of a negative test. You should know how to obtain and interpret an ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve. Outline Part 1 Brief overview of sampling Definition of probability Multiplication Principle Addition Principle Problems in interpreting large batteries of tests Conditional probability True positive False positive False negative False positive Sensitivity Specificity Probability of a positive test Probability of a negative test Part 2 Bayes' Rule MI versus non-MI example CT image example ROC curves Stata: roctab Page 1 Page 3 Page 5 Page 7 Bayes' Rule allows us to define the positive and negative predictive values in terms of sensitivity and specificity of the test and prevalence of the disease. That is, it allows us to consider the patient (has the disease or doesn't have the disease) in terms of the results of the test. Bayes' Rule: P(PV + ) = P(D+|T+ ) = P(D + and T+ ) P( T+ ) Step 1 Definition of PV+ and conditional probability = P(D + and T+ ) P(T + and D+ ) + P(T + and D- ) Step 2 See picture below P ( D + ) P( T+| D + ) = [P(D+ ) P(T+|D+ )] + [P(D- ) P(T+|D- )] P(PV+) = P(D+|T+) = Step 3 See explanation on next page prevalence sensitivity [prevalence sensitivity] + [(1 - prevalence) (1 - specificity)] Step 4 To get from Step 3 to Step 4 we use the definitions of prevalence, sensitivity and specificity Proof by picture that P(T+) = P(T+ and D+) + P(T+ and D-) You can also see in the picture that T- is everything outside the circle so that Pr(D-) = Pr(D- and T+) + Pr(D- and T-) Page -1- Step 3 uses the fact that P(T+|D+) = P(T+ and D+)/P(D+) by definition. So multiplying both sides of the equation by P(D+) gives you P(D+)P(T+|D+) = P(T+ and D+) so P(T+ and D+) = P(D+)P(T+|D+) P(D-)P(T+|D-) = P(T+ and D-) follows from a similar argument. Step 4: P(T+ | D-) = 1 - specificity because P(T+ | D-) + specificity = P(T + | D- ) + P(T - |D- ) = P(T + andD- ) P(T - andD- ) P(D- ) + = =1 P(D- ) P(D- ) P(D- ) (picture above where T- is everything outside the circle) Similarly, P(D-|T-) = P(PV -) = (1 - prevalence) specificity [(1 - prevalence) specificity] + [prevalence (1 - sensitivity)] The data above is made up. The point is to show you how the positive and negative predictive values shift as prevalence of the disease changes. In considering Scenarios 1 - 4, we can see that as the prevalence increases (while holding sensitivity and specificity fixed) the positive predictive value increases and the negative predictive value decreases. So prevalence has a major impact on positive and negative predictive values. Reverend Thomas Bayes (c. 1702 - April 17, 1761) was a British mathematician and Presbyterian minister, known for having formulated a special case of Bayes' theorem, which was published posthumously. The website said he is buried in a cemetery that contains many nonconformists. One of his major mathematical publications was a defense of the logical basis of Newton's calculus. Page -2- MI versus Non-MI example: In this problem we see what happens to sensitivity and specificity as you change the cutoff or referent value (i.e. as you change the definitions of T+ and T-). Figure A: Frequency distribution of enzyme activity in people with and without MI. 60 is called the referent value because if x 60, the test is considered positive and If x < 60, the test is considered negative. The vertical line is at 60 enzyme test units. Because 60 is a referent value, all values to the left of the line are considered to be negative for the test (T-). All values to the right of the line plus the value 60 are considered to be positive for the test (T+) Percent of Total Cases 20 25 30 15 T+ T- 0 0 5 10 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Enzyme Test units The area under the dashed curve on the right hand side of the graph is considered positive for an MI (D+). The area under the solid curve on the lefthand side is considered negative for an MI (non-MI or D-). Notice that some points fall in both the MI and non-MI areas. The hatched area is P(T+|D+ or MI) = sensitivity of the test. Figure C: Frequency distribution of enzyme activity in people with and without MI. Hatched area = specificity = P(T-|D-) 30 Percent of Total Cases 5 10 15 20 25 Non-MI MI The hatched area to the left is P(T-|D- or non-MI) = specificity of the test. If we decide the referent value is 80, then the sensitivity decreases and the specificity increases. 180 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Enzyme Test units Page -3- The MI problem above is from Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses by Galen and Gambino Below is a table which shows with numbers what we showed above with pictures. What happens to sensitivity and specificity as you change the cutoff or referent value? The values below are derived from the figure above, assuming the prevalence of disease is 50%. Referent Value 20 40 50 60 80 100 Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PV+ (%) PV- (%) 100 95 90 85 70 50 60 75 80 85 95 100 71.4 79.2 82.8 85.0 93.3 100.0 100.0 93.8 88.9 85.0 76.0 66.7 Below we look at another way of changing the referent point. Page -4- Table 3.3 (page 65 in Rosner): Ratings of 109 CT images by a single radiologist CT rating by radiologist True Disease Status Normal (D-) Abnormal (D+) Total Definitely normal (1) 33 3 36 Probably normal (2) 6 2 8 Questionable (3) 6 2 8 Probably abnormal (4) 11 11 22 Definitely abnormal (5) 2 33 35 Total 58 51 109 Note that Normal = D- and Abnormal = D+. The above data of Hanley and McNeil are ratings of computed tomographic (CT) images by a single radiologist in a sample of 109 subjects with possible neurologic problems. The true disease status is also known for each of these subjects. The question is how can we quantify the diagnostic accuracy of the test. The earlier problems have all been normal or abnormal not shades of grey. Below we see what changing the cutpoint for normal and abnormal does. An ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve allows us to see the changes in sensitivity (y-axis) that go with changes in 1 - specificity (x-axis) produced by changing the definition of a positive test. Page -5- I have taken Rosner's Table 3.3 and put it in the format of the tables we used to define sensitivity etc. So D+ is column 1 and D- is column 2. T+ is the upper rows and T- the lower rows. CT rating by radiologist Abnormal (D+) Definitely abnormal Probably abnormal Questionable Probably normal Definitely normal Total 33 11 2 2 3 51 Normal (D-) 2 11 6 6 33 58 Total 35 22 8 8 36 109 Page -6- Table 3.3 Ratings of the CT images For the true disease status, normal is D- and abnormal is D+, For test status, normal is T- and abnormal is T+. First Choice: The definition of T+ (and T-) will change as we change the cutpoint, but the first choice will be T+ = {definitely abnormal} The other 4 categories (probably abnormal, questionable, probably normal and definitely normal) will be considered T-. So the 2 by 2 table for this first choice is as follows: Disease Present (D+) Positive (T+) 33 11+2+2+3 = 18 51 Absent (D-) 2 11+6+6+33 = 56 58 Total 35 74 109 Test Result Negative (T-) So for the first choice for T+, (TP = 33, FP = 2, FN = 18 and TN = 56.) sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+) = Pr(T+ and D+)/Pr(D+) = 33/51 = 0.65 and specificity = Pr(T-|D-) = Pr(T- and D-)/Pr(D-) = 56/58 = 0.97 so 1 - specificity = 1 - 0.97 = 0.03. The point on the ROC curve is then (0.03,0.65). Page -7- Second Choice: The second choice for T+ = {definitely abnormal, probably abnormal}. The other 3 categories (questionable, probably normal and definitely normal) will be considered T-. So the 2 by 2 table for this second choice is as follows: Disease Present (D+) Positive (T+) 33+11 = 44 2+2+3 = 7 51 Absent (D-) 2 + 11 = 13 6+6+33 = 45 58 Total 57 52 109 Test Result Negative (T-) So for the second choice for T+, sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+) = Pr(T+ and D+)/Pr(D+) = 44/51 = 0.86 and specificity = Pr(T-|D-) = Pr(T- and D-)/Pr(D-) = 45/58 = 0.78 so 1 - specificity = 1 - 0.78 = 0.22. The point on the ROC curve is then (0.22,0.86). Page -8- Third Choice: The third choice for T+ = {definitely abnormal, probably abnormal, questionable}. The other 2 categories (probably normal and normal) definitely will be considered T-. So the 2 by 2 table for this third choice is as follows: Disease Present (D+) Positive (T+) 33+11+2 = 46 2+3 = 5 51 Absent (D-) 2 +11+6 = 19 6+33 = 39 58 Total 65 44 109 Test Result Negative (T-) So for the third choice for T+, sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+) = Pr(T+ and D+)/Pr(D+) = 46/51 = 0.90 and specificity = Pr(T-|D-) = Pr(T- and D-)/Pr(D-) = 39/58 = 0.67 so 1 - specificity = 1 - 0.67 = 0.33. The point on the ROC curve is then (0.33,0.90). Page -9- Fourth Choice: T+ = {definitely abnormal, probably abnormal, questionable, probably normal} and T- = {definitely normal}. So the 2 by 2 table for this forth choice is as follows: Disease Present (D+) Positive (T+) 33 + 11 + 2 + 2 = 48 3 51 Absent (D-) 2 + 11 + 6 + 6 = 25 33 58 Total 73 36 109 Test Result Negative (T-) So for the fourth choice for T+, sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+) = Pr(T+ and D+)/Pr(D+) = 48/51 = 0.94 and specificity = Pr(T-|D-) = Pr(T- and D-)/Pr(D-) = 33/58 = 0.57 so 1 - specificity = 1 - 0.57 = 0.43. The point on the ROC curve is then (0.43,0.94). Page -10- The two choices for cutpoints that are not so intuitive as Choices 1 - 4 are Choice 0 where all tests negative and Choice 5 where all tests are positive. These are choices that you'd probably never make in clinical practice but they provide the anchor points for the ROC curve. Choice 0: For Choice 0 and T- = {definitely normal, probably normal, questionable, probably abnormal, definitely abnormal} Disease Present (D+) Positive (T+) 0 51 51 Absent (D-) 0 58 58 Total 0 109 109 Test Result Negative (T-) Sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+) = 0/51 = 0 1 - specificity = 1 - 1 = 0 Specificity = Pr(T-|D-) = 58/58 = 1 So the point on the ROC curve is (0, 0). Page -11- Choice 5: T+ = {definitely normal, probably normal, questionable, probably abnormal, definitely abnormal} Disease Present (D+) Positive (T+) 51 0 51 Absent (D-) 58 0 58 Total 109 0 109 Test Result Negative (T-) Sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+) = 51/51 = 1 Specificity = Pr(T-|D-) = 0/58 = 0 1 - specificity = 1 - 0 = 1 So the point on the ROC curve will be (1, 1) Page -12- ROC Curve for Table 3.3 page 65 of Rosner 1 0.94 0.90 0.86 Sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+) 0.65 0 0 0. 03 22 33 0. I don't recommend that you label axes in this odd manner. I did it so you can clearly see that the 6 points derived from the Table 3.3 are what have been graphed. In order to be able to graph the ROC curve and obtain the PV+ and PV- I created a small Stata file which is at the end of this handout. 0. 1 - Specificity = 1 - Pr(T-|D-) 0. 43 Page -13- 1 ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves: The area under the ROC curve is considered an estimate of the overall diagnostic accuracy of the test. It can be shown that this area, when calculated by the trapezoidal rule, corresponds to the probability that for a randomly selected pair of normal and abnormal subjects, the radiologist will correctly identify the normal subject given the CT ratings. It is assumed that for untied ratings the radiologist designates the subject with the lower test score as normal, and the subject with the higher score as abnormal. For tied ratings, it is assumed that the radiologist randomly chooses one patient as normal and the other as abnormal. How you come up with the trapezoids is given in the graph below. ROC Curve for Table 3.3 page 65 of Rosner 1 0.94 0.90 0.86 Sensitivity = Pr(T+|D+) Area of Triangle 0.65 + Area of Rectangle Area of Trapezpoid 0 = 0 03 22 33 0. 0. The area under the above ROC curve is 0.8932. "The area under the ROC curve measures the probability, denoted by , that in a randomly paired normal and abnormal images, the perceived abnormality of the two images will allow them to be correctly identified." The Meaning and Use of the Area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve by James A. Hanley and Barbara J. McNeil, Radiology 143 (1): 29 - 36, April, 1982. 0. 1 - Specificity = 1 - Pr(T-|D-) 0. 43 Page -14- 1 The plots above were created using the numbers in the table on page 16. Page -15- CT rating by radiologist Prevalence 0.05 Sensitivity Pr(T+|D+) Choice 0 Specificity Pr(T-|D-) Prevalence Prevalence 0.50 0.95 PV+ PV0.50 1 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.95 PV+ PV0.05 0.13 0.23 0.27 0.34 PV+ PV0.9500 0 0.65 0.86 0.90 0.94 1 1 0.97 0.78 0.67 0.57 0 0.50 0.17 0.13 0.10 0.05 Choice 1 0.9811 0.95 0.73 0.9908 0.79 0.85 0.9924 0.73 0.87 0.9946 0.69 0.91 0.50 Choice 2 Choice 3 Choice 4 Choice 5 Page -16- Page -17- Page -18- Page -19- . des Contains data from table3pt3.dta obs: 10 vars: 4 10 Sep 2006 20:04 size: 110 (99.9% of memory free) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------storage display value variable name type format label variable label ------------------------------------------------------------------------------id float %9.0g disease byte %13.0g diseaselbl True status of disease rating byte %19.0g ratinglbl CT rating by Radiologist pop byte %8.0g Number of images ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sorted by: . label list diseaselbl: 0 1 ratinglbl: 1 2 3 4 5 Normal (D-) Abnormal (D+) Definitely Normal Probably Normal Questionable Probably Abnormal Definitely Abnormal . list,nolab +-------------...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Mt. Marty - PH - 1725
Chapter 3 Part 1 Probability September 9, 2008The goals and skill set apply to all of Chapter 3Goal:All of inferential statistics rests firmly on probability. So these lectures on probability are designed to give you a good working knowledge of
Mt. Marty - PH - 1725
Chapter 2 Part 1A Measures of Location September 2, 2008Skill set you should have by the time we complete Chapter 2:You should know the definitions of the major measures of location (mean, median, mode, geometric mean) and variability (standard de
Mt. Marty - PH - 1725
Chapter 2 Part 1B Measures of Location September 4, 2008Class will meet in the Auditorium except for Tuesday, October 21 when we meet in 102a.Skill set you should have by the time we complete Chapter 2:You should know the definitions of the major
Mt. Marty - PH - 1725
Homework 9This homework is to be worked alone (i.e. you may ask questions of me, Renke or Yi-Ju but no one else). This homework is due at the beginning of class Thursday, December 4.For the first 4 questions the population values that you should u
Mt. Marty - PH - 1725
Homework 5You are to work alone on this homework. You may ask questions of me, Yi-Ju or Renke. You are to consult no one else. This homework is due on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 at the beginning of class. Question 1: Mr. and Mrs. R. are both know car
Mt. Marty - PH - 1725
Homework #4Due October 16, 2008 at the beginning of class. You may work in groups. You do not need to turn in a log file.These problems will take some thought. I suggest you start work on them early.The problems are from Rosner 6th edition. Rosne
Mt. Marty - PH - 1725
Intermediate Biostatistics I (PH 1725) Rules of the Road September 2, 2008Goal:By the end of Intermediate Biostatistics I (PH 1725) and II (PH 1726), you should be able to analyze studies that are well designed and that require basic statistics suc
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 01: IntroductionVijay Narayanan (www.cse.psu.edu/~vijay) www.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits]CSE477 L01 Introduction.1 Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 2001Course Cont
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 04: CMOS Inverter (static view)Vijay Narayanan www.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L04 CMOS Inverter.1 Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 2001
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 06: Static CMOS LogicVijay Narayanan www.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L06 Static CMOS Logic.1 Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 2001CMOS
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 07: Pass Transistor LogicVijay Narayanan www.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L07 Pass Transistor Logic.1 Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 200
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 08: CapacitancesVijay Narayanan www.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L08 Capacitances. 1 Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 2001Review: Delay
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 10: Inverter, Dynamic ViewVijay Narayanan www.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L10 Inverter Dynamic View.1 Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 20
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Spring 2001 Lecture 12: Designing for Low PowerVijay Narayanan www.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L12 Designing for Low Power.1 Irwin&amp;Vijay, PS
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 17: Dynamic Sequential Circuitswww.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L17 Dynamic Sequential Circuits. 1Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 2001
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 20: Shifters and Other Logicwww.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L20 Shifters. 1Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 2001Parallel ShiftersCo
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 22: RAM Coreswww.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L22 RAM Cores. 1 Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 2001Review: Read-Write Memories (RAMs)
Penn State - CSE - 477
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2001 Lecture 23: Peripheral Memory Circuitswww.cse.psu.edu/~cg477[Adapted in part from Rabaey's Digital Integrated Circuits, Prentice Hall, 1995]CSE477 L23 Memory Peripherals. 1Irwin&amp;Vijay, PSU, 2001Review:
Stanford - CS - 374
CS374: Algorithms in BiologyHieu NguyenAdditional Paper for Lecture 11: &quot;Metabolic Engineering&quot; Paper Reference S. Picataggio. Potential impact of synthetic biology on the development of microbial systems for the production of renewable fuels and
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Math/Stat 511February 22, 2001Using Excel to Compute and Plot PMF'sExample 1Binomial Distribution for n= 3 independent Bernoulli trails, with p=1/3. Here x denotes the number of successes. The Excel function is BINOMDIST(x,3,1/3,FALSE).Binomia
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Math/Stat 511February 22, 2001Using Excel to Compute and Plot PMF'sExample 1Binomial Distribution for n= 3 independent Bernoulli trails, with p=1/3. Here x denotes the number of successes. The Excel function is BINOMDIST(x,3,1/3,FALSE).Binomia
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Los Angeles Southwest College - MATH - 511
Wisconsin - ECE - 352
Boolean Algebra Identities and Theorems The following will be provided in the Quizzes. Please note, however, you will be able to work faster if you know these. 1. X + 0 = X 3. X + 1 = 1 5. X + X = X 7. X + X = 1 ment 2. X 1 = X 4. X 0 = 0 6. X X =
Wisconsin - ECE - 352
Last (Family) Name: First (Given) Name: Student ID:Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Wisconsin - MadisonECE/Comp Sci 352 Digital System FundamentalsQuiz # 2 SolutionsOctober 25, 2001 Closed Book Examination 90 min
Georgia Tech - CEE - 200202
Name_ Homework #2: CEE 30001. You have been asked to determine the optimal capacity of a two-lane highway given the equations for total benefits and total costs. Having taken the CEE 3000 systems course, you know that the optimal value will occur w
Georgia Tech - CEE - 200202
Left Hand Side Coefficients x1 x2 x3 Objective Function Constraints Constraint #1 Constraint #2 Constraint #3 Constraint #4 Constraint #5 Yellow Teal User Entry Calculated Optimal Decision Variable Values x1 x2 x3&lt;= 1 &lt;= 1 &lt;= 1 &lt;= 1 &lt;= 1RHS Values
Georgia Tech - CEE - 200202
CEE 3000 LP Homework Hints1. By &quot;formulate a linear program,&quot; I mean develop and write out the mathematical expressions in the form we discussed in class, i.e., max(or min) Objective Function s.t. Constraint #1 Constraint #2etc. 2. Don't forget
Georgia Tech - CEE - 200202
CEE 3000 Solutions to HW #2 Problem 1 Problem states that optimal capacity, qo, occurs where marginal benefits equal marginal costs. Equations given are TB = 55q - 0.225q 2 TC = 25.5q + 0.47 3 Recognizing that we want to optimize total net benefit,
Georgia Tech - CEE - 200202
Mathematical Programming Cont'dCEE 3000 Mathematical OptimizationFebruary 19, 2002RememberMathematical Programming (including linear and integer programming) is a decision making tool in the planning, design, and operation of civil engineeri
Georgia Tech - CEE - 200202
Mathematical Programming Lecture 2 In class problem If the in class metal recycling problem is solved using the Excel template and the solver routine, you should end up with the following sensitivity report Adjustable Cells Cell $D$17 $E$17 Constr
UCSD - MATH - 262
Robin Moser makes Lovsz Local Lemma Algorithmic! a Notes of Joel Spencer1PreliminariesThe idea in these notes is to explain a new approach of Robin Moser 1 to give an algorithm for the Lovsz Local Lemma. This description is of the a approach as
Berkeley - LING - 100
Features and Rules Section 108 September 22, 2008 How can we efficiently summarize how words might be remembered and then processed for use in speech? Arabic /ilksi/ /ilbab/ /ilfnan/ `the chair' `the door' `the cup' /ianta/ /iddaftar/ /irrais/ `the s
Berkeley - LING - 100
Linguistics 100 Phonology with FeaturesToday: Decomposing sounds into features Describing allophony as the result of phonological processes (rules)1Overview Consistent, precise-categorical Able to group sounds into natural classes Non-natur
Berkeley - LING - 100
Ling 100 Section October 6, 2008 Morphological patterns. Turkish Gloss `rope' `girl' `face' `stamp' `hand' `stalk' `village' `end' Nom. sg. ip kIz yz pul el sap ky son Gen. sg. [-in] ipin kIzIn yzn pulun elin sapIn kyn sonun Nom. pl. [-ler] ipler kIz
Berkeley - LING - 100
Linguistics 100 Syntax and Morphosyntax Review and reminders 1. Clitics (a) They are like affixes in always being bound. (b) But they are unlike affixes in generally being less &quot;connected&quot; to what they attach to. i. It might not matter what word clas
Berkeley - LING - 100
Brookdale - SH - 650561
_Tourism Risks: Natural Disasters, Epidemics and Terrorism _by Shiu Raj shiuraj@dal.ca or rajshiu@yahoo.comApril 2006Focusing on no-escape natural disasters (NEND), Huan, Beaman and Shelby (HBS) highlight that the tourism industry is not plan
Brookdale - SH - 650561
_ Managing island nations' fish stocks: Some lessons from the Canadian experience _by Shiu Raj shiuraj@dal.ca or rajshiu@yahoo.com (April 2006)Seafood is not only the key dietary source for many small island nations, but they are also dependent on
Brookdale - SH - 650561
_ An insight into Sex Trade and Tourism_by Shiu Raj shiuraj@dal.ca or rajshiu@yahoo.com March 2006Oppermann (1999) and Wonders et al. (2001) distinguish sex tourism from prostitution, and underscore its ubiquitous existence. Oppermann proposes a
Brookdale - SH - 650561
_Regionalism, the Pacific way!The Pacific Plana summary of the regional cooperation and integration initiatives undertaken by the Pacific islands _ by Shiu Raj shiuraj@dal.ca or rajshiu@yahoo.com (March 2006)Introduction The Pacific Islands For
Brookdale - SH - 650561
_Alternative Tourism, Ecotourism and Environmentalism _by Shiu Raj shiuraj@dal.ca or rajshiu@yahoo.com February 2006Acott et al. (1998), Loon et al. (2001) and Walpole et al. (2000) focus on ecotourism, but interestingly the authors' definition
Brookdale - SH - 650561
TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT: trade a discussion on trade liberalization issues September, 2005byShiu Raj e-mail: shiuraj@dal.ca or rajshiu@yahoo.com_ AbstractThere is increasing discussions on trade liberalization and its impact on development. In r
Brookdale - SH - 650561
a brief essay onTHE PREDICTIONS OF `OLD' AND `NEW' GROWTH THEORIESApril 2005by Shiu RajAbstract: Although economists have made a distinction between old and new growth theories, policy makers can ignore this because these theories generate ve
Brookdale - SH - 650561
_a review ofTRADE, GROWTH, AND POVERTYby David Dollar and Aart Kraaypublished in 2004, in Economic Journal, 114, pp. 22-49_March 2005by Shiu Raj (views and comments could be sent to shiuraj@dal.ca or rajshiu@yahoo.com )I. INTRODUCTION D
Delaware - CIS - 841
CISC 841 Bioinformatics Fall, 2008 Final Project GoalsThe final project is an essential part of this course (40% of the grade). It is intended to let you get a feel about doing research in bioinformatics. While you are allowed to choose a topic broa
Delaware - CIS - 841
CISC 841 Bioinformatics Fall 2008 Homework 2Handed out: October 21, 2008 Due date: November 6, 2008In this assignment, you are asked to implement Bayesian networks and test your implementation using a set of gene expression data. The both training
Fayetteville State University - PHY - 3101
Statistical Physics 11TopicsIntroduction The Boltzmann Distribution The Maxwell Distribution Summary2IntroductionWe believe we now have the basic laws that, in principle, can be used to predict the detailed behavior of an arbitrarily large
Virginia Tech - CS - 5304
CODE GENERATION SLR Expression Grammar for Pascal Junior - productions -1 start 2 expr -&gt; -&gt; expr expr relop primaryle/lt/ge/gt/eq/ne 3 expr 4 primary -&gt; -&gt; primary primary addop termadd/sub/or 5 primary 6 term -&gt; -&gt; term term multop factormult
S.E. Louisiana - CMPS - 161
Chapter 1 Introduction to Computers, Programs, and Java1.1 Introduction Java is the Internet program language Why Java? The answer is that Java enables user to deploy applications on the Internet for servers, desktop computers, and small hand-held
UC Davis - ATT - 0711
Ill. Chicago - STAT - 381
Ill. Chicago - STAT - 381
Ill. Chicago - STAT - 381