135 Pages

20090406

Course: CHM 6315, Fall 2009
School: Neumont
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 10316

Document Preview

Additions: Conjugate Introduction Nuc EWG EWG Nuc Chiral Acceptor R' EWG Chiral Donnor OM * R' Inherent Chirality R Chiral Additives/Ligands R Cu- +M * R * Inherent Chirality O * Chiral Reagent * Chiral Auxiliary R'M + Chiral Catalysts Chiral Auxiliary Review: Merino Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 2051. Leonard Comtemporary Org. Synthesis, 1994, 387. Rossiter Chem. Rev. 1992, 771. 1 Conjugate Additions:...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Utah >> Neumont >> CHM 6315

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Additions: Conjugate Introduction Nuc EWG EWG Nuc Chiral Acceptor R' EWG Chiral Donnor OM * R' Inherent Chirality R Chiral Additives/Ligands R Cu- +M * R * Inherent Chirality O * Chiral Reagent * Chiral Auxiliary R'M + Chiral Catalysts Chiral Auxiliary Review: Merino Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 2051. Leonard Comtemporary Org. Synthesis, 1994, 387. Rossiter Chem. Rev. 1992, 771. 1 Conjugate Additions: Soft Nucleophiles Organocopper Reagent Copper-Catalyzed Grignard Reagents RMgX + 25 mol% CuX Heteronucleophile Nitrogen R2NH Review: Erdik, Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 641. Et2O/THF Monoalkylcopper reagents RLi + CuX RCu N3 Sulfur RSH Alcohol ROH (oxymercuration) PhOH -LiX RCu: -Unreactive, explosive, polymer and insoluble RCuLA : -More reactive, displays unique reactivity and selectivity patterns Review:NakamuraTetrahedron 1989, 45, 349. Also: JACS 2000, 1826. Homocuprate reagents (Gilman-Cuprates) RLi + CuX Et2O/THF -LiX CuX = CuI, CuBr, CuBrSMe2 -reactive againts a wide variety of electrophiles: the most widely used. -Stable <0C (generally -78C), low basicity -Higher order homocuprates: R3Cu2Li, R3CuLi2, R5Cu3Li RTM + CuR Et2O/THF RTCu(R)M RCu RLi R2CuLi Carbon Nucleophile Cyanide CN Enolate (Michael) Mixed Homocuprate reagents -RT = transferable ligand -R = Dummy ligand: C EWG EWG CR, CH2S(O)Me, 2-Thienyl, CH2S(O)2Me, Mesityl X EWG 2 Review on dummy ligands: Hamon and Levisalles, Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 489. Conjugate Additions: Heterocuprates RTM + CuZ Et2O/THF RTCu(Z)M RM + RTM + CuZ RT(R)Cu(Z)M2 -RT = transferable ligand -CuZ (usually commercially available) = CuCN, CuSPh, CuOt-Bu, CuPPh2, CuN(C6H11)2, CuP(t-Bu)2 -RT = transferable ligand -CuZ (usually commercially available) = CuCN, CuSPh, CuOt-Bu, CuPPh2, CuN(C6H11)2, CuP(t-Bu)2 -R = Dummy ligand 2-Thienyl N-Pyrrolyl N-Imidazolyl Combined Stability of Heterocuprates with the reactivity of Homocuprates. From Functionnalized Organocopper Reagents (Knochel Reagents) Knochel, P.; Singer, R. D. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2117; Lipshutz, B. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 277. Zn CuCN2LiCl FG-RCu(CN)ZnI FG-RI FG-RZnI 3 Conjugate Additions: Relative Stereocontrol Cyclic Systems Facial Selectivity dictated by steric effects Classic Case: Prostanglandin's Synthesis C5H11 OMEM Cp2Zr(H)Cl C5H11 OMEM 1. MeLi 2. Li[ZnMe3] Ph O 1. TBSO cat Me2Cu(CN)Li2 R' 2.OHC(CH2)5CO2Me O OH (CH2)5CO2Me TBSO C5H11 OMEM 4 Acyclic Systems Tomioka TL 1985, 3031. R1 CO2R2 1. Ph(MeS)2CLi 2. MeI R1 CO2R2 SMe Me Zr(Cl)Cp2 Lipshutz JACS 1994, 11689. C5H11 ZnMe2Li OMEM MeS * R EWG Felkin-Anh Rule Review: Mengel, A.; Reiser, O. Chem. Rev. 1999, 1191. Anti Addition Importance of the Reagents and Reaction Conditions Sato J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 3640; Angew. Chem., Int. Edit. 1998, 2099. O O + R1 Enone Yield 77% 91% 73% 84% 78% 87% 25% 45% R1 cis:trans >99:1 >99:1 9:1 50:1 3:1 50:1 4:1 1:3 [Ph2Cu(CN)Li2] [(CH2=CH)2Cu(CN)Li2] 80% 75% 1:32 1:19 [s-Bu2Cu(CN)Li2] [t-Bu2Cu(CN)Li2] --92% <1:50 <1:50 cis R2 R1 trans Yield 83% 92% R2 cis:trans 1:32 1:50 O Cyanocupratea [MeCu(CN)Li] [n-BuCu(CN)Li] [n-BuCu(CN)MgBr] [s-BuCu(CN)Li] [t-BuCu(CN)Li] Cyanocuprateb [Me2Cu(CN)Li2] [n-Bu2Cu(CN)Li2] O TBSO 2 Cu(CN)Li [PhCu(CN)Li] [CH2=CHCu(CN)Li] O [n-BuCu(CN)Li] Me O [n-BuCu(CN)Li] BnO 95% <1:99 80% >50:1 [n-Bu2Cu(CN)Li2] 87% 1:9 5 Effect of the Reagent Structure O TBSO OCu R R CN 2Li+ TBS R2Cu(CN)Li2 TBSO RCu(CN)Li O R Cu CN OLi B O H R OTBS O O B H TBSO R TBSO R R OTBS O O DBU / DCM rt, 98% R O DBU / DFM R 100C, 74% 6 Conjugate Additions to Chiral Electrophiles Yamamoto Chem. Commun. 1987, 1572. JACS 1988, 617. Nu Ph Me CO2Et Nuc Ph Me Felkin-product (anti) CO2Et + Ph Me anti-Felkin-product (syn) Ratio anti:syn 7:1 2.3:1 4:1 7:1 1:2.3 1:2 1:3.8 Nu CO2Et Entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 E/Z-alkene E E E E Z Z Z Nucleophile BuCuBF3 Bu2CuLiBF3 Bu2Cu(CN)Li2BF3 Me3CuLi2BF3 Bu2CuLiBF3 Bu2Cu(CN)Li2BF3 Me3CuLi2BF3 Yield 82% 90% 29% 46% 89% 26% 67% Felkin with E-alkene and anti-Felkin with Z-alkenes 7 Proposed Transition Structures E-Alkene Nuc CO2Et H H Ph Felkin Felkin-product (anti) Z-Alkene Nuc H EtO2C Me H H H Me Ph Felkin H anti-Felkin-product (syn) EtO2C H Ph Me H Nuc 1,3-Allylic Strain 8 Conjugate Additions to Chiral Electrophiles Yamamoto Chem. Commun. 1987, 1572. Nu Ph Me CO2Et CO2Et Nuc Ph Me CO2Et CO2Et + Ph Me Nu CO2Et CO2Et Felkin-product (anti) anti-Felkin-product (syn) Ratio anti:syn 1:2.1 2.8:1 1:1.6 1:18 3.8:1 1.5:1 1.6:1 24:1 Entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Nucleophile Bu2CuLiBF3 BuCuBF3 Me3CuLi2BF3 Bu2CuLi MeCuBF3 MeMgBr Me4AlLi AllylSnBu3 Yield 67% 90% 90% 87% 95% 89% 88% 93% Trisubstituted alkenes show the same tendency than Z-alkenes 9 Important Factors to Consider Important Factors: -Cuprate's electron-donating ability (oxidation potential) : Me2CuLi >> Me2Cu(CN)Li2 > MeCu > MeCu(CN)Li -Michael acceptor's electron-accepting ability (reduction potential): Ph Me Me -1.33 V NO2 > Me CN -1.43 V Ph CN > Me CN -1.68 V Ph CO2Et > Me CO2Et <-2.0V Ph CO2Et Michael acceptor with low reduction potentials + RCu or RCuCNLi (lower electron-donating ability): Normal Felkin-Ahn TS : anti-product is the major isomer Nuc H Me CO2Et H H Ph Felkin Michael acceptor with high reduction potentials + R2CuL or R2CuCNLi2 (higher electron-donating ability): -complex TS : syn-product is the major isomer Ph EWG Me EWG H R CuLn anti-Felkin-product (syn) Felkin-product (anti) "acute" angle of attack (suggested by ab initio calculations) 10 Conjugate Addition to Chiral Electrophiles Yamamoto J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 7652. Nu Me OR CO2Et Nuc Me OR CO2Et Felkin-product (anti) Ratio anti:syn 1:1.4 1:1.5 2.6:1 15:1 2.6:1 19:1 2.2:1 19:1 12:1 2:1 2.7:1 12:1 + Me OR Nu CO2Et anti-Felkin-product (syn) Entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 OR OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OTBS OTBS OTBS Nucleophile (Methallyl)2CuLi MethallylCu (Vinyl)2CuLi (Vinyl)2CuLiBF3 (Vinyl)2Cu(CN)Li2 (Vinyl)2Cu(CN)Li2BF3 MeCuBF3 MeCu(CN)LiBF3 BuCuBF3 MeCuBF3 Me2CuLiBF3 Me2Cu(CN)Li2BF3 Yield 87% 99% 99% 58% 83% 66% 60% 62% 64% 6% 26% 55% Nature of the cuprate reagent is important (entry 1 and 3) Nature of OR does not interfere (entry 9 and 12): no chelation vs non-chelation control 11 Conjugate Addition to Chiral Electrophiles Nu Me OR CO2Et Nuc Me OR CO2Et Felkin-product (anti) OR OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OTBS OTBS OTBS OTBS Nucleophile (Methallyl)2CuLi MethallylCu (Vinyl)2CuLi (Vinyl)2CuLiBF3 (Vinyl)2Cu(CN)Li2 (Vinyl)2Cu(CN)Li2BF3 MeCuBF3 MeCu(CN)LiBF3 BuCuBF3 MeCuBF3 Me2CuLiBF3 MeCu(CN)LiBF3 Me2Cu(CN)Li2BF3 Ratio anti:syn 1:4 1:4.5 >99:1 1.1:1 24:1 1:3.4 1:3.5 1:2.8 1:3.5 1:6 1:7 1:5 1:5 + Me OR CO2Et anti-Felkin-product (syn) Yield 99% 45% 82% 63% 58% 64% 30% 45% 56% 2% 12% 17% 36% Nu Entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Z-Alkenes are syn-selective, excepted for the addition of vinylcuprate The influence of of BF3 is very important but not well understood. Low yields are observec with -silyloxy ,-unsaturated esters. 12 Conjugate Addititon to Chiral Electrophiles Nu Me OBn CO2Et CO2Et Nuc Me CO2Et + Me Nu CO2Et OBn CO2Et Felkin-product (anti) Ratio anti:syn 1:13 1:32 1:9 1:12 1:5 1:24 1:13 1:3 OBn CO2Et anti-Felkin-product (syn) Ratio anti:syn 1:2.2 1:3.5 1:1.6 1:1.6 1:2.3 1:1.9 1:2.4 1:2.2 Entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Nucleophile MethallylCu MethallylCuBF3 (Methallyl)2CuLi (Methallyl)2CuLiBF3 (Methallyl)Cu(CN)Li (Methallyl)Cu(CN)LiBF3 (Methallyl)2Cu(CN)Li2 (Methallyl)2Cu(CN)Li2BF3 Yield 99% 86% 79% 99% 88% 95% 99% 87% Entry 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Nucleophile (Vinyl)Cu (Vinyl)CuBF3 (Vinyl)2CuLi (Vinyl)2CuLiBF3 (Vinyl)Cu(CN)Li (Vinyl)Cu(CN)LiBF3 (Vinyl)2Cu(CN)Li2 (Vinyl)2Cu(CN)Li2BF3 Yield 45% 72% 91% 91% 88% 83% 94% 96% The syn isomer is major with trisubstituted alkenes using vinyl and methallyl cuprates. The best results were observed with low order cuprates and BF3 13 Conjugate Addition to Chiral Electrophiles Nu Me OR CO2Et CO2Et Nuc Me CO2Et + Me Nu CO2Et OR CO2Et Felkin-product (anti) OR OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OBn OTBS OTBS OTBS OTBS OTBS Nucleophile MeCu MeCuBF3 Me2CuLi BuCu BuCuBF3 Bu2CuLi Bu2CuLiBF3 MeCu MeCuBF3 Me2CuLi MeCu(CN)Li MeCu(CN)LiBF3 Ratio anti:syn 1:8 1:16 1:1.7 1:2.3 1:19 1:2.1 1:4.3 1:6 1:5 1:1.6 1:12 1:10 OR CO2Et anti-Felkin-product (syn) Yield 58% 54% 75% 75% 52% 63% 51% 92% 98% 89% 92% 94% Entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Good Selectivities with low order cuprates More reactive substrates: good yield with -silyloxy ,-unsaturated esters. Nature of OR does not interfere (entry 2 and 9): no chelation vs non-chelation control 14 Conjugate Addition to Chiral Electrophiles Nu R OR Y X Nuc (Nu) R X + R Nu X OR Y Felkin-product (anti) OR Y anti-Felkin-product (syn) Reagent Substrate E-Alkene Z-Alkene Trisubstituted (vinyl)CuLn anti anti (syn)* syn (alkyl)CuLn anti syn syn (methallyl)CuLn syn syn syn *syn-selectivity was observed in a certain case. -Cuprate's electron-donating ability (oxidation potential): Methallyl >> n-butyl > vinyl 15 Proposed Transition Structures Disubstituted Alkenes + RCu or RCuCNLi (lower electron-donating ability): Felkin-Anh TS : ratio is dependant of the geometry of the alkenes E-Alkenes Nuc H RO CO2Et H H R Felkin Felkin-product (anti) EtO2C H H R OR H Nuc anti-Felkin-product (syn) Z-Alkenes 1,3-Allylic Strain Disubstituted alkenes + methallyl cuprates and trisubstituted alkenes -complex TS : syn-product is the major isomer R EWG RO EWG H R CuLn anti-Felkin-product (syn) "acute" angle of attack (suggested by ab initio calculations) OR is the "medium size" group : steric effects are more important than stereoelectronic effects. 16 Conjugate Addition of Lithium Amides Yamamoto J. Org. Chem. 1997, 6274. NR1R2 Me OR CO2t-Bu R1R2NLi Me CO2t-Bu + Me NR1R2 CO2t-Bu OR Felkin-product (anti) Entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 OR OTBS OTBDPS OTIPS OCPh3 OTIPS OMe Lithium Amides LiNBnTMS LiNBnTMS LiNBnTMS LiNBnTMS LiNBn2 LiNBn2 OR anti-Felkin-product (syn) Ratio anti:syn 1:1.2 1:8 1:9 <1:99 2.3:1 1:1.7 Yield 91% 99% 95% 79% 77% 83% Nuc H R CO2Et H H OR Felkin syn-isomer Chelation control interfer when LiNBn2 is used 17 Directed Cuprate Delivery Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Edit. 1998, 525; Tetrahedron 2000, 2833. R22Cu EWG PPh2 O R1 Me E-enoate (R1) i-Pr i-Pr i-Pr EtO2C Me2CuLi Me TrOH2C Me2CuLi Me PivOH2C Me2CuLi O O N i-Pr Me O Me 60% 5.7:1 71% 6:1 68% 19:1 O O OEt 1. R22CuLi 2. H+ 61-93%yield Cuprate Me2CuLi n-Bu2CuLi (CH2CH)2CuLi R1 Me Yield 93% 68% 61% R2 O O O OEt anti ratio (anti:syn) 19:1 19:1 4:1 PPh2 H O R D Me2CuLi 75% 19:1 18 Chiral Auxiliaries for Conjugate Addition Reactions O O 75-96% de 75-96% yield Oppolzer Helv. Chim. Acta 1980, 63, 2015. OppolzerTL 1983, 4971. R1 RCu Li O O O R1, R2 = Alkyl, aryl 72-88% de 66-91% yield Suemune TL 1990, 4751 Tet. Asym. 1991, 389 R Dumas and d'Angelo JOC 1994, 500; JOC 1996, 2293. O O PhCHNH2 / MeOH 20C, 14-15 kbar R O O 55-84% y. BnHN H Naph. Ph O 60% de Naph. O 98% de Ph O Naph. O 93% de O 18% de O 18% de O 20% de MeO Ph Ph O 16% de O 10% de 19 O >99% de O 97% de Chiral Auxiliaries for Conjugate Addition Reactions Hruby JOC 1993, 7565. O O N R1 O R2 R3MgBr CuBr/Me2S O O N R1 O R3 R2 85-96% y. R1 = Bn, 10% de R1 = Ph, 98% de with aryl grignard 48-86% de with alkyl grignard Williams Tet. Lett. 1998, 8593 O O N R1 R2MgBr EtMgBr i-PrMgBr PhMgBr MgBr BrMg O R2MgBr CuBr/Me2S BF3OEt2 O O N S R1 R1 = Bn Yield 78% 99% 66% 74% 90% de 53% (R) 62% (R) 54% (R) 97% (S) 15% Yield 89% 99% 65% 85% 95% R1 = Ph de 67% (S) 81% (S) 98% (S) 97% (S) 97% (S) O R2 S major if R1 = Ph R major if R1 = Bn TBDPSO --MgBr --95% 99% (S) 20 Chiral Auxiliaries (Nucleophiles) O R * Nuc Nuc O R OLi Ph O Me + MeO2C XcO Me Me O CO2Me 86% de Proposed TS: -E-Enolate -s-trans-E-enone O H Me H O OXc Corey, Tet. Lett. 1985, 26, 5025. Li Enders Tet. Lett. 1983, 24, 6015. Tet. Lett. 1986, 27, 3491. Chem. Ber. 1987, 120, 1223. Chem. Ber. 1993, 126, 1929. MeO LiN R1 R2 N CH2OMe R3 CO2Me R2 R3 O R1 Li N H R1 H R2 NXc XcN N R3 CO2Me 98% de 21 Chiral Auxiliaries (Nucleophiles) d'Angelo TL 1994, 9705. JOC 1996, 61, 4361. Tet. Asym. 1995, 79 Me O CO2Me H Ph N CO2Me 1. EWG O CO2Me EWG 2. H3O+ Me O CO2Me H Ph N CO2Me 1. Me 2. H3O+ CO2Me O CO2Me CO2Me Me >95% de and ee 90-98% ee Me H Ph E R HN CO2Me H H Christoffers. Angew. Chem., Int. Edit. 2000, 2752. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 701. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 1014. O i-Pr CO2Me H2N O NEt2 NEt2 NH CO2Me O Me Cu(OAc)2 H2O (2.5 mol%) O O i-Pr CO2Me COMe 86% y. 98% ee 22 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Reactions R-M transmetalation step Ln*CuXn OMX Ln*CuXn-1R + MX O R addition + catalyst regeneration MX O complexation CuLn*Xn-1 R Dynamic ligand-exchange processes : formation of a highly reactive and selective catalyst by self-assembly 23 Nickel-Catalyzed Grignard Addition Hoveyda J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 7649. Ph2 P NiCl2 P Ph2 Me Me MeO OMe RMgX (3 equiv) (S,S)-(chiraphos)NiCl2 (5 mol%) PPh3 (10 mol%) O (S,S)-(chiraphos)NiCl2 R Grignard Reagent EtMgBr n-BuMgBr i-BuMgBr PhMgBr PhCH2CH2MgBr Yield 90% 85% 63% 67% 81% ee 85% 85% 70% 83% 84% Without the phosphine, less than 10% ee was observed 15-53% ee were obtained with cyclopentenylacetal. 24 Phosphoramidite Ligands for Conjugate Addition Feringa Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2374-2376. O O i-Pr P N i-Pr 6.5 mol% O Cu(OTf)2, 3 mol% / Tolune, -15 C + Et2Zn (1.5 equiv) O 78% y.; 63% ee O O + Et2Zn (1.5 equiv) 76% y.; 81% ee O Ph Ph + Et2Zn (1.5 equiv) Et -50 C Ph * O Ph 25 88% y.; 90% ee Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Feringa Angew. Chem., Int. Edit. 1997, 2620. O O P N Me Me 4 mol% O Cu(OTf)2, 2 mol% / Heptane, -30C O + R2Zn (1.1 equiv) R Me2Zn 68% y. >98% ee Ph Hep2Zn 95% y. 95% ee AcO i-Pr2Zn 95% y. 94% ee 2 77% y. 95% ee 2 Zn 53% y. 95% ee EtO 2 OEt 91% y. 97% ee Zn Zn PivO 87% y. 93% ee 2 Zn 26 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Feringa Angew. Chem., Int. Edit. 1997, 2620. O O P N Me Me 4 mol% Cu(OTf)2, 2 mol% / Heptane, -30C O O O O O R R 10% ee R1 R1 R1 = H, Me, Ph >98% ee R 84-88% ee >98% ee R 97% ee R 27 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Feringa et al. Org. Let. 1999, 1, 623. O O P N Me Me 4 mol% O Cu(OTf)2, 2 mol% / Heptane, -30C + R2 R1 Et2Zn (1.2 equiv) Et R2 R1 O O O O O O MeO Me OMe MeO Et OMe Me Et OMe Bn Et OMe Et O 99 : 1 (cis:trans) 65% ee (cis) 28 99% ee 97% ee 9 : 1(cis:trans) 97% ee (cis) 32 : 1 (cis:trans) 93% ee (cis) Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition: Kinetic Resolution O O P N Me Me 0.10 mol% O Cu(OTf)2, 0.05 mol% Toluene, -30C Me 33% y. >99% ee O O + Me Et2Zn (0.55 equiv) + Me Et >95% trans:cis Using n-Bu2Zn: O O O Me 54% conv. >99% ee s >200 i-Pr 53% conv. 99% ee s >200 TMS 52% conv. >99% ee s >200 29 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition R O O P N Me Me NO2 Et2Zn (1.2 equiv) Cu(OTf)2 (0.5-2 mol%) Toluene, -30 C R Et NO2 Et 1-4 mol% NO2 Ph 90% conv. 48% ee Et NO2 Cyc 100% y. 94% ee Et Et NO2 NO2 O O 79%y. 10 : 1 dr, 92% ee (MeO)2CH 100% conv. 86% ee 30 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Hoveyda J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 755-756. N O PPh2 H N O Bn 2.4 mol% O NHBu O Cu(OTf)2, 1 mol% / Toluene, -30C R2Zn (3.0 equiv) Substrate Dialkylzinc (3.0 equiv.) Et2Zn O Bu2Zn i-Pr2Zn Zn 2 R Yield 78% 92% 90% 56% ee 97% 98% 79% >98% OAc O Et2Zn Bu2Zn Zn 2 72% 64% 55% >98% >98% >98% O OAc Et2Zn 56% 97% 31 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Hoveyda J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 755-756. H N O Bn 2.4 mol% O NHBu O N O PPh2 Cu(OTf)2, 1 mol% / Toluene, -30C n Substrate O R2Zn (3.0 equiv) Dialkylzinc (3.0 equiv.) Me2Zn Et2Zn Bu2Zn i-Pr2Zn Zn 2 n Yield 71% 98% 93% 98% 76% R ee >98% 98% 95% 72% 95% OAc O Me2Zn Et2Zn Bu2Zn i-Pr2Zn 80% 98% 81% 78% >98% 98% 95% 62% 32 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition PPh2 PPh2 Rh O O O (acac)Rh(C2H4)2 Ph2P PPh2 and 31P NMR Elemental analysis 1H Rh O O + PhB(OH)2 1.4 equiv 2.5 equiv 5.0 equiv (acac)Rh(C2H4)2 / (S)-binap 3 mol% Dioxane/H2O (10/1), 100 C, 16 h 64% y. 97% ee 93% y. 97% ee >99% y. 97%ee O Ph Hayashi and Miyaura, JACS, 1998, 120, 5579-5580. 33 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition OB(OH)2 R-B(OH)2 R O Ph2P PPh2 Ph2P PPh2 Rh Ln R R Rh Ln O O Ph2P P R Rh P O R PPh2 Rh Ln 34 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition O + RB(OH)2 (acac)Rh(C2H4)2 / (S)-binap 3 mol% Dioxane/H2O, 100C, 16h R >99% y. 97% ee 70%y. 99% ee 97% y. 96% ee 94% y. 96% ee 88% y. 94% ee 76% y. 91% ee O 4-MePhB(OH)2 (5.0 equiv) 4-CF3PhB(OH)2 (2.5 equiv) 3-MeOPhB(OH)2 (5.0 equiv) 3-ClPhB(OH)2 (5.0 equiv) B(OH)2 (2.5 equiv) B(OH)2 (5.0 equiv) t-Bu O O O O PhB(OH)2 (1.4 equiv) 93% y. 97% ee i-Pr PhB(OH)2 (5.0 equiv) 82% y. 97% ee PhB(OH)2 (1.4 equiv) 51% y. 93% ee n-pentyl PhB(OH)2 (2.5 equiv) 88% y. 92% ee 35 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition O Oi-Pr + LiArB(OMe)3 (2.5 equiv) (acac)Rh(C2H4)2 / (S)-binap 3 mol% Dioxane/H2O, 100 C, 3 h 4-ClC6H4 4-MeC6H4 4-CF3C6H4 3-MeOC6H4 2-naphtyl Ar O Oi-Pr 95% y. 97% ee 88% y. 97% ee 98% y. 96% ee 83% y. 94% ee 96% y. 93% ee O O + ArB(OH)2 (5.0 equiv) (acac)Rh(C2H4)2 / (S)-binap 3 mol% Dioxane/H2O, 100 C, 3 h O O Ar Ph 4-ClC6H4 4-MeC6H4 4-CF3C6H4 3-MeOC6H4 2-naphtyl 94% y. 98% ee 95% y. 97% ee 91% y. 97% ee 75% y. 97% ee 91% y. 98% ee 93% y. 98% ee Ar NO2 + ArB(OH)2 (5.0 equiv) NO2 (acac)Rh(C2H4)2 / (S)-binap 3 mol% Dioxane/H2O, 100 C, 3 h 71-90% y. 98-99%ee 3:1 8:1 cis:trans NaHCO3 EtOH, Ar NO2 9:1 49:1 trans:cis 36 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition O + cat. 10 mol% RO2C CO2R DME, rt, 72 h CO2R CO2R O O La O HO BnO2C Me 84% yield CO2Bn 98% ee O 94% yield >99% ee (R = Me) O air-stable 96% yield >99% ee (85 h) R = Me O O 97% yield >99% ee (85 h) R = Me 82% yield 99% ee (96 h) R = Me O ee's are lower with acyclic ketones 37 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Corey, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 5347. Br H N O O R1 + Ph N Ph O Ot-Bu (10 mol%) N CsOHH2O, CH2Cl2, -78C CO2t-Bu COR1 N H Ph Ph Acceptor EtCO MeO2C NC (Base : KOH) O yield 85% 85% ee 91% 95% 85% 91% 88% 99% 38 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Br H N O + MeO (2 equiv) KOH (50 mol%) Toluene, -10C MeO 72% y. 80% ee O (10 mol%) N H OH O O OBn N N O + Cl CH3NO2 (10 equiv) H (10 mol%) Br O NO2 CsF (10 equiv) Toluene, -40C Cl 89% y. 70% ee 95% ee after recristallization39 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Br H N N H OH Ar1 O Ar2 (1.1 equiv.) Ar3 OTMS KOH (50 mol%) Toluene, -20C O Ar1 Ar2 79%-94% y. 91-95% ee 2-Me-C6H4 O 4-MeO-C6H4 92% y. 94% ee 4-F-C6H4 O Ph O Ar3 O (10 mol%) Ph O 4-F-C6H4 85% y., 95% ee Ph O 4-F-C6H4 O Ph 79% y., 92% ee Me O Ar1 Ar2 (1.1 equiv.) Ph OTMS Ar1 KOH (50 mol%) Toluene, -20C O Ar2 3 : 1 to 20 : 1 (anti:syn) O Ph Me 65-86% y. 92-99% ee + Ar1 O Ar2 O Ph Me 9-22% y. 81-95% ee 40 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition: Azide Jacobsen J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 8959. H N Al t-Bu O N H R O Ph O Me O (5 mol%) t-Bu t-Bu HN3 (6.6 equiv) Toluene,CH2Cl2, -40C R N3 t-Bu O N H O Ph N H R Me Et n-Pr i-Pr t-Bu CH2Ph CH2OBn Ph yield 96% 97% 97% 98% 99% 97% 93% 60% ee 96% 97% 95% 97% 97% 95% 96% 58% 41 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition: Azide Miller Angew. Chem., Int. Edit. 2000, 3635. O N O N H O NBn N (2.5 mol%) NBOC t-Bu O HN Me R Me Et C6H11 i-Pr yield 97% 91% 79% 84% 84% ee 63% 71% 85% 82% 71% O R TMSN3 (3.8 equiv) RCO2H (1.0 equiv.) Toluene, 25C O N O N3 R N BOCHN O O N O Me TMSN3 (3.8 equiv) RCO2H (1.0 equiv.) Toluene, 25C O O N O N3 Me 85% y. 45% ee 42 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Reduction CN TBSOH2C Me R CO2Et H H (1.2 mol%) CH2OTBS Me CoCl2 (1 mol%) NaBH4 (2 equiv) EtOH/DMF, 23C R CO2Et H R = PhCH2CH2 Me2C=CHCH2CH2 Me2CH Me R CONHMe 94-96% ee Me CoCl2 (1 mol%) NaBH4 (1 equiv) EtOH/diglyme, 23C R CONHMe R = PhCH2CH2 cyclohexyl Ph Me Ph CONHMe 96-99% y. 92-99% ee Me CoCl2 (1 mol%) NaBH4 (1 equiv) EtOH/diglyme, 23C Ph CONHMe 96% y. 97% ee 43 Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Reduction P(p-tol)2 P(p-tol)2 (10 mol%) R1 R2 CO2Et CuCl (5 mol%) NaOt-Bu (5 mol%) / toluene, 23C PMHS (4 equiv) Me3Si O Me Si O H SiMe3 n R2 R1 CO2Et 84-98% y. 83-92% ee Me Ph CO2Et Cyc Me CO2Et Ph Et CO2Et Et Ph (From Z-alkene) Et CO2Et Me Me CO2Et 6 Et Et Ph CO2Et Ph Et CO2Et (From Z-alkene) CO2Et (From Z-alkene) CO2Et 44 Nucleophilic Addition to Imines: General Strategies O R H OH R R' + R OH R' R'M External chiral ligand Excellent electrophiles Major Breakthrough: Ligand-accelerated dialkylzinc addition R2M R M N R1 R2 HN R1 R2 N R R1 H R Imines are less electrophilic: more nucleophilic reagents are needed (highly basic). Imines are more Lewis basics: Lewis acids activate imines but high turnovers can be a problem. Solution: R1 is an electron-withdrawing group (Ar, SOR, SO2R, POR2, etc) 1 Chiral Auxiliaries for Nucleophilic Additions to Imines 1. Nuc 2. Cleavage R2 Ph H N OTBDMS Me N H Me HN RCuBF3 RLi H BnO O O NHBn c-C6H11CH2MgBr CeCl3, 75% BnO O O NBn c-C6H11CH2CuBF3 52% BnO O O Matsumoto Chelation Felkin 2 NH2 Residual Functionality * N R1 1. Nuc 2. Cleavage R2 Ph Bu + Me HN 80 : 20 (Felkin) OTBDMS + Me HN 95-98 : 0-5 (52-93%) 10-20 : 80-90 (41-71) R Bu NH2 * R2 Ph Me Nuc H Nuc Bu2CuLiBF3 80% Me HN OTBDMS R N R2 * R1 Pr Pr Pr H R3 Yamamoto Bn Bn Bn NHBn Chiral Auxiliaries for Nucleophilic Additions to Imines N R2 * R1 R NBn2 H NPG R1Li or R1Li, CeCl3 PG = Bn R1MgX PG = Ts R NBn2 R1 NPG + R NBn2 R1 NPG PG = Bn ds 64->90% (syn) PG = Ts ds 78->90% (anti) Reetz H R3 Also PG = (O)Bn (nitrone), NMe2, NR2 Me N Ph Ph N N R1 N H O O NMe2 H NR1 O H O O N Bn S Me OTr Alexakis (amino aldehydes) Thiam, Chastrette Utimoto Cativiela 3 Aldonitrones: Good Electrophilic Precursors H N O BocN O Ph BnMgCl BocN O Bn(HO)N Bn + BocN O Ph Bn(HO)N Bn H R NucBnMgCl, Et2AlCl TiCl2 or Cu(Oac)2, Zn AcOH, H2O Ph BnHN Bn BocN O BocN O Ph 95 : 5 (90% yield) 6 : 94 (89% yield) OR C N H O Bn Ph Bn Favored (anti-Felkin) OR H2, Pd(OH)2 O Bn H2N Bn N R C H H Nuc- Disfavored (Felkin) With Et2AlCl: chelate formation involving O of nitrone and C=O of Boc group O N Bn R' H HO N Bn O N R Ph N O R N Zn(OTf)2 (cat.) i-Pr|NEt R 88% ee Ph 4 Chiral Auxiliaries for the Nucleophilic Addition to Imines: Imines Derived from Chiral Amines N R2 Chiral Amines Me R N Ph R N Me N Me R N OH R R N O Ph Me N R Ar PivO PivO PivO H R H O OPiv O N R N O N Ph O Several steps are required to regenerate the auxiliary Nucleophilic reagents are quite limited 5 R1 1. Nuc 2. Cleavage R2 N-Sulfinyl aldimines O NH2 * H Nuc Chiral Oxime Ethers O R R = Me, Et, Pr, i-Pr Ph R N O OPG Chiral nitrones Chiral Hydrazones OH Ph N R S R R N H R = p-Tol N Me N OH N R N N OMe Cleavage leads to the destruction of the chiral auxiliary O S t-Bu OR' H H Addition to C=N: -Hydroxyamines-derived Auxiliaries R R N OH R N R OPG R1 R3 R2 N O Takahashi/Pridgen/Fugisawa/Higashiyama ArCHO H2N OH 73-90% R N H OH BnMgX or BnLi 35-90% R HN Bn OH NaIO4, MeNH2 R NH2 Bn ds: >98% H N R1 Ph H N O BnMgCl 87% HN Bn ds: >98% O Ph OH H2, Pd-C AcOH, 95% or Pb(OAc)4 NH2 Bn 6 Addition to C=N: RAMP- and SAMP Chiral Auxiliaries N R N OMe N R N OMe H H O R1 H R1 NH2 R2 H2N N OMe HN OMe recycle H2, Ra-Ni MeOH 47-84% N R1 N OMe R2Li, THF or Et2O -78 C, 73-98% HN R1 N R2 OMe H Alternative deprotection: a. RCOCl b. Li, NH3 7 Hua/Yang/Ellman Chiral Auxiliaries O N R S S p-Tol R N O S t-Bu H H O S S LiNH2 NH3, THF -78 C O S NH2 VO(acac)2 (0.0025 equiv) S 30% H2O2 H N t-Bu R1 Et Et Et i-Pr i-Pr i-Pr Ph Ph Ph R2 Me i-Pr Ph Me Et Ph Me Et i-Pr yield (dr) 96% (93:7) 97% (92:8) 100% (96:4) 99% (98:2) 100% (97:3) 97% (89:11) 96% (97:3) 96% (92:8) 29% (97:3) ClH3N OH (0.0025 equiv) t-Bu O R2 R1 HCl MeOH S N H OH CHCl3 88%, 91% ee 88%, 91% ee R1CHO, MgSO4 CH2Cl2 R2 R2MgBr R1 CH2Cl2 O S N H R1 RS (H) t-Bu O S M N R2 8 RL Ellman's Auxiliary: Synthesis of ,-Dibranched Amines O O S RS NH2 RL O S N RS RL R3Li, Me3Al toluene O S N H RS R RL Ti(OEt)4, THF 60-75 C 61-93% yield 89:11 to 99:1 RS Me Me Bu Bu Me Me RL i-Pr Ph i-Pr Ph i-Bu Bu yield (dr) 84% (1 isomer) 87% (1 isomer) 66% (1 isomer) 77% (1 isomer 88% (6:1) 77% (5:1) t-Bu O S M N R2 RS (H) RL 9 N-(tert-Butylsulfinyl)-imine: Synthesis of -Trifluoromethyl--branched Amines O O S H NH2 R O S N H R TMSCF3, O S N H CF3 R 75-95% yield 90:10 to >99:1 Ti(OEt)4, THF 60-75 C General Mechanism: F TMSCF3 + Ph Si Ph F Ph NBu4 Ph3SiF CF3 Me Si Me Me F O S N H R TMSF CF3 H R NBu4 t-Bu N O TBAT (DeShong) CF3 H2N R 4N HCl MeOH O S N H CF3 NH4Cl R O S N CF3 R Prakash, G. K. S.; Mandal, M.; Olah, G. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 589-590 10 Addition of Arylboronic Acids N R1 S R2B(OH)2 (2 equiv) Rh(acac)(coe)2 (5 mol%) O dppbenz (5.5 mol%) dioxane, 70 C coe: cyclooctene dppbenz: 1,2-diphenylphosphinobenzene HN R1 S R2 O H 70-96% yield 96:4 to 99:1 R1 4-MeC6H4 PhCH2CH2 PhCH2CH2 PhCH2CH2 PhCH2CH2 Ph Ph Ph R2 Ph Ph 4-MeOC6H4 4-CF3C6H4 3-acetylC6H4 4-MeOC6H4 4-CF3C6H4 4-ClC6H4 yield (%) (dr) 96 (97:3) 86 (96:4) 70 (96:4) 73 (96:4) 80 (98:2) 76 (98:2) 71 (98:2) 93 (99:1) 11 Background: C=N Nucleophilic Additions Cat. 1-8 mol% R1 H R1 = Aryl; R2 N Ts Cu(OTf)2 R2Zn (2 equiv) PhMe, 0 oC = Et: 79-99% yield; 90-94% ee Tomioka, K. et al. JACS 2000, 122, 12055; CL 2002, 8. R1 R2 H N Ts SmI2 THF-HMPA Reflux, 5 h R1 R2 (84 %) t-Bu O NH2 Bn N PPh2 Bn H R1 R1 N OMe = Aryl or alkyl; R2 Cat. 10 mol% Zr(Oi-Pr)4 HOi-Pr R2Zn (3-10 equiv) PhMe, 0 oC R2 PhI(OAc)2 (4 equiv) R1 N H MeOH, RT, 1 h OMe R1 R2 NH2 OH (65 %) N O H N O NHBu Ph = Me, Et, Oct, t-isoamyl: 38-98% yield; 81- >98% ee Hoveyda, A. H.; Snapper, M. L. et al. JACS 2001, 123, 984; JACS 2001,123, 10409. R1 H N H O Cat. 2-5 mol% R2Zn (3 equiv) PhMe, -15 to 20 oC R1 R2 H N H O HCl, MeOH 50 oC, 1.5 h R1 R2 NH2 R1 = Aryl; R2 = Et, Me, Ph: 90-99% yield; 70-97% ee (95 %) OH N Ph 12 Brse, S. et al. JACS 2002,124, 5940; ACIE 2002, 41, 3692. MethylDuPHOS MonoxideCu Catalyzed Reactions Boezio, A. A.; Charette, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1692-1693. P N P Ar Me-DuPHOS Boezio, A. A.; Pytkowicz, J.; Ct, A.; Charette, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14260-14261. O N Ar P O P HN O PPh2 H Me-DuPHOS (5 mol%) Cu(OTf)2 (5 mol%) R2Zn (2 equiv) Toluene, 0 C, 48 h Ar HN O PPh2 >80% 85-96% ee R O Me-DuPHOS MO (3 mol%) Cu(OTf)2 (5 mol%) R2Zn (2 equiv) Toluene, 0 C to rt Ar HN PPh2 R R = Me, Et, i-Pr, Bu, R-FG 91-96% 94-98% ee PPh2 H Ct, A.; Boezio, A. A.; Charette, A. B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101, 5405-5410. O PPh2 SO2Tol Me-DuPHOS MO (3 mol%) Cu(OTf)2 (5 mol%) R2Zn (2.5 equiv) Toluene, 0 C to rt O N K2CO3, CH3CN Ar PPh2 H HN R1 O PPh2 R R = Me, Et, i-Pr, Bu, R-FG 78-98% 90-98% ee Me-DuPHOS MO (BozPHOS) R1 Me-DuPHOS MO (3 mol%) Cu(OTf)2 (5 mol%) R2Zn (2 equiv) Toluene, 0 C to rt 13 Catalytic Asymmetric Addition of Organozinc to C=N O N Ph P Ph Ph Et2Zn CuOTf or Cu(OTf)2 (cat.) R3P Ph NHP(O)Ph2 >95% conversion Et H Et Zn Et + CuOTf EtZn NP(O)Ph2 Et L Et Cu L + EtZnOTf O L Cu N NP(O)Ph2 Et Ph P 4 Et2Zn + 2 Cu(OTf)2 Ph 2 Et-Cu + 4 EtZnOTf Ph Ph EtZnOTf EtH H Ph Copper-catalyzed dialkylzinc conjugate addition: Alexakis, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6332. Feringa, B. L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 2374 14 Organostannane Addition to N-Sulfonylimines: Diarylmethylamine Synthesis Hayashi J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 976-977 N Aryl group R2 H SO2R + ArSnMe3 Rh(acac)(C2H4)2 (3 mol%) (R)-MOP (6 mol%) LiF, dioxane, 110 C 12 h Ar = Ph, 4-MeOC6H4, 4-CF3C6H4 N PPh2 Me OMe Me (R)-Ar*-MOP Ph HN SO2R Ph 77% yield 93% ee Ph SO2R H HN R2 SO2R 82-96% ee Ar R = 4-NO2C6H4 2 optimal ligands: PPh2 OMe (R)-MeOMOP BINAP gave low conversions (<10%) but high ee. Much lower yield with less nucleophilic p-CF3 stannane. p-NO2benzenesulfonyl group is cleaved with PhSH, K2CO3 Compatible with esters, halides, CF3. 15 Arylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Organotitanium Addition O SO2R H (S)-SegPHOS (3 mol %) [RhCl(C2H4)2]2 (1.5 mol %) Ar2Ti(OiPr)3 (1.2 equiv) THF, 20 C, 5 h Ar1 SO2R Ar2 O O O (S)-SegPHOS PPh2 PPh2 N Ar1 HN R = 2,4,6-(i-Pr)3C6H2- O HN p-CF3C6H4 S O Ph p-CF3C6H4 O HN S O Ph p-CF3C6H4 HN SO2R R= Ph 99%, 76% ee SO2R Ph p-FC6H4 97%, 88% ee SO2R Ph p-MeOC6H4 98%, 93% ee SO2R Ph m-MeOC6H4 SO2R HN Ph o-MeC6H4 SO2R Ph HN p-ClC6H4 HN HN HN 95%, 94% ee 99%, 92% ee 98%, 92% ee 99%, 86% ee 99%, 89% ee HN 1-Naphthyl SO2R Ph Ph HN SO2R p-FC6H4 Ph HN SO2R m-MeO-C6H4 Ph HN SO2R p-MeO-C6H4 99%, 96% ee 96%, 93% ee 86%, 90% ee 97%, 88% ee 16 Arylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Organotitanium Addition 17 Arylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Boronic Acid Addition N Ar1 Ts Ligand (3 mol %) Rh(acac)(C2H4)2 (3 mol %) (Ar2BO)3 (1.7 equiv) n-PrOH, 60-100 C, 1-3 h Ar1 HN Ts Ar2 N PPh2 O NHBoc H HN Ph Ts HN p-MeC6H4 Ts HN m-MeC6H4 Ts HN o-MeC6H4 Ts HN 1-Naphthyl Ts p-PhC6H4 p-PhC6H4 p-PhC6H4 p-PhC6H4 p-PhC6H4 83%, 66% ee Ts 86%, 72% ee Ts 90%, 76% ee 97%, 86% ee Ts 88%, 92% ee Ts HN o-TMSC6H4 HN o-TMSC6H4 HN o-TMSC6H4 HN o-TMSC6H4 p-PhC6H4 p-MeOC6H4 p-ClC6H4 m-ClC6H4 98%, 92% ee Functionnalization H HN Ts 84%, 88% ee 97%, 90% ee 99%, 94% ee CsF DMF/H2O (10:1) reflux, 25 h 74% R TMS HN Ts ICl, CH2Cl2 0 C, 15 min 99% R I HN Ts R R = Cl 18 R = Ph Arylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Boronic Acid Addition (R,R)-Ph-bod* (3 mol %) [RhCl(C2H4)2]2 (3 mol %) (Ar2BO)3 (1.2 equiv) KOH (20 mol%), H2O (1 equiv) 1,4-Dioxane, 60 C, 6 h Ar1 N Ar1 Ts HN Ts Ar2 Ph (R,R)-Ph-bod* Ph H HN p-Cl-Ph Ts HN p-CF3-Ph Ts HN p-MeO-Ph 96%, 99% ee Ts HN p-Me2N-Ph 94%, 98% ee Ts HN o-MeO-Ph Ts Ph Ph Ph Ph Ph 96%, 98% ee 96%, 98% ee PG = NS, Ligand = Ph-bnd* HN 1-Naphthyl 95%, 98% ee 94%, ee 96% PG = NS, Ligand = Ph-bnd* Ts 97%, 95% ee 98%, 99% ee 98%, 99% ee PG = NS, Ligand = Ph-bnd* HN 2-Furyl Ts HN Ph Ts HN Ph Ts HN Ph Ts Ph Ph p-Cl-Ph p-MeO-Ph o-Me-Ph 99%, 99% ee 99%, 99% ee 97%, 96% ee 96%, 99% ee 96%, 99% ee 94%, 98% ee PG = NS, Ligand = Ph-bnd* PG = NS, Ligand = Ph-bnd* 19 Arylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Boronic Acid Addition (R,R)-Ph-bnd* (3 mol %) [RhCl(C2H4)2]2 (3 mol %) (Ar2BO)3 (1.2 equiv) KOH (20 mol%), H2O (1 equiv) 1,4-Dioxane, 60 C, 6 h Ar1 Ph HN Ns Ph Ar2 (R,R)-Ph-bnd* N Ar1 Ns H NH p-ClC6H4 Ns NH p-MeOC6H4 Ns NH 1-Naphthyl Ns NH Ph Ns NH Ph Ns Ph Ph Ph p-Cl-Ph p-MeO-Ph 94%, 98% ee 96%, 98% ee 98%, 99% ee 94%, 96% ee 96%, 99% ee Deprotection O HN S O NO2 PhSH (2 equiv) K2CO3 (5 equiv) DMF, rt, 4 h 96% No racemization NH2 Cl Cl 20 Arylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Boronic Acid Addition 21 Arylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Boronic Acid Addition O N Ph P (R,R)-DeguPHOS (5.5 mol %) Rh(acac)(coe)2 (5 mol %) ArB(OH)2 (2 equiv) Et3N (1 equiv), MS 3A 1,4-Dioxane, 70 C, 24 h Ph O HN P PPh2 Ph Ph BnN PPh2 (R,R)-DeguPHOS Ph Ph H Ar coe = c-octene To avoid hydrolysis of the imine, Et3N and MS 3A were added. O HN Ph P Ph Ph Ph Cl HN O P Ph Ph Ph CF3 HN O P Ph Ph Ph OMe HN O P Ph Ph O 97%, 94% ee 87%, 88% ee 93%, 93% ee 93%, 88% ee 22 Arylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Boronic Acid Addition O N Ar1 S Ligand (2.5-7.5 mol %) Rh(acac)(C2H4)2 (1-3 mol %) Ar2B(OH) (1.3 equiv) Acetone, 40C, 4 h 2 N O O HN Ar1 S Ar2 N O O O H P N H OMe HN p-ClC6H4 SO2NMe2 Ph p-FC6H4 HN SO2NMe2 Ph HN p-CF3C6H4 SO2NMe2 Ph p-MeOC6H4 HN SO2NMe2 Ph p-MeC6H4 HN SO2NMe2 Ph 95%, 95% ee SO2NMe2 Ph 81%, 93% ee SO2NMe2 Ph 98%, 94% ee SO2NMe2 Ph 72%, 90% ee SO2NMe2 p-MeOC6H4 97%, 92% ee Ph 77%, 92% ee SO2NMe2 p-MeC6H4 HN m-FC6H4 HN o-MeC6H4 HN 2-Thiphenyl HN Ph HN 81%, 93% ee Deprotection 91%, 87% ee 81%, 91% ee 81%, 94% ee O - Inexpensive - Low-molecular-weight - Easy to remove HN p-ClC6H4 S N O H2N NH2 W, 200W, 2 h 96% no racemization p-ClC6H4 NH2 Ph Ph 23 Arylation of Imines: Mechanism of Rh-Catalyzed Boronic Acid Addition P* Rh P* O O Ar2-B(OH)2 (HO)2B Ar1 N SO2NMe2 P* Ar2 Rh Ar2 P* Ar2-B(OH) P* Rh OH Ar2-B(OH)2 P* Ar1 2 N SO2NMe2 H Ar2 P* Rh N P* SO2NMe2 Ar1 H2O P* Rh HN Ar1 SO2NMe2 Ar2 P* Ar2 N Ar1 H SO2NMe2 24 Vinylation of Imines: Ni-Catalyzed Organoborane Addition R1 N Ar H OTMS R2 (2 equiv) Ligand (5 mol %) Ni(cod)2 (5 mol %) Et3B (3 equiv) MeOAc/MeOH, rt, 12 h Ar R2 HN OTMS Et R1 Fe P Ph HN Ph OTMS Et n-Pr n-Pr p-CF3C6H4 HN OTMS Et n-Pr n-Pr p-MeOC6H4 HN OTMS Et n-Pr n-Pr o-Tol HN OTMS Et n-Pr n-Pr 85%, 89% ee 91%, 85% ee 75%, 82% ee 74%, 85% ee HN 2-Naphthyl OTMS Et n-Pr n-Pr c-Hex HN OTMS Et Et Et Ph HN OTMS Et Ph Me Ph HN OTMS Et 2-Naphthyl Me 42%, 70% ee (regio 85:15) 25 90%, 73% ee 53%, 51% ee 45%, 85% ee (regio 80:20) Vinylation of Imines: Ni-Catalyzed Organoborane Addition Deprotection and enrichment HN Ph n-Pr 89% ee OTMS Et n-Pr 1. TBAF, THF 0 C 2. H5IO6, MeNH2 MeOH/H2O (1:1) Ph n-Pr 73%, 89% ee O NH2 Et n-Pr Maleic acid Et2O Recrystallization O O OH Ph n-Pr 71%, >99% ee NH3 Et n-Pr 26 Vinylation of Imines: Rh-Catalyzed Reductive Coupling of Alkynes 27 Enantioselective Addition to C=N: Allylmetal Reagents N R R' M HN * R' H R Precursor to the synthesis of - or -amino acids Me TsN O Ph O N Zn N O BiPc2 Itsuno Low ee 63-73% ee at best B Itsuno R' = TMS, arylimines 92% ee Nakamura O N Ph Zn N O PdCl 2 Ph Hanessian Yamamoto 60-80% ee X O Zr O X Ot-Bu R1 Kobayashi 28 Ot-Bu H CH2OH SnBu3 Enantioselective Addition to C=N: Allylmetal Reagents O N Li i-Pr R3 R1 R2 N Ph ZnL2 Me ZnL2 SiMe2Ph ZnL2 Ph X N X = OMe 90% (95% ee) 96% (98% ee) 74% (98% ee) R3 R4 R2 R5 i-Pr N H 54% (90% ee) 44% (95% ee) R3 = Me i-Pr R1 N Zn N O O N N N N ZnBr R1 R2 R3 N O O N Zn N i-Pr R H R O N R' HN * R' * R3 R2 R1 H X X=H 95% (68% ee) 72% (95% ee) 54% (88% ee) 48% (90% ee) 42% (99% ee) R3 = Me 29 Enantioselective Addition to C=N: Allylmetal Reagents O N N R5O2C OBn R4 + Ph Zn R3 R5O2C R1 R2 N Ph HN * O R' * R3 R2 R1 62-90% yield 74-93% ee Phenylglycinol derived semicorrin Glyoxylates and pyruvates as electrophiles NHOBn COOt-Bu 82% yield 93% ee Me NHOBn COOt-Bu 74% yield 92% ee NHOBn COOt-Bu Ph NHOBn COOt-Bu 90% yield 87% ee Me NHOBn t-BuOOC NHOBn COOt-Bu 89% yield 74% ee COOt-Bu 72% yield 91% ee 30 62% yield 94% ee Chiral Catalyst for the Allylation of Imines Kobayashi ACIEE 2001, 40, 1896. X = Br, Cl X O Zr HO O X N Ar H H H CH2OH H Me SnBu3 Ar Me syn:anti >95 : 5 Tethers for binding to catalyst NHAr CH2OH 87-95% ee 71-84% yield CH2OH SnBu3 Ar Ot-Bu NHAr CH2OH Ot-Bu 31 Allylation of Imines Lou, S.; Moquist, P. N.; Schaus, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15398-15404. 32 Allylation of Imines Lou, S.; Moquist, P. N.; Schaus, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15398-15404. 33 Mannich Reaction: Background O R1 R2 H N R4 R2 N + R4 O Cl R2 + R4 H R2 H R3 R3 + (R)H O H + R3 H N R4 (R)H R4 R3 N R4 N R4 O R1 R2 R3 R3 OH R1 R2 R1 R3 N (R)H H O R1 R2 NHR3 R4 -amino carbonyl OSiR3 R1 R2 Lewis Acid N Organic Base O N R3 -lactam R4 O R1 O R1 + R2 R O + H R3 H N Catalyst R4 R2 N R4 R3 -amino carbonyl R 34 Diastereoselective Mannich - Chiral Auxiliaries H. Waldmann Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 184 MeO O O N Ar Sunji; V. Tetrahedron 1997, 689 t-Bu Me + N OMe Palomo; C. ACIE 2000, 1063 1. LDA, THF, -78 C O OTMS O 2. p-TolO2S NHPG R - p-TolSO2H NPG R 35 (H) Me (H) Me N t-Bu O OTMS OMe MeO O O N Ar ROOC N t-Bu H Me (H) Me (H) Me O 50-82%, >99:1 ds + Cl Me O Me N AlCl4 THF, -78 C t-Bu Me N O O Me 51 % y 82 % ee NHPG R 54 - 94 % y 92 - >99 % de TMSO Xc Mannich-Type Reaction: Chiral Lewis Acid (Metal Catalysts) Metal-catalyzed NR1 Tomioka, Kobayashi R2 H OTMS + NR1 Sodeoka, Lectka RO O H O R3 RO Chiral Lewis acid NHR1 O R3 R2 NHR1 O R3 Ph MeO Ph O OMe O Zr O O Ar P Ar Ar AgOTf P Ar CuClO4 Tomioka (lithium enolate) P Ar P Ar Ar Lectka Ar Kobayashi Sodeoka 36 Kobayashi's Chiral Zirconium Catalyst HO OTMS + R1 Br O Zr O Br O Br Ph 4-ClC6H4 1-naphthyl 2-furyl c-C6H11 O H Y Br R1 Ph 4-ClC6H4 1-naphthyl Yield (Y = OMe) 70 86 quant. H2C=C(OTMS)SEt 78 88 quant. 89 56 88 86 >98 89 80 ee 87 83 92 Chiral catalyst (5-10 mol%) NH NMI (5-30 mol%) CH2Cl2, -45 C R1 O Y OH N Ceric ammonium nitrate to convert the aniline into NH2 group. 37 Kobayashi's Chiral Zirconium Catalyst: Amino Alcohol Synthesis HO PGO + H Y DMI (5-30 mol%) CH2Cl2, -45 C Br O Zr O DMI Br DMI = 1,2-dimethylimidazole Ph Br O Ph 4-ClC6H4 1-naphthyl 1-furyl R1 OPG Br O DMI R1 Yield syn:anti ee OTMS Chiral catalyst (5-10 mol%) NH O Y OH N R1 (E)-TBSOCH=C(OTMS)Oi-Pr quant. 73 65 68 96:4 92:8 >99:1 92:8 95 98 91 98 (Z)-BnOCH=C(OTMS)OR 91 (R = PMP) 6:94 8:92 8:92 13:87 18:82 80 91 96 80 92 4-ClC6H4 72 (R = PMP) 1-naphthyl 80 (R = c-C6H11) 2-furyl c-C6H11 68 (R = PMP) 41 (R = c-C6H11) Ceric ammonium nitrate to convert the aniline into NH2 group. 38 Mannich Reaction of N-Acylimino Esters Kobayashi Org. Lett. 2002, 143-145. O O EtO N O R1 + R4 R4 OR3 R2 Ph NH -Nap TfO Cu OTf Ph O HN -Nap (10 mol%) R4 R4 CH2Cl2, 18 h R1 EtO NH O R2 R4 = H; R3 = TMS; R2 = Ph: 92% yield; 94% ee High ee when R4 = H, Me; R2 = Ar, OMe, SEt O R1 EtO O NH O Ph O 1. K-Selectride 2. LiBEt3H HO HPA-12 (specific inhibitor of sphingomyelin) 39 NH OH Lectka's Chiral Lewis Acid: Enol Silanes as Nucleophiles NTs O OEt H + R R Ar P Ar CuClO4 P Ar Ar = 4-MeC6H4 Ar Ph 4-ClC6H4 2-naphthyl 4-MeOC6H4 t-Bu 4-Me2NC6H4 4-FC6H4 4-CF3C6H4 PhOH, HBr/AcOH to cleave the tosyl protective group Chiral catalyst is also very effective in ene reactions of -imino esters PhOH, HBr/AcOH to cleave the tosyl protective group NHPG O O OEt R PG 4-MeO-2,6-Me2C6H2SO2 4-NO2C6H5SO2Me3SiCH2CH2SO2Deprotection conditions 9 : 1 TEA/MSA, PhSMe PhSH, K2CO3 CsF, DMF 40 OTMS Chiral catalyst (2-10 mol%) THF or CH2Cl2 0 to -80 C Yield 91 93 91 90 65 91 91 75 NHTs O O OEt ee 98 95 92 98 90 92 96 89 R Mannich Reaction of Imino Esters: Ethyl Pyruvate as Nucleophile Jorgensen ACIE 2001, 2995. O RO2C R R = H, Me, Bn Ph 5 mol% Manipulation (sensitivity of Ts group) O O EtO2C R = Me, Bn R NHTs CO2Et 1. L-selectride 2. PTSA 70-92% R CO2Et TsHN O 1. (Boc)2O DMAP (cat.) 2. Mg, MeOH 70% O BocHN O R CO2Et + EtO O N Cu (OTf)2 N Ph O NTs CH2Cl2, 40 C Me Me O RO2C R 89->98% ee >10:1 (syn:anti) >70% yield O NHTs CO2Et 41 Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution with "Iminium" Intermediates Jorgensen ACIE 2000, 39, 4114 O EtO O Ph3P=NCOOMe H EtO O N H O OMe Ar-H (R)-Tol-BINAP CuPF6 (5 mol%) THF, -78 C O OEt EtO O 75% (93% ee) O HN EtO O 63% (97% ee) N Me OEt EtO O 82% (87% ee) HN O OEt EtO O 44% (52% ee) HN O 88% (86% ee) O OEt O EtO 75% (92% ee) N Me N Me O NMe2 HN HN OEt EtO O MeO 68% (72% ee) O OEt HN LA* EtO O N H O OMe Ar-H EtO O HN Ar O OMe Ph P O Ph HN O OEt CuPF6 P Ph Ph EtO NMe2 N NMe2 42 Henry Reaction (Nitroaldol) Jorgensen ACIE 2001, 2992. JACS 2001, 5843 N EtO O C6H4OMe NEt3, 0 C or rt + R NO2 O N Ph TfO Cu OTf N Ph Me Me O EtO O NHAr NO2 R syn:anti 50:50 to 95:5 ee syn: 74-99% anti: 77-98% Modest ratios: R = Ph, Me Good ratios: R = Et, Pent, Bn 43 Mannich-Type Reaction: Organic Chiral Catalyst "Organic Catalyst" H N O CO2H O N N H List Barbas MeO benzoylquinine Lectka 44 Organic Catalysis: Three-component Mannich Reaction List J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9336-9337. OMe CHO O + + DMSO, 50% NO2 OMe 94% ee NO2 NH2 L-Proline (35 mol%) O HN N COOH + MeO N H O2N (Z)-imine (Corey TL 1991, 5287) 45 Organic Catalysis: Three-component Mannich Reaction List J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9336-9337. OMe NH2 O + RCHO + DMSO, 50% OMe OHC 35%, 96% ee R L-Proline (35 mol%) O HN 90%, 93% ee OHC OHC OHC OHC OBn 74%, 73% ee 82%, 75% ee 56%, 70% ee 46 Enantioselective Synthesis of -Keto--amino Acids O PMP + R' R" (20 vol%) H CO2Et Barbas, C. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1842 Barbas, C. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1866 N (L)-Proline (20 mol%) Dioxane 2-24h, rt R' O HN (S) R" PMP (S) CO2Et O H R (1.5 eq) PMP + H N CO2Et (L)-Proline (5 mol%) Dioxane 2-24h, rt H O HN (S) PMP Entry O (1) R HN PMP CO2R 1a (R=Et) 1b (R=iPr) O HN PMP CO2R PMP CO2R 3 Yield dr ee (S) CO2Et 1a: 82% 86% 1b: 85% - 95% 99% 97% R ee >95%, dr>10:1 (2) 72% >19:1 >99% Entry (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) R i-Pr Me Et n-Bu n-Pent Yield 81% 72% 57% 81% 81% 89% 71% dr >10:1 (19:1) 1.1:1 (3:1) 1.5:1 (7:1) 3:1 (>19:1) >19:1 (>19:1) >19:1 (>19:1) >19:1 (>19:1) ee 93% 99% 99% 99% >99% 99% >99% Product O 2 HN 1 (3) 47% >19:1 >99% 2 O HN PMP CO2R 3 4 5 6 (4) 4 O (5) 5 HN 81% >19:1 >99% PMP CO2R 79% >19:1 >99% O (6) HN PMP CO2R 77% 61% 7 F O (7) OH 6 HN PMP CO2R 7 62% >19:1 99% 47 Enantioselective Synthesis of -Lactams Lectka J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7831-7832. O R Cl R benzoylquinine (BQ) (10 mol%) H O C + BQHCl NMe2 NMe2 + O O H N C (1.1 equiv) R O N H + BQ Me2N H NMe2 Cl MeO Ts Ts N EtOOC R O H COOEt N BQ C O R H 36-65% yield 95-99% ee 99:1 dr R = Ph (96% ee), Et (99% ee), OPh (99% ee), OAc (98% ee), OBn (95% ee) 48 Classical Strecker Synthesis General reaction: NH2 RCHO + NH3 + HCN R * H3O+ R NH2 * CN COOH Strecker, A. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1850, 75, 27 Aldimine intermediate. Synthesis of natural and non-natural amino acids. Important for high ee: must be cleavable PG N R1 TMSCN or HCN Catalyst R NHPG * H CN 49 Chiral Ligands for the Strecker Reaction Organic Catalysts O HN NH O N H Corey Lipton t-Bu OMe Jacobsen H N NH N O N HO NH2 Ph H N S N H N H R2 N O N H X N H N HO t-Bu OCOt-Bu Chiral Lewis acids Ph Ph P t-Bu N X OH O H N O N H Ot-Bu OMe O t-Bu N Al O t-Bu Cl O t-Bu t-Bu N O Br Br O Cl Al O Br P OH OH OH OH Ti(Oi-Pr)4 Br Zr(Ot-Bu)4 1:1:0.5-1 Jacobsen O Ph Ph Shibasaki Kobayashi 50 Jacobsen's (Salen)Al(III) Catalyst for Asymmetric Strecker Synthesis: Results Using Aldimines N R N Al t-Bu O t-Bu Cl O t-Bu t-Bu entry a b c d e f g h i a 1. Cat. (5 mol%), 1,2 eq HCN toluene, -70 C, 15h H 2. TFAA O CF3 R N CN N R Ph p-MeOPh p-MePh p-ClPh p-BrPh 1-naphtyl 2-naphtyl cyclohexyl t-Bu yielda(%) 91 93 99 92 93 95 93 (55)c 77 69 eeb(%) 95 91 94 81 79 93 93 (>99)c 57 37 Easily prepared Stable Isolated yield. b Determined by GC or HPLC using commercial chiral columns. c After recrystallization from hexanes. Sigman, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5315. 51 Jacobsen's (Salen)Al(III) Catalyst for Asymmetric Strecker Synthesis: Nitrile Hydrolysis and Deprotection N H 1) 1,2 eq HCN, 7 (2 mol%) toluene, -70C, 15h 2) MeOH/HCl , reflux , 8h HN CO2Me 78% yield, 92% ee dimethylbarbituric acid 5 mol% Pd(PPh3)4, rt CH2Cl2, 3h NH2HCl Recrystallized 60% yield, >99% ee CO2Me 52 Catalytic Enantioselective Strecker Synthesis: Jacobsen's Schiff Base Catalyst 1) cat. (2 mol%) toluene, -78 C, 24h, HCN F3C H 2) TFAA R entry Ph H N O S N H N H 1 2 N HO 3 4 5 t-Bu OMe a b O N CN yielda(%) 78 92 65 88 70 77 eeb(%) 91 70 86 88 85 83 N R R Ph p-OMePh p-BrPh 2-naphtyl t-Bu cyclohexyl 6 Isolated yield. Determined by GC or HPLC using commercial chiral columns. Catalyst improved version for alkyl-substituted imines. Catalyst contains 4 substructures that were optimized from parallel synthetic libraries on solid support Metals were not necessary (Lipton) Sigman, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4901. 53 Jacobsen's Improved Schiff Base Catalyst N R R1 + HCN H 2) TFAA R entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 R Ph t-Bu p-OMePh m-OMePh o-OMePh p-MePh m-MePh o-MePh p-BrPh m-BrPh o-BrPh p-t-BuPh t-Bu cyclohexyl cyclohexyl 1-cyclohexenyl t-BuCH2 pentyl i-Pr cyclopropyl cyclooctyl R1 allyl allyl allyl allyl allyl allyl allyl allyl allyl allyl allyl allyl benzyl benzyl allyl benzyl benzyl benzyl benzyl benzyl allyl CN yield (%) 74 75 98 99 93 99 97 96 89 87 88b 89 88 85 88 90 85 69 74 89 65 eea(%) 95 95 (91) 95 93 77 95 96 95 89 90 95 97 96 (93) 87 86 91 (87) 90 (87) 78 79 91 90 1) 1 or 2 (2 mol%) toluene , -70oC , 20h F3C O N R1 X R2 O 1: R2=Ph X=O 2: R2=polystyrene X=S N H N H N HO t-Bu OCOt-Bu Sigman, M. S.; Vachal, P.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1279 a Values in parentheses were obtained with resin-bound catalyst 2 b Reaction time was 36h. 54 Jacobsen's Improved Schiff Base Catalyst Z-imines: 1) cat (2 mol%) toluene, -70 C, 20h N + HCN 2) TFAA CN O 88% yield, 91% ee Same sense of stereoinduction as the acyclic E-imines. Resin-bound catalyst: No loss of catalyst reactivity or product enantioselectivity after ten catalyst recycles (entry 13 of precedent table). Hydrolysis-deprotection sequence: 1) 3 (4 mol%) toluene, -78 C Ph 15h H + HCN or TMSCN/MeOH Recrystallised >99% ee 99% yield 2) Ac2O formic acid O H N CN Ph 65% (w/v) H2SO4 45C, 20h H O N Ph N CF3 N 1) HCl conc. 70 C, 12h NH2HCl COOH 2) H2, Pd/C COOH MeOH >99% ee, quantitative yield, 84% from imine 55 Catalytic Enantioselective Strecker Synthesis: Snapper and Hoveyda's Ti-Tripeptide Schiff Base Catalyst t-Bu N Ph R N Ph X OH O 1 H N O N H Ot-Bu OMe O 10 mol% R N H Ph CN Ph Ti(Oi-Pr)4 (10 mol%), TMSCN (2 eq) i-PrOH(1,5 eq) added over 20h, toluene, 4 C Without i-PrOH With i-PrOH conv. (%), ee (%)a 99, 97 96, 93 99, 94 100, 94 100, 93 93, 90 100, 85d yield (%), ee (%)a 82, >99b 85, >99b 93, >99b 99, 94c 80, >99b 87, >99b 97, 85c entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 b R Ph o-ClPh o-BrPh p-MeOPh 2-naphtyl 1-naphtyl t-Bu X 5-OMe 3,5-diCl 3,5-diCl 3,5-diCl 5-OMe 5-OMe 3,5-diBr conv. (%), ee (%)a 30, 97 22, 92 15, 88 15, 84 20, 90 25, 91 39, 88 a Determined by HPLC in comparison to authentic racemic materials. c Purified by silica gel chromatography. Purified by recrystallization. d Reaction performed in 1,1,1-trichloroethane with n-BuOH as additive. Krueger, C. A.; Kuntz, K. W.; Dzierba, C. D.; Wirschun, W. G.; Gleason, J. D.; Snapper, L. M. and Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4284. 56 Snapper and Hoveyda's Ti-Tripeptide Schiff Base Catalyst for Strecker Synthesis: Catalytic Cycle N Ph P N O Ti L L O H N O Ph Ti NP O L2 NH NH P = CHPh2 NC Ph NHP RCN (R=TMS or H) N O Ti NP Ph 57 NH O L2 R NC Snapper and Hoveyda's Ti-Tripeptide Schiff Base Catalyst for Strecker Synthesis: Application to ,-Unsaturated Imines cat (10 mol%), Ti(Oi-Pr)4 (10 mol%), TMSCN (2 eq) i-PrOH (1,5 eq)a Ph toluene, 24 h R CN N H Ph Ph Ph R N entry 1 X: Schiff base of optimum ligand. 2 3 4 R Ph o-OMePh p-NMe2Ph o-NO2Ph X 1-naphtyl 1-naphtyl 3,5-diBr 3,5-diBr conv., ee (%)b,c >98, 84 94, 78 >98, 76 >98, 90 yieldd, ee (%) 80, 97 61, 97 93, 76 87, 97 a Entries 1-2 at 4 C, i-PrOH added over 20 h, entries b Determined by 1H NMR of crude reaction mixture. c d 3-4 at -20 C, i-PrOH added over 10 h. Determined by chiral HPLC analysis in comparison with authentic materials. Purified by recrystallization. < 2% of 1,4-addition. Corresponding saturated imines undergo addition with lower yields and ee (15-25% yield, 24% ee for R = Ph) Porter, J. A.; Wirschun, W. G.; Kuntz, K. W.; Snapper, L. M.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2657. 58 Snapper and Hoveyda's Ti-Tripeptide Schiff Base Catalyst for Strecker Synthesis: Application to ,-Unsaturated Imines Ph R1 R2 entry 1 2 3 a b cat (15 mol%), Ti(Oi-Pr)4 (15 mol%), TMSCN (2 eq) n-BuOH (1,5 eq)a Ph toluene, -20 C, 24 h R1 R2 CN N H Ph Ph N R1 Me Me H R2 H Me Me X 3,5-diBr 3,5-diCl 1-naphtyl conv., ee (%)b,c >98, 85 >98, 94 >98, 95 yieldd, ee (%) 84, 85 86, 94 80, 95 Added over 10 h. Determined by 1H NMR of crude reaction mixture. c Determined by chiral HPLC analysis in comparison with authentic materials. d Purified by silica gel chromatography. 59 Snapper and Hoveyda's Ti-Tripept...

Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6310 Synthse organique Jeudi le 30 Avril 1998 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE SALLE: HEURE: D-560 13h30-16h30ATTENTION:-Les notes de cou
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse organique Vendredi le 23 Avril 1999 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE SALLE: HEURE: G-815 9h00-12h00ATTENTION:-Les notes de c
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse organique Lundi 1 Mai 2000 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE SALLE: HEURE: G-715 13h30-17h00ATTENTION:-Les notes de cours et
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Lundi 28 Avril 2003 PROFESSEUR: SALLE: HEURE: A. CHARETTE Z-210 9h00-12h00ATTENTION:-Les notes de cours et le
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Mardi 27 Avril 2004 PROFESSEUR: SALLE: HEURE: A. CHARETTE Z-210 14h30-17h30ATTENTION:-Les notes de cours et l
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Mercredi 27 avril 2005 PROFESSEUR: SALLE: HEURE: A. CHARETTE G-1015 14 h 00-17 h 00ATTENTION:-Les notes de co
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective jeudi 27 avril 2006 PROFESSEUR: SALLE: HEURE: A. CHARETTE D-225 09h00-12h00ATTENTION:-Les notes de cours et l
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Mardi 24 Avril 2007 PROFESSEUR: SALLE: HEURE: A. CHARETTE D-225 9h00-12h00ATTENTION:-Les notes de cours et le
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Lundi 27 Avril 2009 PROFESSEUR: SALLE: HEURE: A. CHARETTE G-835 8h30-11h30ATTENTION:-Documentation permise re
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6310 Synthse stroslective Vendredi le 14 Mars 1997 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE SALLE: HEURE: Z-225 9h30-12h30ATTENTION:-Les notes de
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6310 Synthse stroslective Vendredi le 27 Fvrier 1998 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE SALLE: HEURE: D-560 10h30-13h30ATTENTION:-Les notes
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE Synthse stroslective SALLE: G-835 Vendredi le 26 Fvrier 1999 HEURE: 8h30-10h30ATTENTION:-Les notes
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE Synthse stroslective SALLE: D-560 Vendredi le 10 Mars 2000 HEURE: 14h00-17h00ATTENTION:-Les notes d
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE Synthse stroslective SALLE: G-815 Vendredi le 30 Mars 2001 HEURE: 2 - 5 pmATTENTION:-Les notes de c
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE Synthse stroslective SALLE: G-835 Vendredi le 28 Fvrier 2003 HEURE: 9h - 12hATTENTION:-Les modles m
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT DES ARTS ET DES SCIENCES DPARTEMENT DE CHIMIESIGLE DU COURS: CHM 6315 TITRE DU COURS: Synthse stroslective DATE DE L'EXAMEN: Mardi, le 2 mars 2004 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: Andr Charette SALLE: Z-315 HEURE: De 14 h 30 17 h 30** ATTENTION: Seuls
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Mardi le 1er Mars 2005 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: SALLE: HEURE: A. CHARETTE G-415 13h00-16h00ATTENTION: Les notes de cour
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Mardi 28 fvrier 2006 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: SALLE: Z-220 HEURE: 9h - 12h A. CHARETTEATTENTION:-Les modles molcula
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Mardi 20 fvrier 2007 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: SALLE: Z-317 HEURE: 9h - 12h A. CHARETTEATTENTION:-Les modles molcula
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Jeudi 21 fvrier 2008 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: SALLE: Z-305 HEURE: 9h - 12h A. CHARETTEATTENTION:-Les notes de cours
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: A. CHARETTE Synthse stroslective SALLE: G-815 Vendredi le 28 Fvrier 2003 HEURE: 9h - 12hATTENTION:-Les modles m
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT DES ARTS ET DES SCIENCES DPARTEMENT DE CHIMIESIGLE DU COURS: CHM 6315 TITRE DU COURS: Synthse stroslective DATE DE L'EXAMEN: Mardi, le 2 mars 2004 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: Andr Charette SALLE: Z-315 HEURE: De 14 h 30 17 h 30** ATTENTION: Seuls
Neumont - CHM - 6315
Question 1 TMSCl, Et3N LiHMDS, CH2Cl2, -78 C, 30 minRL Me Me ATBSOO H Me TBSO OH O OTBS RLOOTBSBF3OEt2, -78 C 30 min, 85%MeMeMei-Pr TBSOO H H H Me Me OTBS RL Li TMS O OTBS RL Me3Si H H H RLH MeFelkin-Anh TS (6 pts)O BF3i-Pr
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Mardi 28 fvrier 2006 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: SALLE: Z-220 HEURE: 9h - 12h A. CHARETTE* SOLUTIONS * QUESTION 1 (20 poin
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Mardi 20 fvrier 2007 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: SALLE: Z-317 HEURE: 9h - 12h A. CHARETTEATTENTION:-Les modles molcula
Neumont - CHM - 6315
FACULT des ARTS et des SCIENCES - DPARTEMENT de CHIMIESIGLE du COURS: TITRE du COURS: DATE de L'EXAMEN: CHM 6315 Synthse stroslective Jeudi 21 fvrier 2008 NOM DU PROFESSEUR: SALLE: Z-305 HEURE: 9h - 12h A. CHARETTEATTENTION:-Les notes de cours
Ohio State - MATH - 153
MATH 153 - AUTUMN QUARTER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWO TEACHING ASSISTANT: Cosmin ROMAN office: Math Tower 529 office phone: 292-1923 e-mail: cosmin@math.ohio-state.edu webpage: http:/www.math.ohio-state.edu/~cosmin/Math153.html Note: mind the capital &quot;
Ohio State - MATH - 254
CALCULUS WITH ANALYTIC GEOMETRY - MATH 254 - SP QT 2004LECTURER: Cosmin ROMAN office: Math Tower 529 office phone: 292-1923 e-mail: cosmin@math.ohio-state.edu OFFICE HOURS: T,R 6:00pm-7:25pm; F 10:30am-12:00 (also by appointment) TEXT: Calculu
Ohio State - MATH - 150
MATH 150AUTUMN 2001TA: Cosmin ROMAN office: Math Tower (MW) 529 phone: 292-1923 e-mail: cosmin@math.ohio-state.edu webpage: http:/www.math.ohio-state.edu/~cosmin/Math150.html Office Hours: Tuesday 9:30-11:30 AM; Wednesday 8:00-9:15 AM; by appo
Ohio State - MATH - 150
SOLUTIONS SAMPLE MIDTERM 2 AUTUMN 2000 AND SPRING 2001MATH 150 AU01Comment: no number computation is presented, but rather the method used . AU 2000 1. (1) false: log(4x3 ) = log(4) + log(x3 ) = log(4) + 3 log(x) (2) false: 2x = eln(2)x (3) false:
Ohio State - MATH - 150
Math 150Final ExamSample Exams QuestionsSp 20011. Let g ( x ) = 7 x - 2 and f (x ) = x 2 - 3 . f ( x) a) Find the domain of . g(x) b) Find f (4) - g (4 ) . c) Find a formula for ( f o g )( x) . d) Find a formula for g -1 . 2. Factor the polyno
Ohio State - MATH - 150
SAMPLE EXAM SOLUTIONSCOSMIN ROMAN1. autumn 20003 2 f (x) g(x)(1) (a) g(x) = 0 2x - 3 = 0 x =3 2so the domain ofis all real numbers except(b) f (4) - g(4) = (42 + 4) - (2 4 - 3) = 20 - 5 = 15 (c) (f g)(x) = f (g(x) = f (2x-3) = (2x-3)2
Ohio State - MATH - 150
POLAR COORDINATES - INTERESTING GRAPHSCOSMIN ROMANStart with graphs of functions of the form r = sin(k x), where k = 1, 2, 3 etc (keep in mind that the corresponding graphs for cosine are the very same ones, only rotated 90 degrees counterclockwi
Ohio State - MATH - 150
POLAR COORDINATES - INTERESTING GRAPHS, PART 2COSMIN ROMANHere we have graphs of the form r = a + b sin(). The important (and interesting) issue here is not how big a and b are, but rather how big they are with respect to each other. The first thr
Ohio State - MATH - 132
MATH 132WINTER 2001TA: Cosmin ROMAN office: Math Tower (MW) 529 phone: 292-1923 e-mail: cosmin@math.ohio-state.edu webpage: http:/www.math.ohio-state.edu/ cosmin/Math132.html Office Hours: MW 9:30-10:20; T 11:30-12:20 Homework Turn-in Schedule
Ohio State - MATH - 132
QUIZ # 1MATH 132 WI01Name (1p): . Problem: Let f be the following function: f (x) = Compute the following limits: a) (6p)x0 x+x2 -x-x2 -x-x2 x+x2if x &gt; 0 if x &lt; 0lim f (x)Answer: because of multiple definitions, we need to compute partial l
Ohio State - MATH - 132
QUIZ # 2MATH 132 WI01Name (1p): . Problem (9p): Find the equation of the tangent line to the following curve at the given point. f (x) = x x+1(-2, 2) Answer: we need the slope - and we'll use definition this time: f (-2 + h) - f (-2) lim = lim h
Ohio State - MATH - 132
QUIZ # 3MATH 132 WI01Name (1p): . Problem: Differentiate the following functions: (a) f (x) = ln(x - 1)(x + 1)(x + 3)(x + 5) 2 (b) g(x) = ln(ex ) (3 points) 2 (c) h(x) = ex +x+1 (3 points)(3 points)Answer: (a) Use natural logarithm's propertie
Ohio State - MATH - 132
QUIZ # 4MATH 132 WI01Name (1 point): . Problem: Let f (x) = xe ex . (a) Find intervals of increase/decrease of f (b) Find relative extrema (3 points) (3 points)(c) Find y-intercept, and sketch the graph (you can use straight lines to connect poi
Ohio State - MATH - 132
QUIZ # 5MATH 132 WI01Name (1 point): . Problem: Compute the ones from the following integrals that can be computed (and point out which one cannot): (a) (x4 + 3x2 + 1)(4x3 + 6x) dx (b) (c)1 x2 +12(3 points) (3 points) (3 points) 2x dxex dx
Ohio State - MATH - 132
QUIZ # 6 - OR - LAST QUIZ - OR - FINALLY, IT'S OVER! OR - . WHAT DID I DO TO DESERVE THIS? .MATH 132 WI01Name (1 point): . Problem: Compute the following (1) the definite integralln 3e3x dxln 2(2) the definite integral 1 2x dx x2 + 1 0 (3)
Ohio State - MATH - 132
SAMPLE PROBLEMS MIDTERM IMATH 132 WI01I. Compute the following limits (if the limit is + or - or DNE, state whether it is + or - or DNE; leave the answer in fractions) 4 - x2 x2 x2 - x - 2 lim x2 + 6x + 9 x (7x - 5)2 lim lim x-3(a)(b)(c)x
Ohio State - MATH - 132
SOLUTIONS SHEET FOR SAMPLE PROBLEMS MIDTERM IMATH 132 WI01I. Compute the following limits (if the limit is + or - or DNE, state whether it is + or - or DNE; leave the answer in fractions) 4 - x2 x2 x2 - x - 2 lim Answer: - 4 3 x2 + 6x + 9 x (7x -
Ohio State - MATH - 132
MIDTERM I, FORM AMATH 132 WI00I. Compute the following limits (if the limit is + or - or DNE, state whether it is + or - or DNE; leave the answer in fractions)(a)t2lim3t2 + 1(6 points)(b)4 - x2 x2 x2 - 5x + 6 lim(6 points)(c)
Ohio State - MATH - 132
MIDTERM II, FORM AMATH 132 WI00I. Find the derivatives of the following functions. (a) y = ln(2x + 1) (5 points)(b)y = ln( 41+x2 ) 1-x2(10 points)(c)y = e5x2 -11x+12(10 points)II.(x3 -1 x4+ 2) dx(10 points)III. Given y
Ohio State - MATH - 132
MIDTERM IIIMATH 132 WINTER 2000I. Evaluate the following integralsa)x(7x2 + 2)4 dx(10p)b)x2 + 6x + 3 dx x(10p)Date: 03/03/2000.12MATH 132 WINTER 20006c)0100 + 6x2 dx(10p)d)ex dx ex + 5(10p)(at this point have th
Ohio State - MATH - 132
MIDTERM IIIMATH 132 WINTER 2000I. Evaluate the following integrals a) x(7x2 + 2)4 dx (10p)1 14use substitution: u = 7x2 + 2) du = 7 2x dx = 14x dx The integral then becomes: u4 1 1 du = 14 14 u4 du =du = x dx.1 u5 (7x2 + 2)5 +C = +C 14 5
Ohio State - MATH - 132
FINAL EXAMMATH 132 WINTER 20001. Compute the following limits (leave the answers in fractions) (a) x2 - 4x + 4 x2 x2 + x - 6 lim (8 points)(b)x2 - 9x + 3 x- x - 3 - 72 lim(8 points)2. Find the derivatives of the following function (do not
Ohio State - MATH - 132
FINAL EXAMMATH 132 WINTER 20001. Compute the following limits (leave the answers in fractions) (a) x2 - 4x + 4 x2 x2 + x - 6 lim (8 points)Proof. plug in x = 2 . we get 0 ! so we need to simplify it first: 0 x2 - 4x + 4 (x - 2)(x - 2) x-2 = = 2+
Ohio State - MATH - 415
MIDTERMS' ANSWERSCOSMIN S. ROMANMidterm 2 1. (a) the equation giving the r is: r2 - 4r + 4 = 0 Double solution - r = 2. y = C1 e2t + C2 te2t (b) the equation is now: r2 - 4r + 13 = 0 Complex roots: r = 2 3i y = C1 e2t cos(3t) + C2 e2t sin(3t)
Ohio State - MATH - 131
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS II(MATH 131) WINTER QUARTER, 2003Lecturer: Cosmin ROMAN office: Math Tower (MW) 529 office phone: 292-1923 e-mail: cosmin@math.ohio-state.edu web: http:/www.math.ohio-state.edu/~cosmin/Math131.html Office Ho
Ohio State - MATH - 131
REVIEW PROBLEMS - SOLUTIONSREAD THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, so you can see where one begi
Ohio State - MATH - 131
REVIEW PROBLEMS (PINK SHEET LIST) - SOLUTIONS MIDTERM 3READ THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, s
Ohio State - MATH - 131
THINGS TO KNOWThis list comes as a completion of the list I designed for the second midterm. Again, it's not exhaustive, and contains a bare minimum. Notations: x, y stand for variables and/or functions; f , g, h stand for functions; n stands for c
Ohio State - MATH - 131
SAMPLE MIDTERM 1 - PROBLEMSREAD THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, so you can see where one begi
Ohio State - MATH - 131
SAMPLE MIDTERM 1 - SOLUTIONSREAD THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, so you can see where one beg
Ohio State - MATH - 131
REVIEW PROBLEMS - SOLUTIONSREAD THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, so you can see where one begi
Ohio State - MATH - 131
REVIEW PROBLEMS - SOLUTIONSREAD THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, so you can see where one begi
Ohio State - MATH - 131
SAMPLE - MIDTERM 3READ THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, so you can see where one begins and wh
Ohio State - MATH - 131
SAMPLE MIDTERM 3 - SOLUTIONSREAD THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, so you can see where one beg
Ohio State - MATH - 131
SAMPLE FINAL EXAM - PROBLEMSREAD THIS NOTE: I will be using parenthesis &quot;(&quot;, &quot;)&quot; and brackets &quot;[&quot;, &quot;]&quot; interchangeably (when there are too many parenthesis involved, I will put brackets to clear the situation a bit out, so you can see where one beg