service "Should projects undergo ethics committee review?" Ethics committees are defined as .service project, which work done by one person or a group of people that benefits another. From researching organizations like _______, I have come to understand that ethics committees It is necessary for service projects to undergo ethics committee reviews because they provide objective regulation that ensures proper _____. The benefits of ethics committee reviews are vast and impact many different aspects of service work. A unifying standard, a safeguard for cultural relativism, and stringent regulation to prevent fraud all legitimize both the existence and work of service groups. Without ethics committee reviews, it would be virtually impossible promote ethical behavior in any aspect of service work. ________, ethics committee review provides a unifying standard that all service groups need to abide by. Government models like those the United States and Europe, have shown that when a single standard is applied, it provides an effective backbone to maintaining the structure and integrity of all organizations. With something as detailed as NGOs and service organizations, a case by case anaylysis is simply not feasible. This is the case for many reasons. First, one standard simplifies the and reduces confusion as to what is and what is not allowed. Furthermore, a single standard helps to maintain direction towards stated goals. It is important that these goals are consistent with what the service organization has explicitly stated as their goals prior to initiating service. Without this standard service groups would be left to selfdetermine the scope of action that is necessary or appropriate. This is problematic because underlying motives could influence the work done. At this point it becomes the subjective viewpoint of a few individuals rather than a collaborative effort of the service organization and the society that determines action. Often times, service workers, especially those new to the service sector, find themselves enamored by the idea of fast and sweeping improvements in the area they are serving. The most recent generations are highly invested in service projects, as exemplified by the prevalence of programs like Duke Engage. A commitment to cultural relativism is an integral part of any service project because it provides the insight and open-mindedness necessary to make an effective impact. Many times review boards consist of members who come from the society or who are well-educated on the society being served. This is so crucial because frequently the incoming service groups are foreign and thus do not understand that intricate dynamics of the new society they are working in. Often times, a service group is completely displaced from the area they are serving and thus they are not able to properly asses the situations in detail. In May of 2003, a Berkley NGO called the international rivers network (IRN) protested against the World Bank promotion of s dam near the Bujagali IRN waterfalls. stated that the Ugandan environmental initiative was outraged by the potential for damage to the falls and harm to the people in the surrounding area. However, upon further investigation it became clear that the dams would provide electricity to millions of Ugandans who believed themselves to be justly compensated for any discomfort building the dams would have brought on. The protests of the American NGO (which was so disjointed as to
have most of its members based in Sweden) was so displaced from the Bujagali people that their efforts to promote welfare really impeded real development and opportunity. Nigerian doctor While the motives of some service projects are ethical and well-intentioned, some organizations fail to uphold this standard of moral integrity all together and thus require outside regulation. A 2004 article in The Globalist titled Good intentions-Bad Outcomes stated that not all NGOs are created equal; while some do work that is effective and appropriate, others do work with the best of intentions but do not see some of the negative outcomes of their work. On the other side of the spectrum there is an entire class of NGOs that serve no other purpose than to con people out of their money, Because of their inherent good nature, the public is more likely to trust and invest in these service groups. Crafty marketing techniques use emotive advertisement to draw on public empathy. A recent University of Miami study has shown that people are 73% more likely to donate money to an organization that uses children in its advertisements. Another reason why service organizations have an allure to the general public is because they often represent countries and societies far away. Because much of the population has not visited themselves, there in an exotic stigma that surrounds these places. In many countries, such as Afganistan, organizations pose as NGOs but are in fact a group of locals who are mainly interested in making money from foreign aid directed to the area. This fraudulent practice was so rampant last year that the Afghani government started noticing a distinct misdirection of funds for NGOs and shut down as many as 500 of the 2,000 NGOs in the country. So especially in countries without well-established justice systems, there is an intrinsic need for regulation when it comes to the power and breadth of service groups. Ethics committees are so important in these circumstances because they provide a type of pseudo governmental regulation in the absene of true governmental regulation. Because most ethic committees include a subset dedicated to allocation of funding, it would be easier to prevent fraudulent practices
Extra to add in somewhere else. Goals should be in line with what careful analysis of service sites have shown to be an appropriate action. A disclaimer to this would be necessary in the case where cultural relativism is necessary i.e. what a service group may deem appropriate action may not be favorable or understood by the group being served.