Unformatted Document Excerpt
Coursehero >>
Texas >>
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas >>
BA 1
Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
BREAK FIRST, ALL THE RULES
What the Worlds Greatest Managers Do Differently
By Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman
THE SUMMARY IN BRIEF
Based on in-depth interviews with more than 80,000 managers at all levels (and in companies of all sizes), the Gallup Organizations Buckingham and Coffman reveal in this summary what great managers do differently from ordinary managers to coax world class performance out of their workers. Great managers, write the authors, routinely break all the rules. They take the conventional wisdom about human nature and managing people and turn it upside down. In this summary you will learn which conventional wisdoms to ignore. First, you will find a simple list of twelve questions that will help you assess whether your workplace is the kind of place that will attract and keep the best employees. You will then learn the four keys for unlocking the potential of each and every one of your employees. The first key is to select employees based on talent rather than experience o intelligence. This r summary will help you learn what talent is and why you cant create it from scratch. The second key is to evaluate performance based on desired outcomes rather than direct control over the way a worker performs his or her job. You will learn how to define outcomes so performance can be measured and tracked. The third key to great management is to reject the conventional wisdom that people can be fixed. Focus on strength, the authors urge, not on weaknesses. You will learn how to manage around weaknesses. The fourth and final key is to find the right fit for your employees talents. Again, you will learn to avoid the conventional wisdom that promotion is the only just reward for high performance - mindset that creates an organization where everyone is ultimately promoted to their level of incompetence.
Marcus Buckingham is the leader of The Gallup Organizations twenty-year effort to identify the core characteristics of great managers and great workplaces. He is also a senior lecturer in Gallups Leadership Institute. Curt Coffman is the global practice leader for the Gallup Organizations Workplace Management Practice. He consults regularly on the development of productive customer-oriented workplaces. This summary of First, Break all The Rules, What the Worlds Greatest Managers Do Differently (Simon & Schuster, 1999) is from Soundview Executive Book Summaries, 10 LaCrue Avenue, Concordville, PA 19331.
from Soundview Executive Book Summaries February 2000
First, Break All the Rules
THE The Measuring Stick
THE COMPLETE SUMMARY
those are important to every employee, good, bad or mediocre. Therefore, they arent a true measure of a healthy and strong workplace. A workplace with nothing but low-performing employees but an excellent benefit plan would fare very well on a survey, but the survey responses would say nothing about how well the company attracts and keeps the best. And therein lies the folly of the best places to work type surveys. Just because a place is a good place to work doesnt mean it will attract good workers. It may be a popular but weak workplace. To test this theory, The Gallup Organization surveyed 2,500 business units. After assessing their productivity, profitability, retention levels and customer ratings, employees were asked to answer the 12 questions. Consistently, the companies that ranked highest in the four measures of success had workers who answered the questions affirmatively and emphatically. That is, the best business units had more workers respond that they strongly agreed with each of the 12 questions while the worst business units had fewer workers respond that way. There was a clear link between employee opinion and business unit performance. Managers are the key to a strong workplace. Managers who create an environment where workers can answer the questions positively are the managers who will attract and retain the best.
What a Strong Workplace Looks Like Lankford-Sysco is a strong workplace. The Ocean City, MD, workplace doesnt look very special. The warehouses are cold and foreboding. Workers clad in arctic wear move crates in and out of deep freezers. But as you continue your tour, you quickly notice the workers are focused and cheerful. In the lobby there is a huge mural depicting company history as well as an employee portrait gallery. The company is part of a $15 billion food distribution giant, yet resembles the small, family owned operation it was before merging with industry giant Sysco. The company has a turnover rate in the single digits, absenteeism is at an all-time low, and theft is virtually nonexistent. Company executives think they know the reason. Every employee is paid for performance regardless of what position he or she holds. Managers constantly talk about the importance of customers and say they treat workers with respect and really listen to their concerns. In turn, workers measure their success by personal bests like breakage records and miles traveled without accidents. Virtually everyone would answer yes to the 12 measuring stick questions.
Today, more than ever, employers realize they must find and keep top talent for every role. And the approach many of them are taking is to offer an array of carrots to keep employees happy and around. The problem is that carrots in the form of perks are expensive and may not accomplish their purpose. Carrots dont distinguish between great performers, mediocre performers or poor ones. Your job, of course, is to attract and keep top performers. Unfortunately, the measures you and your company are using to determine if you are succeeding may not accurately reflect what is really happening. You need a new measuring stick. That stick is an assessment of the strength of your workplace. Through an extensive survey, the Gallup Organization has isolated the 12 characteristics of a strong workplace as that workplace is seen through the eyes of the most successful and productive employees. If employees can answer each of the following 12 questions affirmatively, you have a strong workplace, a workplace where the best want to work and stay. 1. Do I know what is expected of me at work? 2. Do I have the equipment and material I need to do my work right? 3. At work, do I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day? 4. In the last seven days, have I received recognition or praise for good work? 5. Does my supervisor or someone at work seem to care about me as a person? 6. Is there someone at work who encourages my development? 7. At work, do my opinions seem to count? 8. Does the mission/purpose of my company make me feel my work is important? 9. Are my co-workers committed to doing quality work? 10. Do I have a best friend at work? 11. In the last six months, have I talked to someone about my progress? 12. This last year, have I had opportunities at work to learn and grow? As a manager, it is your job to make sure employees can respond with a resounding yes to these dozen questions. If they can, you likely have a strong workplace capable of attracting and keeping top performers at every level from the bottom to the top. You probably noticed that there are no questions about pay, benefits, senior management or organizational structure on the list. The reason is that
2
from Soundview Executive Book Summaries February 2000
First, Break All the Rules activities of a manager and a leader are very different. If you want great managers, you must stop insisting that How do the best managers in the world lay the founthey be great leaders and let them concentrate on their dations of a strong workplace? The Gallup talent: managing. Organization set out to answer that question in phase Be wary of compensation systems that identify two of a massive survey project. First, the researcher countless competencies for managers and expect asked clients to identify their best managers, the ones every manager to possess them all. Just as great you would dearly love to clone. Next, the managers managers build on worker strengths and dont try to were evaluated by standard measures such as the completely overhaul weaknesses, companies should not productivity and profitability of their divisions, insist that managers develop visionary talents they employee accidents, shrinkage, customer feedback and simply may not have. Concentrate instead on employee opinion. Those who scored the best overall developing the skills needed to select, set expectations, were interviewed and asked about their management motivate and develop employees. practices. Heres how you do that. Next, another group of managers was identified. This First, when you select someone, select for talent group did not perform anywhere near the level of the rather than the more conventional approach, which is first set. Instead, they could best be characterized as to select for experience, mediocre. They, too, intelligence or determinacompleted the interview. Manager as Catalyst tion. Talent is crucial to When the results were success once you undercompared, a remarkable People dont change that much. stand that you cant teach discovery came to light. Dont waste time trying to put in what talent, only develop it. Great managers break all the was left out. Talent cant be added later, rules. They ignore the conit is either there or it is not. ventional wisdom that says Try to draw out what was left in. If it is there, it can be managements job is to That is hard enough. identify worker weaknesses nurtured to grow. Thats the revolutionary conclusion of great and devise a plan to correct Next, when you set managers. Great managers share another trait; and overcome those expectations, define the they see their role as catalyst rather than weaknesses. Instead, they outcome rather than the manager. One on one, great managers reach operate on the assumption right steps. That way, the inside workers and coax great performance. To that people dont and individual is free to select become a great manager, you must work to get probably cant change many how to reach the outcome positive answers to the first six questions high of the traits they carry. performers answered affirmatively. To get those the best way possible using Good managers recognize answers, you must perform these four activities his or her unique talents the futility in demanding well: (within the confines of change and concentrate 4 Select the right person for the job. legal and practical instead on developing 4 Set appropriate expectations. considerations, of course.) employee strengths. 4 Motivate the person. By defining the outcome 4 Develop the person. rather than dictating the Managers are not Leaders steps, you allow each If your company is going worker to use his or her talent to the fullest. to succeed in developing great managers, it had best Next, motivate by focusing on strengths rather begin by breaking the conventional rule that managers than weaknesses. Remember, it is harder to transform are just leaders in waiting. Great managers need to be weaknesses than it is to develop strengths. If you focus recognized for what they do best; reaching inside a on weaknesses, you doom the worker to perpetual and worker and encouraging exceptional performance. That impossible self-improvement plans. Instead, recognize is not the same as being a great leader. that some workers will be more productive and happier Great managers look inward, inside the company, doing what they have a talent for. Instead, find ways to into the individual, into the differences in style, goals, reward those who dont want to move up. needs and motivations of each person. They then find Finally, when developing someone, help him or her the right way to release each persons unique talents find the right fit, rather than simply the next rung of into great performance. By contrast, great leaders look the corporate ladder. Dont do what most managers do, outward. They look out of the company, into the which is to promote everyone to their level of future, and seek out alternative routes. They are incompetence. visionaries, strategic thinkers, activators. The core
The Wisdom of Great Managers
3
from Soundview Executive Book Summaries February 2000
First, Break All the Rules
The First Key: Select for Talent
Talent is a quality we are all familiar with. Michael Jordan has talent, as do Robert De Niro, Tiger Woods, Jay Leno, and Maya Angelou. These celebrities have special abilities in sports and the arts. But talent isnt restricted to Hollywood or the sports arena. Good managers recognize that talent is something everyone possesses in varying degrees. Talent may be the ability to remember the name that
Myths of Talents Myth # 1 Talents are rare and special The truth is there is nothing particularly special about talent. Remember, a talent is simply a recurring pattern of thought, feeling, or behavior. The key is for managers to help each employee cultivate his talents by finding him a role that plays to those talents. Nurses who can empathize are valuable as floor nurses, not administrators. Similarly, surgeons and anesthesiologists may love the thrill of life and death decisions that others might feel as pressure. They are well suited for their jobs. Myth # 2: Some roles are so easy, they dont require talent All roles require talent. And managers who assume anyone could do a particular job or that everyone doing that job wants out of it as soon as possible are seeing the position through their own filters.
with workers who got great grades in school but simply werent motivated or interested in performing in the job. Similarly, willpower is not enough. If you want to be an exceptional manager, you must select for talent. To do so, you must know what talent is necessary for the job. The best way to identify relevant talents is to study your best. The Right Stuff Perhaps nothing better illustrates the need to place talent over experience, determination or intelligence than the Mercury Space Program. Faced with the race for space, seven men were carefully selected for the program after passing rigorous physical and psychological tests. All seven were trained on space travel. Eventually, they would fly six missions. In all, there were two textbook flights, two heroic ones and two mediocre ones. Two men, Allen Shepard and Wally Schirra, experienced the textbook flights with no drama and no surprises. Two others had heroic flights. Both John Glenn and Gordon Cooper experienced unanticipated mechanical problems and both handled them brilliantly. Cooper even managed the most accurate splashdown of the program despite a loss of his reentry guidance system. But two did considerably less well. Gus Grisson panicked when his craft splashed down and opened his hatch too soon in an effort to get out. He was rescued but the craft was lost. Scott Cooper appeared to be so excited about his flight that he foolishly used up most of his fuel flying this way and that. He was almost lost in space forever. Why did six well-trained, smart and experienced astronauts perform so differently? The answer lies in talent. Exposed to the same stimuli, all six reacted differently, filtering what was happening. They each
Three Kinds of Talent There are three basic types of talent: striving, thinking and relating talents. Striving talents explain the why of a person. Does he or she want to stand out, or is good enough good enough? Thinking talents explain the how of a person. Does he think linearly or does he or she strategize with what if games? Is he or she structured or does the person love surprises? Relating talents explain the who of a person. Whom does he or she trust, whom does he or she build relation ships with? Does he love confrontation or avoid it?
goes with the face, or the ability to solve complex puzzles. It can be your fascination with risk or your impatience. It can be your aversion to risk and your patience. In the workplace, talent is any recurring pattern of thought, feeling or behavior. Great managers understand that every role performed with excellence requires talent, because every role requires certain recurring patterns of thought, feelings or behavior. Consider the example of great nurses. Great nurses have a talent we commonly call empathy, or the ability to feel what another is feeling. They empathize with their charges, making the patient feel that they are cared about Talent is far more important than experience, brainpower or will power. Managers who pore over each persons rsume to see who he or she worked for and the kind of work he or she performed believe the past is a window to the future, and credit experience as a valuable lesson. Experience can be all that, but it is no guarantee. And intelligence is nice, but it does not guarantee performance. We have all experiences
4
had had a unique way of responding to what was happening. One panicked when claustrophobia set in, another was unable to control his desire to play, while others reacted to emergencies calmly and saved the day.
First, Break All the Rules
The Second Key: Define the Right Outcomes
If you want to manage well, you must understand that management is not about direct control, but about remote control. That is, you must realize that trying to control every aspect of someones performance is futile. The object must be to allow people enough room to accomplish the goals set by the organization. World class managers understand this concept almost intuitively and see their role as focusing people toward performance. In other words, they dont see their primary goal as developing workers or creating an environment that makes each person feel special and significant. But remarkably, by focusing on performance enhancement, those things happen anyway. The dilemma for managers is that they know they cant change much about an individual and that they must focus people on performance. The solution is both elegant and efficient. Define the outcome and let each person find his or her own way to it. Each person can reach the outcome by the route most comfortable for him or her, and each worker takes responsibility for the solution. In the end, by focusing on outcome, your employees will become more self-reliant and self-aware.
Perfect Plan Flops When Madeline Hunter, an educator at UCLA, studied expert teachers, she saw that they had a method in common. They approached each lesson in a similar fashion, starting with a brief review and ending with a period of independent study. She became convinced that by following a simple seven-step lesson plan, every teacher could be a great teacher, every teacher could be perfect. She was wrong. In practice, there were no differences in test scores for students taught with her method than other methods. Other teachers using other methods sometimes did better, and sometimes worse. In the end, her one best way method flopped, partly because different teachers have different talents. When the focus was on the steps and not the outcome, the steps were useless.
And off to training they go because the manager believes that the one best way can be taught. Once his people are trained, he reasons, all that is left is to monitor that everyone is following the plan. Dont attempt to make perfect people. What looks like a miracle cure is actually a disease that diminishes
Remember Desired Outcome Airlines often define customer satisfaction in terms of on-time departures. In practice, some airlines define ontime departures from the time the plane left the gate. Time spent on the tarmac isnt counted. Consider what happens when a plane full of passengers waits to take off for several hours because the airline does not want to cancel the departure and lose an on-time departure. Here, the defined rule (leaving the gate but not leaving the ground) prevents reaching the desired outcome (customer satisfaction).
and demeans people, and weakens the organization. Second, avoid the temptation to declare that your people dont have enough talent. Every job requires some talent. Select for it and you wont need to control every move. For example, not everyone is suited for outbound telemarketing. No amount of training is going to make someone succeed who is afraid of rejection and non-competitive, no matter what script he or she follows. Instead, select for the dual talents of competitiveness and ability to connect to others. Third, dont buy the belief that trust is precious and must be earned. If you have a basic mistrust of people, you are likely to want to control the details of their performance rather than set the outcomes and let the employee find his or her way. Another temptation you must guard against is the belief that some outcomes defy definition. It just isnt so. Some outcomes, such as employee morale or customer satisfaction may be difficult to define, but they are measurable nonetheless. Rules of Thumb Follow these rules of thumb, and you will manage for outcome by turning talent into performance: All employees must follow safety and accuracy rules for everyones protection. Employees must follow required steps when they are a part of company or industry standards. Required steps are only useful if they dont obscure the desired outcome. Steps dont lead to customer satisfaction, but can only prevent dissatisfaction.
The Temptation to Control If you want to manage your division or company effectively, you must avoid the temptation to take control of the way your employees achieve the outcomes you defined. Each temptation is familiar and each can sap the life out of the company. First, avoid the temptation to create perfect people. Imagine a well-intentioned expert wanting to help workers rise above their imperfections. He identified the one best way to perform a function.
5
First, Break All the Rules
The Third Key: Focus on Strengths
If you want to become a great manager and want to release each persons potential, you must let workers become more of what they already are. You must focus on each employees strengths and manage around his or her weaknesses. Each person is different, with a unique set of talents, passions, yearnings and patterns of behavior. Dont let stereotypes about people blind you to that reality. It is very tempting to try to fix people, but it just doesnt work. It simply isnt true that everyone can be anything they want to be if only they try hard enough. If you only focus on weaknesses, you are doomed to failure just as you would be if you tried to fix a romantic interest. If you insist that every worker turn non-talents into talents, it simply wont happen. The worker will fail. So how does a great manager manage around weaknesses and encourage strengths? It is actually rather simple. First, make sure each worker is in a role that uses his or her talents; casting is everything. Second, manage by exception. And finally, spend the most time with your best people. Casting for Talent If you want to turn talent into performance, you must position each person so that you are paying him or her to do what he or she is naturally wired to do. That means you place your patient, relationshipbuilding salesman in the territory that requires careful nurturing and your aggressive, ego-driven salesman in the territory that requires a fire lit under it. Of course, sometimes it isnt that easy. Many managers take over a group of workers and go about identifying keepers and losers, and then fill the empty slots with new people. But dont throw out the losers so fast; perhaps they were miscast and there is another role for them. Sometimes it is as simple as recognizing what kind of attention the employee craves. A loser who desires a close relationship with a manager may blossom if you give it to him or her. Manage by Exception Every worker should be treated as an exception, as a unique individual. Some want you to leave them alone. Others want to check in with you regularly. Some crave recognition by you, the boss. Others are only happy with peer praise. Some want publicity, while others want a private, quiet thanks for a job well done. The best managers break the Golden Rule every day. Instead of doing unto others as they would want done onto them, they do unto others as others would have done unto themselves. But how do you know how your
6
employees want to be treated? Ask! In particular, get to know their goals for the future and how they prefer to be praised. It makes no sense, for example, to force a shy worker to accept an award at a gala banquet. Above all else, dont believe that fairness requires you to treat everyone alike. Act as if each worker is unique and give each what he or she needs to succeed. Spend the Most Time With Your Best People Great managers play favorites. Great managers spend the most time with the most productive members of their staff. Remember that no news kills behavior. Your stars may think you are ignoring them if you spend most of your time with the strugglers, and will eventually stop being your top performers. You must tell them often that they are your top people. Ironically, spending a lot of time with your strugglers isnt very productive. Oh, to be sure, you begin to understand what failure looks like. But dont assume that you will learn what works. That you can only learn from your top performers.
Average is Irrelevant Consider what happens when performance is measured against excellent performers rather than the average. For data entry work, the national average is 380,000 keypunches per month. But a wise manager doesnt measure performance against that. Heres what happened when one manager used a top performer, who averaged 560,000 punches per month, as the standard. Within six months of receiving feedback and recognition, she was over the 3 million mark! Her manager designed a performance pay plan around her. Today, the department average is over 1 million strokes.
It is also crucial that you get away from looking at everything through averages. In business, far too much is measured in terms of average. Dont make the mistake of using averages to calculate performance. Do not measure a strugglers performance against the average; measure it against excellent performance. How to Manage Around a Weakness All this focus on high performers doesnt mean that you should ignore the non-performers. Poor performance must be confronted head on, or it will degenerate into a dangerously unproductive situation. Procrastination in the face of poor performance is a fools remedy. First, a great manager will look for obvious solutions to a performance problem. Does the worker have the equipment and support needed to do the job? If not,
First, Break All the Rules get it. Is there a personal problem? If so, be patient. current role arent tempted to take a promotion solely Next, see if the problem can be cured with some for the money. In fact, with broadbanding, the training. Perhaps the employee isnt adept at a promotion may net less pay, not more. computer program and needs some instruction. Another solution is to create upper level jobs that The problem is more complicated if the employee is still utilize talents workers used previously, but dont being asked to perform a job for which he or she does ask the worker to perform an entirely foreign role. not have talent. For example, if you cant remember Lawyers have been doing this for years. Attorneys start names, that non-talent becomes a weakness if you take as associates with a specialty and develop their area of a job as a server in a expertise as they move up restaurant. If talent is lacking, through the ranks to there are only three possible partner. A Perfect Support System ways to make it work. Either devise a support system to When a fast food restaurant chain began hiring Turning the Keys: overcome the lack of talent, mentally disabled workers, managers faced several A Practical Guide performance challenges. One involved a young or find a compatible partner You now know that the woman whose job it was to load frozen chicken into for him or her, or find an four keys to great managea fryer and remove the chicken when a bell rang. alternative role. She did well except for one problem. She could not ment are selecting for count to six, the maximum number of chicken talent, defining the right The Fourth Key: pieces the fryer could hold for safe and thorough outcomes, focusing on Find the Right Fit frying. She did not have a talent for counting, and strengths, and finding the teaching her was impossible. The restaurant reaSooner or later, someone right fit. You are now soned that if they could supply chicken prepacked who works for you will tell ready to turn the keys. in six piece lots, she would be able to do the job. you he wants to grow, to earn The supplier refused to cooperate, so the more status and money, and Interview for Talent restaurant found one that would. With the proper gain more prestige. He wants Remember that intersupport system, the worker succeeded. to move up and wants your viewing for talent, rather help. Should you help him? than just experience, That depends on whether the intelligence and drive, is an workers talents can be utilized in the role he seeks. art form. Here are some tools that may help. First, Your role as a manager is to make sure your make sure the talent interview stands on its own. There employees are in roles that fit. This may mean a is only one purpose, to see if the candidates recurring promotion, a lateral move, or even a move back to patterns of thought, feeling and behavior match the another position. Understandably, a transfer or job. This interview must be very structured. demotion may be unpopular, and a promotion Start by asking a few open-ended questions and wait popular, but a great manager always steers workers for the answer. For example, you might ask a teaching toward roles that create the greatest chance for success. candidate what he likes about teaching. Let him answer The problem with conventional wisdom is that and be quiet. And believe his answers even if they promotion to the next level is seen as inevitable, arent what you want to hear. desirable and the only way to get ahead. It doesnt have Second, listen for specific responses to questions like to be that way. Companies can design systems that Tell me about a time when you overcame resistance to reward people who climb the ladder and those who an idea. If the candidate cant provide specifics quickdont. Only when there are opportunities for more ly, he or she probably hasnt overcome resistance very prestige and more money at the present level will the often; it is not a trait he or she has. allure of the corporate ladder lose its pull. And only Next, listen for clues to talents. Ask the applicant then will workers find that they havent been promoted what kinds of roles he or she has learned rapidly in the into roles that dont fit. past. Ask what satisfies him or her about past work. One solution is to create pay plans that rely on broadbanding. With a broadband system, pay scales Turning the Last Three Keys Everyday often overlap. That is, a lower level position may pay The biggest challenge for great managers is to continfar more than the entry-level position next on the ue to turn the last three keys every day. To meet this career ladder. Companies that broadband pay scales challenge, great managers develop a routine for recognize that those who perform a role well shouldnt performance management that displays four have to abandon that role for the next one up the characteristics: ladder. In effect, those who are comfortable in their
7
First, Break All the Rules Simplicity . Great managers dont use complicated appraisal systems. Instead, they concentrate on what to tell each employee and how to tell them. Frequent interaction . Great managers also frequently interact with each worker, not just once a year at review time. Meet, at a minimum, once a quarter to discuss performance. The meeting doesnt have to last long, but it must focus on performance. One clear advantage to frequent feedback is that poor performance can be corrected earlier rather than be left for a bombshell discussion at annual review time. Focus on the future . All reviews should focus on the future. Great managers ask workers to identify where they want to go and how they are going to go about getting there. Self-tracking. Great managers also ask workers to track their own performance and write down successes, goals and discoveries throughout the review period. Creating the Climate for Great Managers Companies can do a great deal to create a climate in which great managers flourish. Great performance will happen if companies defy conventional wisdom and start turning the four keys to performance. How do you start? First, define every role in terms of outcomes. Second, begin measuring, rating and quantifying as many outcomes as possible. And hold managers accountable for their employees responses to the 12 questions discussed earlier. The company also has to value world class performance in every role at every level. Broadband salaries and reward personal bests. Dont forget to study the top performers; they are the key to success. If you create a climate where great managers can flourish, you will begin experiencing performance management at its best.
Soundview Executive Book Summaries is published monthly. To order Executive Book Summaries, send your name and address to Soundview, 10 LaCrue Avenue, Concordville, PA 19331, or call 1-800-521-1227. Subscriptions are $89.50 per year.
8
from Soundview Executive Book Summaries February 2000
Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more.
Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand
their education.
Below is a small sample set of documents:
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
WISDOM IN A NUTSHELLTHE 21 MOST POWERFUL MINUTES IN A LEADERS DAYRevitalize Your Spirit and Empower Your LeadershipBy John C. MaxwellThomas Nelson, December 2002 ISBN 0785274324 224 pagesBusinessSummaries.com is a business book summaries service. Eve
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
A good business model begins with an insight into human motivations and ends in a rich stream of prots.Why Business B Models Matterby Joan Magrettausiness model was one of the great buzzwords of the Internet boom, routinely invoked, as the writer Micha
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
The Top 200 Secrets of Success and the Pillars of Self-Mastery - Robin S. SharmaThe Top 200 Secrets of Success and the Pillars of Self-Mastery By Robin S. Sharma (Author of The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari) 1. Sleep less. This is one of the best investments
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
Optimal Marketing Marcel Corstjens; Jeffrey Merrihue Insead; Accenture 3,769 words 1 October 2003 Harvard Business Review 114 0017-8012 English Copyright (c) 2003 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. When Eric Kim, executi
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
BEST OF HBR1988Tough-Minded Waysto Get Innovativeby Andrall E. PearsonLike John Seely Brown, Andrall Pearson takes a broad view of innovation. And like Peter Drucker, he believes that productive innovation the kind that actually makes a company more
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
1What Is a Leader?Jack Welch, CEO of General Electric, is reported to have called his direct reports together one day. He issued a threeword dictumDont manage! Lead!and then promptly left the room. Many were left wondering, Whats the difference? Thats
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
TABLE OF CONTENTSPART 1 MCQsMCQs. 1 to 20PART 2 FILL IN THE BLANKSFill in the Blanks.21 TO 22PART 3 TRUE / FALSETrue False.23 TO 25Principles of Management Important MCQs By www.mgtforum.netThe following four different approaches to management thi
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
ChapterTWELVEBasic Approaches to Leadership 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.What Is Leadership?Leadership The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals. Management Use of authority inherent in designated formal rank to
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
ChapterNI NEFoundations of Group Behavior 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.Defining and Classifying GroupsGroup(s) Two or more individuals interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives. Formal Grou
Court Reporting Institute of Dallas - BA - 1
Multiple Choice Single Answer Question Written communication is aCorrect Answer Non-Direct Communication Your Answer Direct CommunicationMultiple Choice Single Answer Question The most effective way of communicationCorrect Answer Written Your Answer Vi
Durham College - ASTR - 125
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
*August 25, 2010Lecture 1Welcome to BIO 311cA biology course that emphasizes principles and facts regarding living cellsLectures here (RLM 4.102) Mon., Wed., & Fri. at 9:00 a.m.1BIO 311C - BrandInstructor: Discussion Instructor: Textbook: Dr. J. B
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
*Instructor: Discussion Instructor: Textbook:BIO 311C Fall 2010Dr. J. Brand Rebecca Knight Biology; Campbell & Reece; 8th EditPlease raise your hand immediately after the start of the class period if you have not yet received the introductory hand-out
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
*BIO 311c Fall 2010Dont forget, discussion periods start this week.1Lecture 3 Monday 30 Aug. 2010A standard way of classifying all living organisms is to separate them into three broad groups, called domains.Domain Bacteria Domain Archaea Domain Euk
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
*BIO 311C Fall 2010You will learn most from each lecture if you examine the PowerPoint slides and read the corresponding textbook assignment before the lecture.1Lecture 4 Wednesday 1 Sept. 2010Some Ways that Prokaryotic Cells Differ from Eukaryotic C
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
*BIO 311C Fall 2010You are responsible for all reading assignments, even when the reading material goes beyond the lecture information.1Lecture 5 Friday 3 Sept. 2010Ribosomes are attached to the cytoplasmic surface of the endoplasmic reticulum and to
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
*!"#$%&' ()*$+,&,&Lecture 6 Wednesday 8 Sept 2010I*-./0)/123$24$/56$7382969:0)36$;<./69 24$7-=)0<2/1>$'6*.?6@/:22=$41AB$CB&CD$EB$&,F+I6*)/123.51E$J923A$K)012-.$#0A)36*6.$24$/56$ 7382969:0)36$;<./69$24$7-=)0<2/1>$'6*.G6.1>*6 G)>-2*63->*6)0 63G6*2E
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
BIO 311C Fall 2010Lecture 7 Friday 10 Sept 20101External Appearance of Flagella- Cells that contain flagella generally have only one or a very few flagella. - Flagella are typically very long, sometimes much longer than the length of the cell. - Flage
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
BIO 311C Fall 2010Reminder: We will devote the last ~20 minutes of next Wednesdays lecture to a review of the subject matter of topics ro be covered on Exam 1.1Lecture 8 Friday 13 Sept. 2010A Few of the Many Types of Intermediate Filaments that Occur
University of Texas - BIO - 311C
BIO 311C Fall 2010Exam 1: in this room at this time on Friday, Feb. 12 (this Friday) You are only required to bring a pencil (preferably #2) to the exam. You will not be allowed to use a calculator or any notes during the exam.1Lecture 9 Wednesday 15 S
University of Phoenix - BIS - 219
Running head: INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS1.INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS Information Systems and Software Applications The arrival of information systems has changed the way the companies operate. Previously, businesse
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
University of Texas - CH - 302
peeples (jjp2256) HW01: Thermo and Collig Prop walker (51645) This print-out should have 32 questions. Multiple-choice questions may continue on the next column or page nd all choices before answering. 001 0.1 points Calculate the heat of formation of but
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C
City College of San Francisco - PHYC - 4C