9 Pages

OFDM

Course: SCE 5403, Spring 2010
School: Carleton University
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 6341

Document Preview

processing The signal principles of OFDM Multicarrier modulation techniques are rapidly moving from the textbook to the real world of modern communication systems By Louis Litwin and Michael Pugel digital signals, the information is in the form of bits, or collections of bits called symbols, that are modulated onto the carrier. As higher bandwidths (data rates) are used, the duration of one bit or symbol of...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Canada >> Carleton University >> SCE 5403

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
processing The signal principles of OFDM Multicarrier modulation techniques are rapidly moving from the textbook to the real world of modern communication systems By Louis Litwin and Michael Pugel digital signals, the information is in the form of bits, or collections of bits called symbols, that are modulated onto the carrier. As higher bandwidths (data rates) are used, the duration of one bit or symbol of information becomes smaller. The system becomes more susceptible to loss of information from impulse noise, signal reflections and other impairments. These impairments can impede the ability to recover the information sent. In addition, as the bandwidth used by a single carrier system increases, the susceptibility to interference from other continuous signal sources becomes greater. This type of interference is commonly labeled as carrier wave (CW) or frequency interference. Frequency division multiplexing modulation system Frequency division multiplexing (FDM) extends the concept of single carrier modulation by using multiple subcarriers within the same single channel. The total data rate to be sent in the channel is divided between the various subcarriers. The data do not have to be divided evenly nor do they have to originate from the same information source. Advantages include using separate modulation/demodulation customized to a particular type of data, or sending out banks of dissimilar data that can be best sent using multiple, and possibly different, modulation schemes. Current national television systems committee (NTSC) television and FM stereo multiplex are good examples of FDM. FDM offers an advantage over single-carrier modulation in terms of narrowband frequency interference since this interference will only affect one of the frequency subbands. The other subcarriers will not be affected by the interference. Since each subcarrier has a lower information rate, the data symbol periods in a digital system will be longer, adding some additional immunity to impulse noise and reflections. FDM systems usually require a guard band between modulated subcarriers to prevent the spectrum of one subcarrier from interfering with another. These guard bands lower the systems effective information rate when compared to a single carrier system with similar modulation. T he principles of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation have been in existence for several decades. However, in recent years these techniques have quickly moved out of textbooks and research laboratories and into practice in modern communications systems. The techniques are employed in data delivery systems over the phone line, digital radio and television, and wireless networking systems. What is OFDM? And why has it recently become so popular? This article will review the fundamentals behind OFDM tech- Figure 1. Single carrier spectrum example. Orthogonality and OFDM If the FDM system above had been able to use a set of subcarriers that were orthogonal to each other, a higher level of spectral efficiency could have been achieved. The guardbands that were necessary to allow individual demodulation of subcarriers in an FDM system would no longer be necessary. The use of orthogonal subcarriers would allow the subcarriers spectra to overlap, thus increasing the spectral efficiency. As long as orthogonality is maintained, it is still possible to recover the individual subcarriers signals despite their overlapping spectrums. If the dot product of two deterministic signals is equal to zero, these signals are said to be orthogonal to each other. Orthogonality can also be niques, and also discuss common impairments and how, in some cases, OFDM mitigates their effect. Where applicable, the impairment effects and techniques will be compared to those in a single carrier system. A brief overview of some modern applications will conclude the article. The single-carrier modulation system A typical single-carrier modulation spectrum is shown in Figure 1. A single carrier system modulates information onto one carrier using frequency, phase, or amplitude adjustment of the carrier. For 30 www.rfdesign.com January 2001 son that the OFDM subcarriers spectrums can overlap without causing interference. A simple OFDM example Figure 3 shows a simple representation of an OFDM system. These types of systems have been built but the practicality of such construction quickly diminishes as the number of subcarriers increases. Each subcarrier carries one bit of information (N bits total) by its presence or absence in the output spectrum. The frequency of each subcarrier is selected to form an orthogonal signal set, and these frequencies are known at the receiver. Note that the output is updated at a periodic interval T that forms the symbol period as well as the time boundary for orthogonality. Figure 4 shows the resultant frequency spectrum. In the frequency domain, the resulting sin function side lobes produce overlapping spectra. The individual peaks of subbands all line up with the zero crossings of the other subbands. This overlap of spectral energy does not interfere with the systems ability to recover the original signal. The receiver multiplies (i.e., correlates) the incoming signal by the known set of sinusoids to produce the original set of bits sent. The digital implementation of an OFDM system will enhance these simple principles and permit more complex modulation. Figure 2. FDM signal spectrum example. viewed from the standpoint of stochastic processes. If two random processes are uncorrelated, then they are orthogonal. Given the random nature of signals in a communications system, this probabilistic view of orthogonality provides an intuitive understanding of the implications of orthogonality in OFDM. Later in this article, we will discuss how OFDM is implemented in practice using the discrete fourier transform (DFT). Recall from signals and systems theory that the sinusoids of the DFT form an orthogonal basis set, and a signal in the vector space of the DFT can be represented as a linear combination of the orthogonal sinusoids. One view of the DFT is that the transform essentially correlates its input signal with each of the sinusoidal basis functions. If the input signal has some energy at a cer- tain frequency, there will be a peak in the correlation of the input signal and the basis sinusoid that is at that corresponding frequency. This transform is used at the OFDM transmitter to map an input signal onto a set of orthogonal subcarriers, i.e., the orthogonal basis functions of the DFT. Similarly, the transform is used again at the OFDM receiver to process the received subcarriers. The signals from the subcarriers are then combined to form an estimate of the source signal from the transmitter. The orthogonal and uncorrelated nature of the subcarriers is exploited in OFDM with powerful results. Since the basis functions of the DFT are uncorrelated, the correlation performed in the DFT for a given subcarrier only sees energy for that corresponding subcarrier. The energy from other subcarriers does not contribute because it is uncorrelated. This separation of signal energy is the rea- Implementation of an OFDM system The idea behind the analog implementation of OFDM can be extended to Figure 3. A Simple OFDM generator. N subcarriers transmitting 1 bit of information each, by turning on and off at time intervals T. Figure 4. Overall spectrum of the simple OFDM signal shown with four subcarriers within. Note that the zero crossings all correspond to peaks of adjacent subcarriers. 32 www.rfdesign.com January 2001 Multipath channels and the use of cyclic prefix A major problem in most wireless systems is the presence of a multipath channel. In a multipath environment, the transmitted signal reflects off of several objects. As a result, multiple delayed versions of the transmitted signal arrive at the receiver. The multiple versions of the signal cause the received signal to be distorted. Many wired systems also have a similar problem where reflections occur due to impedance mismatches in the transmission line. A multipath channel will cause two problems for an OFDM system. The first problem is intersymbol interference. This problem occurs when the received OFDM symbol is distorted by the previously transmitted OFDM symbol. The effect is similar to the intersymbol interference that occurs in a single-carrier system. However, in such systems, the interference is typically due to several other symbols instead of just the previous symbol; the symbol period in single carrier systems is typically much shorter than the time span of the channel, whereas the typical OFDM symbol period is much longer than the time span of the channel. The second problem is unique to multicarrier systems and is called Intrasymbol Interference. It is the result of interference amongst a given OFDM symbols own subcarriers. The next sections illustrate how OFDM deals with these two types of interference. Figure 5. Block diagram of a simple OFDM system. the digital domain by using the discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) and its counterpart, the inverse discrete Fourier Transform (IDFT). These mathematical operations are widely used for transforming data between the time-domain and frequency-domain. These transforms are interesting from the OFDM perspective because they can be viewed as mapping data onto orthogonal subcarriers. For example, the IDFT is used to take in frequency-domain data and convert it to time-domain data. In order to perform that operation, the IDFT correlates the frequency-domain input data with its orthogonal basis functions, which are sinusoids at certain frequencies. This correlation is equivalent to mapping the input data onto the sinusoidal basis functions. In practice, OFDM systems are implemented using a combination of fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and inverse fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) blocks that are mathematically equivalent versions of the DFT and IDFT, respectively, but more efficient to implement. An OFDM system treats the source symbols (e.g., the QPSK or QAM symbols that would be present in a single carrier system) at the transmitter as though they are in the frequency-domain. These symbols are used as the inputs to an IFFT block that brings the signal into the timedomain. The IFFT takes in N symbols at a time where N is the number of subcarriers in the system. Each of these N input symbols has a symbol period of T seconds. Recall that the basis functions for an IFFT are N orthogonal sinusoids. These sinusoids each have a different frequency and the lowest frequency is DC. Each input symbol acts like a complex weight for the corresponding sinusoidal basis function. Since the input symbols are complex, the value of the symbol determines both the ampli- tude and phase of the sinusoid for that subcarrier. The IFFT output is the summation of all N sinusoids. Thus, the IFFT block provides a simple way to modulate data onto N orthogonal subcarriers. The block of N output samples from the IFFT make up a single OFDM symbol. The length of the OFDM symbol is NT where T is the IFFT input symbol period mentioned above. After some additional processing, the time-domain signal that results from the IFFT is transmitted across the channel. At the receiver, an FFT block is used to process the received signal and bring it into the frequencydomain. Ideally, the FFT output will be the original symbols that were sent to the IFFT at the transmitter. When plotted in the complex plane, the FFT output samples will form a constellation, such as 16-QAM. However, there is no notion of a constellation for the time-domain signal. When plotted on the complex plane, the time-domain signal forms a scatter plot with no regular shape. Thus, any receiver processing that uses the concept of a constellation (such as symbol slicing) must occur in the frequency-domain. The block diagram in Figure 5 illustrates the switch between frequency-domain and timedomain in an OFDM system. Intersymbol interference Assume that the time span of the channel is LC samples long. Instead of a single carrier with a data rate of R symbols/second, an OFDM system has N subcarriers, each with a data rate of R/N symbols/second. Because the data rate is reduced by a factor of N, the OFDM symbol period is increased by a factor of N. By choosing an appropriate Figure 6. Example of intersymbol interference. The green symbol was transmitted first, followed by the blue symbol. 34 www.rfdesign.com January 2001 Figure 7. Left plot shows the frequency response of a channel, and the right plot shows the corresponding frequency-domain equalizer response. Note that the equalizer response is large when the channel response is small in order to counteract the effect of a channel null. value for N, the length of the OFDM symbol becomes longer than the time span of the channel. Because of this configuration, the effect of intersymbol interference is the distortion of the first LC samples of the received OFDM symbol. An example of this effect is shown in Figure 6. By noting that only the first few samples of the symbol are distorted, one can consider the use of a guard interval to remove the effect of intersymbol interference. The guard interval could be a section of all zero samples transmitted in front of each OFDM symbol. Since it does not contain any useful information, the guard interval would be discarded at the receiver. If the length of the guard interval is properly chosen such that it is longer than the time span of the channel, the OFDM symbol itself will not be distorted. Thus, by discarding the guard interval, the effects of intersymbol interference are thrown away as well. Intrasymbol interference The guard interval is not used in practical systems because it does not prevent an OFDM symbol from interfering with itself. This type of interference is called intrasymbol interference. The solution to the problem of intrasymbol interference involves a discrete-time property. Recall that in continuous-time, a convolution in time is equivalent to a multiplication in the frequency-domain. This property is true in discrete-time only if the signals are of infinite length or if at least one of the signals is periodic over the range of the convolution. It is not practical to have an infinite-length OFDM symbol, however, it is possible to make the OFDM symbol appear periodic. This periodic form is achieved by replacing the guard interval with something known as a cyclic prefix of length LP samples. The cyclic prefix is a replica of the last LP samples of the OFDM symbol where LP > LC. Since it contains redundant information, the cyclic prefix is discarded at the receiver. Like the case of the guard interval, this step removes the effects of intersymbol interference. Because of the way in which the cyclic prefix was formed, the cyclically-extended OFDM symbol now appears periodic when convolved with the channel. An important result is that the effect of the channel becomes multiplicative. In a digital communications system, the symbols that arrive at the receiver have been convolved with the timedomain channel impulse response of length LC samples. Thus, the effect of the channel is convolutional. In order to undo the effects of the channel, another convolution must be performed at the receiver using a timedomain filter known as an equalizer. The length of the equalizer needs to be on the order of the time span of the channel. The equalizer processes symbols in order to adapt its response in an attempt to remove the effects of the channel. Such an equalizer can be expensive to implement in hardware and often requires a large number of symbols in order to adapt its response to a good setting. In OFDM, the time-domain signal is still convolved with the channel response. However, the data will ultimately be transformed back into the frequency-domain by the FFT in the receiver. Because of the periodic nature of the cyclically-extended OFDM symbol, this time-domain convolution will result in the multiplication of the spectrum of the OFDM signal (i.e., the frequency-domain constellation points) with the frequency response of the channel. The result is that each subcarriers symbol will be multiplied by a complex number equal to the channels frequency response at that subcarriers frequency. Each received subcarrier experiences a complex gain (amplitude and phase distortion) due to the channel. In order to undo these effects, a frequency-domain equalizer is employed. Such an equalizer is much simpler than a time-domain equalizer. The frequency-domain equalizer consists of a single complex multiplication for each subcarrier. For the simple case of no noise, the ideal value of the equalizers response is the inverse of the channels frequency response. An example is shown in Figure 7. With such a setting, the frequency-domain equalizer would cancel out the multiplicative effect of the channel. 36 www.rfdesign.com January 2001 Figure 8. Received spectrum with one non-zero subcarrier. The left plot is for the case of no LO offset, and the right plot is for the presence of an LO offset. COFDM: Coded OFDM Coded OFDM, or COFDM, is a term used for a system in which the error control coding and OFDM modulation processes work closely together. An important step in a COFDM system is to interleave and code the bits prior to the IFFT. This step serves the purpose of taking adjacent bits in the source data and spreading them out across multiple subcarriers. One or more subcarriers may be lost or impaired due to a frequency null, and this loss would cause a contiguous stream of bit errors. Such a burst of errors would typically be hard to correct. The interleaving at the transmitter spreads out the contiguous bits such that the bit errors become spaced far apart in time. This spacing makes it easier for the decoder to correct the errors. Another important step in a COFDM system is to use channel information from the equalizer to determine the reliability of the received bits. The values of the equalizer response are used to infer the strength of the received subcarriers. For example, if the equalizer response had a large value at a certain frequency, it would correspond to a frequency null at that point in the channel. The equalizer response would have a large value at that point because it is trying to compensate for the weak received signal. This reliability information is passed on to the decoding blocks so that they can properly weight the bits when making decoding decisions. In the case of a frequency null, the bits would be marked as low confidence and those bits would not be weighted as heavily as bits from a strong subcarrier. COFDM systems are able to achieve excellent performance on frequencyselective channels because of the combined benefits of multicarrier modulation and coding. Non-ideal effects in an OFDM system This section will examine the effects of non-idealities in an OFDM system. These effects will include impairments and receiver offsets. Because the fourier transform is a fundamental operation in OFDM, the effects of several offsets can be intuitively understood by applying fourier transform theory. Local oscillator frequency offset At start-up, the local oscillator (LO) frequency at the receiver is typically different from the LO frequency at the transmitter. A carrier tracking loop is used to adjust the receivers LO frequency in order to match the transmitters LO frequency as closely as possible. The effect of having an LO frequency offset can be explained by Fourier Transform theory. The LO offset can be expressed mathematically by multiplying the received time-domain signal by a complex exponential whose frequency is equal to the LO offset amount. Recall from Fourier Transform theory that multiplication by a complex exponential in time is equivalent to a shift in frequency. The LO offset results in a fre- quency shift the of received signal spectrum. This shift causes a condition called loss of orthogonality to occur. The frequency shift causes the OFDM subcarriers to no longer be orthogonal. The orthogonality of the subcarriers is lost because the bins of the FFT will no longer line up with the peaks of the received signals since pulses. The result is a distortion called inter-bin interference or IBI. IBI occurs when energy from one bin spills over into adjacent bins and this energy distorts the affected subcarriers. In Fourier Transform theory this effect is called DFT leakage. The left plot of Figure 8 shows the spectrum of a received OFDM signal with no LO offset. For the purpose of clarity, only one non-zero subcarrier was transmitted. Note that this subcarrier is not interfering with its adjacent subcarriers. The spectrum of the nonzero subcarrier actually extends over the entire range of the FFT, however, due to the orthogonal nature of the signal, the zero-crossings of the spectrum exactly line up with the other FFT bins. The right plot of Figure 8 shows the received spectrum of the same signal with one non-zero subcarrier, however, in this case there is an LO offset. This offset has resulted in a loss of orthogonality, and the zero-crossings of the non-zero subcarriers spectrum no longer line up with the FFT bins. The result is that energy from the non-zero subcarrier is spread out among all of the other subcarriers, with those sub- 38 www.rfdesign.com January 2001 carriers closest to the non-zero subcarrier receiving the most interference. This simple example was for the case of only one non-zero subcarrier. In a practical system, almost all of the subcarriers would be actively used for transmitting data. A given subcarrier would experience IBI due to energy from all of the other active subcarriers in the system. The central limit theorem states that the sum of a large number of random processes will result in a signal that has a Gaussian distribution. Because of this property, the IBI will manifest itself as additive Gaussian noise, thus lowering the effective SNR of the system. The effect of an LO frequency offset can be corrected by multiplying the signal by a correction factor. The correction factor would be a sinusoid with a frequency that is ideally equal to the amount of the LO frequency offset. Various carrier tracking algorithms exist that can adaptively determine the frequency that will correct for the offset. is small, the frequency-domain equalizer can correct this effect. Each filter coefficient in a frequency-domain equalizer multiplies its corresponding subcarrier by a complex gain (i.e., amplitude scaling and phase rotation). The equalizers coefficients can be used to correct for a small phase rotation as long as the rotation doesnt cause the constellation points to rotate beyond the symbol decision regions. Larger phase rotations are corrected by a carrier tracking loop. FFT window location offset Another non-ideal effect that can occur in a real-world OFDM system is an FFT window location offset. An Npoint FFT at the receiver processes data in blocks of N samples at a time. Ideally, the N samples taken in by the FFT will correspond to the N samples of a single transmitted OFDM symbol. In practice, a correlation is often used with a known preamble sequence located at the beginning of the transmission. This correlation operation aids the receiver in synchronizing itself with the received signals OFDM symbol boundaries. However, inaccuracies still remain, and they manifest themselves as an offset in the FFT window location. The result is that the N samples sent to the FFT will not line up exactly with the corresponding OFDM symbol. If the offset is very large, part of the N samples will be from one OFDM symbol, and the rest of samples will be from another OFDM symbol. Such a situation would result in a severe distortion of the received subcarriers constellations. Fortunately, such a large offset does not typically occur if a robust synchronization algorithm is used. More likely, an FFT window location offset of just a few samples will LO phase offset It is also possible to have an LO phase offset, separate from an LO frequency offset. The two offsets can occur in conjunction or one or the other can be present by itself. As the name suggests, an LO phase offset occurs when there is a difference between the phase of the LO output and the phase of the received signal. This effect can be represented mathematically by multiplying the time-domain signal by a complex exponential with a constant phase. The result is a constant phase rotation for all of the subcarriers in the frequencydomain. The constellation points for each subcarrier experience the same degree of rotation. If the phase rotation occur. The presence of the cyclic prefix gives enough headroom to enable a small offset to be present without taking samples from more than one OFDM symbol. However, even an offset of just one sample will cause some degree of distortion. Again, the effect can be understood from Fourier Transform theory. The offset can be viewed as a shift in time. As long as the FFT window l oc at i on offset does not go beyond an OFDM symbol boundary, this shift in time is equivalent to a linearly-increasing phase rotation in the frequency-domain constellations. Constellations on subcarriers corresponding to low frequencies will be rotated slightly, whereas constellations on higher-frequency subcarriers will experience a larger rotation. The amount of rotation increases linearly as the subcarriers FFT bin location increases. Examples of the effects of different degrees of FFT window location offsets are shown in Figure 9. FFT window location offsets are often corrected by performing a time-domain correlation with a known training sequence embedded in the transmitted signal. The location of the peak of the correlation allows the receiver to synchronize itself with the incoming signal. Sampling frequency offset Another potentially harmful situation is the presence of a sampling frequency offset. This condition occurs when the A/D converter output is sampled either too fast or too slow. Recall that FS/2 is the highest available frequency in discrete-time where FS is the sampling frequency. Sampling too fast essentially increases the value of FS/2 and the result is a contracted (i.e., Figure 9. Effect of different FFT window offsets. 40 www.rfdesign.com January 2001 squashed) spectrum. Similarly, sampling too slow decreases the value of FS/2 and results in an expanded spec- but the system may also have other sources that can increase the noise in the system. The effect of AWGN on an sending the same data on several subcarriers, or sending data that can be considered lower priority. In extreme cases, the subcarriers can transmit no data, essentially turning them off. Impulse noise Impulse noise is a common impairment in a communications system arising from motors or lightning. Impulse noise is typically characterized as a short time-domain burst of energy. The burst may be repetitive or may be a single event. In either case, the frequency spectrum from this energy burst is wideband, typically much wider than the channel, but is present for only a short time period. One of the most important concepts to understand about OFDM and its properties related to the FFT algorithm is how the algorithm changes the nature of the signal. In a single-carrier system, the symbol can be viewed as occupying all of the available frequency spectrum for the time duration of the symbol. A group of symbols then occupies all of the spectrum for the duration of the whole group, but in a time division arrangement. OFDM, using the FFT, takes symbols and creates these groups directly and then transforms them. They are no longer time-domain multiplexed, they are now frequency-domain multiplexed. The OFDM symbol is now a collection of these source symbols, and this OFDM symbol now has a much longer duration. Each original symbol occupies only a small frequency region, but now occupies that region for the entire OFDM symbol duration. Figure 13 illustrates this concept. For impulses that are short in duration, the impulse energy masks a smaller percentage of time of each OFDM symbol compared to the single carrier case. Impulse noise can therefore have less of an effect on short duration noise. Figure 10. Illustration of the effect of a sampling frequency offset. trum. If the spectrum expands too much, aliasing of the spectrum can occur. Either type of sampling frequency offset results in IBI since the expansion or contraction of the spectrum prevents the received subcarriers from lining up with the FFT bin locations. The effect of sampling too fast is illustrated in Figure 10 and simulation results to demonstrate this effect are shown in Figure 11. A sampling frequency offset can be corrected by generating an error term that is used to drive a sampling rate converter. OFDM system is similar to its effect on a single carrier system. The signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) is a function of the total signal power over the total noise power across the received channel. The uniform noise contributes to the SNR of each subcarrier in the OFDM system and the net result is equivalent to the effect on single channel systems. Non-uniform noise Noise in a communications channel can often be shaped, or colored, by various effects. These effects can include transmit signal imperfections, transmission channel characteristics, or receiver frequency shaping. The implications of these effects for an OFDM system can be different compared to its Uniform noise Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is the most common impairment encountered in a communications Carrier interference Figure 11. Simulation results showing the effect of a sampling frequency that is too high. Note that the sample that was originally at bin 15 is now at bin 8. system. In a wireless medium, the noise source is typically considered to be thermal noise that is Gaussian and uniform across the frequency range. Additional noise sources include atmospheric sources and solar radiation. In a contained media, such as a coaxial cable system, thermal noise will be present, single-carrier counterpart. The modulation of the OFDM system can be tailored for the noise characteristics. One method previously mentioned involves lowering the modulation (number of bits/symbol) on subcarriers in a low SNR environment as illustrated in Figure 12. Another method involves Single-carrier interference arises from other sources that may co-exist in the frequency range of interest. These can be generated by nearby circuits or other transmission sources. The single carrier system must handle this interference as a noise source for all information sent. The OFDM system can avoid the frequency region of interference by disabling or turning off the affected subcarriers. Narrowband modulated sources of interference can be consid- 42 www.rfdesign.com January 2001 are generated by the IFFT and can be used to provide a stable phase reference for the receiver circuitry. Adding these pilots lowers the available data rate of the system because these subcarriers are no longer available to transmit data. Non-linear circuits in the transmitter and receiver All transmitters and receivers in communications systems contain devices such as amplifiers and mixers that have non-linear transfer functions. These non-linearities create an additional performance limitation. The receiver performance is typically limited by distortion generated in the input amplifier or mixer in the presence of strong undesired signals. The transmitter performance is limited primarily by power amplifier linearity. An OFDM signal is made up of multiple simultaneous signals that, for a given average power, have a higher peak signal level. OFDM signals result in an increase in the peak-to-average ratio (PAR) of the signal. For multi-carrier systems, the PAR value is often expressed in terms of statistics because the probability that all subcarriers will simultaneously reach peak amplitude is low, even though the simultaneous peak amplitude value is large. These higher peak amplitude levels will create more severe distortion than a single carrier case even if the average power levels of each are the same. The higher distortion will increase the SNR needed to maintain adequate performance. Linearity requirements in both the receiver and transmitter must be adjusted or backed off to account for this increase in PAR value. The PAR value, and also the amount of linearity compensation, will depend on a number of parameters including the number of subcarriers and the level of SNR that must be maintained. Figure 12. Uniform and Non-uniform noise and SNR. OFDM can tailor its modulation to the shape of the noise spectrum. ered similar to carrier interference in their impairment. Phase noise Noise can also be added to the signal through a frequency-conversion stage. The local oscillator used in the converter will inherently have some phase noise (uncertainty of actual frequency or phase of the signal) that will be transferred to the desired signal. Figure 14 shows the effect of phase noise on a local oscillator. Phase noise is shaped and is primarily concentrated near the carrier (or center frequency) of the signal. An OFDM signal set contains multiple subcarriers, each of which is a smaller percentage of the total frequency bandwidth than in a single carrier system. As a result, phase noise is a smaller percentage of the bandwidth in a single-carrier system. For this reason, phase noise degrades the performance of an OFDM system more than in a single carrier system. Phase noise effects in an OFDM system can be separated into two categories: phase noise maintained within one subcarrier spacing, and phase noise that extends across subcarrier spacings. Phase noise that extends across subcarrier spacings is considered extreme and results in demodulation errors. Phase noise within one subcarrier spacing essentially has a similar but scaled effect as for the single carrier system. The phase noise results in phase uncertainty in the constellation point producing an arcshaped noise pattern in the constellation of each subcarrier. In order to help the OFDM system handle phase noise, pilot subcarriers are often used. These pilot subcarriers Modern applications OFDM has been chosen for several current and future communications systems all over the world. It is well-suited for systems in which the channel characteristics make it difficult to maintain adequate communications link performance. Asynchronous digital subscriber line (ADSL) provides a method of delivering high speed data over the phone line. The system uses OFDM techniques, calling their variation discrete multi-tone (DMT). DMT includes fea- Figure 13. Comparison of single carrier versus OFDM spectrum. 46 www.rfdesign.com January 2001 tures for allowing the removal of subcarriers and for adjusting modulation format (from 1 to 15 bits per symbol) on a per subcarrier basis to best suit the transmission channel characteristics. The system also permits dynamic allocation of these parameters. European digital television is based on the DVB-T (digital video broadcast terrestrial) standard that uses either 2048 (2K) or 8192 (8K) subcarriers within a standard 8 MHz TV channel. The system specifications and coding were specifically designed to allow multipoint repeater signaling that creates co- Figure 14. Phase noise on a LO. The upper picture shows a signal channel signals. Discus- with very little phase noise, and the lower picture shows the same signal with phase noise added sions are ongoing in the U.S. to look at a similar system and Japan is close to adopting a ment it can still make up a sizeable and similar standard for their future digital expensive portion of the design. OFDM TV broadcast system. should not be considered for every comThe next generation of radio broadmunication system because of its cast may also make use of OFDM techincreased complexity and higher transniques. In the U.S., the system under mitter and receiver demands. However, consideration will initially co-exist in for certain systems, modern digital sigthe same frequency slot as the current nal processing techniques now make it analog broadcast. OFDM allows the syspossible to use this modulation system tem designers to shape the digital specto improve the reliability of the commutrum by disabling the subcarriers that nications link. correspond to the current analog spectrum during the co-existence period. After the co-existence period the subcarriers can be enabled and the subsequent REFERENCES data rate increased. Various high-speed wireless network[1] Bingham, J.A.C., Multicarrier ing standards in the 5 GHz frequency Modulation for Data Transmission: An region employ OFDM modulation. The idea whose time has come, IEEE U.S. IEEE 802.11a and European ETSI Communications Magazine, Vol. 28, no. Hiperlan/2 standards utilize similar 5, pp. 5-14, May 1990. physical layer structures with 64-carrier OFDM and modulation ranging from [2] J.M. Cioffi, A Multicarrier Primer, BPSK to 64-QAM per subcarrier. Variin ANSI T1E1.4 Committee ous data rates from 6 to 54 Mbps are Contribution, No. 91-157, Boca Raton, possible. OFDM works well in home FL, Nov. 1991. and office environments for handling wall reflections and movement within [3] Weinstein, S.B., Ebert, P.M., Data the structure. Transmission by Frequency-Division Multiplexing Using the Discrete Fourier Transform, IEEE Transactions on Conclusions Communication Technology, Vol. COMOFDM techniques are quickly becom19, no. 5, pp. 628-634, October 1971. ing a popular method for advanced communications networks. Advances in [4] J. Stott, The Effects of Phase Noise VLSI technology have made it possible in COFDM, EBU Technical Review, to efficiently implement an FFT block in Summer1998 hardware. Despite the advantages OFDM can offer, the hardware to imple- [5] P. Shelswell The COFDM Modulation System, The Heart of Digital Audio Broadscasting, BBC Research and Development Report, BBC RD 1996/8 About the authors Michael Pugel is a principal member of the technical staff at Thomson Multimedia, Indianapolis. He is currently working in corporate innovation and Research for the Future Communications Systems Group investigating home networking concepts and advanced front-end technology. Previously, he has worked on analog and digital television, digital satellite receiver, RF remote control, and cable modem front-end product development. He currently holds 11 U.S. patents and has received numerous internal Thomson awards. He has co-authored several papers and a tutorial previously presented at ICCE. He graduated from Purdue University with his BSEE in 1986 and MSEE in 1991. He can be contacted at: 317-587-4027; fax 317-5876898; e-mail: PugelM@tce.com. Louis Litwin is a member of the technical staff with Thomson Multimedia Corporate Research where he is working on a wireless OFDM-based modem for digital home networking applications. Mr. Litwin received his M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Purdue University in 1999 and his B.S. degree in electrical engineering (summa cum laude) from Drexel University in 1997. He was named by Eta Kappa Nu as the Alton B. Zerby and Carl T. Koerner outstanding electrical engineering student for 1997. He has published over a dozen technical articles and conferences papers on various topics related to digital communications and also has five patents pending related to OFDM. His professional interests include digital communications with a particular focus on adaptive equalization and error-control coding. He can be contacted at: 317587-4745; fax 317-587-6898; e-mail: litwinl@tce.com The authors would like to thank Max Belotserkovsky (Thomson Multimedia) for expanding their OFDM horizons . 48 www.rfdesign.com January 2001
Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Carleton University - SCE - 5403
UMTS Networks and Techniques Dr. Roshdy H.M. Hafezhafez@sce.carleton.ca 613-520-5731UMTS Networks and Techniques Copyright R. H. M. Hafez 1996-200621Course OutlineSection 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Sect
Carleton University - SCE - 5403
Wireless Local Area NetworksOutline1. Rates and Spectral Allocation 2. The IEEE802.11 Family (WIFI)Theory & Deployment ExtensionsSYSC-5403 WLAN Copyright Roshdy H. M. Hafez 1990-20071Wireless Standardste Ra e oic Low ata V D g sin ow Br oe de nc V
Carleton University - SCE - 5403
WiMaxOutline1. What is WiMax? 2. The History of 802.16 3. The MAC of WiMax Copyright Roshdy H. M. Hafez 1990-20071What is WiMax?WiMax is an industrial forum that promotes deployments of Broadband Wireless Networks It supports IEEE802.16 family of st
Carleton University - SCE - 5201
Chapter 1 IntroductionA note on the use of these ppt slides:Were making these slides freely available to all (faculty, students, readers). Theyre in PowerPoint form so you can add, modify, and delete slides (including this one) and slide content to suit
Carleton University - SCE - 5201
Chapter 2 Application LayerA note on the use of these ppt slides:Were making these slides freely available to all (faculty, students, readers). Theyre in PowerPoint form so you can add, modify, and delete slides (including this one) and slide content to
Carleton University - SCE - 5201
Chapter 3 Transport LayerA note on the use of these ppt slides:Were making these slides freely available to all (faculty, students, readers). Theyre in PowerPoint form so you can add, modify, and delete slides (including this one) and slide content to s
Carleton University - SCE - 5201
SYSC 5504 ELG 6154Carleton University Department of Systems and Computer Engineering Principles of Digital Communications Assignment #3 Due on Tuesday, November 16, 2010Fall 2010/111. Suppose the following signalling scheme is used for transmission ove
Carleton University - SCE - 5201
SYSC 5504 ELG 6154Carleton University Department of Systems and Computer Engineering Principles of Digital Communications Assignment #4 Due on Tuesday, November 30, 2010Fall 2010/111. For the convolutional encoder shown below: E c(1) i B aiE s(1) iE
Carleton University - SCE - 5201
Table of Fourier Transform PairsFunction, f(t)Definition of Inverse Fourier TransformFourier Transform, F(w)Definition of Fourier Transform1 f (t ) = 2pf (t - t 0 )- F (w )ejwtdwF (w ) =- f (t )e- jwtdtF (w )e - jwt0 F (w - w 0 )f (t )e j
Carleton University - SCE - 5201
SYSC 5504 Principles of Digital CommunicationCourse NotesFall 2010/11Department of Systems & Computer Engineering Carleton University 2010, Ian Marsland, Dept. of Systems & Computer Engineering, Carleton UniversityContentsRandom Variables . . . . .
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
MPLS IntroductionThe slides are based on a set developed by MPLS Forum; MPLS Technology and Applications, B. Davie and Y. Rekhter, Morgan Kaufman, 2001. Traffic Engineering with MPLS by E. Osborne and A. Simha, Cisco Press 2003; and IP Switching and Rout
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
Trafc Engineering With Traditional IP Routing ProtocolsBernard Fortz Jennifer Rexford Mikkel Thorup Institut dAdministration et de Gestion Internet and Networking Systems Universite Catholique de Louvain AT&T Labs Research Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Florh
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMSII: EXPRESS BRIEFS, VOL. 55, NO. 4, APRIL 2008369A Flexible UMTS-WiMax Turbo Decoder ArchitectureMaurizio Martina, Member, IEEE, Mario Nicola, Member, IEEE, and Guido Masera, Senior Member, IEEEAbstractThis wor
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
2170IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 7, NO. 6, JUNE 2008A Software-Dened Radio System for Backscatter Sensor NetworksGiovanni Vannucci, Senior Member, IEEE, Aggelos Bletsas, Member, IEEE, and Darren Leigh, Member, IEEEAbstractBacksca
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
Common Architecture for Decoding Turbo and LDPC CodesT. S. V. Gautham, Andrew Thangaraj, Devendra JalihalDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India 600036. Email: gautham.thasari@gmail.com; andrew,dj@iitm
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 51 2009Comparison between Turbo Code and Convolutional Product Code (CPC) for Mobile WiMAXAhmed Ebian, Mona Shokair, and Kamal Awadallamessage, is converted into a matrix (nxm). First each row will b
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
High Performance Turbo Decoder on CELL BE for WiMAX SystemHuili Guo*, Juntao Zhao*, Jianwen Chen , Xiang Chen*, Jing Wang**Department of Electronic Engineering, State Key Laboratory on Microwave and Digital Communications and Tsinghua National Laborato
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
WANG LAYOUT9/22/0812:24 PMPage 41WIMAX: A TECHNOLOGY UPDATEMobile WiMAX Systems: Performance and EvolutionFan Wang, Amitava Ghosh, Chandy Sankaran, Philip J. Fleming, Frank Hsieh, and Stanley J. Benes, Networks Advanced Technologies, Motorola Inc.A
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
The 17th Annual IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC06)THE DESIGN AND DECODING SCHEMES FOR SHORTENED TURBO PRODUCT CODESChanglong Xu, Ying-Chang Liang and Wing Seng Leon Institute for Infocomm Research
Carleton University - SCE - 5441
TURBO-CODES AND HIGH SPECTRAL EFFICIENCY MODULATIONStkphane Le Goff, Alain Glavieux and Claude BerrouSt6phane Le Goff and Claude Berrou, Integrated Circuits for Telecommunications Laboratory Alain Glavieux, Digital Communication LaboratoryTELECOM BRETA
University of Ottawa - SCIENCE - CHM2120
University of Ottawa - SCIENCE - CHM2120
CHM 2120 Assignment #1 In this assignment: - Lewis structures, formal charge - Electronegativity, dipoles - Resonance - Acid/base 1. Draw the following molecules as full Lewis structures. Many molecules below possess a charge that is not showncalculate th
University of Ottawa - SCIENCE - CHM2120
CHM 2120 Assignment #1 ANSWERS In this assignment: - Lewis structures, formal charge - Electronegativity, dipoles - Resonance - Acid/base 1. Draw the following molecules as full Lewis structures. Many molecules below possess a charge that is not showncalc
University of Ottawa - SCIENCE - CHM2120
CHM 2120 Assignment #2 In this assignment: - Separation of organic compounds using acid/base techniques - Acids/Bases - SN2, SN1 - E2, E1 1. How would you separate the following mixtures of compounds by extraction? a. Octan-1-ol and octan-1-amine b. Cyclo
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment #2 ANSWERS In this assignment: - Separation of organic compounds using acid/base techniques - Acids/Bases - SN2, SN1, E2, E1 1. How would you separate the following mixtures of compounds? a. Octan-1-ol and octan-1-amine Dissolve both i
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 - Assignment 3 - ANSWERS In this assignment: - Electrophilic addition reactions - Radical substitution reactions - Anti-Markovnikov addition to alkenes - Syntheses Note: Some questions were taken directly from CHM1321 assignments. You can choose
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 - Assignment 4 In this assignment: - Drawing and naming aromatic compounds - Drawing resonance structures involving aromatic compounds - Distinguishing aromatic from antiaromatic compounds 1. Supply a clear structure of: a) m-dibromobenzene; b) 3
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 - Assignment 4 ANSWERS In this assignment: - Drawing and naming aromatic compounds - Drawing resonance structures involving aromatic compounds - Distinguishing aromatic from antiaromatic compounds 1. Supply a clear structure of:a) m-dibromobenze
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 5 Reactions of aromatic compounds In this assignment: - Electrophilic aromatic substitution - Manipulation of products of aromatic substitution - Acidity/basicity is affected by aromaticity and substituents on aromatic rings - Synthesi
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 5 Reactions of aromatic compounds ANSWERS In this assignment: - Electrophilic aromatic substitution - Manipulation of products of aromatic substitution - Acidity/basicity is affected by aromaticity and substituents on aromatic rings -
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 6 In this assignment: - NMR spectroscopy - IR spectroscopy - Problem-solving and structure identification 1. Associate each of the following IR spectra with one of the following compounds and justify your answer. a. Propanoic acid b. 2
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 6 ANSWERS 1. Associate each of the following IR spectra with one of the following compounds and justify your answer. a. Propanoic acid: look for a carbonyl stretch and a broad OH stretch b. 2-Pentanol: look for an OH peak (broad). No c
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 7 In this assignment: - Oxidation of alcohols - Nucleophilic addition to carbonyls - Acetals and derivatives - Wittig reaction - Baeyer-Villiger reaction 1. Provide names for the following compoundsa)Oc) Ob)Od) HO2 C O2. Draw th
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 7 ANSWERS In this assignment: - Oxidation of alcohols - Nucleophilic addition to carbonyls - Acetals and derivatives - Wittig reaction - Baeyer-Villiger reaction 1. Provide names for the following compoundsa) ( E )-hept-4-enal b)S S
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 8 In this assignment: - The aldol reaction - Haloform reaction - Synthetic applications Note: many questions incorporate earlier material 1. Draw the mechanism for the tautomerization of 1-phenyl-1-butanone (also known as butyrophenone
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 8 - ANSWERS In this assignment: - The aldol reaction - Haloform reaction - Synthetic applications Note: many questions incorporate earlier material 1. Draw the mechanism for the tautomerization of 1-phenyl-1-butanone (also known as but
University of Ottawa - CHM - 2120
CHM 2120 Assignment 9 ANSWERS In this assignment: - Esterification - Saponification of esters - Chemistry of carbonyl derivatives - Synthesis of carbonyl compounds (via oxidation of alcohols, etc) For the brainstorming/analysis portions of a synthesis, yo
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment 11) Draw Lewis structures, showing all unshared electrons, for the following molecules: (a) CH3NH2 (b) CH2CH2 (c) C2H2 (d) CH3CH2CHO (e) CH3CH2OH2+ (f) (CH3)3N (g) CH3CN (h) CH3CH(OH)CH3 (i) CH3NCO (j) CH2CHCH(OH)CH2CO2H (k) NCCH2COCH
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment #2In this assignment: - Drawing Lewis structures and assigning formal charges - Analyzing the effects of intermolecular forces - Conformational analysis 1) Draw Lewis structures for the following molecules. Identify the hybridization
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment #2 - Answers1) Draw Lewis structures for the following molecules. Identify the hybridization oft the underlined atoms. a.AlCl3 Cl Cl sp2 The "p " or bital is empty Cl Alf. Propanoic acidHH O C C H C O H HHg. FormaldehydeH CO Hb.
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment 31) Identify each of the following pairs as constitutional isomers, stereoisomers (configurational isomers), or conformers.a) + d) Br Br + b) + e) Br BrBr Br +BrBrc) + f) Br Br + Br Br2) Draw each structure below along with its
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment 3 - ANSWERS1) Identify each of the following pairs as constitutional isomers, stereoisomers (configurational isomers), or conformers.a) + Stereoisomers b) + Constitutional isomers c) + Same compound f) Br Br + Br e) Br Br + Br d) Br
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment 4In this assignment: - Acid/base reactions - Resonance 1) Draw the important resonance forms and show the resonance hybrid structures for the following:(a) H3C O C CH3 (b) H3C O C CH2 H C C H (c) O C OH (d) H C C C CH3 3 H2 CH2 C CH
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment 4 Answers1) Draw the important resonance forms and show the resonance hybrid structures for the following:(a) H 3C O C CH3 O C O CH3 H 3C + CH 3H3 CO CCH3H3 CO (b) H 3C C CH 2 O C OH 3CO CCH2H3 CO CCH2H3CCH2 H3 C + CH2
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment #5 In this assignment: - SN2 reactions - SN1 reactions (these occur primarily when there is a tertiary alpha carbonwill be seen in class shortly) 1. Use arrow notation to show the mechanisms of the following reactions. Use your mechani
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment #5 - ANSWERS 1. Use arrow notation to show the mechanisms of the following reactions. Use your mechanism to predict the product of the reaction. Identify the nucleophile, its nucleophilic atom, the carbon of the electrophile and the le
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment #6 In this assignment: - Nucleophilic addition to carbonyls - Elimination reactions (E1, E2) 1) Give the products of the following reactions and give mechanisms to show how they are formed:O a) H3CO O b) H 1) NaBH4 2) H3O+ 1) NaBH4 2)
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment #6 - ANSWERS In this assignment: - Nucleophilic addition to carbonyls - Elimination reactions (E1, E2) To be covered the week of March 24th 1) Give the products of the following reactions and give mechanisms to show how they are formed
University of Ottawa - CHM - 1321
CHM 1321 Assignment 7 In this assignment: - Alkene addition reactions - Synthesis 1. Predict the major product(s) of the following reactions and give a mechanism to account for its formation.a) + HBrb)+ HCl + HClc)1-methylcyclohexened)+ HBrH 2SO4
University of Ottawa - MAT - 2378
Assignment 1Due date: 23 September 2009Total number of points: 33Q1. (2.1 in the textbook) For parts (a) and (b), (i) identify the variables in the study; (ii) for each variable, write the type of variable (cathegorical/ordinal, discrete etc.); (iii) i
University of Ottawa - MAT - 2378
Assignment 2Due date: 7 October 2009Total number of points: 34Q1. The three events are shown on the Venn diagram: '$ '$ A B&% &% '$ C &% Reproduce the gure and shade the region corresponding to the following events: (a) (c) (e) Ac (A and B ) or C (A a
University of Ottawa - MAT - 2378
Assignment 3Due date: 21 October 2009Total number of points: 32Q1. A medical research team wished to evaluate a proposed screening test for Alzheimers disease. The test was given to a random sample of 450 patients with Alzheimers disease, in 436 cases
University of Ottawa - MAT - 2378
Assignment 4Due date: 16 November 2009Total number of points: 27Q1. (6.39) In a natural population of mice near Ann Arbor, Michigan, the coats of some individuals are white-spotted on the belly. In a sample of 580 mice from the population, 28 individua
University of Ottawa - MAT - 2378
Assignment 6Due date: 7 December 2009Total number of points: 22Q1. (12.5, 12.14, 12.21, 12.28) Twenty plots were randomly chosen in a large eld of corn. For each plot, the plant density (number of plants in the plot) and the mean cob weight (g of grain
University of Ottawa - PSY - 2105
Background and TheoriesChapter 1Learning ObjectivesLearning Objective 1.1 Understand the philosophical and historical roots of child psychology. Learning Objective 1.2 How can we understand the influences of nature and nurture, stability and change, an
University of Ottawa - PSY - 2105
Research MethodsChapter 2 ChapterLearning Objectives Learning Learning Objective 2.1 Understand how researchers use the scientific method to study child development. study Learning Objective 2.2 Compare and contrast the research methods commonly used t
University of Ottawa - PSY - 2105
Genetics: The Biological Genetics: Context of Development ContextChapter 3 ChapterLORD THE HUMAN GENOME CODE HAS BEEN DISCOVEREDOH THOSE HACKERS! I WILL HAVE TO CHANGE THE PASSWORD.Learning Objectives Learning Learning Objective 3.1 Identify and desc
University of Ottawa - PSY - 2105
Chapter 5 ChapterPhysical DevelopmentLearning Objectives Learning Learning Objective Discuss the assessment of and factors affecting newborn health. newborn Learning Objective Describe ways in which the infants behaviour appears to be organized at birt
University of Ottawa - PSY - 2105
Chapter 6 ChapterSensory and Perceptual Sensory Development 2nd. part DevelopmentLearning Objectives Learning Learning Objective 6.1 Explain the issues for understanding perceptual development. development. Learning Objective 6.2 Outline the developmen
University of Ottawa - PSY - 2105
Cognitive Development: Cognitive The Piagetian Approach TheChapter 7 ChapterLearning Objectives Learning Learning Objective 7.1 Define the concepts from biology that Piaget used to explain cognitive development and evaluate his theory of stages. of Lea
University of Ottawa - PSY - 2105
Cognitive Development: Cognitive The Piagetian Approach TheChapter 7 ChapterLearning Objectives Learning Learning Objective 7.3 Identify some strengths and limitations of preoperational thought in childrens cognitive development. childrens Learning Obj