This preview has intentionally blurred parts. Sign up to view the full document

View Full Document

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Payback 8-2. a. on this bond is 25 years. You pay $1,000. You receive $40 a year for 25 years, a total of $1,000. b. The bond is not necessarily a bad investment. Payback does not take time value of money into account, nor does it account for cash flows received after the payback period. It is more appropriate to calculate the NPV of an investment. Given the risk level of the bond, is 4% a fair return? If the answer is yes, then the bond may be a good investment. c. The discounted payback, using a 4% discount rate, is 30 years. This shows that unless the acceptable payback period is decreased discounted when payback is used, vs. regular payback, then projects which return money late in the life of the investment are even more disadvantaged under discounted payback than under regular payback. NPV is a more appropriate method to use to determine the value of an investment project. 8-9. Project IRR A B C D 17.4% 8.7% 27.2% 21.4% 10-1a. Cost of Equity = 6% + [1.6(11%-6%)] = 14% 10-3. Pepsico has a higher operating leverage as per the attached excel sheet Sales Operating income DOL Coca-Cola 2006 2005 $24.09 $23.10 $6.09 $6.31 0.81 Pepsi 2006 $35.14 $6.44 1.11 2005 $32.56 $5.92 ... View Full Document

End of Preview

Sign up now to access the rest of the document