14 Pages

150_5220_9a

Course: CEE 4674, Fall 2011
School: Virginia Tech
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 2980

Document Preview

Department of U.S. Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEMS ON CIVIL AIRPORTS Advisory Circular Date: 12/20/2006 Initiated by: AAS-300 AC No: 150/5220-9A Change: 1. PURPOSE. This Advisory Circular (AC) contains the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards and recommendations for the installations of aircraft arresting systems on civil airports not owned or...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Virginia >> Virginia Tech >> CEE 4674

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Department of U.S. Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEMS ON CIVIL AIRPORTS Advisory Circular Date: 12/20/2006 Initiated by: AAS-300 AC No: 150/5220-9A Change: 1. PURPOSE. This Advisory Circular (AC) contains the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards and recommendations for the installations of aircraft arresting systems on civil airports not owned or operated by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). 2. CANCELLATION. This AC cancels AC 150/5220-9, Aircraft Arresting Systems for Joint Civil/Military Operations, dated April 6, 1970. 3. APPLICABILITY. FAA recommends the information contained in this AC be used on civil airports. For federally obligated civil airports, the standards and recommendations contained in this AC are mandatory. For certificated airports, the standards and recommendations in this AC satisfy the requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139, Certification of Airports. This AC does not describe Engineered Materials Arresting Systems (EMAS). For guidance on EMAS, see AC 150/5220-22, Engineered Materials Arresting Systems (EMAS) for Aircraft Overruns. 4. PURPOSE OF AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEMS. The military installs and maintains aircraft arresting systems when certain military operations are authorized at civil airports. Aircraft arresting systems serve primarily to save lives by preventing aircraft from overrunning runways in cases where the pilot is unable to stop the aircraft during landing or aborted takeoff operations. They also serve to save aircraft and prevent major damage. 5. INSTALLATION OF ARRESTING SYSTEMS. a. Aircraft arresting systems must be installed according to the latest official criteria of the military aircraft operational need. In most cases, the criteria can be found in Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32-1043, Managing, Operating, and Maintaining Aircraft Arresting Systems. b. Airport management may request an FAA determination on the effect the location and use of the arresting system will have on the operation of navigation aids serving the airport. At the request of airport management, the military will submit plans in sufficient detail to the appropriate FAA Airports Regional or Airports District Office for review. c. FAA must find, prior to the installation of the arresting system, the location and use of the system will have no adverse effect on the safe operation of the airport and the navigation aids serving the airport. In addition, the FAA determination must state that the criteria in this AC and AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design, are satisfied to the extent practicable. FAA will provide its determination to both the military and airport management. d. Airport management must provide written permission to the DOD service component or major command headquarters to install the aircraft arresting system at the agreed-upon location. e. Inspection, general maintenance, certification, and operation of the aircraft arresting system must be detailed in a Letter of Agreement (LOA) between the military proponent and airport management. The LOA should also include provisions to change/upgrade the system based on any change to the military mission or operating requirements. In addition, the LOA should outline any requirements for decommissioning and removing the system, including restoration of the area to current runway safety AC 150/5220-9A 12/20/2006 area standards. There is no specified format for this LOA between the military and airport management. At Part 139-certificated airports, this LOA must be included in the Airport Certification Manual (ACM). 6. GENERAL INFORMATION. a. The location of the aircraft arresting system on a civil airport is considered fixed by its function. To the extent practicable, the frangibility requirements found in Part 139 must be satisfied. In situations where some components of the aircraft arresting system cannot satisfy frangibility requirements, the safe and proper operation of these components, and only these components, will take precedence over the frangibility requirements. When the arresting system is installed according to U.S. Military criteria, it will not be viewed as a violation of Part 139. b. The airport design criteria found in AC 150/5300-13 should be followed to the extent practicable. Grading and site layout criteria in the immediate area of the arresting system will follow the guidance in AFI 32-1043. For example, a 1-vertical to 30-horizontal ground gradient can be used for the backfill area around the fairlead beam of a BAK-12 Aircraft Arresting System, as described in AFI 32-1043. 7. PERMANENT INSTALLATIONS. Permanently installed arresting systems should only be allowed when there is a valid military requirement (normally based on the type of military aircraft assigned at the airport). This requirement should be documented in an LOA between the DOD service component or major command headquarters and the airport owner. At a Part 139-certificated airport, the LOA must be included in the ACM. When the arresting system is no longer needed at an airport, it should be removed, and the runway safety area should be restored to the current FAA airport design standards. 8. TEMPORARY ARRESTING GEAR INSTALLATION. a. IN A RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA). The threshold needs to be moved or relocated to provide the required safety area between the arresting gear and the threshold if the runway is to remain open to civil aircraft for the amount of time the temporary installation is in place. During this period, the new threshold will need to be marked and lighted in the following manner: (1) Mark the threshold bar with a painted white bar in the grass on each side of the new or relocated threshold. (This can be made from plywood sheets or equivalent materials on each side of the runway to provide an 8-foot by 24-foot threshold bar to satisfy this requirement.) (2) Install yellow painted chevron(s) before the threshold bars on each side of the runway. (This can be made from plywood sheets or equivalent materials. Each chevron can consist of three 4foot by 8-foot sheets of plywood with one sheet cut diagonally in half to form the point of the chevron. The chevrons will also need to be securely anchored to the ground. Anchoring can be done with spikes.) (3) Cover the Runway Distance Remaining Signs (DRSs) for the opposite direction from the relocated threshold. (4) Place any Precision Approach Path Indicators (PAPIs), Visual Approach Slope Indicators (VASIs), Runway End Identification Lights (REILs), or approach lights systems for the relocated runway threshold end out of service. (5) If night operations will be conducted on the runway, install threshold/runway end lights at the relocated threshold. (6) Adjust the yellow caution zone runway edge lights for the opposite direction to accommodate the new threshold (if applicable). (7) Place runway centerline lights for the opposite direction out of service. (8) Cover or place out of service the runway edge lights and threshold/runway edge lights in the relocated area. If the relocated area will be used for taxiing operations at night, taxiway reflectors will need to be installed. (9) Airport management should coordinate with the FAA offices (Air Traffic, Flight Standards, and Airports District Office) to determine the effect the temporary arresting equipment will have on civil aircraft operations. 2 12/20/2006 AC 150/5220-9A b. EXCEPTION. The runway threshold does not need to be relocated if a Mobile Aircraft Arresting System (MAAS or a BAK-12) is installed in accordance with the following: (1) the RSA. The fairlead beam installation is used, and the MAAS energy absorbers are located outside (2) To the extent practicable, all arresting system components within the RSA are below grade and covered, and the deck sheaves are covered, ramped, and compacted to a 30 to1 (horizontal to vertical) ratio. Nothing in this subparagraph is intended to compromise the safe use or proper maintenance of any arresting system component located in the RSA. (3) The aircraft arresting cable is removed when not required for military operations. 9. NOTICE REQUIREMENT FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS. Airports where aircraft arresting systems are installed should include the type, number, and location of arresting system(s) in the Airport Data System [Airport/Facility Directory (A/FD) or Flight Information Publications through the FAA Form 5010-1, Airport Master Record, and/or Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) systems]. CENTERLINE STRIPE 10. RUNWAY PAVEMENT MARKING. The location of a permanent aircraft arresting system that crosses operational runway pavement will be identified by a series of reflective circles 10 feet (3.05 meters) in diameter and painted solid yellow (striated marking will not be allowed) on the runway. The circles will be 15 feet (4.57 meters) apart on centers and extend the full width of the runway. The middle two circles will straddle the runway centerline. See Figure 1. When interference occurs with any runway markings, except for runway designation markings, the runway markings may be interrupted with a clearance of 1 foot (0.30 meters) to the edge of the discs. If possible, the aircraft arresting system should ARRESTING SYSTEM WARNING MARKING ARRANGEMENT WHEN SACRIFICIAL PANELS ARE USED 5 (1.52m) RADIUS SEMI-CIRCLES 10 (3.05m) 15 (4.57m) 7.5 (2.29m) 15 (4.57m) PENDANT RUNWAY CENTERLINE SACRIFICIAL POLYETHYLENE PANELS SIDE STRIPE 10 (3.05m) 5 (1.52m) SIDE STRIPE 10 (3.05m) DIAMETER DISCS Figure 1. Arresting System Runway Pavement Marking. 3 AC 150/5220-9A 12/20/2006 be located to avoid any runway marking interference. All other runway markings are to be in compliance with AC 150/5340-1, Standards for Airport Markings. 11. ARRESTING SYSTEM SIGNAGE. a. Purpose. Arresting Gear Markers (AGMs) identify arresting gear pendant cables or systems on the operational runway surface. See Figure 2. Figure 2. Arresting Marker (AGM). Gear AGMs have characteristics of Runway Distance Remaining Signs but with a yellow circle 39 inches (1 meter) in diameter on a black background. b. Installation. Arresting pendant cables must be identified by AGMs on both sides of the runway. The AGMs are located in line with the pendant cable +/-10 feet (3 meters) and equidistant from the runway edge. Where Distance Remaining Signs (DRSs) (Figure 3) are installed along a runway, locate the AGMs in line with the DRSs, except where the pendant cable is within 20 feet (6 meters) of a DRS. In this case, relocate the AGM 5 feet (1.5 meters) outboard of the DRS. The distance indicated is to the inside edge of the marker. If the arresting gear is in the stopway or runway safety area, signs are not allowed but obstruction lights are required. (This is a common requirement for the BAK-15.) Markers are oriented perpendicular to the runway centerline. Typical installation of an AGM is shown in Figure 4. c. Message. The AGM has a yellow translucent circle approximately 39 inches (1 meter) in diameter facing both runway directions. d. Dimensions. The AGMs are double faced, internally lighted, with retroreflective message faces that meet the color and reflectivity requirements of ASTM D 4956, Type I Sheeting. AGMs are similar to Size 4 Runway Distance Remaining Signs, as described in AC 150/5345-44, Specifications for Runway and Taxiway Signs. Additionally, the AGM should meet the wind-load and frangibility requirements of an L-858B sign. The spacing, stroke, and shape of legend characters, numerals, and symbols must be in accordance with Appendix 1 of AC 150/5345-44. A Size 4 sign has a marker panel height of 48 inches (1220 millimeters) and overall mounting height of 54 to 60 inches (1370 to 1520 millimeters). As with the DRS, the AGM should provide at least 12 inches (30 centimeters) of clearance between the top of the sign and any part of the most critical aircraft expected to use the runway when the aircraft wheels are at the pavement edge. e. Electrical. The AGM installation must be compatible with the existing airfield electrical system. The AGMs should be powered from the same source and circuit as DRSs. Figure 3. Runway Distance Remaining Sign (DRS). A DRS is Type L-858B, with a white legend on a black background and conforming to AC 150/5345-44, Size 4, Style 2 or 3. 4 12/20/2006 AC 150/5220-9A Figure 4. Arresting Gear Marker (AGM) Configuration. Install the AGM the same distance from the runway centerline as the DRSs. If a DRS is within 20 feet (6 meters) of an AGM, install the AGM an additional 5 feet (1.5 meters) outbound from the runway centerline. (Refer to Paragraph 11b.) 12. REFERENCES. Please refer to the current versions of the following documents. FAA ACs are available at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/. Air Force Instructions are available at http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/. a. Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139, Certification of Airports (http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/). b. Air Force Instruction 32-1043, Managing, Operating, and Maintaining Aircraft Arresting Systems. c. Advisory Circular 150/5300-13, Airport Design. d. Advisory Circular 150/5340-1, Standards for Airport Markings. e. Advisory Circular 150/5340-18, Standards for Airport Sign Systems. f. Advisory Circular 150/5345-44, Specification for Taxiway and Runway Signs. David L. Bennett Director, Airport Safety and Standards 5 AC 150/5220-9A 12/20/2006 This page intentionally left blank. 6 12/20/2006 AC 150/5220-9A Appendix 1 APPENDIX 1. TYPES OF AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEMS This Appendix is provided for informational purposes only. (Refer to AFI 32-1043, Attachment 2, for additional detailed information.) 1. General Information. Aircraft arresting systems consist of engaging devices and energy absorbers. Engaging devices are net systems, such as BAK-15; disc-supported pendants (hook cables); and cable support systems, such as BAK-14 and the Type H, that raise the pendant to the battery position or retract it below the runway surface. Energy absorbing devices are ships anchor chains, rotary friction brakes (such as BAK-12), or rotary hydraulic systems. 2. E-5 Hook Cable Arresting System. This unidirectional emergency arresting system is a U.S. Navy design and designation (Figure A1-1). This system uses several shots of ships anchor chain as the energy absorber, but these systems are never connected with a barrier (net). For the Navy or Marine Corps, these systems can have from 1 to 4 disc-supported hook cables, with designations of E-5 and E-5 Mod 1 through E-5 Mod 3. Obtain further technical information on the Navy configuration of this system from the Naval Air Warfare Center, Lakehurst, NJ. The location of the E-5 system can be either on the runway or on the blast pad depending on mission requirements. Figure A1-1. E-5 Hook Cable Arresting System. 3. BAK-12. The BAK-12 (Figure A1-2) is the standard USAF operational aircraft arresting system. This bidirectional system employs two energy absorbers. Each absorber consists of two multi-disc rotary friction brakes mounted on either side of the purchase-tape reel on a common shaft. The energy absorbers are located on opposite sides of the runway, connected to a 1.25-inch (32-millimeter) discsupported pendant by the purchase tape. Ideally, the energy absorbers should be in a below-grade pit with a minimum split distance of 50 feet (15.24 meters). (Split distance is a measurement taken between the lead-on sheave of the fairlead beam or deck sheave and the energy absorber.) Split distances of up to 300 feet (91 meters) are acceptable for all BAK-12 installations. A-1 AC 150/5220-9A Appendix 1 12/20/2006 a. Originally, BAK-12 energy absorbers were fitted with a 60-inch purchase-tape storage reel. This design allowed the maximum energy expected to be imparted during an aircraft engagement to dissipate within a runout of 950 feet (290 meters) plus the length of the aircraft. Designers have since improved the BAK-12 to meet the demands of heavier and faster aircraft b. The standard BAK-12 is configured for cross-runway separations of up to 200 feet (61 meters) (distance between fairlead beams or deck sheaves). Dual BAK-12 systems are special-purpose installations configured to accommodate high-energy engagements of aircraft ranging from 60,000 to 140,000 pounds (27,200 to 63,500 kilograms). These configurations consist of four BAK-12 energy absorbers arranged in pairs on either side of the runway. c. A BAK-12 can be located anywhere on the runway or in the safety area depending upon the military mission requirements. 4. Cable Support Systems. a. The BAK-14 hook cable support system (Figure A1-3) is a bidirectional hook cable (pendant) support system used in conjunction with the BAK-12, or a comparable arresting system to engage and safely stop a hook-equipped aircraft. It provides the means to support the pendant at least 2 inches above the runway surface while giving air traffic control (ATC) the means to lower the pendant below the surface of the runway to prevent damage to low-undercarriage aircraft, the pendant, and the pavement below the pendant during trampling. These systems can accommodate runway widths of 150, 200, and 300 feet (46, 60, and 90 meters). The control side BAK-12 pit or protective shelter and foundation must be expanded to house the compressed air and control systems needed to operate this supplemental system. b. The Type H hook cable support system (Figure A1-4) is a bidirectional hook cable support system that can be used in conjunction with any type of energy-absorbing device. It provides a means to raise a cable at least 2 inches above a runway surface or lower it below the runway surface in less than 1.5 seconds. It can be supplied to accommodate runway widths of 150, 200, and 300 feet (46, 60, and 90 meters). A radio remote control system provides ATC the means to operate the system and to monitor its operational status. A-2 12/20/2006 AC 150/5220-9A Appendix 1 Figure A1-2. BAK-12 Aircraft Arresting System. A-3 AC 150/5220-9A Appendix 1 12/20/2006 Figure A1-3. BAK-14 Cable Support System. A-4 12/20/2006 AC 150/5220-9A Appendix 1 Figure A1-4. Type H Hook Cable Support System. A-5 AC 150/5220-9A Appendix 1 12/20/2006 5. Mobile Aircraft Arresting System (MAAS). a. The MAAS (Figure A1-5) is essentially a BAK-12 aircraft arresting system mobilized through installation on a specially developed trailer. It is configured for a maximum aircraft runout of 990 feet (302 meters). This system was initially developed and tested to accommodate recovery of fighter aircraft returning to a battle-damaged airfield. Such cases require rapid deployment and installation and may require that only the minimum essential anchoring hardware be installed to accommodate the above scenario. When installed for this purpose, the MAAS is installed using a 19-stake anchoring scheme. This configuration is limited to unidirectional engagement capability with a maximum aircraft weight and speed of 40,000 pounds (18,144 kilograms) at 150 knots. b. The MAAS can be upgraded to accommodate bidirectional engagements with the full capacity of a standard BAK-12 aircraft arresting system. This is accomplished by increasing the total number of stakes used to anchor the system from 19 to 31, extending the runout to 1,200 feet (366 meters), and synchronizing the system for higher brake pressure. Figure A1-5. Mobile Aircraft Arresting System (MAAS) in Set-Back Configuration. A-6 12/20/2006 AC 150/5220-9A Appendix 2 APPENDIX 2. TYPICAL INSTALLATION PHOTOGRAPHS Figure A2-1. Close-up view of the Fairlead Beam and Deck Sheave. Figure A2-2. Front view of the Fairlead Beam and Deck Sheave. A-7 AC 150/5220-9A Appendix 2 12/20/2006 Figure A2-3. Arresting Barrier Fairlead Beam longitudinal view. Figure A2-4. Arresting Barrier Fairlead Beam diagonal view. A-8
Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal AviationAdministrationSubject: Engineered Materials Arresting Systems(EMAS) for Aircraft Overruns1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) containsstandards for the planning, design, installation, andmaintenan
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal AviationAdministrationAIRPORT DESIGN/ INCORPORATES CHANGES 1 THRU 16 /AC:Date:150/5300-139/29/89Advisory Circular3/28/07ParagraphAC 150/5300-13 CHG 11CONTENTSPageChapter 1. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AN
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
.-U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal AviationAdministrationSubject: AIRPORT PAVEMENT DESIGN ANDEVALUATIONAdvisoryCircularDate: 7/7/95Initiated by: AAS-AC No: 150/5320-6DChange:1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular provides guidance to the p
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
AC 150/5320-6D7l7195C.Muskeg. Muskeg is sometimes encountered in arctic areas. Muskeg is a highly organic soil depositwhich is essentially a swamp. Every effort should be made to avoid pavement construction on this material. Ifconstruction in areas o
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
AC150/5320-6D7l7l95C.Stabilized Subbase. Stabilized subbases also offer considerably higher strength to the pavement thanP-154. Recommended equivalency factors associated with stabilized subbase are presented in Table 3-7.-/TABLE 3-7. RECOMMENDED EQ
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
AC 150/5320-6D7f7l95U! SS3NXlIHL EWIS82L-1011-100, 200nnnANNUAL DEPARTURESCONTACT AREA= 337 SQ. IN.DUAL SPACING= 52 IN.TANDEM SPACING = 70 IN.1,2006,0003,00025,00015,000-1719 -2018 -19-1617-1516-1415-1314-1213-10650-11600
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
AC150/5320-6D7l7J95Increasing C, Factor. A value of C, lower than 0.75 represents a severely cracked base slab,(2)which would not be advisable to overlay without modification due to the likelihood of severe reflection cracking. Seeparagraph 406 f. In
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal AviationAdministrationSubject: RUNWAY LENGTHREQUIREMENTS FOR AIRPORT DESIGNAdvisoryCircularDate: 7/1/2005Initiated by: AAS-100AC No: 150/5325-4BChange:1. PURPOSE. This Advisory Circular (AC) provides gui
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal AviationAdministrationSubject: RUNWAY LENGTHREQUIREMENTS FOR AIRPORT DESIGNAdvisoryCircularDate: 7/1/2005Initiated by: AAS-100AC No: 150/5325-4BChange:1. PURPOSE. This Advisory Circular (AC) provides gui
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation AdministrationAdvisory CircularDate: 4/29/05 Initiated by: AAS-300 AC No: 150/5340-1J Change:Subject: STANDARDS FOR AIRPORT MARKINGS1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) contains the Federal Aviatio
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 1: Familiarization with Data SetsDate Due: January 27, 2011Instructor: TraniProblem 1Pick one of the following airports and write a one page (double spaced) essay with a brief history of the
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Dr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityFebruary 9, 2009Blacksburg, VirginiaCEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design (copyright A. Trani )1Problem # 2Airport Statistics using the F
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2009Assignment 2: Runway Length AnalysisDate Due: Feb/5/2009Instructor: TraniProblem 1a)Estimatethepercentageofaircraftbelow12,500lb.thatcanbeoperatedfromVirginiaTechairport(BCB)onaroutinebasis.2)BCBwant
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 2: Runway Length AnalysisDate Due: February 8, 2010Instructor: TraniReading Assignment: Read Chapters 1 through 4 of the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5325-4b beforeworking on this homework.Pro
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Dr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityFebruary 10, 2009Blacksburg, VirginiaNEXTOR/Virginia Tech - Air Transportation Systems Lab1NEXTOR/Virginia Tech - Air Transportation Syst
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 2: Runway Length AnalysisProblem 1Design the appropriate runway length for a new airport to be located near a Mid-west metropolitan area.A survey of the existing demand at a nearby airport re
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2009Assignment 3: Runway Safety Areas and ATCDate Due: Feb/19/2009 by COBInstructor: TraniProblem 1A new runway is to be designed to accommodate the Airbus A340-600 (i.e., critical design aircraft). The ai
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2009Assignment 3: Runway Safety Areas and ATCDate Due: Feb/19/2009 by COBInstructor: TraniProblem 1A new runway is to be designed to accommodate the Airbus A340-600 (i.e., critical design aircraft). The ai
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS DesignDate Due: February 17, 2011Instructor: TraniProblem 1The Roanoke Regional Airport would like to request your services to estimate the runway length extension
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS DesignSolutionsInstructor: TraniProblem 1The Roanoke Regional Airport would like to request your services to estimate the runway length extension to Runway 15-33 to
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674 Homework 4Spring 2009Assignment 4: Runway Orientation and Obstruction AnalysisDate Due: Feb/28/2009 by COBInstructor: TraniProblem #1A new airport in Florida is expected to serve airline commercial traffic (also called air carrier operation
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674 Homework 4Spring 2009Assignment 4: Runway Orientation and Obstruction AnalysisDate Due: Feb/28/2009 by COBInstructor: TraniProblem #1A new airport in Florida is expected to serve airline commercial traffic (also called air carrier operation
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 4: Wind Rose and Obstructions to NavigationDate Due: March 1, 2010Instructor: TraniProblem 1Perform an obstruction analysis for airport shown in Figure 1. The airport has two runways oriente
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 4: Wind Rose and Obstructions to NavigationSolutionInstructor: TraniProblem 1Perform an obstruction analysis for airport shown in Figure 1. The airport has two runways oriented East-West and
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674 Homework 5Spring 2009Assignment 5: Geometric Design StandardsDate Due: March/6/2009 by COBInstructor: TraniProblem #1A new airport in Nevada (near Las Vegas) is expected to serve business jets and regional jets using a single 7,500 footrun
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674 Homework 5Spring 2009Assignment 5: Geometric Design StandardsDate Due: March/6/2009 by COBInstructor: TraniProblem #1A new airport in Nevada (near Las Vegas) is expected to serve business jets and regional jets using a single 7,500 footrun
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 5: Geometric Design StandardsDate Due: March 29, 2011Instructor: TraniProblem #1A new airport is expected to serve corporate jets. Representative aircraft expected to operate at the airport
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 5: Geometric Design StandardsDate Due: SolutionInstructor: TraniProblem #1A new airport is expected to serve corporate jets. Representative aircraft expected to operate at the airport are: t
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2009Assignment 6:Date Due: April/3/2007Instructor: TraniProblem 1Use the FAA Terminal Area Forecast (http:/aspm.faa.gov/main/taf.asp) to explain the growth of passenger enplanements andflight operations a
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2009Assignment 6: SolutionDate Due: April/3/2007Instructor: TraniProblem 1Use the FAA Terminal Area Forecast (http:/aspm.faa.gov/main/taf.asp) to explain the growth of passenger enplanements andflight ope
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 6: Demand Analysis and Geometric Design StandardsDate Due: April 5Instructor: TraniProblem 1Use the FAA Terminal Area Forecast (http:/aspm.faa.gov/main/taf.asp) to explain the growth of pass
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2008Assignment 7:Date Due: April 15, 2007Instructor: TraniProblem 1An airport has two parallel runways separated 5,000 feet away and oriented North-South. The saturation capacity analysis forone of the ru
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2008Assignment 7:Date Due: April 15, 2007Instructor: TraniProblem 1An airport has two parallel runways separated 5,000 feet away and oriented North-South. The saturation capacity analysis forone of the ru
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2010Assignment 7: Capacity and DelayDate Due: April 19, 2011Instructor: TraniProblem 1An airport shown in Figure 1 has a single 9,500 feet runway oriented East-West. The airport has a standard airport surv
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2011Assignment 7: CapacitySolutionInstructor: TraniProblem 1An airport shown in Figure 1 has a single 9,500 feet runway oriented East-West. The airport has a standard airport surveillanceradar (ASR) which
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2009Assignment 8:Date Due: April 21, 2009Instructor: TraniProblem 1An airport has two satellite concourses separated by an above ground connector as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1. Airport Terminal Configurat
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2009Assignment 8Date Due:Instructor: TraniProblem 1An airport has two satellite concourses separated by an above ground connector as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1. Airport Configuration.The peak flow of pas
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and DesignSpring 2009Assignment 9: MiniProjectDate Due: May 12, 2009 (COB)Instructor: TraniProblem 1A demand file for Los Angeles International Airport is provided. It contains one day of typical flight data into LAX from
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Aircraft Runway Length Estimation(Part 1)Dr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate ProfessorDepartment of Civil EngineeringVirginia TechVirginia Tech1 of 59Organization of this SectionUnderstanding basic aircraft weights and its limitsGeneral Equations of M
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
CEE 5614 and CEE 4674Aircraft ClassicationsDr. Antonio A. TraniProfessorCivil and Environmental EngineeringSpring 2011Airport Planning and Design (Antonio A. Trani)1Material Presented The aircraft and the airport Aircraft classications Aircraft
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Analysis of Air Transportation SystemsAirport Capacity - IntroductionDr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil and Environmental EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg, VirginiaMarch 2005Virginia Tech1Meth
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Airport FinanceDr. A. A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil EngineeringVirginia TechBlacksburg, VAVirginia Tech1 of 10Outline of this PresentationFinancing IssuesFinancing ProcessAirport RevenuesAirport ExpensesBonds and UnderwritingVirginia T
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Historical PerspectiveDr. Antonio A. TraniProfessorDepartment of Civil and Environmental EngineeringJanuary 18, 2010A.A. Trani - Virginia Tech1 of 40Early Developments1903 - Wright Brothers rst ight in North Carolina1916 - First air mail service
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Airport Landside Analysis and ModelingDr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil and Environmental EngineeringVirginia TechJune 12-13, 2002Advanced Airport and Airspace Capacity Seminar1 of 140Material Presented in this SectionBrief descript
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Airport Landside Analysis and Modeling (2)Dr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil and Environmental EngineeringVirginia TechJune 12-13, 2002Advanced Airport and Airspace Capacity Seminar1 of 38Material Presented in this SectionSizing Othe
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Airport Landside Modeling(Computer Applications and Modeling)Dr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil and Environmental EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityCEE 4674 - Airport Planning and DesignVirginia Polytechnic
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Airport Master Planning NotesCEE 4674 Airport Planning and DesignDr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil EngineeringVirginia TechVirginia Tech1 of 47PurposePlanning concept to develop the ultimate version of anairportIncludes aviation a
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Dr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg, Virginia2008Copyright Antonio Trani1Purpose Provide guidance in the transition from instrument tovisual conditions Very im
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Airport and Airspace Operations in theUS (Air Traffic Control)Dr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate ProfessorDepartment of Civil EngineeringVirginia TechVirginia Tech1 of 68Discussion of Flight RulesFlight RulesIFR - instrument flight rules (ATC control
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Runway Capacity ExampleCEE 5614Analysis of Air Transportation SystemsDr. Antonio A. TraniProfessorVirginia Tech - Air Transportation Systems LaboratoryProblem DescriptionThe airport to be studied in this problem is shown in Figure 1The airport has
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Dr. Antonio A. TraniProfessor of Civil EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityJanuary 27, 2009Blacksburg, VirginiaCEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design (copyright A. Trani)1Runway Length for Regional Jets and Aircraftwith MTO
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Airport and Aviation DemandDr. Antonio TraniAir Transportation Systems LaboratoryVirginia TechCEE 4674 Airport Planning and DesignMarch 21, 2009Blacksburg, VACEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design (copyright A. Trani)1PresentationAviation demand (
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Modeling a Runway Arrestor SystemUsing SimulinkDr. A. A. TraniCEE 4674Airport Planning and DesignDescription" A runway arrestor is a soft concrete (also calledcellular concrete) bed installed at the end of runwayto stop an aircraft involved in
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Errata Sheet forAdvisory Circular 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport DesignLast Update: July 31, 2008This errata sheet logs content errors that were identified after the advisory circular (AC) was published online on July 1, 2005. Thes
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Chapter 4, Section IAirplane AttitudeInstrument FlyingUsing Analog InstrumentationIntroductionAttitude instrument flying is defined as the control of anaircrafts spatial position by using instruments rather thanoutside visual references. Todays air
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal AviationAdministrationOrder JO 7110.65SAir Traffic ControlFebruary 14, 2008This web version contains Change 1, dated 7/31/2008An electronic version of this publication is on the internet athttp:/www.faa.gov
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
FAR Part 77 - Obstructions to NavigationDr. A. A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil EngineeringVirginia TechCEE 4674Airport Planning and DesignCEE 4674 - Airport Planning and Design1 of 28Outline of this PresentationObstructions to navigation aro
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Dr. Antonio A. TraniProfessor of Civil EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityFebruary 25, 2009Blacksburg, VirginiaCEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design (copyright A. Trani)1Organization of this Presentation Review of geometr
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
!CEE 4674 Airport Planning and DesignGeometric Design IAddendum 1Dr. Antonio A. TraniProfessor of Civil EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityFebruary 25, 2009Blacksburg, Virginia!CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design (cop
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
Dr. Antonio A. TraniProfessor of Civil EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityFebruary 25, 2009Blacksburg, VirginiaCEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design (copyright A. Trani)1Organization of this Presentation Geometric design
Virginia Tech - CEE - 4674
INM - Integrated Noise Model BasicsCEE 4674 - Airport Planning and DesignDr. Antonio A. TraniAssociate Professor of Civil EngineeringVirginia TechCopyright - A.A. Trani1 of 44Basics on INMDeveloped by FAA Office of Energy and Environmentand EPAT