Drake The Equation
ns , total number of stars in Galaxy of the right type (6 billion)
f , fraction on which life actually develops (100%)
L, average lifetime of civilizations
fp , fraction of these stars with planets (5%)
ne , average number of planets orbiting those stars that have right size and are in
habitable zone (100%)
fi , fraction on which evolution produces intelligent species (1010 1)
fc , fraction of intelligent species
that develop ability and interest to
communicate (100%)
T , age of Galaxy (1010 years)
L/T gives the fraction of civilizations
that currently exist.
N = ns fp ne f fi fc L/T
N = 6 109 0.05 1 1 fi 1
L
1010 yr
N = 0.03fi L
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 1/12
Primary Uncertainties in the Drake Equation
fi The development of intelligence
Limited availability of raw materials, forces evolution of complex processes to
develop alternate, more reliable, sources
Example: original organisms relied on limited supplies of H2 S and anaerobic
photosynthesis.
Aerobic photosynthesis and metabolism used more common materials.
By-product: O2 -rich atmosphere and ozone layer
Specialization in cells: development of eukaryotes and organelles by symbiosis
Development of nervous system/brain: elimination of DNA-length bottleneck
Sexual reproduction: permits greater genetic variation in offspring
Development of multicellular organisms, probably by symbiosis, triggered
Cambrian explosion of phyla, as recorded in the Burgess Shale
Convergent evolution argues in favor of intelligence as a survival optimizer.
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 2/12
The generally increasing maximum encephalization quotient of other mammals,
like dolphins and whales, also supports large values for fi .
Note, however, that all mammalian species do not show such increases. But if on
other planets, there are several competing species, this fact is unimportant.
Lacking other information,
fi 1.
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 3/12
fc The development of civilization and technology
Competing hominid species (H. erectus, Neandertals, H. sapiens) coexisted (only
H.S. was an omnivore) 200,000 yrs ago
Development of technology and communication requires certain physical attributes
(hands, living on land, ...?)
Development of communication has been cultural, not biological
Development of written language, beginning with art, 30,000 yrs ago
Development of agriculture 5000 yrs ago
Development of alphabet (Sumerians) 3500 yrs ago
Development of printing press 550 yrs ago
Development of radio 100 yrs ago
Development of electronic information storage 50 yrs ago
Progressive transformation from individual to collective intelligence
Note:
Independent evolution of key technologies: agriculture, alphabets, numbers,
metallurgy, astronomy
However, note that wheel was invented only once (Sumeria), and the zero
relatively rarely
Lacking other information fc = 1.
Simplied Optimistic Drake Equation: N L
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 4/12
Civilization Lifetimes
Overpopulation, leading to resource
depletion or irreversible pollution
dN
dt
= N (b d)
b=1/301/60 (42 children per woman)
d=1/60 (1/life expectancy)
N = No e(bd)t
Population grows by the factor e 2.7
every 1/(b d) years 60 years
Malthus in 1798 rst proposed that resources tend to grow linearly, but population
grows exponentially. If left unrestricted, populations grow until they exceed
carrying capacity of environment. He showed this had happened before in human
history with catastrophic consequences (e.g., Mayan, Mesopotamian, Norse,
Angkor and Easter Island civilizations) and predicted it would again.
However: industrialization, readily available social services (i.e., birth control) and
improved living conditions generally lead to a decrease in the birth rate. From
1950 to 2005, the number born per woman decreased from 5.01 to 2.65
worldwide, and by 2050 is expected to decrease to 2. This could lead to a peak in
population around 8 billion by 2050. Furthermore, new resources are found at
faster rates due to technological and scientic advances. But underinvestment and
pollution, including irrigation salt poisoning, could still be insurmountable problems.
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 5/12
Limits To Civilization Lifetimes
Warfare
Nuclear
Biological
But these factors are inherently driven overpopulation.
Natural by catastrophes
Asteroid or comet impact
Solar evolution increasing solar luminosity, eventual red giant phase
Gamma ray bursts,
massive supernovae
or merging neutron
stars and/or black
holes in binaries
(within 510 kpc)
inner Galaxy
Supernova
(within 0.1 kpc)
outer Galaxy
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 6/12
Galactic Habitable Zone
Metallicity - too much: hot Jupiters
destroy Earths, or Earths become
too big; too little: no Earths or
too small Earths
Supernovae or gamma ray bursters
- cannot be too close too frequently
inner Galaxy
Biological evolution time - 4 1 Gyr
outer Galaxy
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 7/12
Future of Civilizations
Kardashev Civilization Types
Type
who
0
I
II
bee colony
us
uses all
Suns energy
uses all
Galaxys energy
III
Energy used
compared to us
1/1 trillion
1
1 trillion
1 trillion trillion
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 8/12
Dyson Sphere
A result of a Type II civilization. Since 100% of
the stars energy is intercepted by the sphere,
which would re-radiate it in the infrared, the
energy output of the star would be altered
completely. Dyson proposed a shell-like
structure, but this has numerous aws:
A shell would have no net gravitational
interactions with its star and would
drift without some form of propulsion. Collision with the star would be catastrophic.
Anything on the inside of the Dyson sphere
would not be gravitationally attracted to it and would fall into the star if not attached.
Strength of shell material would have to be enormous, well outside the parameters
of any known material.
If all planetary material were used, a 1 AU Dyson sphere could be 3 m thick, but
only 10 cm thick if H and He were excluded. If only the inner planets are used, the
thickness becomes less than 1 cm.
The equilibrium temperature at 1 AU is 360-380 K (too hot for humans).
A better design: individual self-propelled habitats, but gravitational ineractions would
result in loss of orbital stability and occasional eclipses.
The best design would be foating individual habitats using the balance between radiation
pressure and gravitation. Requires a large light sail area for each habitat.
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 9/12
Ultimate Limit to Lifetime
Technology can be developed to protect against all astronomical catastrophes, like
supernovae, gamma ray bursts, meteorite/comet impacts, solar changes.
For example, civilizations can move to other planets to escape solar
luminosity increase.
Or they can move to other solar systems to escape red giant phase.
Thus, the ultimate lifetime depends on the ultimate fate of universe.
An open or critical universe expands forever, but slowly cools off, and its
usable energy disappears.
Dyson hibernation strategy can preserve life subjectively forever.
A closed universe eventually recollapses, so there is an apparently nite
lifetime.
However, subjectively, an innite lifetime is theoretically possible if uploading
(the process of transferring mental structure and consciousness to external
carrier) is possible.
Subjective time different than clock time because computers process
information millions of times more quickly than brain cells.
Tipler argues that life alters the ultimate fate of the universe to force an
Omega Point, which has an innite subjective lifetime.
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 10/12
Distance to Nearest Civilization
Sun is about 8000 pc from nucleus of Galaxy
If R < 200 pc, the Galaxy looks like a sphere: N = 4R3 /3 = 4 1011 /N.
The average density of stars in the Galaxy is = Number/Volume 1.4 pc3 .
Let N be the number of civilizations, and N the average number of stars we
would have to search to nd a civilization N = 4 1011 /N
R3 = 3 4 1011 /(4N 1.4),
or
R 4085/N 1/3 pc.
Instead, if R > 200 pc or N < 8500, the Galaxy looks like a disk.
N = R2 400 = 4 1011 /N ;
or R 15, 000/ N pc.
R2 = 4 1011 /(1.4N 400)
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 11/12
Difculty of Communication
N
R (pc)
N
(yrs)
1/2
1
8 1011
6.5
500
10
8 108
65
5 105
100
8 105
650
1.9 108
326
2117
2117
6 108
1000
625
6500
2.9 109
2126
138
13,800
5.8 109
3000
69
20,000
6.3 1010
10,000
6.3
65,000
4 1011
25,000
1
163,000
N =L=
N = 0.01L = 0.01
Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 23 p. 12/12