43 Pages

fm8eism17-entire

Course: BMGT 221H, Spring 2011
School: Maryland
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 5029

Document Preview

17Solutions COSTING CHAPTER SYSTEMS: JOB ORDER AND PROCESS COSTING Chapter 17, SE 1. 1. 2. 3. yes yes yes Chapter 17, SE 2. 1. 2. 3. process job order job order 4. 5. 6. process process job order Chapter 17, SE 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. Dr. Materials Inventory, Cr. Accounts Payable Dr. Work in Process Inventory, Cr. Factory Payroll Dr. Work in Process Inventory, Cr. Materials Inventory Dr. Work in Process Inventory,...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Maryland >> Maryland >> BMGT 221H

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
17Solutions COSTING CHAPTER SYSTEMS: JOB ORDER AND PROCESS COSTING Chapter 17, SE 1. 1. 2. 3. yes yes yes Chapter 17, SE 2. 1. 2. 3. process job order job order 4. 5. 6. process process job order Chapter 17, SE 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. Dr. Materials Inventory, Cr. Accounts Payable Dr. Work in Process Inventory, Cr. Factory Payroll Dr. Work in Process Inventory, Cr. Materials Inventory Dr. Work in Process Inventory, Cr. Overhead Chapter 17, SE 4. Work in Process Inventory (1) 34,000 (2) Overhead (1) 82,420 Factory Payroll Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 52,000 (1) Ch17 SE1 to SE4 18,000 82,420 (2) Chapter 17, SE 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Dr. Work in Process Inventory, Cr. Materials Inventory Dr. Work in Process Inventory, Cr. Factory Payroll Dr. Materials Inventory, Cr. Accounts Payable Dr. Overhead, Cr. Accounts Payable Dr. Work in Process Inventory, Cr. Overhead Dr. Finished Goods Inventory, Cr. Work in Process Inventory Chapter 17, SE 6. 168 Job Order: JOB ORDER COST CARD Keeper, 3000 Apache City, North Dakota Customer: Brian Patcher Custom: X Batch: Specifications: 6 Custom Built Computer Systems Date of Order: 4/4/xx 6/8/xx Date of Completion: Previous Months Current Month Cost Summary $3,540 $2,820 $ 6,360 Direct labor 2,340 1,620 3,960 Overhead applied 2,880 2,550 5,430 $8,760 $6,990 $15,750 Costs Charged to Job Direct materials Totals 6 $ 2,625 Units completed Product unit cost Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 SE5 to SE6 Chapter 17, SE 7. Blue Blaze FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended July 31 Physical Units Beginning inventory Units started this period Units to be accounted for Beginning inventory Equivalent Units 3,000 17,000 20,000 Direct Materials 3,000 Units started and completed 14,500 Ending inventory 2,500 20,000 Units accounted for Conversion Costs 0% 1,800 60% 14,500 100% 14,500 100% 2,500 17,000 100% 1,750 18,050 70% Chapter 17, SE 8. Blue Blaze Total Cost per Equivalent Unit--FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended July 31 Total Costs Direct Materials Conversion Costs $20,400 17,000 $32,490 18,050 Current Costs Equivalent Units Cost per equivalent unit Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. $3.00 = Ch17 SE7 to SE8 $1.20 + $1.80 Chapter 17, SE 9. Blue Blaze Assigning Costs--FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended July 31 Total Costs Direct Materials Conversion Costs Costs of goods manufactured and transferred out: From beginning inventory $10,145 Current costs to complete 3,240 Units started and completed this period 43,500 Cost of goods manufactured 6,150 $63,035 ( 1,800 x $1.80 ) x $1.20 ) + ( 14,500 x $1.80 ) 2,500 x $1.20 ) + ( 1,750 x $1.80 ) = ( 14,500 $56,885 Ending inventory = Total costs Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. =( Ch17 SE9 Chapter 17, SE 10. The data indicate that the direct materials costs per unit of Product A are steadily increasing, whereas the direct materials costs per unit of Product B are remaining fairly constant. If this change in Product A is a surprise, the manager should determine its cause. But the change may have been planned in an attempt to increase the quality of Product A. If so, the manager can verify that the increased costs are a result of an increase in the quality of direct materials. Chapter 17, E 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. yes yes yes no yes 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. no no yes yes no Chapter 17, E 2. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. process process job order process job order process process job order Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 SE10 to E2 Chapter 17, E 3. 1. T accounts prepared Materials Inventory Beg. Bal. Work in Process Inventory 238,820 (a) 28,400 (c) 240,000 Beg. Bal. 28,400 (c) 29,400 (a) (b) (b) 52,490 (c) 88,200 (d) Overhead 238,820 132,300 Factory Payroll 132,300 (d)* 140,690 (b) 28,400 Accounts Payable 28,400 (c) * 2. $88,200 x 150% = $132,300 Ending balance computed Work in Process Inventory account: Beginning balance, June 30 $ 29,400 Debits during July: Direct materials 238,820 Direct labor 88,200 Overhead 132,300 $488,720 Less transfers to Finished Goods Inventory Ending balance, July 31 Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 E3 461,400 $ 27,320 Chapter 17, E 4. Materials Inventory 42,000 Used 164,000 Beg. Bal. (a) Purchases End. Bal. 168,000 38,000 Work in Process Inventory Beg. Bal. Direct Materials Used Direct Labor (b) Overhead Applied 66,000 (c) Completed During 168,000 Period 382,000 305,600 * End. Bal. 783,000 138,600 Finished Goods Inventory Beg. Bal. (c) Completed During Period (d) End. Bal. * $382,000 29,000 783,000 4,000 x 80% = $305,600 Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 E4 Cost of Goods Sold 808,000 Chapter 17, E 5. Job Order: A-62 JOB ORDER COST CARD The Cabinet Company Thomas Cabinets, Inc. Customer: Batch: Custom: X Specifications: Kitchen Cabinets per Customer 1/10/xx Date of Order: Date of Completion: 1/24/xx Previous Cost Months Costs Charged to Job Current Month Summary Direct materials Cedar $ 7,900 Pine 6,320 Hardware 2,930 Assembly supplies 988 Total direct materials $18,138 $18,138 Direct labor Sawing $ 2,840 Shaping 2,200 Finishing 2,250 Assembly 2,890 Total direct labor $10,180 10,180 Overhead ( $21.60 per machine hour ) Sawing ( 120 hours ) $ 2,592 Shaping ( 220 hours ) 4,752 Finishing ( 180 hours ) 3,888 Assembly ( 1,080 50 hours ) Total overhead $12,312 Total cost Units completed 34 $ 1,195 Product unit cost Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 12,312 $40,630 Ch17 E5 Chapter 17, E 6. 1. Total cost of each job computed Style Corporation Special Cost Analysis Job Order Cost Cards Job A25 Job A27 Job B14 Fabric Q $10,840 $12,980 $ 17,660 Fabric Z 11,400 12,200 13,440 5,260 6,920 10,900 $27,500 $32,100 $ 42,000 $ 8,900 $10,400 $ 16,200 Layout 6,450 7,425 9,210 Packaging 3,950 4,875 6,090 $19,300 $22,700 $ 31,500 $23,160 $69,960 $27,240 $82,040 $ 37,800 $111,300 Direct materials: Fabric YB Total Direct labor: Garment maker Total Overhead: ( 120% of direct labor costs ) Total cost 2. Product unit cost for each job computed $69,960 Units produced $111,300 775 $105.86 * 1,482 * $ 99.94 Product unit cost *Rounded. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. $82,040 700 Total cost Ch17 E6 $ 75.10 * Chapter 17, E 7. Job Order: H.W. JOB ORDER COST CARD Personal Trainers, Inc. Customer: Hillary White Batch: Custom: X Specifications: Marathon Training Date of Order: 4/2/xx Date of Completion: 7/24/xx Costs Charged to Job Previous Months Current Month Total Cost In-person consultation Training logbook $ 20.00 $ $ 20.00 Labor ($10 per hour) Overhead ( 20.00 30.00 50.00 2.00 3.00 5.00 $ 42.00 $ 33.00 $ 75.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 60.00 150.00 300.00 450.00 37.50 75.00 112.50 $217.50 $405.00 $622.50 $ 30.00 $ 10.00 $ 40.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 $ 45.00 $ 25.00 $ 70.00 $767.50 10% of in-person labor costs ) Total Training Bike rental Labor ($5 per hour) Overhead ( 25% of labor costs ) Total Telephone consultations Cell phone calls ($1 per call) Labor ($10 per hour) Overhead ( 50% of telephone labor costs ) Total Total cost Job Revenue and Profit Logbook and bike rental Service fee: $ 97 hours* x $30 80.00 2,910.00 Job revenue $2,990.00 Less total cost 767.50 $2,222.50 Profit *5 + 90 + 2 = 97 hours Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 E7 Chapter 17, E 8. Total manufacturing costs: Manufacturing utilities $ 500 Depreciation, manufacturing equipment 450 Indirect materials 300 Direct materials 1,300 Indirect labor 800 Direct labor 2,400 Insurance, manufacturing plant 600 Rent, manufacturing plant 5,000 $11,350 Total manufacturing costs Computation of product unit cost: $11,350 4,540 = $2.50 per unit Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 E8 Chapter 17, E 9. All of the questions except question 2 can be answered from information provided by the process costing system. Question 2 could be best answered by a job order costing system that included a job order cost card for each special-order birthday cake produced. It is not unusual for a company to have both types of costing systems. Tom must decide if the volume of special-order birthday cake sales is worth the addition of a job order costing system for just those cakes. Chapter 17, E 10. Olivares Enterprises FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended August 31 Physical Units Beginning inventory Equivalent Units 5,200 Units started this period 212,500 217,700 Units to be accounted for Beginning inventory Direct Materials 5,200 Conversion Costs 0% 1,040 20% Units started and completed 208,000 208,000 100% 208,000 100% Ending inventory 4,500 217,700 4,500 212,500 100% 2,700 211,740 60% Units accounted for Chapter 17, E 11. Cunningham Paper Corporation FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended September 30 Physical Units Beginning inventory Units started this period Units to be accounted for Beginning inventory Units started and completed Ending inventory Units accounted for Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Equivalent Units 40,000 250,000 290,000 40,000 170,000 80,000 290,000 Direct Materials 170,000 80,000 250,000 Ch17 E9 to E11 0% 100% 100% Conversion Costs 16,000 170,000 32,000 218,000 40% 100% 40% Chapter 17, E 12. Direct Materials Dept. A B C D E Conversion Costs Dollars Equiv. Units Unit Cost $12,000 21,835 23,896 1,000 1,985 1,030 $12.00 11.00 23.20 $46.20 Totals Total Dollars Equiv. Units Unit Cost Unit Cost $33,825 13,065 20,972 22,086 15,171 2,050 1,005 2,140 2,045 1,945 $16.50 13.00 9.80 10.80 7.80 $57.90 $ 28.50 24.00 33.00 10.80 7.80 $104.10 Chapter 17, E 13. Turner's Pots, Inc. FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended August 31 Total Costs Beginning inventory Current costs Total costs $ 61,100 450,441 $511,541 Direct Materials = = $ 31,700 275,373 Conversion Costs + + $ 29,400 175,068 Current Costs $275,373 $175,068 Equivalent Units 16,450 16,210 Cost per equivalent unit Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. $27.54 = $16.74 Ch17 E12 to E13 + $10.80 Chapter 17, E 14. Beach Bakery Assigning Costs--FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended March 31 Total Costs Direct Materials Conversion Costs Costs of goods manufactured and transferred out: From beginning inventory Current costs to complete $ 655 324 Units started and completed 31,240 Cost of goods manufactured 804 * $33,023 ( 450 x 90% x $0.80 ) $32,219 Ending inventory = Total costs = ( 14,200 x $1.40 ) + ( 14,200 x 100% x $0.80 ) =( x $1.40 ) + ( x 410 *Rounded to the nearest dollar. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 E14 410 70% x $0.80 ) Chapter 17, E 15. Managers can interpret the data in several ways. One possible interpretation: Machine Operator 1 may be a new person just learning the operation; that person's productivity is steadily rising and should meet the target in a week or two. Machine Operator 2 has a problem that is causing his or her productivity to continuously decrease. The situation should be further examined to determine whether the decrease is being caused by the person or the machine. Machine Operator 3 is maintaining a constant productivity level but is not quite reaching the target. This person may need additional training, or the machine may not be functioning properly. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 E15 Chapter 17, P 1. T accounts prepared and unknown values computed MAY Materials Inventory Beg. Bal. (a) Purchases JUNE Materials Inventory 36,240 84,990 End. Bal. Requests 82,320 (e) Beg. Bal. Purchases 38,910 End. Bal. Work in Process Inventory Beg. Bal. Direct Materials (b) Direct Labor Overhead 56,480 (c) Completed 82,320 66,500 * 53,200 (d) End. Bal. 212,730 45,770 93,080 72,250 57,800 ** (k) End. Bal. End. Bal. 47,500 209,050 (g) Beg. Bal. Completed 80% = $66,500 x 80% = $57,800 Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Completed 221,400 Finished Goods Inventory 47,940 * $53,200 ** $72,250 Cost of Goods Sold 93,080 41,950 (f) Beg. Bal. (h) Direct Materials Direct Labor (i) Overhead Finished Goods Inventory 44,260 212,730 (h) Requests Work in Process Inventory 45,770 Beg. Bal. (c) Completed 38,910 96,120 End. Bal. Ch17 P1 47,940 221,400 51,180 (j) Cost of Goods Sold 218,160 Chapter 17, P 2. 1. Entries recorded in T accounts and job order cost cards prepared Materials Inventory 1/1 1/2 1/19 215,400 1/4 49,500 1/21 218,000 End. Bal. Work in Process Inventory 231,300 246,150 193,200 1/31 120,000 1/15 108,000 1/21 1/31 1/31 5,450 1/4 1/15 214,750 132,000 118,800 End. Bal. Finished Goods Inventory 1/31 End. Bal. 855,990 1/31 855,990 30,760 Overhead 824,520 38,100 1/15 108,000 1/10 1/15 1/21 1/31 1/31 31,470 1/4 12,100 1/31 60,620 31,400 62,240 22,600 118,800 End. Bal. Cash 260 Accounts Receivable 1/10 12,100 1/31 996,800 End. Bal. 12,100 End. Bal. 996,800 Accumulated Depreciation-Machinery Prepaid Insurance 1/31 3,700 1/31 15,500 End. Bal. 3,700 End. Bal. 15,500 Accounts Payable Factory Payroll 1/1 215,400 1/2 49,500 1/19 218,000 End. Bal. 482,900 Property Taxes Payable 3,400 End. Bal. 3,400 Cost of Goods Sold 824,520 End. Bal. 824,520 Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. End. Bal. 180,620 194,240 374,860 Sales 1/31 1/31 1/15 1/31 Ch17 P2 1/31 End. Bal. 996,800 996,800 Chapter 17, P 2. (Continued) Job Order: X Custom: X JOB ORDER COST CARD Par Carts, Inc. Job X Customer: Batch: Specifications: Golf Carts per Customer Specs Date of Order: 1/4/xx Costs Charged to Job Date of Completion: Previous Months 1/31/xx Current Month Cost Summary $193,200 Direct materials 178,170 Total direct materials $371,370 Direct labor $371,370 $120,000 118,500 Total direct labor $238,500 $238,500 Overhead ( 90% of direct labor costs ) $108,000 106,650 Total overhead $214,650 $824,520 Total Cost $824,520 375 $2,198.72 Units completed Product unit cost Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. $214,650 Ch17 P2 (2) Chapter 17, P 2. (Continued) Job Order: Y Custom: X JOB ORDER COST CARD Par Carts, Inc. Job Y Customer: Batch: Specifications: Golf Carts per Customer Specs Date of Order: 1/21/xx 1/31/xx Date of Completion: Cost Summary $18,170 7,000 7,000 6,300 6,300 $31,470 Direct materials Direct labor Current Month $18,170 Costs Charged to Job Previous Months $31,470 Overhead ( 90% of direct labor costs ) Total Cost 10 $ 3,147 Units completed Product unit cost Job Order: Z Custom: X JOB ORDER COST CARD Par Carts, Inc. Job Z Customer: Batch: Specifications: Golf Carts per Customer Specs Date of Order: 1/21/xx Costs Charged to Job Date of Completion: Previous Months Cost Summary $18,410 $18,410 6,500 6,500 5,850 5,850 $30,760 Direct materials Direct labor Current Month $30,760 Overhead ( 90% of direct labor costs ) Total Cost Units completed Product unit cost Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P2 (3) Chapter 17, P 2. (Continued) 2. Underapplied overhead computed Overhead incurred $227,060 Overhead applied 226,800 $ 260 Underapplied overhead Overhead 1/4 38,100 1/15 108,000 1/10 12,100 1/31 118,800 1/15 60,620 1/21 31,400 1/31 62,240 1/31 22,600 1/31 End. Bal. 260 Cost of Goods Sold 1/31 824,520 1/31 260 End. Bal. 3. 824,780 Manager Insight: Transfer of underapplied or overapplied overhead discussed The Overhead account's underapplied or overapplied overhead must be transferred to the Cost of Goods Sold account for cost of goods sold to reflect the actual overhead costs incurred during the period. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P2 (4) Chapter 17, P 3. 1. 4. Transactions reconstructed using T accounts Ending inventory balances computed Materials Inventory Work in Process Inventory Beg. Bal. 21,360 6/6 37,240 Beg. Bal. 15,112 6/4 33,120 6/23 38,960 6/6 37,240 6/16 28,600 6/15 23,680 6/22 31,920 6/15 30,784 End. Bal. 38,800 6/23 38,960 6/29 25,960 6/29 33,748 End. Bal. 20,411 Finished Goods Inventory Beg. Bal. 6/30 17,120 6/30 185,073 ** Overhead 182,857 * 6/15 Accounts Receivable 33,748 End. Bal. 19,336 30,784 6/29 185,073 ** End. Bal. 6/30 64,532 Factory Payroll 6/30 320,000 6/15 23,680 End. Bal. 320,000 6/29 25,960 End. Bal. 49,640 Sales Cost of Goods Sold 6/30 ** $205,484 ( 6/30 182,857 * End. Bal. * Rounded 320,000 320,000 End. Bal. 182,857 1.75 = $182,857 ) . $20,411 = $185,073 $320,000 Ending Work in Process Inventory: Job 24A $ 4,563 Job 24B 4,666 Job 24C 6,032 Job 24D 5,150 $20,411 Total Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P3 Chapter 17, P 3. (Continued) 2. Cost of completed units computed Cost of ending Work in Process Inventory: Direct Direct Job No. Materials Labor Overhead Total 24A $1,596 $1,290 $1,677 $ 4,563 24B 1,492 1,380 1,794 4,666 24C 1,984 1,760 2,288 6,032 24D 1,608 $6,680 1,540 $5,970 2,002 $7,761 5,150 $20,411 Costs of units completed: Beginning balance, Work in Process Inventory $ 15,112 Cost of direct materials, direct labor, and overhead added during period Total costs included in Work in Process Inventory 190,372 $205,484 Less ending Work in Process Inventory Cost of goods completed and transferred 3. Cost of units sold computed Sales equal to 175% of cost of units sold $320,000 1.75 = $182,857 * *Rounded. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P3 (2) 20,411 $185,073 Chapter 17, P 3. (Continued) 5. Product unit costs computed Job 24A: July beginning balance $4,563 July costs: Direct labor 960 Overhead ( 130% ) 1,248 $6,771 Total cost Product unit cost: $6,771 1,200 = $5.64 * Job 24C: July beginning balance $6,032 July costs: Direct labor 1,610 Overhead ( 130% ) 2,093 $9,735 Total cost Product unit cost: $9,735 950 = $10.25 * *Rounded. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P3 (3) Chapter 17, P 4. 1. Process cost report prepared using FIFO costing method Lightning Industries Process Cost Report--FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended January 31 Physical Units Beginning inventory Units started this period Units to be accounted for Beginning inventory Equivalent Units 15,300 15,300 Conversion Direct Materials Costs 0% 0% Units started and completed 13,600 13,600 100% 13,600 100% Ending inventory 1,700 15,300 100% 680 14,280 40% Units accounted for 1,700 15,300 Beginning inventory Total Costs $ Current costs 89,505 $89,505 Total costs Direct Materials $ = Conversion Costs $ 46,665 + 42,840 * = Current Costs $46,665 $42,840 Equivalent Units 15,300 14,280 Cost per equivalent unit $6.05 $3.05 = + $3.00 Cost of goods manufactured and transferred out: From beginning inventory $ Current costs to complete $ Units started and completed Ending inventory Total costs *( $17,136 + $25,704 ) = = ( 13,600 x $3.05 ) + ( 13,600 x $3.00 ) 7,225 $89,505 Cost of goods manufactured 82,280 $82,280 =( $3.05 ) + ( $3.00 ) 1,700 x 680 x $42,840 2. Amount to be transferred identified The amount of $82,280 should be transferred to the Finished Goods Inventory account. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P4 Chapter 17, P 5. 1. Process cost report prepared using FIFO costing method Liquid Extracts Company Process Cost Report--FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended June 30 Physical Units Beginning inventory Units started this period Units to be accounted for Equivalent Units 4,250 61,300 65,550 Beginning inventory Conversion Direct Materials 4,250 Costs 0% 1,275 30% Units started and completed 57,900 57,900 100% 57,900 100% Ending inventory 3,400 65,550 3,400 61,300 100% 1,700 60,875 50% Units accounted for Total Costs Conversion Costs Direct Materials Beginning inventory $ 8,142 = $ 4,607 + Current costs 122,243 $130,385 = 71,108 + Total costs $ 3,535 51,135 * = Current Costs $71,108 $51,135 Equivalent Units 61,300 60,875 $2.00 Cost per equivalent unit $1.16 = $0.84 + Cost of goods manufactured and transferred out: From beginning inventory Current costs to complete Units started and completed $ 8,142 1,071 ( 1,275 x $0.84 ) Ending inventory Total costs = ( 57,900 x $1.16 ) + ( 57,900 x $0.84 ) 5,372 $130,385 Cost of goods manufactured 115,800 $125,013 =( $1.16 ) + ( $0.84 ) 3,400 x 1,700 x *( $19,760 + $31,375 ) = $51,135 2. Amount to be transferred identified The amount of $125,013 should be to transferred the Finished Goods Inventory account. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P5 Chapter 17, P 6. 1. Transactions reconstructed using T accounts 4. Ending inventory balances computed Materials Inventory Beg. Bal. 2/6 2/12 2/24 27,450 7,200 8,110 5,890 End. Bal. 2/4 2/13 2/25 9,080 5,940 7,600 26,030 Work in Process Inventory Beg. Bal. 22,900 2/28 76,470 ** 2/4 9,080 2/13 5,940 2/14 13,750 2/14 19,250 2/25 2/28 2/28 7,600 13,230 18,522 End. Bal. 33,802 *** Finished Goods Inventory Beg. Bal. 2/28 End. Bal. 2/28 End. Bal. 19,200 2/28 76,470 ** Overhead 2/14 2/28 89,647 * 6,023 End. Bal. Accounts Receivable 152,400 Factory Payroll 2/14 2/28 152,400 End. Bal. Sales 2/28 End. Bal. 152,400 2/28 Cost of Goods Sold 89,647 * 152,400 End. Bal. 89,647 * $152,400 1.70 = $89,647 ** $110,272 $33,802 = $76,470 *** Ending Work in Process Inventory: Job AJ10 $ 7,564 Job AJ14 8,944 Job AJ15 6,916 Job AJ16 10,378 $33,802 Total Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P6 19,250 18,522 37,772 13,750 13,230 26,980 Chapter 17, P 6. (Continued) 2. Cost of completed units computed Cost of ending Work in Process Inventory: Job No. Direct Materials Direct Labor Overhead Total AJ10 $ 3,220 $1,810 $ 2,534 $ 7,564 AJ14 3,880 2,110 2,954 8,944 AJ15 2,980 1,640 2,296 6,916 AJ16 4,690 $14,770 2,370 $7,930 3,318 $11,102 10,378 $33,802 Costs of units completed: Beginning balance, Work in Process Inventory $ 22,900 Cost of direct materials, direct labor, and overhead added during period 87,372 Total costs included in Work in Process Inventory $110,272 Less ending Work in Process Inventory 33,802 $ 76,470 Cost of goods completed and transferred 3. Cost of units sold computed Sales equal to 170% of cost of units sold $152,400 1.70 = $89,647 * *Rounded to the nearest dollar. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P6 (2) Chapter 17, P 6. (Continued) 5. Product unit costs computed Job AJ10: March beginning balance $ 7,564 March costs: Direct labor Overhead ( 720 140% ) 1,008 $ 9,292 Total cost Product unit cost: $9,292 40 = $232.30 Job AJ14: March beginning balance $ 8,944 March costs: Direct labor Overhead ( 1,140 140% ) 1,596 $11,680 Total cost Product unit cost: $11,680 55 = $212.36 * *Rounded. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P6 (3) Chapter 17, P 7. 1. Job order cost cards completed JOB ORDER COST CARD Peruga Engineering Company Customer: Customer A Job Order No.: P12 Contract Type: Cost-Plus Specs: Date of Completion: Previous Months Costs Charged to Job Bid and proposal Beginning balance Current month's costs Supplies Engineering labor $ 2,460 Total Cost $ 2,460 $ 192 Service overhead ($18 per hour) Totals Totals Totals $ 2,868 4,998 14,434 $22,300 6,690 $28,990 Contract revenue Ch17 P7 408 $ 2,868 $ $ 1,910 400 1,280 1,408 400 1,280 1,408 $ 3,088 $ 4,998 $ 2,410 Total Cost Bid and proposal Design Prototype development Totals Profit margin ( 30% ) 216 $ $ 2,410 Cost Summary to Date 216 $ 1,910 $ 1,910 Prototype development Beginning balance Current month's costs Supplies Engineering labor Service overhead ($20 per hour) 192 $ 2,460 Design Beginning balance Current month's costs Supplies Engineering labor Service overhead ($22 per hour) Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Current Month Jan. 31, 20xx $ 2,410 $ 6,744 2,880 2,400 6,744 2,880 2,400 $12,024 $14,434 Chapter 17, P 7. (Continued) JOB ORDER COST CARD Peruga Engineering Company Customer: Customer B Job Order No.: P15 Contract Type: Cost-Plus Specs: Date of Completion: Previous Months Costs Charged to Job Bid and proposal Beginning balance Jan. 31, 20xx Current Month $ 2,290 Total Cost $ 2,290 Current month's costs Supplies Engineering labor $ Service overhead ($18 per hour) Totals $ 2,290 $ 280 320 360 280 320 360 960 $ 3,250 Design Beginning balance $ 460 Current month's costs Supplies $ $ 460 Service overhead ($22 per hour) Totals $ 460 460 840 Engineering labor 460 840 924 924 $ 2,224 $ 2,684 Prototype development Beginning balance Current month's costs $ 1,680 Supplies $ 7,216 Engineering labor Service overhead ($20 per hour) Totals $ 1,680 Total Cost Cost Summary to Date Bid and proposal $ 3,250 Design 2,684 Prototype development 14,616 Totals $20,550 Profit margin ( 30% ) 6,165 $26,715 Contract revenue Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. $ 1,680 Ch17 P7 (2) 7,216 3,120 2,600 3,120 2,600 $12,936 $14,616 Chapter 17, P 7. (Continued) JOB ORDER COST CARD Peruga Engineering Company Customer: Customer C Job Order No.: P19 Contract Type: Cost-Plus Specs: Date of Completion: Previous Months Costs Charged to Job Bid and proposal Beginning balance $ Current Month 940 Total Cost $ 940 Current month's costs Supplies Engineering labor $ 2,300 1,088 Service overhead ($18 per hour) Totals 2,300 1,088 1,224 1,224 $ 4,612 $ 5,552 $ 940 Design Beginning balance $ Current month's costs Supplies $ $ 290 290 520 520 572 572 $ $ 1,382 $ 1,382 Engineering labor Service overhead ($22 per hour) Totals Prototype development Beginning balance Current month's costs $ Supplies $ 2,400 Totals 2,400 600 500 600 500 $ Engineering labor Service overhead ($20 per hour) $ 3,500 $ 3,500 Total Cost Cost Summary to Date Bid and proposal $ 5,552 Design 1,382 Prototype development 3,500 Totals $10,434 Profit margin ( 30% ) Contract revenue Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. $ Ch17 P7 (3) Chapter 17, P 7. (Continued) 2. Customer's cost per unit computed Customer A $28,990 12 = $2,416 Customer B $26,715 18 = $1,484 3. Ending Contract in Process balance Ending balance = $10,434 4. Manager Insight: Jobs ranked and observations made Ranking from most costly to least costly: P-12 $22,300 P-15 $20,550 Currently, P-12 is the most costly, followed by P-15. Although P-19 has incurred the least cost to date, it will incur additional costs as the tasks contracted for by the job are completed. 5. Manager Insight: Price to charge discussed Currently, the company uses a flat cost-plus contract based on 30 percent of total costs. The company needs to cover all its costs plus build in a profit margin appropriate for each activity or product. For example, Bid and Proposal, Design, and Prototype Development may each have a different profit margin percentage due to differences in their usage of material, labor, or overhead. Product lines may use different profit margin percentages due to time-to-market and capacity constraints and varying market conditions for different types of products. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P7 (4) th Chapter 17, P 8. 1. Process cost report prepared using FIFO costing method Good Foods, Inc. Mixing Department Process Cost Report--FIFO Costing Method For the Month Ended January 31 Physical Units Beginning inventory Units started this period Units to be accounted for Beginning inventory Equivalent Units 5,000 90,000 95,000 Conversion Direct Materials 5,000 Costs 0% 3,000 60% Units started and completed 84,000 84,000 100% 84,000 100% Ending inventory 6,000 95,000 6,000 90,000 100% 3,600 90,600 60% Units accounted for Conversion Costs Direct Materials Total Costs Beginning inventory $ 33,790 = $ 28,560 + Current costs 631,200 $664,990 = 450,000 + Total costs $ 5,230 181,200 Current Costs $450,000 $181,200 Equivalent Units 90,000 90,600 Cost per equivalent unit $7.00 $5.00 = $2.00 + Cost of goods manufactured and transferred out: From beginning inventory $ 33,790 Current costs to complete 6,000 Units started and completed Cost of goods manufactured Ending inventory Total costs 2. = ( 3,000 x $2.00 ) 588,000 $627,790 = ( 84,000 x $5.00 ) + ( 84,000 x $2.00 ) 37,200 $664,990 =( $5.00 ) + ( $2.00 ) 6,000 x 3,600 x Manager Insight: Analysis for the Cooking Department explained The Cooking Department will require a separate Work in Process Inventory account and a separate analysis. The costs transferred from the Mixing Department to the Cooking Department are treated in the same way as direct materials costs added at the beginning of the process. Because the Cooking Department has no direct materials other than those transferred in from the Mixing Department, there would be no need to include a line for additional direct materials. Otherwise, the analysis for the Cooking Department is the same as the analysis for the Mixing Department. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 P8 Chapter 17, C 1. All nine questions that every great business plan should answer should be addressed when managers plan. Customer identification, customer buying habits, market segmentation, customer acquisition costs, and pricing strategies are all considered when managers try to answer the questions "How much should the product cost?" and "Are period costs reasonable in supporting and retaining customers?" Managers must understand not only their product costs but also their customers. As managers move through the management process from planning to performing to evaluating and communicating, they must continue to monitor customer expectations and business goals. If a customer-related change occurs, managers will review what actions can be taken to improve results and adapt the execution of the business plan accordingly. Chapter 17, C 2. Methocel is a liquid and would be produced in a continuous process. Thus, the most appropriate system for accounting for the costs of Methocel would be the process costing system. In a continuous flow environment, where liquid products or large numbers of similar products are produced, it is not practical or useful to track costs to individual products, as would be done in a job order costing system, because all gallons or units of the products are identical. A process costing system accumulates the costs of direct materials, direct labor, and overhead for each process, department, or work cell and assigns those costs equally to the products produced during a particular time period. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C1 to C2 Chapter 17, C 3. Ingrid Bjorn installed a process costing system in the new division because product flow had changed. Changes in product flow also made it necessary to create the new division. In the specialty steel division, costs are accounted for by job order. Products are produced in the type and amount specifically ordered by the customer. Costs are traced to each job being completed. In the new division, product flow is continuous. Individual jobs are not a part of this process. The sheet steel rolls are produced in bulk, and customers buy a specific number of rolls. Because of the changed nature of the product flow in the new division, costs are traced to each of the three work cells. Process costing is used to assign those costs to the individual sheet steel rolls. Three Work in Process Inventory accounts are necessary because the three work cells produce different types of sheet steel rolls. The continuous flow of production in the new division makes it a candidate for the process costing system. In process costing, a different Work in Process Inventory account is used for each work cell because different types of direct materials, direct labor, and overhead costs are needed by the three work cells. If product costing for the three new work cells had been incorporated into the existing job order costing system and only one Work in Process Inventory account was used, the assignment of overhead would be inaccurate. Made-to-order products are usually more costly than those produced in a continuous fashion because the production process must be changed to accommodate the specific requirements of each job. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C3 Chapter 17, C 4. 1. Inaccuracies resulting from cost-charging error pointed out a. Recorded costs exceed actual costs incurred. b. Unit cost is wrong. c. Work in process and finished goods inventories and cost of goods sold are in error. d. Selling price is incorrect and could cost the company revenue dollars and future customers. e. Net income is understated. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C4 Chapter 17, C 4. (Continued) 2. Process cost report prepared using FIFO costing method Ready Tire Corporation Process Cost Report--FIFO Costing Method For the Year Ended December 31 Physical Units Beginning inventory Equivalent Units 4,200 Units started this period 84,200 88,400 Units to be accounted for Beginning inventory Conversion Direct Materials 4,200 Costs 0% 1,260 30% Units started and completed 80,400 80,400 100% 80,400 100% Ending inventory 3,800 88,400 3,800 84,200 100% 1,140 82,800 30% Units accounted for Conversion Costs Direct Materials Total Costs Beginning inventory $ 180,670 = $ 123,660 + Current costs 4,108,400 $4,289,070 = 1,978,700 + Total costs $ 57,010 2,129,700 * Current Costs $1,978,700 $2,129,700 Equivalent Units 84,200 82,800 $49.22 Cost per equivalent unit $23.50 = $25.72 + Cost of goods manufactured and transferred out: From beginning inventory $ 180,670 Current costs to complete 32,407 Units started and completed 3,957,288 84 Cost of goods manufactured *( $800,400 = ( 80,400 x 1,260 x $25.72 ) $23.50 ) + ( 80,400 x $25.72 ) $23.50 ) + ( $25.72 ) (Add rounding, $84.) $4,170,449 Ending inventory Total costs ( 118,621 =( 3,800 x $4,289,070 + $1,600,800 ) [ Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. $90,500 + ( $90,500 x Ch17 C4 (2) $2.00 )] 1,140 x Chapter 17, C 4. (Continued) 3. Minimum selling price per tire computed Production cost per unit $49.22 Plus operating costs and profit markup (75%) to cover 36.92 * $86.14 * Minimum selling price *Rounded. 4. Ways of preventing errors suggested a. Review recording procedures for direct labor costs. b. Review document verification for direct labor. c. Conduct a special review of the system of recording manufacturing costs. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C4 (3) Chapter 17, C 5. 1. Bar chart prepared P12 P19 $ 2,868 $ 3,250 $ 5,552 4,998 2,684 1,382 14,434 $22,300 Bid and Proposal P15 14,616 $20,550 3,500 $10,434 Design Prototype Development Total Job Cost Peruga Engineering Company $ 3,500 100% 90% $ 14 ,4 34 $ 14 ,616 80% $ 1,382 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% $ 4 ,998 $ 2,684 $ 2,868 $ 5,552 $ 3,250 20% 10% 0% P12 Bid and Proposal P15 P19 Design Prot otype Development 2. Differences between costs discussed Because of the nature of an engineering company's services, each of the jobs may require different amounts of Bid and Proposal costs, Design costs, and Prototype Development costs to carry out the tasks contracted for with the customer. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C5 Chapter 17, C 6. This is a case of defrauding the federal government. Laws have been broken in this scenario. Jennifer Martin should report the incident to her superior. She should also tell Joe Barnes to correct the pricing error as soon as possible. Martin has the obligation to work toward a successful solution to the problem. Otherwise, she could face charges as a co-conspirator. If she keeps quiet about an illegal transaction, she becomes a party to that transaction. Chapter 17, C 7. This case will elicit a wide variety of responses. Its objective is to encourage students to explore companies' websites for product information and to apply that information to what they know about process costing systems. All of the companies listed make similar units of products in a continuous flow and thus are appropriate candidates for process costing systems. Usually, the type of product will not affect the appropriateness of the process costing system. Some students may question how companies solve the problem of different models or configurations of products. Process costing is still appropriate because even different models are usually made in large numbers and are not special orders for specific customers. Students may find cases, however, in which job order costing would be appropriate. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C6 to C7 Chapter 17, C 8. This assignment is designed to develop students' interviewing, data-gathering, and writing skills. Students will identify similarities and differences in the processes, documentation, and recordkeeping practices of small businesses. Some interviewees will be very knowledgeable about the costs of running their businesses. Others will be less familiar with these costs. It is helpful for students to recognize the variations that exist in business practices. Group students based on the type of business they have selected. Discussion within the groups should focus on the questions in part 5 of the assignment (estimating costs and selling prices, differences in documentation and recordkeeping practices, and students' opinions about the effectiveness of the businesses' accounting processes). Select a few groups to share the main points of their discussion with the class. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C8 Chapter 17, C 9. 1. a. The memo is being prepared for the president of the company. Because the president probably has tremendous responsibility and limited amounts of time, the memo should be brief, perhaps no more than a twopage summary. You should be prepared to provide additional detailed information to support the summary, upon request. b. The purpose of the memo is to report any inefficiencies or waste that currently exists in the production process and to make suggestions for reducing or eliminating the problems. c. You can take the following actions to obtain information for the memo: (1) Identify the cost per equivalent unit of Smackaroos for each month to verify the increase in production costs. (2) Identify the department where processing activities contribute most to the increase in the cost per equivalent unit. (3) Identify the cost element within the department that reflects the increase in the cost per equivalent unit. (4) Examine the nonfinancial quantitative measures of processing activities within the department. (5) Talk to production employees and managers to understand the working environment and the problems that are occurring. Information from the unit cost analysis schedules will help you in analyzing the increase in costs. The accounting system provides this information. Nonfinancial measures, such as number of boxes spoiled, time to bake cereal for one box, time to package one box, machine downtime, number of machine repairs, and skill levels of employees, will provide additional knowledge. The accounting system can be designed to gather such information as well. If the Accounting Department is unable to help, the Production Department must be willing to track the activity and maintain the records. Finally, much can be learned about the situation by interviewing the employees in the production departments and observing their actions. Winslow's information provides a good basis for the analysis, but it is insufficient. The specific causes of the increased costs must be identified by gathering nonfinancial quantitative and qualitative information. d. The president must receive the memo in time to use it to prepare for the meeting in ten days. How quickly you prepare the memo depends on the availability and reliability of the information. If the managers and employees in the Accounting and Production Departments are reliable, you should be able to get accurate information quickly. Valuable time will be lost if the accounting system is slow or the information is not readily available. 2. Production problem discussed Increased direct labor and overhead costs in the Baking Department imply that a problem exists in the baking process. The problem may or may not be related to the direct materials used. Additional information is needed to determine if the problem is associated with the employees, the equipment, or some other variable. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C9 Chapter 17, C 9. (Continued) 3. Outline of memo prepared MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Topic: Gilbert Rom Student's Name, Production Manager Today's date Reducing inefficiencies in the production process of Smackaroos I. Introduction: Purpose of the memo II. Analysis of recent production activity III. Causes of increased production costs IV. Recommendations for reducing or eliminating inefficiencies and waste in the production process V. Impact of recommended actions on the profitability of Smackaroo sales Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Ch17 C9 (2)
Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

Maryland - BMGT - 221H
Chapter 24Pricing Decisions,Including Target Costingand Transfer PricingThe PricingDecision and the ManagerObjective 1Identify the objectives and rules used toestablish prices of goods and services, andrelate pricing issues to the managementproc
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
Chapter 22Standard Costingand Variance AnalysisStandard CostingObjective 1 Define standard costs, and describe howmanagers use these costs.Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.22 | 2Standard CostingA method of cost control tha
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
Chapter 19Cost Behavior AnalysisCost Behavior and Management Objective 1 Define cost behavior and explain howmanagers use this concept.Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.19 | 2Cost Behavior and Management Cost behavior is the
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
Chapter 18Activity-Based Systems:ABM and JITActivity-BasedSystems and Management Objective 1 Explain the role of managers in activity-basedsystems.Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.18 | 2Activity-BasedSystems and Managemen
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
Chapter 17Costing Systems:Job Orderand Process CostingProduct Cost Informationand the Management Process Objective 1 Discuss the role that information about costsplays in the management process, and explainwhy unit cost is important.Copyright Ho
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
Chapter 16Cost Conceptsand Cost AllocationCost Informationand Managers Objective 1 Describe how managers useinformation about costs.Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.16 | 2Managers Use ofCost Information One of a companys
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
Chapter 15The ChangingBusiness Environment:A Managers PerspectiveThe Role ofManagement AccountingObjective 1 Distinguish management accounting fromfinancial accounting and explain howmanagement accounting supports themanagement process.Copyrigh
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
BMGT 221H Homework 7 From the information below prepare a Performance Report (Chapter 21) and a Variance Analysis (Chapter 22). This homework is designed to help you appreciate the difference between the two piec
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
BMGT 221HSpring 2011Homework 1I pledge on my honor that I have not given or received any unauthorized assistance onthis assignmentSigned:.NAME:.What are the differences between Financial Accounting and Management Accounting?(write no more than 200
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
BMGT 221H - PRINCIPLES OF ACCOUNTING IISpring 2011Professor:Dr. Colin LinsleyOffice:VMH 4332GEmail:clinsley@rhsmith.umd.eduOffice Hours: T,Th: 2.30pm to 4.00pm, and by appointmentThe Course:This course is an introduction to managerial accounting
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
Maryland - BMGT - 221H
BMGT 221HSpring 2011Homework 3NAME:I pledge on my honor that I have not given or received any unauthorized assistance onthis assignmentSigned:.Complete the following Process Cost Report (FIFO Method) by filling in the shadedcells:PhysicalUnitsB
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 7.4:Problem 7.5:Problem 7.12:Problem 7.13:Problem 7.14:Problem 7.15:Problem 7.17:Problem 7.18:Problem 7.21:Problem H.04: The frame shown below is composed of three members (ABCD, CEF, and BE) that are connected to each other through pins
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 6.8:Problem 6.13:Problem 6.13: (cont)Problem 6.17:Problem 6.20:Problem 6.25:Problem 6.27:Problem 6.31:Problem 6.35:Problem 6.35: (cont)
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 5.15:Problem 5.16:Problem 5.18:Problem 5.18: (cont)Problem 5.20:Problem 5.24:Problem 5.27:Problem H.02: The A36 steel column is used to support the symmetric loads from two floors of anoffice building. Determine the loads P1 and P2 if A mo
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 4.31:Problem 4.34:Problem 4.40:Problem 4.42:Problem 4.42: (cont)Problem 4.42: (cont)Problem 5.1:Problem 5.4:Problem 5.10:-Problem 5.13:
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 4.1:Problem 4.4:Problems 4.7 & 4.9:Problem 4.12:Problem 4.15:Problems 4.19 & 4.22:
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 3.41:Problem 3.43:Problem 3.45:Problem 3.47:
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 3.10:Problem 3.12:Problem 3.33:Problem 3.39:-Problem 3.44:Problem 3.42:Problem 3.46:Problem 3.48:
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 3.7:Problem 3.9:Problem 3.16:Problem 3.18:Problem 3.28:Problem 3.31:Problem 3.37:H.01: The overhanging beam AB is supported by a pinned connection at A and by a roller at B. Thebeam is subjected to a concentrated force (3 kN), a concentrat
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 2.43(b):Problem 2.44(b):Problem 2.45:Problem 2.45: (cont)Problem 2.47:Problem 2.47: (cont)Problem 10.13:Problem 10.16*:Problem 10.22*:Problem 10.23*:
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 2.37(a):Problem 2.38(a):Problem 2.39(d):Problem 2.40:Problem 2.33:Problem 2.34:Problem 2.41(a):Problem 2.42(a):
Maryland - ENES - 102
Problem 1.2:-Problem 1.14:Problem 1.22:Problem 1.27:Problem 2.16:Problem 2.18:Problem 2.21:Problem 2.25:
Maryland - ENES - 102
TRUSS BRIDGE DESIGN PROJECTENES 102 Fall 2010The Truss Bridge Design Project to be undertaken this semester is a hands-on project that will consist of thefollowing steps:Each team will design and analyze a truss bridge, to withstand a maximum applied
Maryland - PHYS - 260
Maryland - PHYS - 260
Maryland - PHYS - 260
Maryland - PHYS - 260
Maryland - BMGT - 380
1)Limitationsoftimeandterritory2)Employeesolecontactw/customer8)Whetheremployee'stalentdevelopedduringemploymentMr.Moore,yougaveadepositioninthiscase,correct?Atthedeposition,yousworetotellthetruth,isthatright?Inyourdepositiontestimony,yousaid.isn'tth
Maryland - BMGT - 380
Chapter 2: JurisdictionTwo kinds of jurisdiction aka court powerSubject matter > people who have been victimizedPersonalActor Forum Reisequitor- You must follow them to their forum or where they liveBalancing Test Due Process of LawSubject Matter-
Maryland - BMGT - 380
3/23/2010INTENTIONAL TORTSTort law intentional and negligenceThe claims you put in the complaint to get to the systemEach of these claims that give you the right to ask for money, civil, not criminalOn the defense side poke a hole in one of those ele
Maryland - BMGT - 380
35 questionsIJKLMNOPRI Intro to Contracts Chapter 9Nature of contractsNot every promise is legally enforceableBut when a set of promises has the status of contract, a person injured by a breach of thatcontract is entitled to call on the government (
Maryland - BMGT - 380
INTENTIONAL TORTST. Leigh Anenson, J.D., LL.M.FOUR CATEGORIES OF TORTS1) INTENTIONAL TORTS2) BUSINESS TORTS3) UNINTENTIONAL (NEGLIGENCE)TORTS4) STRICT LIABILITY TORTSINTENTIONAL TORTSAGAINST PERSONSASSAULT & BATTERYINTENTIONAL INFLICTIONOF EMO
Maryland - BMGT - 380
NEGLIGENCE&STRICTLIABILITYT.LEIGHANENSON,J.D.,LL.M.NEGLIGENCE:FOURELEMENTS 1)DUTY 2)BREACH 3)CAUSATION 4)DAMAGESNEGLIGENCE:DUTYDEFINITION ACTLIKEREASONABLEPERSONUNDERTHECIRCUMSTANCES SPECIALRELATIONSHIPCALLINGFORSUCHDUTIESBETWEENTHEPARTIES
Maryland - BMGT - 380
PRODUCTS LIABILITYT. Leigh Anenson, J.D.,LL.M.THREE WARRANTIES 1)EXPRESS WARRANTY 2)IMPLIED WARRANTY OFMERCHANTABILITY 3)IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FORA PARTICULAR PURPOSEEXPRESS WARRANTY: 3 WAYS AFFIRMATIONOF FACT OR PROMISEREGARDING GOODS
Maryland - BMGT - 380
INTRODUCTION TO CONTRACTST. LEIGH ANENSON, J.D., LL.M.Contracts are agreements made up ofbig words and little type.Sam Ewing, quoted in Saturday EveningPost, May 1993CONTRACT LAW Introduction toContracts The Agreement:Offer The Agreement:Accep
Maryland - BMGT - 380
THE AGREEMENT:OFFERT. LEIGH ANENSON, J.D., LL.M.There is nothing more likely to startdisagreement among people or countries thanan agreement.E.B. WhiteCONTRACT LAW Introduction toContracts The Agreement:Offer Capacity to Contract Illegality
Maryland - BMGT - 380
Make your bargainbefore beginning to plow.- Arab proverbTHE AGREEMENT:ACCEPTANCET. LEIGH ANENSON, J.D., LL.M.CONTRACT LAW Introduction toContracts The Agreement:Offer Capacity to Contract Illegality Writing The Agreement:Acceptance Rights
Maryland - BMGT - 380
CHAPTER12CONSIDERATIONCONSIDERATIONT. LEIGH ANENSON, J.D., LL.M.Make yourself necessary to someone.Ralph Waldo Emerson, The Conduct of Life (1860)CONTRACT LAWCONTRACT Introduction toIntroductionContractsContracts The Agreement:TheOfferOffe
Maryland - BMGT - 380
CHAPTER13Reality of ConsentNecessity nevermade a goodbargain.Benjamin Franklin, 1735T. LEIGH ANENSON, J.D., LL.M.Learning Objectives Five doctrines that permit people toavoid their contracts because of theabsence of real consent:Misrepresentat
Maryland - BMGT - 380
ENFORCEABILITY OF NONCOMPETE AGREEMENT(4th contract requirement lawful object)3 Requirements of Reasonableness of Restrictive Covenant:1) necessary to protect employers legitimate interest2) not unduly harsh or more harsh than is required to protect t
Maryland - BMGT - 380
15ILLEGALITYCHAPTERT.LeighAnenson,J.D.,LL.M.In a free society thestate does not administerthe affairs of men [andwomen]. It administersjustice among men [andwomen] who conducttheir own affairs.Walter LippmanCONTRACT LAWIntroduction toContrac
Maryland - BMGT - 380
CHAPTER16WritingA verbal contractisnt worth thepaper its writtenon.Samuel Goldwyn, quoted inThe Great Goldwyn (AlvaJohnson, 1937)CONTRACT LAW Introduction toContracts The Agreement:Offer The Agreement:Acceptance Consideration Reality of
Maryland - BMGT - 380
CHAPTER18Performance & RemediesT. Leigh Anenson, J.D., LL.M.It is an immutable lawin business that wordsare words, explanationsare explanations,promises are promises but only performance isreality.Harold S. Geneen, CEO of ITT,Managing (co-writ
Maryland - BMGT - 380
14Capacity to ContractCHAPTERT. LEIGH ANENSON, J.D., LL.M.No brilliance is need in the law.Nothing but common sense, andrelatively clean fingernails.John MortimerCONTRACT LAW IntroductiontoContracts TheAgreement:Offer TheAgreement:Accepta
Maryland - BMGT - 430
96CHAPTER 5Fitting Curves to Data5.1Model Summaries:R-squareLinear ModelSecond Order ModelAdjusted R-squareStandard Error99.2100.099.099.914.343.54The second-order model appears better than the first-order model. The p value on thesecond-
Maryland - BMGT - 430
Chapter 4Multiple Regression Analysis(Part 2)TerryDielmanAppliedRegressionAnalysis:ASecondCourseinBusinessandEconomicStatistics,fourtheditionMultipleRegressionIIMultipleRegressionIICopyright2005Brooks/Cole,adivisionofThomsonLearning,Inc.14.4 Co
Maryland - BMGT - 430
Chapter 4Multiple Regression Analysis(Part 1)TerryDielmanAppliedRegressionAnalysis:ASecondCourseinBusinessandEconomicStatistics,fourtheditionMultipleRegressionIMultipleRegressionICopyright2005Brooks/Cole,adivisionofThomsonLearning,Inc.14.1 Usin
Maryland - BMGT - 430
Chapter 3Simple Regression Analysis(Part 2)TerryDielmanAppliedRegressionAnalysis:ASecondCourseinBusinessandEconomicStatistics,fourtheditionSimpleRegressionIISimpleRegressionIICopyright2005Brooks/Cole,adivisionofThomsonLearning,Inc.13.4 Assessin
Maryland - BMGT - 430
Chapter 3Simple Regression Analysis(Part 1)TerryDielmanAppliedRegressionAnalysis:ASecondCourseinBusinessandEconomicStatistics,fourtheditionSimpleRegressionISimpleRegressionICopyright2005Brooks/Cole,adivisionofThomsonLearning,Inc.13.1 Using Simp
Maryland - BMGT - 430
Chapter 2Review of BasicStatistical ConceptsTerryDielmanAppliedRegressionAnalysis:ASecondCourseinBusinessandEconomicStatistics,fourtheditionStatisticsReviewStatisticsReviewCopyright2005Brooks/Cole,adivisionofThomsonLearning,Inc.12.1 Introductio
Maryland - BMGT - 430
Chapter 1An Introduction to RegressionAnAnalysisAnalysisTerryDielmanAppliedRegressionAnalysis:ASecondCourseinBusinessandEconomicStatistics,fourtheditionIntroductionIntroductionCopyright2005Brooks/Cole,adivisionofThomsonLearning,Inc.1A Mountai
Maryland - BMGT - 430
CHAPTER THREEHomework Solution3.2bxy40307090506070408070600836013818097118140751591441194x2xy3320 160018009009660 490016200 81004850 25007080 36009800 49003000 160012720 640010080 490078510 394001b11 xy n x y 7
Maryland - BMGT - 301
CHAPTER11The Data Asset: Databases,Business Intelligence, andCompetitive Advantage1. INTRODUCTIONLEARNINGOBJECTIVESAfter studying this section you should:1. Understand how increasingly standardized data, access to third party datasets, cheap, fas
Maryland - BMGT - 301
CHAPTER10Software in Flux: PartlyCloudy and Sometimes Free1. INTRODUCTIONLEARNINGOBJECTIVESAfter studying this section you should:1. Understand how low marginal costs, network eects, and switching costs have combined tohelp create a huge and impo
Maryland - BMGT - 301
CHAPTER9Understanding Software: APrimer for Managers1. INTRODUCTIONLEARNINGOBJECTIVESAfter studying this section you should be able to:1. Recognize the importance of software and its implications for the rm and strategic decisionmaking.2. Unders
Maryland - BMGT - 301
CHAPTER8Google: Search, OnlineAdvertising, and Beyond1. INTRODUCTIONLEARNINGOBJECTIVESAfter studying this section you should:1. Understand the extent of Googles rapid rise and its size and inuence when compared againstothers in the media industry
Maryland - BMGT - 301
CHAPTER7Facebook: Building aBusiness from the SocialGraph1. INTRODUCTIONLEARNINGOBJECTIVESAfter studying this section you should:1. Be familiar with Facebooks origins and rapid rise.2. Understand how Facebooks rapid rise has impacted the rms abi
Maryland - BMGT - 301
CHAPTER6Peer Production, SocialMedia, and Web 2.01. INTRODUCTIONLEARNINGOBJECTIVESAfter studying this section you should be able to:1. Recognize the unexpected rise and impact of social media and peer production systems, andhow these services die