3 Pages

1_Gaussian_Beam_Optics

Course: EEL 6447, Spring 2012
School: University of Florida
Rating:
 
 
 
 
 

Word Count: 7009

Document Preview

Beam Gaussian Optics, Ray Tracing, and Cavities Revised: 1/25/12 1:57 PM 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 1 I. Gaussian Beams (Text Chapter 3) 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 2 Gaussian Beams Real optical beams are not plane waves Real optical beams are not rays Real optical beams are of finite transverse extent Laser beams tend to be Gaussian in...

Register Now

Unformatted Document Excerpt

Coursehero >> Florida >> University of Florida >> EEL 6447

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one
below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.

Course Hero has millions of student submitted documents similar to the one below including study guides, practice problems, reference materials, practice exams, textbook help and tutor support.
Beam Gaussian Optics, Ray Tracing, and Cavities Revised: 1/25/12 1:57 PM 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 1 I. Gaussian Beams (Text Chapter 3) 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 2 Gaussian Beams Real optical beams are not plane waves Real optical beams are not rays Real optical beams are of finite transverse extent Laser beams tend to be Gaussian in cross-section why? 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 3 Gaussian Beams Observation : Most real optical beams are almost pure TEM Certainly for free space: ! !i E = 0 and ! !i H = 0 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 4 Gaussian Beams Decompose the divergence into transverse and longitudinal components: ! ! ! i E = 0 " ! i Et + zEz = 0 ( ) $ #' ! = & !t + z ) i Et + zEz #z ( % $ #' ! $ #' = & !t + z ) i Et + & !t + z ) i zEz #z ( #z ( % % ( ) $ ! ! # = & !t i Et + z i Et #z % ! # = !t i Et + Ez = 0 #z 2011, Henry Zmuda '$ #' ) + & !t i zEz + z i zEz # z ) ( (% Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 5 Gaussian Beams The beam propagates as the speed of light and hence must at least approximately contain a factor of the form: e ! jkz , k = nko = n Hence 2! " ! 2! E z ! " jn Ez !z " At optical frequencies the wavelength is small hence the factor multiplying Ez is large. ! ! ! " " Also note !i E = !t i Et + E z = 0 # E z = $!t i Et "z "z 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 6 Gaussian Beams ! ! Approximate !t i Et as: !t i Et " ! Et D Where D is the transverse extent of the beam. ! ! Thus from Ez = "#t i Et !z ! Et 2$ %! n Ez " & Ez " Et % D 2$ nD Since in general D ~ 1 cm, but be careful!) ! ! 1 at optical wavelengths D " " Ez ! Et 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 7 Gaussian Beams It is thus reasonable (even intuitive) to examine an electric field of the form: E x, y, z = E ! x, y, z e ! jkz o ! "# plane!-type #$ wave ( ) ( ) slowly varying The factor ! ( x, y, z ) captures how the beam differs from a uniform plane wave. This form must satisfy the wave equation: !2 E + k 2 E = 0 "2 !t2 E + 2 E + k 2 E = 0 "z E ( x, y, z ) = Eo# ( x, y, z ) e$ jkz 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 8 Gaussian Beams "2 !t2 E + 2 E + k 2 E = 0 "z Substitute: ( ) ( ) E x, y , z = Eo! x, y , z e # jkz ( ) !! x, y , z ! jkz ! E = Eo e ! jkEo! x, y , z e ! jkz !z !z 2 ! ! 2! x, y , z !! x, y , z ! E = Eo # ! j 2k ! k 2! x, y , z !z !z 2 !z 2 # " (t2 E = Eo e ' jkz (t2! x, y , z ( ( ( ) ( 2011, Henry Zmuda ) ) ) ( ) $ ' jkz &e & % Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 9 Gaussian Beams Substitute: "2 ! E + 2 E + k2E = 0 "z %2 ( $ jkz " 2# ( x , y , z ) "# ( x , y , z ) 2 2 Eo '!t # ( x , y , z ) + $ j 2k $ k # ( x, y, z ) + k # ( x, y, z )* e = 0 2 "z "z ' * & ) 2 t $ 2" ( x, y, z ) ! " ( x, y, z ) + 1 % j2 k 2 $z # !#"#$ # 2 t $" ( x, y, z ) $z =0 neglect , k >>1 ! " ( x, y, z ) # j 2k 2 t 2011, Henry Zmuda $" ( x , y , z ) $z =0 Paraxial Wave Equation Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 10 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Express the transverse gradient in cylindrical coordinates. The simplest beam will have cylindrical symmetry (d/d = 0) 1 $ % $" ( 1 $ 2" !t2" ( r ,# , z ) = ' r $r * + r 2 $# 2 r $r & ) ! "# #$ +0 ( ) ! ! x, y, z ! j 2k 2 t ( !! x, y , z ) =0 !z 1 ! ! !! $ !! ! # r !r & ' j 2k !z = 0 r !r " % 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 11 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Try a Gaussian function for a possible solution !0 = e 2011, Henry Zmuda # kr 2 & " j% P z + ( 2q z ' $ () () Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 12 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Derivatives !" 0 1 ! # !" 0 & % r !r ( ) j 2 k ! z = 0, " 0 = e r !r $ ' # kr 2 & ) j% P z + ( 2q z ' $ () () k 2 r 2 q* ( z ) & !" 0 # ) j 2k = % )2 kP* ( z ) + j (" 0 2 !z $ q (z) ' !" 0 kr =)j " 0, !r q( z) ! 2" 0 k k 2r 2 =)j "0 ) 2 "0 2 !r q( z) q (z) 1 ! # !" 0 & 1 !" 0 ! 2" 0 2k k 2r 2 % r !r ( = r !r + !r 2 = ) j q z " 0 ) q 2 z " 0 r !r $ ' () () 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 13 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode !" 0 1 ! # !" 0 & =0 % r !r ( ) j 2 k ! z r !r $ ' #$ !# "## # ! "# & # $ 22 () () k r q* z 2k k 2r 2 % )2 kP* z + j 2 (" 0 )j " 0) 2 " 0 % qz ( $ ' qz qz () () () Group powers of r: #j & k 2r 2 )2 k % + P* ( z )( " 0 ) 2 1 ) q* ( z ) " 0 = 0 q (z) $ q( z) ' !## ## " $ !## "### # $ j = 0 + q* ( z ) = 1 = 0 + P* ( z ) = ) q( z) + q( z) = q + z ( ) 0 Where is z = 0? 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 14 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Thus, !0 = e # kr 2 & " j% P z + ( 2q z ' $ () () =e () " jP z e kr 2 "j 2q z () If q(z) were purely real, then for a fixed value of z the phase would continue to increase more and more rapidly with increasing radial distance with a constant amplitude, and kr this is impossible. "j 2 " jP z !0 = e ( ) e () 2q z =1 Consider then a complex q, q ( z ) = q0 + z = z + jz0 " jP 0 ! 0 ( z = 0 ) = e ( )e This gives (at z = 0) 2011, Henry Zmuda " kr 2 2 zo Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 15 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode " jP 0 ! 0 ( z = 0 ) = e ( )e Examine " kr 2 2 zo kr"21 zo zo %o "1 2 2 ! 0 ( z = 0) = e # = 1 # r"1 = wo = 2 = 2 2 zo k 2& n $ wo is the 2 & nwo Beam Waist or # zo = Spot Size (radius), %o Really the minimum spot size 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 16 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode z = 0 plane 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 17 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode For z ! 0 !0 = e () ! jP z e q ( z ) = z + jz0 j P! ( z ) = " q( z) kr 2 !j 2q z () 2 # nwo zo = We really want q-1: $o z0 1 1 z ! jz0 z ! jz0 z = = 2 2= 2 2!j 2 2 z + z0 q ( z ) z + jz0 z ! jz0 z + z0 z + z0 !0 = e =e () " jP z () " jP z 2011, Henry Zmuda e kr 2 1 "j 2 qz () =e e e 2 1 kz0r " 2 2 z 2 + z0 ! "# #$ 1 kzr 2 "j 2 2 z 2 + z0 ! "# #$ Rapid phase variation with r () " jP z z0 & kr 2 # z "j "j % 2 2( 2 $ z 2 + z0 z 2 + z0 ' e Vanishing amplitude with r Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 18 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode !0 = e 2 1 kz0r "22 2 z + z0 =e #r& "% ( $w z ' 2 2 ) nwo () , zo = *o 4 ) 2 n2 wo z2 + 2 2 z 2 + z0 *o w2 ( z ) = 2 = 2 kz0 ) 2 n2 wo 2 *o Spot size: 2 ) 2 n2 wo 2 z2 + wo # # * z &2& 2 2 *o z 2 2 = = 2 2 2 + wo = wo % 1 + % o 2 ( ( 2 ) 2 n2 wo ) n wo % $ ) nwo ' ( $ ' 2 2 *o *o Minimum spot size is at z = 0 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 19 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode What about P(z)? 2 # nwo j j Recall: P! ( z ) = " =" , zo = z + jz0 $o q( z) Or, z z 0 0 P ( z ) = # P! (" ) d" = $ j # j " + jz0 d" = $ j ln (" + jz0 ) z " =0 ) z + jz0 , ) z, = $ j % ln ( z + jz0 ) $ ln ( jz0 ) ' = $ j ln + . = $ j ln + 1 $ j z . & ( * jz0 * 0- 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 20 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode " z% Thus, P ( z ) = ! j ln $ 1 ! j ' z0 & # z z 1! j = 1! j e z0 z0 We need e " z% j arg$ 1! j ' z0 & # 2 " z% = 1+ $ ' e # z0 & " z% ! j tan !1$ ' # z0 & () ! jP z 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 21 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode e () ! jP z =e =e " " z %% ! j $ ! j ln $ 1! j ' ' z0 & & # # " !1" z % % 2 " z % ! j tan $ z0 ' ' $ #& ! ln $ 1+$ ' e ' # z0 & $ ' # & =e 1 = e = 1 " z% 1+ $ ' # z0 & 2 e " z% ! ln $ 1! j ' z0 & # " 2 ! j tan !1" z % % $' " z% $ # z0 & ' ln $ 1+$ ' e ' # z0 & $ ' # & = 1 2 " z% 1+ $ ' e # z0 & " z% ! j tan !1$ ' # z0 & " z% j tan !1$ ' # z0 & 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 22 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode 1 ! z$ 1+ # & " z0 % 2 = 2 ' nwo zo = (o ! (o z $ wo = , w ( z ) = wo 1 + # 2& 2 w( z ) " ' nwo % ! z(o $ 1+ # 2 ' nwo & " % 2011, Henry Zmuda 1 Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 2 23 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Putting it all together, E ( x , y , z ) = Eo! ( x , y , z ) e wo = e w( z ) "1 # kr 2 z& j tan % ( " j 2R z $ z0 ' e () e " jkz , ! ( x, y, z ) = e 2 1 kz0r "22 2 z + z0 wo = e w( z ) () " jP z "1 # e kr 2 "j 2q z () kr 2 z& j tan % ( " j 2R z $ z0 ' e () " e r2 () w2 z where # # ) z &2& 2 zo )o * nwo 2 2 w2 ( z ) = wo % 1 + % o 2 ( ( , wo = 2 , zo = , 2* n )o % $ * nwo ' ( $ ' 2 2 # z 2 + z0 z0 & Define R ( z ) = = z %1+ 2 ( z z' $ 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 24 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Rearranging, ( ) ( ) E x, y , z = Eo! x, y , z e ! r2 ! jkz ' * !1 ! z $ ! j ) kz ! tan # & , " z0 % , ) ( + kr 2 -j 2R z () () = Eo w( z ) e e #"## e "$ !# $! !#"#$ Longitudinal Radial wo w2 z Amplitude Factor 2011, Henry Zmuda Phase Factor Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities Phase Factor 25 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Field Amplitude: E ( x, y, z ) = Eo w( z ) e wo ! r2 () w2 z $ $ " z '2' 2 w2 ( z ) = wo & 1 + & o 2 ) ) & % # nwo ( ) % ( For increasing (or decreasing) z, The field amplitude decreases The beam waist increases The narrowest beam waist is wo occurring at z = 0 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 26 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode wo e!1 e 2 wo !1 e!1 e-1 points of the field ! wo e!1 z=0 e!1 2 wo 2 ! z$ w ( z ) = wo 1 + # & ' w ( z ) = 2 wo z = z o " zo % 2011, Henry Zmuda e!1 z = z0 Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 27 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode For large z the beam waist increases linearly 2 # !o z & !o z w ( z ) = wo 1 + % ) 2 ( z) * " nwo $ " nwo ' and spreads with angle 2 ! dw ( z ) = = wo 2 dz 2011, Henry Zmuda ! !o $ # " nw 2 & z " o% !o ' 2 z '( " nw o ! !o z $ 1+ # 2& " " nwo % Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 28 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Longitudinal Phase: # )o # z& "1 ! ( z ) = kz " tan % ( = kz " tan % 2 * nwo $ z0 ' $ "1 & z( ' The phase velocity of a Gaussian beam is close to, but slightly greater than, the velocity of light in the equivalent uniform medium. c cko z !z n vp z ! = = #! & #! & !z ! "1 "1 nko z " tan % z 1" tan % z 2( 2( 2! nz $ " nwo ' $ " nwo ' () () 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 29 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Radial Phase: e kr 2 !j 2R z () For z = constant, the phase in not a constant (the equiphase surface is not a plane) but varies with radius r, hence we do not have a plane wave. The phase front is curved, not flat as with a plane wave. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 30 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode To better understand the radial phase factor, consider a point source which emits a spherical wave. 1 ! jkR The electric field can be expressed as E ! e R R r Point Source z " 1 r2 % r2 1 r2 R = r 2 + z2 = z 1+ 2 ! z $1+ ! z+ 2 ' z& R 2R z z!r # 2 z & "$$$$#$$$$% via the binomial theorm 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 31 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Radial Phase Factor close to the z-axis: " 1 r2 $ z+ R=# 2R $ R!z % E! 1 & jkR 1 e !e R R 2011, Henry Zmuda for phase terms for amplitude terms ' 1 r2 * & jk ) z + , ( 2 R+ Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 32 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode But for a Gaussian beam the apparent center for the curved wavefront changes. For a Gaussian beam recall, 2 ! z0 $ R z = z #1 + 2 & z% " () When z ! z0 , R ( z ) ! z and the wave appears to originate from the origin z = 0 . 2 z0 As we move closer to the origin however, R ( z ) ! " # the z !0 z center of curvature is at infinity and the wavefront is planar. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 33 Gaussian Beams: TEM0,0 Mode Where is z = 0? Where the spot size is minimum and the wavefront is planar. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 34 Gaussian Beams: Higher Order Modes What if the assumption that ! is relaxed? !" Any type of imperfection. Intentional or otherwise, even dust in an optical system, can cause this to occur. Now the wave equation becomes: ( ) ! ! x, y, z ! j 2k 2 t ( !! x, y , z ) =0 !z 1 ! ! !! $ 1 ' 2! !! ! r +2 ! j 2k =0 # !r & r '" 2 r !r " !z % ! "# #$ added term 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 35 Gaussian Beams: Higher Order Modes The solution is significantly more involved. It is simply stated here as: r 2 ( + ! new term$ % ! z $* ' j * kz '# 1+ m+ p & tan '1# & kr 2 # & 'j " z0 % * 2R z " % ) , ! 2x $ ! 2 y $ w ' w2 ( z ) o E ( x , y , z ) = Em , p H m # Hp # e e e () & & w( z ) " $ " w( z ) % " w ( z ) % !###### ###### !#### "##### # $ original terms new terms The Hm(u) are Hermite Polynomials 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 36 Gaussian Beams: (Hermite-Gaussian) Higher Order Modes Hermite Polynomials: H m m ! u2 de u = !1 e du m () ( ) m u2 () H ( u ) = 2u H (u ) = 2 ( 2u ! 1) H (u ) = 4 ( 2u ! 3u ) H (u ) = 4 ( 4u ! 12u H (u ) = Homework H0 u = 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 2 ) +3 5 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 37 Gaussian Beams: Higher Order Modes 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 38 Gaussian Beams: (Hermite-Gaussian) Higher Order Modes The idea of spot size can be a bit vague here. The spot size definition for w(z) is the same for all the modes illustrated, but the field occupies a bigger area as the mode number gets larger. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 39 Gaussian Beams Lasers produce Gaussian beams The laser beam is generally produced by a cavity We need to understand what a cavity is along with methods of analyzing them. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 40 II. 2011, Henry Zmuda Ray Tracing (Text Chapter 2) Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 41 To trace a ray in an optical system two (very simple) things must be known: 1. Where is the ray at a given point? 2. In what direction is it going? 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 42 2 Ray Tracing ! 2 ( = !1 ) Ray 1 r2 !1 r1 Length d of free space d Optical Axis Clearly, if we know where the ray is at plane 1 and we know its slope w.r.t. the optical axis, then we know where the wave is when it exits at plane 2. We assume a paraxial approximation, namely r2 ! r1 tan ! = sin ! = ! ! ray slope r ! = = tan ! = ! d ( 2011, Henry Zmuda ) Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 43 2 Ray Tracing !2 Ray 1 !1 r2 r1 d r2 = r1 + r1! d Optical Axis ( y = mx + b) r2! = r1! "r % " % " r1 % " rout % " A B % " rin % '=$ ' $ 2 ' = $ 1 d '$ '($ '$ $ r! ' # 0 1 & $ r! ' $ r! ' # C D & $ r! ' #2& # 1 & # out & # in & ABCD Matrix 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 44 Ray Tracing 2 12 1 r2 r12 r1 d1 "r % " % " r1 % $ 12 ' = $ 1 d1 ' $ ' $ r! ' $ 0 1 ' $ r! ' &# 1 & # 12 & # d2 Optical Axis "r % " % " r12 $ 2 ' = $ 1 d2 ' $ $ r! ' $ 0 1 ' $ r! & # 12 #2& # % ' ' & =# % "r % " "r% " ! d ' " r1 % " 1 d 2 % " 1 d1 % $ 1 ' $ 2 $ '=$ ' = $ 1 d1 + d 2 ' $ '$ ' $ r! ' $ 0 1 ' $ 0 1 ' $ r! ' $ ' $ ' # r1! & &# &# 1 & #2& # 1 #0 & Note the reverse order 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 45 Ray Tracing A Thin Lens A thin lens means this distance is negligible, hence r1 = r2 regardless of angle of incidence. f f 12 "r % " % " r1 % " 1 2 $ ' = $ A B '$ '=$ $ r! ' # C D & $ r! ' # C #2& #1& 2011, Henry Zmuda % " r1 % 0$ ' '$ D & r1! ' # & Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 46 Ray Tracing A Thin Lens f f For the blue ray: 12 ! = 0, r ! = " r1 r1 2 f #r & # #r& # 1 % 2 ( = % A B &% 1 ( = % 1 % r! ( $ C D ( % r! ( % " '$ 1 ' % f $2' $ 2011, Henry Zmuda 0 &# r (% 1 D ( % r! ($ 1 ' & ( ( ' Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 47 Ray Tracing A Thin Lens f f For the red ray: 12 ! = 0, r ! = + r1 " r ! = 0 = # r1 + D r1 " D = 1 r2 1 2 f f f $r ' $ $r ' $ 1 & 2 ) = & A B '& 1 ) = & 1 & r! ) % C D ) & r! ) & # (% 1 ( & f %2( % 2011, Henry Zmuda 0 '$ r )& 1 D ) & r! )% 1 ( $1 ' )"T = & 1 &# ) & f ( % Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 0' ) 1) ) ( 48 Ray Tracing Free Space and a Thin Lens d 1 Note the reverse order "1 $ T =$ 1 ! $ f # 23 "1 0% '" 1 d % $ 1 $ '= 1 '# 0 1 & $ ! ' $ f & # 2011, Henry Zmuda % ' d' 1! f' & d Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 49 Ray Tracing A Spherical Mirror Tangent Plane 2! R R 2 R f= 2 ! = 0, r ! = "2 r1 r1 2 R #r & # #r & # 1 % 2 ( = % A B &% 1 ( = % 2 % r! ( $ C D ( % r! ( % " '$ 1 ' % R $2' $ 2011, Henry Zmuda 0 &# r (% 1 D ( % r! ($ 1 ' & ( ( ' Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 50 Ray Tracing A Spherical Mirror 2! R R 2 ! = 0, r ! = 2 r1 " r ! = 0 = # 2 r + D 2 r " D = 1 r2 1 2 R R1 R1 $r ' $ $r ' $ 1 0 '$ r ' $ 1 )& 1 ) & & 2 ) = & A B '& 1 ) = & 2 )& &# )& ! ) = & # 2 & r! ) % C D ( r! ) D 2( 1( &R ) % r1 ( & R % % % ( % 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 0 '$ r )& 1 1 ) & r! )% 1 ( 51 ' ) ) ( Ray Tracing A Spherical Mirror "1 $ T=$ 2 ! $R # 0% ' 1' ' & R Note the similarity to the lens. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 52 Ray Tracing Summary "r % " % " rin % $ out ' = $ A B ' $ ', $ r! ' # C D & $ r! ' # out & # in & Length d of free space !1 d$ Td = # & "0 1% Thin lens with focal length f "1 $ Tf = $ 1 ! $ f # 0% ' 1' ' & 2011, Henry Zmuda AD ( BC = 1 Length d of free space followed by a thin lens with focal length f "1 $ Tdf = $ 1 ! $ f # % ' d' 1! f' & d Spherical mirror, radius R "1 $ TR = $ 2 ! $R # 0% ' ' , f = 2R 1 ' & Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 53 III. Ray Tracing in an Optical Cavity 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 54 Ray Tracing An Optical Cavity The most important part of a laser is the feedback system. A ray inside the cavity bounces back and forth between the two mirrors. 1. If the rays stays close to the optical axis even after many bounces it is called a stable cavity. 2. If the ray walks off one of the mirrors it is called unstable. 3. If the mirrors have to be perfectly aligned to keep the ray near the axis is is called conditionally stable. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 55 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability Equivalent Lens System: d R2 R1 M1 M2 ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! "$$ #$$$ $ % Unit Cell 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 56 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability Equivalent Lens System: ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! "$$ #$$$ $ % Unit Cell Unit Cell f1 f1 f1 f1 f2 f2 d 2011, Henry Zmuda d f2 d d Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 57 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability Equivalent Lens System: T T " #$ $ 1 % " #$ $2% ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! d ! M 2 ! d ! M1 ! &$$ '$$$ $ ( Unit Cell #1 % 1 T1 = % " % f2 $ #1 % T2 = % 1 " % f1 $ 0& (# 1 (% ($ ' 0& (# 1 (% ($ ' 1d 01 1d 01 #1 d % d T = T2T1 = % 1 " 1" % f1 f1 $ #1 d &% ( = % " 1 1" d '% f2 f2 $ #1 d &% ( = % " 1 1" d '% f1 f1 $ &# 1 (% (% " 1 (% f2 '$ 2011, Henry Zmuda & ( ( ( ' & ( ( ( ' # d 1" &% d f2 (% d (=% 1" f2 ( % " 1 " 1 ) 1 " d , '% f1 f 2 + f1 . * % $ & ( ( ( ) d ,) d, d ( 1" . +1" . " + f1 - * f 2 - f1 ( * ( ' ) d, d + d +1" . f2 * Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 58 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability Equivalent Lens System: ( d * 1! f2 * Tn = * d% * 1 1" * ! f ! f $1 ! f ' 1 2# 1& * ) + - (A B+ -=* " d %" d% d - ) C D , $1 ! f ' $1 ! f ' ! f # 1& # 2& 1, " d% d + d $1 ! ' f2 & # (r + (r + * n+1 - = T * n * r. - n * r. ) n+1 , )n, 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 59 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability "r % "r % n+1 $ '=T $ n ' $ r! ' n $ r! ' # n+1 & #n& 1 1 rn+1 = Arn + Brn! ( rn! = ( rn+1 ) Arn ) ( rn!+1= ( rn+2 ) Arn+1 ) B B r ! = Cr + Dr ! n+1 n n 1 1 rn+2 ) Arn+1 ) = Crn + Drn! = Crn + D ( rn+1 ) Arn ) ( B B 1 1 ( rn+2 ) Arn+1 ) = Crn + D B ( rn+1 ) Arn ) B rn!+1= 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 60 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability 1 D ( rn+2 ! Arn+1 ) = Crn + B ( rn+1 ! Arn ) B #=1 $ # ! "# & 1 A+ D % AD ! BC ( " rn+2 ! rn+1 + % ( rn = 0 B B B % ( $ ' " rn+2 ! ( A + D ) rn+1 + rn = 0 A second order difference equation. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 61 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability ( ) rn+2 ! A + D rn+1 + rn = 0 rn = ro x n Assume a solution of the form: Substitute: ro x n+2 ! ( A + D ) ro x n+1 + ro x n = 0 ro " x 2 ! ( A + D ) x + 1$ x n = 0 # % & A+ D) A+ D 1 A+ D x= ( A + D) ! 4 = 2 j 1! ( 2 + 2 2 ' * 2 2 2 2 & A+ D) & A+ D) x =( + 1! ( = 1 , x = e j- = cos (- ) j sin (- ) '2+ * '2+ * & A+ D) A+ D cos (- ) = , sin (- ) = 1 ! ( 2 '2+ * 2011, Henry Zmuda 2 Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 62 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability () () x = e j! = cos ! j sin ! () cos ! = # A + D& A+ D ! ! = cos "1 % 2 $2( ' () () x n = e jn! = cos n! j sin n! # # # A + D&& # A + D&& = cos % n cos "1 % j sin % n cos "1 % $ 2 (( '' $ 2 (( '' $ $ ) ## && , ) , "1 "1 # A + D & "1 # A + D & = exp + j tan % tan % n cos % . = exp + jn cos % . 2 ((( . $ ''' $ 2 (' $$ + * * ) , ) , ) , "1 # A + D & "1 # A + D & "1 # A + D & x = exp + jn cos % . + exp + " jn cos % . = 2 cos + n cos % . $ 2 (' $ 2 (' $ 2 (' * * * n 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 63 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability ( " A+ D% + x n = 2 cos * n cos !1 $ # 2 ', & ) A+ D >1 2 rn = ro x n A+ D =1 2 A+ D <1 2 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 64 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability Clearly for a bounded solution: A+D A+D ! 1 " #1 ! !1 2 2 A+D A+D+2 "0! +1 ! 2 " 0 ! !1 2 4 A+D+2 The condition for a stable cavity is: 0 ! !1 4 A+ D >1 An unstable cavity: 2 Unstable cavities are sometimes used in high-power lasers. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 65 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability For the cavity being studied: " d d %" d% d A = 1 ! , D = $1 ! ' $1 ! ' ! f2 f1 & # f2 & f1 # d" d %" d% d 1 ! + $1 ! ' $1 ! ' ! + 2 f2 # f1 & # f2 & f1 A+ D+2 = 4 4 d d d dd d 1! +1! ! + ! +2 1 d 1 d 1 d2 f2 f2 f1 f1 f2 f1 = = 1! ! + 4 2 f2 2 f1 4 f1 f2 " 1 d %" 1 d % = $1 ! ' $1 ! 2 f ' # 2 f1 & # 2& 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 66 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability The condition a for stable cavity is: # 1 d &# 1 d & Or 0 ! 1 " % 2 f ( %1 " 2 f ( ! 1 $ 1'$ 2' Since 2 f1 = R1, A+D+2 0! !1 4 2 f2 = R2 The stability condition reduces to: # d &# d& 0 ! %1 " ( %1 " ( ! 1 $ R1 ' $ R2 ' 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 67 Ray Tracing Optical Cavity Stability # d &# d& Stability condition: 0 ! 1 " % R ( %1 " R ( ! 1 $ 1' $ 2' " d% 1! ' $ R& # 2 Unstable Stable " d% 1! ' $ R1 & # Stable Unstable 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 68 Ray Tracing Confocal Geometry Borderline stability R' $ R' $ R1 = R2 = R, d = R ! 0 " & 1 # ) & 1 # ) " 1 % (% ( !"R !"R #### $ $ =0 " d% 1! ' $ R& # 2 =0 R R Unstable Stable " d% 1! ' $ R1 & # Stable Unstable 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 69 Ray Tracing Example 3 d = R2 4 R1 = ! Flat Mirror R2 r0 f= R2 2 The entering horizontal ray will pass through the Focal point of M2. M1 This is an example of a repetitive ray path. 2011, Henry Zmuda M2 Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 70 Ray Tracing Summary "r % " % " rin % $ out ' = $ A B ' $ ', $ r! ' # C D & $ r! ' # out & # in & Length d of free space !1 d$ Td = # & "0 1% Thin lens with focal length f "1 $ Tf = $ 1 ! $ f # 0% ' 1' ' & 2011, Henry Zmuda AD ( BC = 1 Length d of free space followed by a thin lens with focal length f "1 $ Tdf = $ 1 ! $ f # % ' d' 1! f' & d Spherical mirror, radius R "1 $ TR = $ 2 ! $R # 0% ' ' , f = 2R 1 ' & Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 71 Ray Tracing Example Recall: " d %" d % " 3% 1 $ 1 ! R ' $ 1 ! R ' = $ 1 ! 4 ' = 4 ( stable # & # 1& # 2& ) + + T =+ + + + * ) + =+ + + * d 1! f2 ! 1 1" d% ! $1 ! ' f1 f 2 # f1 & 1 4 3 ! 4 5 d 4 1 4 2011, Henry Zmuda ,) . + 1! d .+ f2 .=+ " 1 d %" d% d . + ! 1 ! ' $1 ! ' ! $ f2 f1 & # f 2 & f1 . + # .* " d% d + d $1 ! ' f2 & # " d% , d + d $1 ! ' . f2 & . # . d . 1! . f2 - , . . . . - Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 72 IV. ABCD Law for Gaussian Beams 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 73 ABCD Law for Gaussian Beams Recall our earlier result: ! 0 = e # kr 2 & " j% P z + ( 2q z ' $ () () =e () " jP z e kr 2 "j 2q z () The ABCD law relates the complex beam parameter q2 of a Gaussian beam at plane 2 to the value q1 at plane using the elements of the ABCD matrix. Aq1 + B qz = Cq1 + D The proof of this result is tedious, but it is easy to to convince ourselves on its validity. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 74 ABCD Law for Gaussian Beams Recall that: q! = 1 " q ( z ) = q1 + z Also recall that for free space of length z that: !1 z$ Aq1 + B T=# = q1 + z & ' qz = Cq1 + D "0 1% The same result. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 75 ABCD Law for Gaussian Beams 1 We were more interested in q( z) z0 1 z =2 !j 2 , 2 2 z + z0 z + z0 qz () 2 2 # # ! nwo z0 ! o 2 z0 & z2 & 2 2 z0 = " wo = , w ( z ) = wo % 1 + 2 ( , R ( z ) = z % 1 + 2 ( !o !n z0 ' z' $ $ 2 z0 wo 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 " = !j 2 = !j = !j o 2 2 2 # z0 w 2 z !n w z z + z0 R z qz Rz z0 & z %1 + 2 ( z' $ () Also: () () () () 1 Aq1 + B q1 1 qz = != 1 Cq1 + D qz A+ B q1 C+D 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 76 ABCD Law for Gaussian Beams If we assume a beam with a minimum spot size wo and a planar wavefront at z = 0 and utilize the ABCD parameters for free space we can confirm our previous results that: 2 ! ! !o z0 $ 1 1 1 z2 $ 2 = =!j =!j , w 2 z = wo # 1 + 2 & , R z = z # 1 + 2 & 2 q1 z0 ! nwo z0 % z% q0 " " () () () ! ! z z 1 1 ' j o 2 1 + jz o 2 +j 0 +1 2 z0 ! nwo ! nwo z0 q1 q1 1 = = = = 1 1 !o !o z2 qz A+ B 1+ z 1 ' jz 1 + jz 1+ 2 2 2 q1 q1 ! nwo ! nwo z0 C+D () z z ! 11 1 z = +j 02 = + j o2 2 2 z z0 z !n w z Rz 1+ 2 1+ 2 z0 z () 2011, Henry Zmuda () Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 77 V. Gaussian Beams in Cavities 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 78 Gaussian Beams in Simple Stable Resonators Cavities How are the parameters of a Gaussian beam determined by a real cavity? 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 79 Gaussian Beams in Cavities TEM0,0 Knowing wo, we can predict everything about the beam. d curvature () wo R1 = ! z=0 flat phase front here (infinite radius) Rz R2 ! Note how weve picked mirrors that exactly match the phase fronts. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 80 Some Numbers Recall our earlier results for the spot sizes on the mirrors of the cavity studied: 2 ! nw2 ( d ) ! nwo d = R2 d 1 # , = "o R2 "o For: d = 1 meter R = 20 meter R2 d d 1# R2 ( reasonably flat ) ! = 632.8 nm () ! w ( d ) = 9.614 ! 10 ! wo 0 = 9.37 ! 10!4 2011, Henry Zmuda !4 meter meter ( flat mirror ) ( spherical mirror ) Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 81 Gaussian Beams in Cavities Since the rays associated with this Gaussian beam impinge perpendicular to the mirror surface, they will be redirected back on themselves and return to the other. We have then a self-consistent description of a normal mode of this cavity. Three of our previous results are needed to relate the beam parameters to mirror specification. They are 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 82 Gaussian Beams in Cavities They are 2 ! z0 $ R( z) = z #1+ 2 & z% " z2 w ( z ) = wo 1 + 2 z0 2 ' nwo z0 = (o We choose the value of wo such that the equiphase surfaces coincide with the choice of mirrors. On the previous slide the flat mirror matches the phase surface at z = 0. We then force the phase surface to match the mirror at z = d. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 83 Gaussian Beams in Cavities We force the phase surface to match the mirror at z = d. 2 ! z0 $ R2 d R d = R2 = d # 1 + 2 & ' z0 = d ( 1 = R2 d 1 ( d R2 " d% () 2 ! nwo d z0 = = R2 d 1 ( !o R2 Note that z0 and wo are real so long as 0 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda d !1 R2 Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 84 Application of ABCD Laws to Stable Cavities Definition: A cavity mode is a field distribution that reproduces itself in relative shape and in relative phase after a round trip through the system. Finding these modes rigorously is complicated. 1. Here we assume that the Hermite-Gaussian beams are the characteristic modes of the cavity. 2. For this to be true we require the complex beam parameter q(z) to repeat itself after a round trip. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 85 Application of ABCD Laws to Stable Cavities Require the complex beam parameter q(z) to repeat itself after a round trip: q2 ( z2 ) = q1 ( z1 + ! ) = q1 ( z1 ) " q1 ( z1 ) = Aq1 ( z1 ) + B Cq1 ( z1 ) + D " Cq12 ( z1 ) + ( D # A) q1 ( z1 ) # B = 0 1 1 "B 2 # ( D # A) #C =0 q1 ( z1 ) q1 ( z1 ) 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 86 Application of ABCD Laws to Stable Cavities Require the complex beam parameter q(z) to repeat itself after a round trip: 1 1 B 2 ! D! A !C = 0 q1 q1 ( ) 2 1 D ! A 1 ! D ! A$ != # 2 & + BC q1 2B B" % Recall AD ! BC = 1 1 D! A 1 = q1 2B B A + D ! 2 AD + 4 BC D ! A 1 = 4 2B B 2 2011, Henry Zmuda 2 ( A + D) Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 2 !4 4 87 Application of ABCD Laws to Stable Cavities Thus " A+ D% 1 A! D 1 =! j 1! $ 2B B #2' & q1 ( z1 ) 2 2B Radius of curvature: R ( z1 ) = ! A! D Spot Size: n! w2 ( z1 ) "0 2011, Henry Zmuda = B $ A+ D' 1# & %2) ( 2 Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 88 Ray Tracing Summary "r % ! $ " rin % $ out ' = # A B & $ ' , AD ! BC = 1 $ r! ' " C D % $ r! ' # out & # in & Length d of free space !1 d$ Td = # & "0 1% Thin lens with focal length f "1 $ Tf = $ 1 ! $ f # 0% ' 1' ' & 2011, Henry Zmuda Length d of free space followed by a thin lens with focal length f "1 $ Tdf = $ 1 ! $ f # % ' d' 1! f' & d Spherical mirror, radius R "1 $ TR = $ 2 ! $R # 0% ' ' , f = 2R 1 ' & Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 89 Application of ABCD Laws to Stable Cavities These parameters are found at the plane z1 where the unit cell starts and stops. ! 1 d+z 1 T=# #0 1 " !1 $# &# 1 &# ' % f # " $ & d ' z1 & 1' & f & % d ' z1 Unit Cell f= Flat Mirror d ! z1 d z1 2011, Henry Zmuda R 2 Flat Mirror d ! z1 d z1 Flat Mirror d ! z1 d Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities z1 90 Application of ABCD Laws to Stable Cavities General procedure: 1. Assume that Hermite-Gaussian modes are the normal modes of the cavity. 2. Formulate an equivalent transmission system for the cavity showing at least one round trip. 3. Identify a unit cell. Is the cavity stable? a. The starting point is arbitrary. However the beam parameters to R and w at the corresponding planes b. Considerable arithmetic can be avoided by an intelligent choice of the unit cell. 4. Force the complex beam parameter to transform into itself after a round trip by the ABCD law. 5. Evaluate R and w via 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 91 Application of ABCD Laws to Stable Cavities General procedure: 5. Evaluate R and w via 2B R ( z1 ) = ! A! D n! w2 ( z1 ) "0 2011, Henry Zmuda = B $ A+ D' 1# & %2) ( 2 Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 92 Mode Volume in Stable Resonators What volume does a cavity mode occupy? Well see that the active atoms in a laser interact with the square of the electric field, hence we would like to know the effective mode volume of a Gaussian beam. Knowing this volume, we can estimate the number of atoms that must be present and radiating to generate a given optical power. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 93 Mode Volume in Stable Resonators Define the mode volume as: d"" 2 EoV = # ## ( )( ) E x, y, z E * x, y, z dx dy dz 0 !" !" Eo is the peak electric field (occurs on the beam waist and on the optical axis) Recall that a mode (m, p) is given by r2 ' ! $* 2 ! 2x $ ! 2 y $ w ! w2 ( z ) ! j )kz !(1+m+ p) tan !1# zz & , ! j 2kr( z ) R " 0%, o ( + E x , y , z = Em , p H m # Hp # e e) e & & wz% w z %w z " " ( ) () 2011, Henry Zmuda () () Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 94 Mode Volume in Stable Resonators Define the mode volume as: d"" 2 EoV = # ## ( )( ) E x, y, z E * x, y, z dx dy dz 0 !" !" Eo is the peak electric field (occurs on the beam waist and on the optical axis) For a given mode (m, p) d"" 2 Em, pVm, p = # ## 0 !" !" E ( x, y, z ) E * ( x, y, z ) dx dy dz $ 2x ' 2 $ 2 y ' w 2 # !#" !#" w2 ( z ) H m & w( z ) ) H p & w( z ) ) e % ( % ( 0 d"" =E 2 m, p 2011, Henry Zmuda 2 o !2 x2 + y2 () w2 z dx dy dz Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 95 Mode Volume in Stable Resonators Let w( z ) w( z ) 2x 2y u= ! dx = du, v = ! dy = dv w( z ) w( z ) 2 2 2 w( z ) ( % # 2 w( z ) ( wo % # 2 2 " u2 " v2 = Em , p $ 2 du * ' $ H p ( v ) e dv * dz ' $ H m (u ) e "# "# 2 2 *' * 0 w (z) ' & )& ) d 2 Em, pVm, p 2 = Em , p 2 wo d % # 2 " u2 ( % # H 2 u e" u2 du ( dz $ ' $"# H m (u ) e du * ' $"# p ( ) * 2 0& )& ) The inner integral can be looked up in most tables: # " !" 2011, Henry Zmuda H (u ) e 2 m ! u2 du = 2 m m! $ Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 96 Mode Volume in Stable Resonators 2 Em, pVm, p 2 wo d $ " 2 ' $ " H 2 u e ! u2 du ' dz = 2 ! u2 = Em , p ! & #!" H m u e du ) & #!" p ) 2 0% (% ( () ( () )( 2 wo d m 2 = Em , p 2 m! ! 2 p p ! ! 2! 0 " Vm, p = ) dz 2 2 wo d m+ p = ! ! 2 m! p!dz 20 12 wo ! d 2m+ p m# ! ! " !$ #p 2 ! len!gth HO are " $ ! a # FacMr # to volume 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 97 Mode Volume in Stable Resonators For the previous example where: d = 1 meter R = 20 meter ! = 632.8 nm () wo 0 = 9.37 ! 10"4 V0,0 2 wo 12 m+ p = wo ! d 2 m! p! = ! d 2 0 0 !0 ! 2 2 (9.37 ! 10 ) ! ! 1 = 1.379 ! 10 = "4 2 2 = 1.379 ! 10"6 m3 = 1.379 cm3 2011, Henry Zmuda "6 m3 So what? Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 98 Mode Volume in Stable Resonators So what? Suppose we had a neon filled tube with a pressure of 0.1 torr. And that each atom is excited on average of ten times per second via gas discharge which produces a photon at 632.8 nm. The maximum power that we could expect this laser to produce is: Energy Average Excitation Average Emission # Number of atoms # # Phot# on Atom Atom !"$ # hc = h! = " 10 %####### sec ###### &# ' Average Excitation Average Emission = 1.96 eV # 0.1 # 3.54 # 1017 V0,0 # # Atom Atom !### ### " $ Power = ( ) Number of neon atoms = 15.3 mW 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 99 VI. Resonance 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 100 Resonance Weve discussed much about cavities. Weve noted that cavities are the basic feedback mechanism for a laser. The cavity also ultimately determines the laser frequency via its resonant properties. To understand resonance consider the simplest possible cavity 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 101 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity Partially Reflecting Mirror: 1, 1, 1 = 1 + 1 Incident Plane Wave n1 ! Ei ! Hi Partially Reflecting Mirror: 2, 2, 2 = 1 + 2 ! ki !1 ! n2 n3 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 102 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! ! Ei ! 1Ei ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 103 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! ! Ei ! " jk " ! 1Ei ! 1 Ei e 2 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 104 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! " jk " ! ! jk " 2 ! 1 Ei e ! 1! 2 Ei e 2 ! ! Ei ! ! jk " ! 1Ei !2! 1Ei e 2 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 105 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! ! " jk " ! ! jk " ! 1 Ei e ! 1Ei ! 1! 2 Ei e ! Ei 2 2 ! ! jk " !2! 1Ei e 2 ! # j2k " !2" 1 Ei e 2 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 106 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! " jk " ! ! 1 Ei e ! ! ! Ee ! Ei !E ! jk2" 2 1 ! # j2k " n2 2 !2" 1 Ei e 2 n1 1 2 i ! ! jk " !2! 1Ei e 2 i ! !1!2! 1Ei e ! j 2 k2" ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 107 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! " jk " ! ! 1 Ei e ! ! ! Ee ! Ei !E ! jk2" 2 1 ! ! j 2k " n2 2 !2! 1 Ei e 2 n1 1 2 i ! ! jk " !2! 1Ei e 2 i ! !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 3k2" ! !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 2 k2" ! ! j 3k " !1!2! 1! 2 Ei e 2 ! ! j 3k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 2 12 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 108 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! " jk " ! ! 1 Ei e ! ! ! Ee ! Ei !E ! jk2" 2 1 ! ! j 2k " n2 ! 1!2! 1Ei e 2 n1 ! n2 2 !1!2! 12 Ei e ! j 4 k2" n1 1 2 i ! ! jk " !2! 1Ei e 2 i ! !1!2! 1Ei e ! j 3k2" ! !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 2 k2" ! # j 3k " !1!2" 1" 2 Ei e 2 ! 2 !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 3k2" ! # j4k " !1! " 1 Ei e 2 2 2 ! 2 !12 !2! 1Ei e ! j 4 k2" ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 109 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! " jk " ! ! 1 Ei e ! ! ! Ee ! Ei !E ! jk2" 2 1 ! ! j 2k " n2 ! 1!2! 1Ei e 2 n1 ! # j4k " n2 22 !1!2" 1 Ei e 2 n1 1 i ! ! jk " !2! 1Ei e 2 i ! !1!2! 1Ei e ! j 3k2" ! !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 2 k2" ! # j 3k " !1!2" 1" 2 Ei e 2 ! 2 !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 3k2" ! ! j 4k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 ! # j5k " ! ! j 5k " 2 2 2 ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 !1 !2" 1" 2 Ei e 2 12 2 1 ! # j4k " ! ! " 1 Ei e 2 2 1 2 2 2 ! # j5k " ! ! " 1 Ei e 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 110 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! " jk " ! ! 1 Ei e ! ! ! Ee ! Ei !E ! jk2" 2 1 ! ! j 2k " n2 ! 1!2! 1Ei e 2 n1 ! # j4k " n2 22 !1!2" 1 Ei e 2 n1 n2 2 3 2 ! # j 6 k2" !1 !2" 1 Ei e n1 1 ! !1!2! 1Ei e ! j 3k2" ! !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 2 k2" ! # j 3k " !1!2" 1" 2 Ei e 2 ! 2 !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 3k2" ! ! j 4k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 ! # j5k " ! ! j 5k " 2 2 2 ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 !1 !2" 1" 2 Ei e 2 12 2 1 ! ! j 4k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 2 2 ! # j5k " ! ! " 1 Ei e 2 2 2 2 1 ! ! j6k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 2 1 i ! ! jk " !2! 1Ei e 2 i 2 1 2 3 2 3 2 ! # j6k " ! ! " 1 Ei e 2 3 1 3 2 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 111 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! !1 Ei ! " jk " ! ! 1 Ei e ! ! ! Ee ! Ei !E ! jk2" 2 1 ! # j2k " n2 2 !2" 1 Ei e 2 n1 ! # j4k " n2 22 !1!2" 1 Ei e 2 n1 n2 2 3 2 ! # j 6 k2" !1 !2" 1 Ei e n1 1 ! !1!2! 1Ei e ! j 3k2" ! !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 2 k2" ! ! j 4k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 ! # j5k " ! ! j 5k " 2 2 2 ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 !1 !2" 1" 2 Ei e 2 1 ! ! j 4k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 2 2 ! # j5k " ! ! " 1 Ei e 2 2 2 2 1 ! ! j6k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 3 2 3 2 ! ! j 7k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 3 1 ! ! j6k " ! ! ! 1Ei e 2 3 1 ! # j 3k " !1!2" 1" 2 Ei e 2 ! 2 !1!2" 1 Ei e# j 3k2" 2 12 2 1 i ! ! jk " !2! 1Ei e 2 i 2 1 2 3 2 ! # j7 k " ! ! " 1" 2 Ei e 2 3 1 3 2 3 2 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 112 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity 1 " z N +1 ! zn = 1" z n= 0 N Transmitted wave (field): ! ! " jk " ! " j 3k " ! " j5k " ! " j7 k " 22 33 2 2 2 ET = ! 1! 2 Ei e + #1#2! 1! 2 Ei e + #1 #2! 1! 2 Ei e + #1 #2! 1! 2 Ei e 2 + # ! " jk " 2 33 = ! 1! 2 Ei e 2 $1 + #1#2 e" j 2 k2" + #12 #2 e" j 4 k2" + #1 #2 e" j 5k2" + #& % ' n ! " jk " N " j 2 k2 " 2 = ! 1! 2 Ei e ( #1#2e ( ) 1" ( # # e ) n= 0 ! " jk " = ! 1! 2 Ei e 2 " j 2 k2 " 1 N +1 2 1 " #1#2 e" j 2 k2" 2011, Henry Zmuda ! " jk " ) Ei e 2 N )* ! 1! 2 1 " #1#2 e" j 2 k2" Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 113 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity Transmitted wave (intensity): 2 ! 12! 2 1 ! !* 1!2 IT = ET ! ET ! Ei ! j 2k ! + j 2k ! N !" ! ! 1 ! !1!2e 2 1 ! !1!2e 2 ( )( ) 2 ! 12! 2 = I i2 2 1 + !12 !2 ! 2 !1!2 cos ( 2k2! ) Note: The field reflection coefficient is The power reflection coefficient is R what we usually use, i.e., R1,2 = |1,2|2 Similarly, T1,2 = 1,22, and T1,2 = 1 ! R1,2 for a lossless mirror. 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 114 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity Transmitted wave (intensity): (1 % R1 )(1 % R2 ) 1 ! !* 1!2 IT = ET " ET # Ei N #$ ! ! 1 % R1 R2 e% j 2 k2" 1 % R1 R2 e+ j 2 k2" ( = Ii )( (1 % R )(1 % R ) 1 ) 2 1 + R1 R2 % 2 R1 R2 cos ( 2 k2 " ) When k2! = q! and let R1 R2 = R Suppose R1 = R2 = R , then (1 ! R )(1 ! R ) = I (1 ! R ) = I (1 ! R ) =I 1+ R ! 2R 1 + R ! 2 R cos ( 2q" ) (1 ! R ) 2 IT 1 i 2 2011, Henry Zmuda 2 2 i 2 i 2 = Ii Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 115 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ( ) 2 1! R IT = I i 1 + R 2 ! 2 R cos 2k2! 2011, Henry Zmuda ( ) Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 116 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity IT (1 ! R ) = I i 1 + R 2 ! 2 R cos ( 2 k2 ! ) 2 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 117 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity IT (1 ! R ) = I i 1 + R 2 ! 2 R cos ( 2 k2 ! ) 2 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 118 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity ! ET ! Ei 2011, Henry Zmuda 2 = ( 1 ! !1!2e ! j 2 k2! 1 ! !1!2e ) N +1 2 ! j 2 k2! Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 119 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity The distance between peaks is known as the Free Spectral Range (FSR) in Hertz 2! f o 2k2! = 2n2 ! = 2q! c 2! f o + FSR 2 k2 + !k ! = 2n2 ! = 2 q +1 ! c 2! f o + FSR 2! f o ! 2n2 ! ! 2n2 ! = 2 q + 1 ! ! 2q! c c c ! FSR = 2n2! ( ) ( ) ( ) 2011, Henry Zmuda ( ) ( ) Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 120 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 121 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity Linewidth (or 3 dB Bandwidth, Sharpness): ( 1! R ) ( 2 IT = I i 1 + R 2 ! 2 R cos 2k2! ( (1 ! R) ) () = 1! R IT Ii ( ) = ( )) ( ) 1 + R 2 ! 2 R 1 ! 2 sin 2 k2! cos 2 x =1! 2 sin 2 x (1 ! R) 2 = ( ) 2 2 ( ) (1 ! R) + 4 R sin ( k !) (1 ! R) (1 ! R) = sin ( k !) = sin 1 = =" (1 ! R) + 4 R sin ( k !) 2 4 R sin ! k3dB ! = 1 + R 2 ! 2 R + 4 R sin 2 k2! 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 dB 2 3dB 1! R 2R " ! k3dB ) ! f3dB = 1! R 2! R " ! f 3 dB ) c 2 # & % ko ! + ! k3dB !( = sin 2 ! k3dB ! %! ( $ q! ' ( 1! R 4! n2! R 1 1# R c 1# R c $ %f3dB = 2! f3dB = 2" R 2 n2 ! " R 2 n2 ! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 122 ) Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity Linewidth (or 3 dB Bandwidth, Sharpness): 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 123 Resonance Consider the simplest possible cavity Linewidth (or 3 dB Bandwidth, Sharpness): HPBW = !f 3dB 1! R c = ! R 2n2! Free Spectral Range: FSR = c 2 n2 ! Finesse (or cavity Q): 2011, Henry Zmuda c 2n2! FSR "f !R F! = = = HPBW "f 3dB 1 # R c 1# R ! R 2n2! Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 124 Photon Lifetime Closely related to the finesse. Represents a time constant describing the build up or decay of energy in the cavity; i.e., the time dynamics of a cavity. Recall: 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 125 Photon Lifetime Closely related to the finesse. Consider a cavity with a packet of Np photons, frequency fo in it at t = 0. The total energy is Nphfo. Np R 2N p R 1R 2N p Index n d The number of photons lost in one round trip is: !N p = N p " R1 R2 N p 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 126 Photon Lifetime Closely related to the finesse. The number of photons lost in one round trip is: !N p = N p " R1 R2 N p # !N p dN p dt !t (1 " R R ) N =" 1 2 p $ RT % lim !t%0 !N p !t (1 " R R ) N = " lim 1 $ RT %0 2 p $ RT dN p 1 " R1 R2 1 =" Np = " Np dt $ RT $p $ RT $p = Photon Lifetime 1 " R1 R2 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 127 Photon Lifetime dN p 1 ! R1 R2 1 =! Np = ! Np dt " RT "p # N p (t ) = N p (0) e !t " p In words, it takes on the order of (1 ! R1 R2 ) round trips for the energy in the cavity to fall to e-1 of its initial value. If the cavity is lossy (with loss factor ) the fall off is even quicker: !1 (1 ! R R e ) !2! d 1 Also note that ! RT = index n. !1 2 2 nd for cavity length d and refractive c 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 128 Summary: R = R1R2 ! RT !p = 1 ! R2 HPBW = "f 3dB = 1! R c ! R 2n2! c FSR = 2n2! FSR "f !R F# = = HPBW "f 3dB 1 ! R fo ! R c! Q= = = !p "f 3dB 1 ! R n2! 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 129 Some numbers: 2011, Henry Zmuda Set 1 Gaussian Beams and Optical Cavities 130
Find millions of documents on Course Hero - Study Guides, Lecture Notes, Reference Materials, Practice Exams and more. Course Hero has millions of course specific materials providing students with the best way to expand their education.

Below is a small sample set of documents:

University of Florida - EEL - 6447
Atomic RadiationRevised: 2/9/12 10:44 2011, Henry ZmudaSet 2 Atomic Radiation1Atomic RadiationA laser is a quantum device.Energy levels in an atomic system are discrete, be theymolecular, solid, or semiconductor.( 2)(1)EnergyLevelDiagram 201
University of Florida - EEL - 6447
Laser Oscillation &amp; AmplificationRevised: 2/2/12 17:02 2011, Henry ZmudaSet 3 Laser Oscillation1Threshold ConditionsFrom Slide 50 of Note set 2, our central equation of lasertheory, we recall:&quot;&quot;2g2 %! o ( f ) = g ( f ) 2 A21 $ N 2 ! N1 '8n #g
University of Florida - EEL - 6447
Laser CharacteristicsRevised: 3/21/12 13:04 2012, Henry ZmudaSet 4 Laser Characteristics1Laser CharacteristicsStill to be answered:1. What is the laser amplitude?2. What if there are transient effects (time dynamics)?3. What exactly is the pumpin
University of Florida - EEL - 6447
Mode Locked LasersRevised: 2/24/12 10:56 2011, Henry ZmudaSet 4a Mode Locked Lasers1Mode Locked Lasers 2011, Henry ZmudaSet 4a Mode Locked Lasers2Mode Locked Lasers 2011, Henry ZmudaSet 4a Mode Locked Lasers3Mode Locked Lasers 2011, Henry Zm
University of Florida - EEL - 6447
Pulsed LasersRevised: 3/21/12 13:28 2012, Henry ZmudaSet 5a Pulsed Lasers1Laser Dynamics Puled LasersMore efficient pulsing schemes are based on turning thelaser itself on and off by means of an internal modulationprocess, designed so that energy
University of Florida - EEL - 6447
Semiconductor LasersRevised: 3/21/12 12:56 2012, Henry ZmudaSet 6 Semiconductor Laser Fundamentals1Semiconductor LasersThe simplest laser of all. 2012, Henry ZmudaSet 6 Semiconductor Laser Fundamentals2Semiconductor LasersThe simplest laser of
University of Florida - EEL - 6447
Laser DiodesRevised: 3/27/12 15:24 2012, Henry ZmudaSet 6a Laser Diodes1Semiconductor LasersThe simplest laser of all. 2012, Henry ZmudaSet 6a Laser Diodes2Semiconductor Lasers1. Homojunction Lasers2. Heterojunction Lasers3. Quantum Well Lase
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Vector PotentialsSet 1 - Vector Potentials1Maxwell s Equations Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields Homogeneous Medium!!! &quot; E = # j$ H # M!!! &quot; H = j$% E + J!&amp;!i E =%! &amp;m!i H =Set 1 - Vector Potentials2The Wave Equation Time-Harmonic Fie
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Radiation and ScatteringSet 2 Radiation and Scattering1The Near Field: Recall,z( x, y, z)! r! r!A=4!!R!e &quot; j !R#V# J x !, y !, z ! R dv !( x, y , z )()! !R = R = r !r&quot;yxSet 2 Radiation and Scattering2!!e ! j !RA=!V! J x !, y !
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Planar ScatteringSet 3 Planar Scattering1Radiation form an infinite line source.yxIezSet 3 Planar Scattering2!I e ( z !) = a z I eRecall:!e &quot; j !RA=# I e x !, y !, z ! R d ! !4! C&quot;$ A = a z Az ! , &quot; , z()()!!e &quot; j !RF=# I m x !
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Cylindrical ScatteringSet 4 Cylindrical Scattering1For scattering of a plane wave from a planar surface, rectangularcoordinates provided the most convenient basis. For scatteringfrom cylindrical structures, the plane wave is best described interms o
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
RECTANGULAR WAVEGUIDESSet 5 - Rectangular Waveguide1Maxwells Equations:= j is assumed, region is also assumed source free.t E = j HEz E y= oHx jyzEx Ez= oH y jzxE y Ex= oHz jxy H = j EH z H y=xj EyzH x H z=yj EzxH y H x=z
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Cylindrical Scattering ContinuedScattering by a (Two-Dimensional)Conducting WedgeSet 5 - Scattering by a Conducting Wedge1Infinitely long electric currentTMz PolarizationIeyxzSet 5 - Scattering by a Conducting Wedge2Incident electric field pr
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
CIRCULAR (ROUND) WAVEGUIDESSet 6 - Round Waveguide1 =az0zaazaSet 6 - Round Waveguide2Maxwells Equations:= jtassumed E = j H1 Ez E= oH j zE Ez= o H jz1 ( E ) E = oHz j H = j E1 H z Hj E= zH H z=j Ez1 ( H ) H Set 6
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Scattering by a Conducting SphereSet 6 - Scattering by a Conducting Sphere1zSphericalCoordinatesA quick review from last semester.arzoo( xo , yo , zo )aroayooyxoxSet 6 - Scattering by a Conducting Sphere2The Wave Equation Time-Harmoni
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Integral Equationsand theMethod of MomentsSet 7 - Integral Equations and the Method of Moments - Part 11Integral Equation Method Objective: Express the(unknown) current density induced on the surface of ascattering object in the form of an integral
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Electric Field Integral Equation(EFIE)Set 8 - Integral Equations and the Method of Moments Part 21In general the EFIE is based on the fact that the satisfaction ofboundary conditions requires that the total tangential electricfield on the surface of
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Spectral Domain TechniquesandDiffraction TheorySet 9 - Spectral Domain Techniques and Diffraction Theory - 2-D Fields1References:1. *R.H. Clark and J. Brown, Diffraction Theory andAntennas, Wiley, 1980 Excellent treatment, easy to read.2. P.C. Cle
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Review of Electromagnetic Field TheorySet 1 - Review of Fundamental Electromagnetic Field Theory1Maxwells Equations Differential Form Time Domain E (r ,t ) = B ( r , t )tD ( r , t ) M (r ,t ) H (r ,t )=+ J (r ,t )tD ( r , t ) = (r ,t )(B (
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
The Wave EquationSet 2 - The Wave Equation1The Wave EquationH E E = M, H = +JttH E = Mt= H Mt E = + J Mt t2E= 2 J MttSet 2 - The Wave Equation2The Wave Equation2 A = A A2E2 E = E E = 2 J MttD = E = J JS + E=2JS
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
Spectral Domain TechniquesandDiffraction TheoryThree-Dimensional FieldsSet 10 - Spectral Domain Techniques and Diffraction Theory 3-D Fields1Three Dimensional FieldsAngular spectrum for linearly polarized aperture fields.xAperture AzyThe radia
University of Florida - EEL - 6487
EEL 6487Instructor:ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY II Spring 2012Prof. Henry Zmuda235 Larsen Hall(352) 392 0990 (Office)(850) 225 9200 (Cell - Emergencies only please!)zmuda@ece.ufl.eduText: C.A. Balanis, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics, John W
University of Florida - EEL - 3211
EEL 3211 Homework 2 Solutions
University of Florida - EEL - 3211
EEL 3211 Homework 4 Solutions Chapter 4 Assignment: Problems 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
EEL 4458/5441Fundamentals of PhotonicsUpdated:8/18/11 14:01 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 0 Introduction1Fundamentals of Photonics (EEL 4458/5441) - 3 CreditsSpring Semester 2011Meeting Time/Place:MWF, 3rd (9:35 10:25) Larsen 330Instructor:Office:Office
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Essentials of Electromagnetic Field TheoryMaxwells equations serve as a fundamentaltool in photonicsUpdated: 9/8/11 11:52 2011, Henry Zmuda - Essentials of Electromagnetic Theory for Photonics1Light is an Electromagnetic WaveElectromagnetic waves a
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Rectangular Dielectric Waveguide(Revised 9/21/11) 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 10 - Rectangular Dielectric Waveguides1Rectangular Dielectric Waveguide(Revised 9/21/11)Side View!kncGuided WaveConfined in xdirectionxCovernfGuiding FilmnsSubstratey
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
The Planar Slab WaveguideBasic Optical WireRevised: 9/14/11 15:38 2011, Henry ZmudaSet 2 Planar Slab Waveguide1The Infinite Slab Waveguide Simplest OpticalWaveguide Structuren f &gt; ns &gt; ncxncCoverGuiding FilmnfSubstrateyznsSinusoidal stea
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Dispersion in Optical WaveguidesUpdated: 10/4/11 14:29 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 3 - Dispersion1Dispersion:Motivation for using optical waveguides is the large information capacity(large bandwidth).What are the bandwidth limitationsof optical waveguide
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Graded-Index WaveguidesUpdated: 9/8/11 10:47 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 3 - Graded-Index Waveguides1Graded-Index WaveguidesTwo ways to to reduce modal dispersion:1. Use a single mode waveguide2. Use a graded-index waveguidencncnfnsnfnsMulti ModeS
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Optical Detection and NoiseUpdated: 11/16/11 10:46 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 7 - Detection and Noise1Detection ProcessOptical electrical conversion/detection is a critical process.The optimum detector depends on wavelength, informationbandwidth, and opt
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Optical DetectorsUpdated: 11/22/11 09:21 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 8 - Detectors1Optical DetectorsWe focus on junction semiconductor detectorsFour basic parameters used to characterize detectors1. Responsivity: Amount of electrical signal obtained per u
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
ANTI REFLECTION (AR) COATINGSand MULTILAYER FILMS forHIGH REFLECTIVITY DIELECTRIC MIRRORSDiscussion based on:E. Hecht, Optics (2nd Ed.) Addison Wesley, 1987, pp. 373 378. 2011 Henry ZmudaAR Coatings1Remember this side? Note Set 1, Slide 27: 2 , 2
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Optical ModulatorsUpdated: 11/22/11 09:24 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 9 - Modulators1Optical ModulatorsModulators are the means by which information is encoded ontothe optical carrier.There are two basic forms of modulation:1. Direct Modulation2. Extern
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Pollock Problems 1, 4 (Dispersion Chapter) V12!3.52 # 3.42 = 3.69 : There are about 4 TE modes and 4 TM 1. a) m ! = &quot; 2 &quot;!0.9 modes, so modal dispersion is an issue. b) The Group Delay Dispersion depends on di
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Step-Index Circular Waveguide(Dielectric Rod Waveguide, Optical Fiber)Updated: 10/3/11 13:21 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 5 - Optical Fiber1Step-Index Circular WaveguideJacketBufferCladdingCore 2011 Henry ZmudaCladdingCoreSet 5 - Optical Fiber2Step
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Problem 2.2 %#2! ( ! E &quot; ! 2 E = &quot;! ' E $!*&amp;)#t2 Let E ( z, t ) = Z ( z ) T (t ) , then #! (%Z !T &quot; ! ZT ! = &quot;# ' ZT $*&amp;!)# $ #! (% #!= T ' Z!+Z*&amp;!!)Divide both side by ZT , Z !T ! Z ! #!&quot; !=+ZTZ!# $ #
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Attenuation and Nonlinear EffectsUpdated: 10/3/11 13:22 2011 Henry ZmudaSet 6 - Attenuation and Nonlinear Effects1Attenuation and Nonlinear EffectsAn optical signal degrades by attenuation and dispersion as it propagatesthrough a material.Dispersi
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Numerical Aperture for a graded index fiber: For graded index waveguides, the NA is a function of position on the waveguide endface. A ray entering the endface must turn parallel the zaxis before it reaches the li
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Problem 2.7 The fields in the two regains are given by: Einc = Eo e jko ( z cos 45! y sin 45)e j&quot; t Eref = rEo e jko ( ! z cos 45! y sin 45)e j&quot; t Etrans = ! Eo e jko ( z cos&quot;2 # y sin&quot;2 )e j$ t The refraction angle is f
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Problem 3-4DIELECTRIC SLAB WAVEGUIDEn c := 1.0n f := 1.56h := 7 10n s := 1.4786o := 1 10()fmax k o := k o k o :=2 oco := 3 10k omax := 1.25 k o6k o = 6.283 10 n 2 n 2sfs f :=() n 2 n 2 k 2 2s off() n 2 n 2 k 2 2c offc f :=
University of Florida - EEL - 5441
Problem 3-11DIELECTRIC SLAB WAVEGUIDEn c := 1.0n f := 1.56h := 2 10n s := 1.488o := 1.3 106()fmax k o := k o k o :=co := 3 102 k omax := 1.25 k oo6k o = 4.833 10 n 2 n 2sfs f :=() n 2 n 2 k 2 2s off() n 2 n 2 k 2 2c offc f
Pittsburgh - ECON - 0100
ECON 1100: Intermediate MicroeconomicsInstructor: Sandra Orozco1. In the ancient country of Roma, only two goods, spaghetti and meatballs, are produced.There are two tribes in Roma, the Tivoli and the Frivoli. By themselves, the Tivoli eachmonth can p
Pittsburgh - ECON - 0100
Chapter 9 Costo Explicit cost- a cost that involves actually laying out moneyo Implicit cost- does not require an outlay of money; measured by the valueof the benefits that are foregoneo Sunk cost- cost that has already been incurred and is non-recov
Pittsburgh - ECON - 0100
Micro Midterm 1Chapter 1 Economic analysis is based on a set of common principleso Principles for understanding the economics of how individuals makechoices Individual choice- the decision by an individual of what to dowhich necessarily involves a d
Pittsburgh - HIST - 101
770-96 Competing Alliances, Clashing Ambitions Imperial competition causes rivalries to intensify among the Powersnationalism &quot;Arms race&quot; among superpowers stimulates economies but will haunt the future Dual Alliance: between new German empire and Austria
Pittsburgh - HIST - 101
Sources of Stability (Post War) 1. Europe Divided, Decentered, Defended 2. Economic Recovery 3. The Welfare State United Nations Marshall Plan NATO/Warsaw Pact Nuremberg Tribunals Once WWII was over, it seemed as if this was going to be WWI all over again
Pittsburgh - HIST - 101
Karl Marx (1818-1883)&quot;Working men have no Country&quot; Communist Manifesto-1848 Second International (1889, Paris)-goal of socialism is to be an international movement Russian Revolution of 1905 (pages 768-70) Urban Unrest, Strikes January 1905Bloody Sunday P
Pittsburgh - HIST - 101
Lecture Notes 10/20/2010 Progress and its Challengers I. A Century of Progress II. Continuation of the Scientific Revolution III. Degeneration and Apocalypse 1. Progress is at its peak 50 years after Franco-Prussian war a. During time of peace between sup
Pittsburgh - HIST - 101
Nazi Society1. Challenge to Western CivilizationNazis challenge liberalism, democracy, rule of law, individual rights Reordering of societyDarwinian struggle Mein Kempf: My struggle Darwins sense of civilization: think of the individual before the g
Pittsburgh - HIST - 101
Impact of the Great WarI.II.III.IV.From Integration to DisintegrationThe Russian RevolutionThe German RevolutionVisions of Post WarIdentifications:Bolsheviks-VanguardLenin-Dictatorship of the ProletariatWilsonEbertLeague of NationsVersaille
Pittsburgh - HIST - 101
831-51Totalitarian TriumphTotalitarianism: highly centralized systems of government Use of a single party system and police terror to control society Italy: Mussolini and Fascism, Germany: Hitler and Nazism, Soviet Union: Stalin andCommunismRise of
Pittsburgh - HIST - 101
Democracy and Destitution (11/3)1. Democracy and Nationalism2. Militarist Nationalism (Fascism)3. The Great Depression3 visions of the world emerge from WWI-Soviet Union: shattered-France, Britain, US = dominant powers that wonUS becomes dominant fo
University of Florida - MAN - 3240
Chapter 1The Nature of OperationsChapter 1: The Nature of Operations1IntroductionChapter 1: The Nature of Operations2McDonalds CorpFacing increased competitionSmarter and more demandingcustomersLess brand loyalSwitched to hamburger bun that do
University of Florida - MAN - 3240
Excel Tutorial to Improve Your EfficiencyIntroductionMy purpose with this Excel tutorial is to illustrate some Excel tips that will dramatically improveyour efficiency. I make no attempt to be as encyclopedic as some of the 800-page Excel manualsavail
University of Florida - TAX - 5005
b295a337221313596ac96a4f483dd18bbbc6116e.doc . Page 1 of 4FEDERAL TAX - TEST. Chapters 1- 4.Test No. _Name_ Row In Class_INSTRUCTIONS: This test is &quot;open book,&quot; which means you may use your textbook during the test.You may also use up to 4 pages of n
University of Florida - TAX - 5005
d2cd0ed0057957781e38d223ee9082a1bc7e8c09.doc. Page 1 of 5Test No. _FEDERAL TAX - TEST NO. 3. Chapters 8-11Name_ Row In Class_Instructions: This test is &quot;open book,&quot; which means you may use your textbook during the test. You may alsouse up to 4 pages
University of Florida - TAX - 5005
16969161a7c01ff08867a4c30722007b710784f2.doc. Page 1 of 4.FEDERAL TAX - TEST. Chapters 1- 4.Fall, 2011.Test No. _Name_ Row In Class_INSTRUCTIONS: This test is &quot;open book,&quot; which means you may use your textbook during the test.You may also use up to
University of Florida - TAX - 5005
830370a04a2c38cf9b0456cdc558a4fb99682ce0.doc. Page 1 of 5Test No. _FEDERAL TAX - TEST NO. 3. Chapters 9-12Name_ 11:00 or 6:30. Row In Class_Instructions: This test is &quot;open book,&quot; which means you may use your textbook during the test. You may alsouse
University of Florida - TAX - 5005
Part-1. What constitutes income [income fromlabor or capital, increase in wealth, currentview]Part-2. Common income sources [Earned,Unearned (rent, royalty, annuities),Transfers from others (prizes,unemployment income, Social Security,Alimony), Imp