ms122NW19951119
Southern Utah, MS 122
Excerpt: ... NO SALES TAXES FOR INTERNET USE The Deseret News. Salt Lake City, Utah: November 19, 1995. pg. M.6 Copyright The Deseret News November 19, 1995 Companies that charge for access to the Internet are not required to collect sales taxes, according to an opinion issued by the Utah State Tax Commission. Richard Pettingill, CEO for Fibernet, an Internet access company, sought the opinion to find out how to proceed with company clients. Fibernet is a leading provider of Internet access and the only Utah member of the Commercial Internet Exchange. The response to Pettingill's request came from Commissioner Alice Shearer. `Under Utah law, charges for access to online service such as the Internet are not subject to sales tax,' she wrote. `Additionally, charges associated with interstate telephone communications are also exempt from sales tax.' ...
|
|
04-19
Kentucky, TEL 310
Excerpt: ... TEL 310 p. 1 TEL 310 04/19 Indecency via Telephone and Internet; Structural Regulation of cable Quiz 4 returned Course evaluation today Final paper due next Tues. Dial-a-porn and Indecency via Telephone - Congress made its first effort to address dial-aporn in 1983: - - Sec. 223(b) made it a crime to use telephone facilities to make "obscene or indecent" interstate telephone communications "for commercial purposes to any person under 18 years of age or to any other person without that person's consent" [p. 481] The Court of Appeal of the Second Circuit invalidated the provision insofar as it applies to non-obscene speech on constitutional grounds in Carlin v. FCC (1988). The court had ruled on the case twice before in 1984 and 1986. - Congress amended Sec. 223(b) in April 1988: - Prohibiting indecent as well as obscene interstate commercial telephone communications directed to any person regardless of age - Sable Communications of California v. FCC (U.S., 1989): - The Court first upheld the prohibiti ...
|
|
2008128_f01c_0810631
Stanford, KRY 1041
Excerpt: ... 'UN'ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DANIEL T. RUSSO , on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -vCase No.: TODD BRUCE, GORDON THOMPSON, and CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendants. C CLAS ...
|
|
readme
TCU, BJONES 20263
Excerpt: ... pp-lecture The PowerPoint slides in this folder are designed to be used to support lectures on the textbook contents. They include the text figures plus bulleted lists and other slides that reflect the narrative. Some instructors choose to post the ...
|
|
StudyGuideS08C
Illinois Tech, MATH 149
Excerpt: ... <STUDYGUIDES08C.TXT> {5-9-2008} Math 149 Spring 2008 Final Study Guide, Part III - Chapter 6 Concept Check, p. 378: 1,2,3,4,5 Exercises: 1-6, 7-11, 12-16 Chapter 9 Concept Check, p. 598: 1 Exercises: 1, 3a, 7 ...
|
|
20011108_f01c_014606
Stanford, NOVN 1021
Excerpt: ... eged fraud and/or its effects have occurred within this District and Noven maintains its principal executive offices in this District. 8. In connection with the acts and omissions alleged in this complaint, defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications , and the facilities of the national securities markets. PARTIES 9. Plaintiff purchased Noven common stock during the Class Period, as set forth in the accompanying certification which is incorporated herein by reference, and was damaged thereby. 10. Defendant Noven is a pharmaceutical company with its principal executive offices located at 11960 S.W. 144th Street, Miami, Florida, 33186. Noven develops transdermal and transmucosal drug delivery technologies and products. - 4 - 11. The individual defendants, at all times relevant to this action, served in the capacities listed below and received substantial compensation: Name R ...
|
|
2005624_o03c_Amio
Stanford, LAZ 1034
Excerpt: ... 1331 . 8. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 27 of the Exchange Act,1 5 U.S.C. 78aa, Section 22 (a) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S .C . 77v(a), and 28 U .S .C. 1391(b) . Many of the acts and transactions alleged herein , including the preparation and dissemination o f materially false and misleading information, occurred in substantial part in this District . Additionally, the Company maintains its principal executive offices in this Judicial District . 9 . In connection with the acts, conduct and other wrongs alleged in this complaint , defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including but not limited to, the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and th e facilities of the national securities exchange . -3- PARTIE S 10 . Plaintiff, Renato Amio, as set forth in the accompanying certification, incorporate d by reference herein, purchased Lazard' s securi ties at artificially inflated prices pursuant and/o ...
|
|
200865_f01c_0810960
Stanford, FUSFX 1040
Excerpt: ... the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") (the "Class"). JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to Sections 11,12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77k, 771(a)(2) and 77o]. In connection with the acts complained of, Defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of the national securities markets. 3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and Section 22 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77v]. 4. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) because the Ultra- Short Bond Fund is a fund of Fidelity Income Fund, an open-end management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust on August 7, 1984. 5. In connection with the acts alleged in this complaint, Defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means an ...
|
|
20041018_f01c_STAYMAN
Stanford, HIETOB 1032
Excerpt: ... ter of this action pursuant to Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") (15 U.S.C. 78aa et seq.) and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1367. In connection with the acts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. _ CLC: _ JT/101801 Complaint.wpd and course of conduct alleged in this Complaint, Defendants, directly and indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the U.S. mails and interstate telephone communications . INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 2. This is a class action brought on behalf of those persons who acquired the stock of HiEnergy Technologies, Inc. ("HiEnergy" or the "Company") during the period from February 22, 2002 through July 8, 2004 (the "Class Period"). Plain- tiffs allege claims against all defendants for violations of 10 and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act") arising out of false and misleading statements in publicly annual reports, registration st ...
|
|
StudyGuideS08A
Illinois Tech, MATH 149
Excerpt: ... <STUDYGUIDES08A.TXT> {5-5-2008} Math 149 Spring 2008 Final Exam Study Guide, Part I - Chapter 3 Review Concept Check, p. 196: 1 - 11 True-False Quiz, p. 196. Exercises: 10,11 & 12-40 - Chapter 4 Review Concept Check, p. 281: 1,2,3,4,5,6, ...
|
|
2007813_f01c_0707205
Stanford, LLNW 1038
Excerpt: ... ndirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including but not limited to, the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of the national securities exchange. PARTIES 11. Plaintiff Faisal Mustafa purchased shares of Limelight Networks common stock issued pursuant to the IPO, as shown on the attached Certification, and was damaged economically thereby. 5 Case 1:07-cv-07205-PAC Document 1 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 6 of 13 12. 13. Defendant Limelight Networks, Inc. is headquartered in Tempe, Arizona. Defendant Goldman Sachs was a co-lead underwriter of the Limelight Networks IPO. Goldman Sachs maintains corporate headquarters in New York, New York. 14. Defendant Morgan Stanley was an underwriter of the Limelight Networks IPO. Morgan Stanley is headquartered in New York, New York, and provides investment banking services, including underwriting, equity research, sales, trading and mergers and acquisitions advice. 15. Defendant Jeffrey W. Lunsford ...
|
|
2001514_o01c_Slater
Stanford, BOL 1018
Excerpt: ... ict. 5. In connection with the acts, transactions and conduct alleged herein, defendants used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of national securities and exchanges and securities markets. -3- PARTIES 6. Plaintiff purchased shares of Bausch & Lomb on the New York Stock Exchange, an open market during the Class Period as set forth in the annexed certification. 7. Defendant Bausch & Lomb maintains its principal executive offices at One Bausch & Lomb Place, Rochester, New York. Bausch & Lomb is primarily engaged in development, manufacture and marketing of healthcare products for the eye in three business segments of vision care, pharmaceuticals and surgical. Bausch & Lomb stock trades on the New York Stock As of April 10, 2001, Exchange, an open and efficient market. Bausch & Lomb had approximately 53.6 million shares outstanding. 8. Defendant William Carpenter ("Carpenter" or the "Individua ...
|
|
200575_f01c_05CV00388
Stanford, MYG 1034
Excerpt: ... ufactures home and commercial appliances. -1- JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1337 and 1367 and Section 27 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78aa). 3. This action arises under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78j(b) and 78t(a) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5). 4. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78aa) and 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c). Substantial acts in furtherance of the alleged fraud and/or its effects have occurred within this District and Maytag maintained its principal executive offices at 403 West Fourth Street, North, Newton, Iowa 50208. 5. In connection with the acts and omissions alleged in this complaint, defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications , the Internet, a ...
|
|
2005324_f01c_Pittman
Stanford, ORNG 1033
Excerpt: ... VEN UE The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to 11 and 15 of the 1933 Act 18 [15 U.S.C. 77k and 77o]. 19 9. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 1331 and 22 of the 1933 Act. 21 10. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), because the 22 defendants maintain an office in this District and many of the acts and practices complained of 23 herein occurred in substantial part in this District. 24 11. In connection with the acts alleged in this complaint, defendants, directly or 25 indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited to, 26 the mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of the national securities markets. 27 28 -2- 1 2 12. PARTIES Plaintiff Christine Pittman acquired the common stock of Orange 21 pursuant to the 3 IPO, as set forth in the accompanying certification, and has been damaged thereby. 4 13. Defendant Orange 21 is ...
|
|
2008102_f01c_088462
Stanford, CFW 1041
Excerpt: ... ct, 15 U.S C. 77v(a), and 28 U.S.C. 1391, because during the class period one or more of the defendants were found and/or transacted business in this district and/or the substantial acts in furtherance of the wrongs alleged herein arose at least in part in this district. 4. In connection with the acts and omissions alleged in this complaint, all of the defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications , and the facilities of the national securities markets. PARTIES 5. Plaintiff Truk International Fund LP is a limited partnership with offices in New York, NY. It purchased shares of Cano common stock during the class period as described in the certification attached as Exhibit A hereto. 6. Defendant David W. Wehlmann ("Wehlmann") served as a Director on Cano' s Board of Directors at all times since December 12, 2007. Defendant Wehlman signed the registration statement for the ...
|
|
Moldau Lesson Plan 1
Penn State, MJH 5156
Excerpt: ... LessonPlan Date:_ Goals:Focus Topic ToneProduction Objectives Studentswillbeableto playinslurredsections usingenoughbowto produceagoodtone. Techniques&Activities Demonstratecorrectbow usageandhavestudentsplay slurredpassageusingas muchbowasyou.S ...
|
|
20011129_o01c_Scala
Stanford, XOMA 1021
Excerpt: ... ACTION COMPLAINT 33504 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Act, 15 U.S.C. 77v(a); and Sections 1331 and 1337(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1337(a). 19. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act, Section 22 of the Securities Act, and 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). Many of the wrongs alleged in this complaint occurred in substantial part in this District, including the preparation and dissemination of materially false and misleading statements to the investing public. Both XOMA and Genentech have their principal places of business in this District. 20. In connection with the acts, transactions and conduct alleged herein, defendants, directly and indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of national securities exchanges and markets. THE PARTIES 21. Plaintiff Victoria Scala ("Plaintiff") purchased shares of ...
|
|
2004421_o01c_Dummer
Stanford, VAPH 1030
Excerpt: ... ts corporate headquarters in this District. 5. In connection with the acts alleged in this complaint, defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of the national securities markets. PARTIES 6. Plaintiff Dean Dummer purchased shares of Vaso Active common stock and thus suffered economic damages. 7. Vaso Active is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 99 Rosewood Drive, Suite 260, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923. Vaso Active is an early-stage company focused on commercializing, marketing and selling over-thecounter (OTC) pharmaceutical products, with a particular focus on drugs that incorporate the Vaso Active lipid encapsulated, or VALE, transdermal delivery technology. 8. The defendants listed below served, during the period specified, as senior officers and/or directors of Vaso Active: 2 (a) Defendant John Masiz (Masiz ...
|
|
20011115_f01c_014256
Stanford, XOMA 1021
Excerpt: ... ding statements to the investing public. Both XOMA and Genentech have their principal places of business in this District. 20. In connection with the acts, transactions and conduct alleged herein, the defendants, 4 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 directly and indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of national securities exchanges and markets. THE PARTIES 21. Plaintiff Joseph R. Tingle purchased shares of XOMA stock as set forth in the attached certification, and suffered damages as a result. 22. Defendant XOMA maintains its principal executive offices at 2910 Seventh Street, Berkeley, California 94710. Its common stock trades on the NASDAQ National Market System under the ticker symbol XOMA. 23. Defendant Genentech maintains its principal executive offices at 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California 94080-49 ...
|
|
20011220_o02c_015006
Stanford, XOMA 1021
Excerpt: ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75434) Jennifer A. Abams (178203) BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO BURT & PUCILLO 425 California Street, Suite 2025 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: ( ...
|
|
20011119_o03c_unknown
Stanford, XOMA 1021
Excerpt: ... e their principal places of business in this District. 20. In connection with the acts, transactions and conduct alleged herein, the defendants, directly and indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of national securities exchanges and markets. THE PARTIES 21. Plaintiff _ purchased shares of XOMA stock as set forth in the attached certification, and suffered damages as a result. 22. Defendant XOMA maintains its principal executive offices at 2910 Seventh Street, Berkeley, California 94710. Its common stock trades on the NASDAQ National Market System under the ticker symbol XOMA. 5 23. Defendant Genentech maintains its principal executive offices at 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California 94080-4990. Its common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol DNA. 24. Defendant John L. Castello (Castello) was, at all releva ...
|
|
2005314_o02c_Vincii
Stanford, FRX 1033
Excerpt: ... C . 78aa and 28 U .S .C. 1391(b) . Many of the acts and transactions alleged herein, including the preparation and dissemination of materially false and misleading information, occurred in substantial part in this Judicial District . Additionally, the Company maintains a principal executive office in this Judicial District . 5 . In connection with the acts, conduct and other wrongs alleged in this complaint , defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including but not limited to, the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and th e facilities of the national securities exchange . PARTIE S -2- 6. Plaintiff, Vincent Vinci, as set forth in the accompanying certification, incorporate d by reference herein, purchased Forest securities at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period and has been damaged thereby. Defendant Forest is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive office s located at 909 Third Avenue, New Yor ...
|
|
20030625_f01c_Johnson
Stanford, ITMN 1028
Excerpt: ... sdiction). Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act. Many of the acts and transactions giving rise to the violations of law complained of herein, including the preparation and dissemination to the investing public of materially false and misleading information, occurred in this judicial district. InterMune maintains its executive offices at 3280 Bayshore Boulevard, Brisbane, CA 94005. 4. In connection with the acts, transactions and conduct alleged herein, defendants used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of a national securities exchange and market. THE PARTIES Plaintiff purchased shares of InterMune securities during the Class Period, as set forth in the accompanying Certification, and has been damaged as a result of defendants' conduct Defendant InterMune is a Delaware corporation that maintains its principal offices in Brisbane, California. The Co ...
|