Processing Complex Sentences in the Centering Framework
Michael Strube
Freiburg University Computational Linguistics Lab Europaplatz 1, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
st rube@ coling, uni- freiburg, de
Abstract
We extend the centering model for the resol
Formal Semantics and Anaphora, Lecture 13 Barbara H. Partee, RGGU, May 13, 2008 p. 1
Formal Semantics and Anaphora, Lecture 13 Barbara H. Partee, RGGU, May 13, 2008 p. 2
Lecture 13. Pronouns and Reflexives IV: Notes on Semantic Typology
1. Schedule
Formal Semantics and Anaphora, Lecture 15 Barbara H. Partee, RGGU, May 27, 2008 p. 1
Lecture 15. Null Anaphora, Ellipsis, and Fragments
1. Null anaphora and bound variables..1 1.1 Background: Deep and surface anaphora (Hankamer & Sag 1976).2 1.2. Sl
Formal Semantics and Anaphora, Lecture 11 Barbara H. Partee, RGGU, April 22, 2008 p. 1
Lecture 11. Pronouns and Reflexives III: Typological Issues
1. Background: typology and theory..1 2. Kiparskys approach to anaphora typology.2 2.1. On Obviation v
Discourse Structure and Dialogue
Scott Farrar CLMA, University of Washington farrar@u.washington.ed
Discourse Structure and Dialogue
Scott Farrar CLMA, University of Washington farrar@u.washington.edu
Discourse Processing
Coreference resolution Di
Automatic Construction of Nominal Case Frames and its Application to Indirect Anaphora Resolution
Ryohei Sasano, Daisuke Kawahara and Sadao Kurohashi Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, University of Tokyo {ryohei,kawahara,kuro}@kc
EXTENDING
DRT WITH
A FOCUSING MECHANISM FOR PRONOMINAl. ELLIPSIS RESOLUTION
ANAPHORA
AND
Jos6 Abraqos, Jos6 Gabriel Lopes - (jea,gpl) @fct.unl.pt CRIA/UNINOVA, Faculdade de Ci6ncias e Tccnologia, 2825 Monte da Capafica, Portugal
ABSTRACT
Corma
T o w a r d s a S e m a n t i c T h e o r y of D i s c o u r s e
C. Raymond Perrault Artificial Intelligence Center and Center for the Study of Language and Information SRI International
I don't feel comfortable trying to building reliable, well-un
Human-Computer Interaction for Semantic Disambiguation
Ralf D. Brown School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Intemet: ralf@cs.cmu.edu Sergei Nirenburg Center for Machine Translation Carnegie Mellon University Pittsb
Update
TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences
Vol.10 No.2 February 2006
51
precisely because in this system syntactic composition is impaired. In Brocas production, semantics is less visible because in this case syntax guides the process by which semantic
Formal Semantics and Current Problems of Semantics, Lecture 9 Barbara H. Partee, RGGU, April 8, 2008 p. 1
Lecture 9. Pronouns and Reflexives: Syntax and Semantics
1. Review of Chomsky's (syntactic) "Binding condtions". ..1 2. Semantic binding vs. co
CS 388: Natural Language Processing Introduction
Raymond J. Mooney
University of Texas at Austin
1
Natural Language Processing
NLP is the branch of computer science focused on developing systems that allow computers to communicate with people usin
Statistical NLP
Spring 2007
"Meaning"
What is meaning?
Meaning
"The computer in the corner." "Bob likes Alice." "I think I am a gummi bear."
Knowing whether a statement is true? Knowing the conditions under which it's true? Being able to react appr
Informatics122 SoftwareDesignII
Lecture1 AndrvanderHoek&AlexBaker
Duplicationofcoursematerialforanycommercialpurposewithouttheexplicitwritten permissionoftheprofessorisprohibited.
April 16, 2009 14:09:23
2009 University of California, Irvine And