Vangilder Contracts Outline- Schmitz

Vangilder Contracts Outline- Schmitz - CONTRACTS OUTLINE...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

CONTRACTS OUTLINE VanGilder 1 Prof. Schmitz Does the UCC or Common Law Apply? (What is the predominant purpose?) Is there a contract? Contract (K) = offer + acceptance + consideration If so, what are the terms? If not, are there other ways to enforce the agreement? Consideration A. Functional Analysis 1. Consideration shows the parties acted deliberately—INTENT 2. Consideration is evidence or proof of the promise, that the party meant what he said 3. Helps determine remedies 4. Keeps courts efficient (prevents open floodgates) B. Gold Standard— R2d § 71 1. Bargained for exchange (external manifestation rather than undisclosed mental state) 2. Inducement to the promisor (benefit to promisor or detriment to the promisee) a. measured by the reasonable persons standard b. may consist of 1) Act other than a promise (including money) 2) Promise to pay works 3) Detriment or Forbearance (declining a legal right) a) Hamer v. Sidway (drug and alcohol free nephew)—A promisee does not have to suffer harm for there to be consideration. It is enough that something is promised, done, forborne, or suffered by the party to whom the promise is made as consideration (here, there was inducement because nephew abstained from drinking, gambling, etc. Uncle benefited by gaining family pride.) 4) creation, modification, or destruction of a legal relation (restriction of a legal right) 3. Must be proportional 4. No pre-existing duties 5. Not gratuitous a. Squishy promises are often gratuitous b. Cash v. Benward (promise to mail insurance application) —An oral expression to aid or assist someone, when unsupported by consideration or bargaining, is an unenforceable promise. (here, no inducement or bargained for exchange) C. Consideration for Option Contracts 1. When there is gross disproportion between payment and value of the option, there is no consideration— R2d § 87, comment b. 2. When an option is supported by adequate consideration, it becomes its own meta contract Consideration Substitutes (other mechanisms that serve the same function as consideration) A. Past Performance Doctrine based on Moral Obligation R2d § 86 1. A promise made in recognition of a benefit previously received is binding only to the extent necessary to prevent injustice (prevents unjust enrichment) a. Webb v. McGowin (saved from a falling block)—A moral obligation is a sufficient consideration to support subsequent promise to pay where the promisor has received a material benefit (here, $15 every 2 weeks is a proportionate payment for serious bodily harm)
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

CONTRACTS OUTLINE VanGilder 2 Prof. Schmitz b. Harrington v. Taylor (blocked an axe with her hand)—No consideration for the promise to pay and that the plaintiff had not engaged in her humanitarian act with an expectation of compensation 2. Promise for benefit previously received NOT binding if: a. Gift or no unjust enrichment b. Value is disproportionate to the benefit received B. Promissory Estoppel Doctrine based on Detrimental Reliance— R2d § 90 1. A promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern