Public Lands- 2006- Anonymous- Grade A

Public Lands- 2006- Anonymous- Grade A - CHAPTER 2 HISTORY...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

CHAPTER 2: HISTORY OF PUBLIC LAND LAW Acquisition of the Public Domain Johnson v. M’Intosh (USSC 1823) (Discovery Doctrine) o Nations claim land they “discover” Right against all other nations to acquire lands from Indians. o Creates title subject to Indian right of occupancy Indian right of occupancy not protected by 5 th A Taking (use right) ( Tee-Hit-Ton (1955 USSC)) Reservations are recognized property rights o Indian title must be cleared before disposal No transfer of title from Indians to private party w/o US consent Above rule codified in Indian Trade and Intercourse Act (1790) E.g. USSC held invalid a purchase made by the state of NY of Indian title lands. ( Oneida 1985) Disposition of the Public Domain Early Public Lands Policy Issues o Land Ordinance of 1785 Rectangular Survey System Surveyed land to be auctioned of w/ § 16 of each township reserved for public education o Property Clause (Article IV, § 3) Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regs respecting U.S. property US may retain ownership of lands under Property Clause ( U.S. v. Gratiot (1840)) It is constitutional for US to lease public lands and resources. Statehood and Equal Footing o 1) Navigable for Title lands Rule : New states receive land underlying navigable waters under the = footing doctrine ( Pollard v. Hagan (USSC 1845)) Navigable for title test (Daniel Ball): Navigable for title waters are those which in their natural/ordinary condition are used, or are susceptible of being used, as highways of commerce, over which trade and travel are or may be conducted in the customary modes of trade and travel on water. However, under the commerce clause, the US has power to regulate navigable waters ( AZ v. CA (USSC 1963)) Rule : States succeed to ownership of submerged lands subject to the ebb and flow of tides ( Phillips Petroleum v. Mississippi (USSC 1988)) Exception to Pollard : US may reserve the beds of navigable waters for federal purposes prior to statehood, but reservation must be EXPRESS ( UT Division of State Lands v. US (1987)) NOTE: Lands underlying navigable-for-title waters are subject to a public trust . These lands cannot be sold or transferred out of state ownership, except in de minimis amounts. ( Illinois Central RR v. Illinois (USSC 1892)) o 2) Express Land Grants in Statehood Acts 1
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

a) In-Place Grants : grants of specified numbered sections of lands #s depended on the state (most states received 2 sections; AZ & UT got 4) Usually for schools Actual location not determined until land was surveyed. “in place” grants were not automatic. Lands could only be obtained if states went through the patenting process. In-Lieu Grants: If before survey, the feds had disposed of or made other uses of these sections (through Indian reservations, homesteading, NF, mining, etc.), the states were given the right to make “in lieu” selections of other available federal lands as indemnity for the unsatisfied place grants.
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Fall '05
  • Wilkinson
  • Law, The Land, Supreme Court of the United States, United States Congress, Lands, Bureau of Land Management, United States federal public land legislation

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern