Lecture 9 - Alcohol no liver trans

Lecture 9 - Alcohol no liver trans - Anti-Transplants 1...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Anti-Transplants 1 Anti-Transplants Moss and Siegler: “Should Alcoholics Compete Equally for Liver Transplantation?” I. Prelims A. ESLD (End Stage Liver Disease) B. ARESLD (Alcohol Related End Stage Liver Disease) II. The Main Conclusion A. Given the extreme scarcity of donated livers, as a matter of general policy, people with ARESLD should be placed lower on the waiting list for livers than those with ESLD B. If we do a first come first served approach, over half of the available livers will be taken by people who could have prevented their livers from failing. This approach is both unfair and could lead to a decline in public support for liver transplantation. III. Questions A. Why are livers an extremely scarce medical recourse as opposed to being a relatively scarce medical resource? B. Just how scarce are they? IV. Objection to Moss and Siegler A. Alcoholism is a disease; thus it’s not true that people with alcohol liver disease could have prevented the destruction of their liver
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/09/2008 for the course PHIL 7 taught by Professor Blair during the Winter '08 term at UCSB.

Page1 / 2

Lecture 9 - Alcohol no liver trans - Anti-Transplants 1...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online