Poli Sci Review - Fed eralists • Legislative supremacy o No executive o No judiciary • Experience causes change • Annapolis convention o 1786

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Fed eralists • Legislative supremacy o No executive o No judiciary • Experience causes change • Annapolis convention o 1786 o Failed Not enough delegates came • Philadelphia Convention o 1978 o Success- Secured attendance All Members were fairly well off economically They were all young minus WA and Franklin • Values from 1770-1780 • Their experience showed that Whig values weren’t working • Northwest Ordnance o States gave up land for Articles voluntarily No Slavery Schools for religion Way to have revenue Anti-Federalists • Executive and Judicial have too much power o No Bill of Rights o No Separation of Powers o Lack of Representation—Legislation is too small o Not enough State power o Federal Government can directly effect citizens • Checks and balances o Veto was seen as source to limit legislation • Ambition of each branch checks each other o Ensures liberty Graphing • Hypothesis- An educated guess o + + More of one—more of the other o- - Less of one—less of the other...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/09/2008 for the course POL 1101 FS1 taught by Professor Lee during the Fall '08 term at Saint Joseph's University.

Page1 / 4

Poli Sci Review - Fed eralists • Legislative supremacy o No executive o No judiciary • Experience causes change • Annapolis convention o 1786

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online