SOME PROBLEMS WITH CONSENT THEORY

SOME PROBLEMS WITH CONSENT THEORY - SOME PROBLEMS WITH...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: SOME PROBLEMS WITH CONSENT THEORY: PART I: EUTHANASIA AND SUICIDE I. For John Locke and many others, consent seems to be the key to both an acceptable governrnent, an acceptable -- and moral -- legal system, and social justice. II. Assumption: We consent autonomously – and the autonomous consent (of free/rational people) is what matters. a. “The Autonomy Theory of Contract” i. Autonomy as the central value ii. Who one is/issues of fairness do not necessarily make a contract void iii. Consent makes any contractual terms valid (?) 1 III. What does this mean? a. A contract into slavery? (if the act is voluntary) b. The sale of individual rights? c. Etc…? IV. Is this a good thing? a. Maybe, because: i. Values are subjective: the value of anything for us is just the value that we autonomously decide that it possesses ii. Self-ownership is inherently valuable: our bodies are our property b. But, is autonomy a property right?...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 5

SOME PROBLEMS WITH CONSENT THEORY - SOME PROBLEMS WITH...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online