# hw1a - . Since and are disjoint, there is no shared horse...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

Michael Sipser Introduction To The Theory Of Computation 2 nd Edition Chapter 0 (0.3) a. b. c. d. e. f. (0.5) (0.6) 1 6 2 7 3 6 4 7 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 2 7 8 9 10 6 3 7 7 8 8 9 4 9 8 7 6 10 5 6 6 6 6 6 a. b. c. d. e. (0.8) (0.10) If , dividing by is dividing by , which is a no-no. 1 2 3 4

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
(0.11) Take . The induction hypothesis (and the base step, and common sense, for that matter) tells us that for a set of horse, all horses in the set are the same color. To prove for , we pull out one horse, and the second horse comprises set . Then we put it back and pull out the second horse, so the first is set
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: . Since and are disjoint, there is no shared horse forcing them to be the same color, so the proof falters. (0.12) Suppose there is a graph with nodes, . If no 2 nodes have the same degree, each node must have a different degree between (no connections to other nodes) and (connections to all other nodes), inclusive. Since there can’t be both an unconnected node and a node connected to every other node, at least 2 of the nodes must therefore have the same degree....
View Full Document

## This homework help was uploaded on 04/10/2008 for the course COSI 30a taught by Professor Di lillo during the Spring '08 term at Brandeis.

### Page1 / 2

hw1a - . Since and are disjoint, there is no shared horse...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online