Comm 101 Final Review - Comm 101 Final Review Research...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Comm 101 Final Review Research methods: Not just for public opinion Surveys systematic way of gathering information Focus groups Interviews one-on-one, most depth of information Personal interactions/Observations Experiments Textual analysis, historical analysis Reliability : Can the study be reproduced and get the same results? Validity : Do the results actually mean what you think they mean? Methods Surveys : Reliable with limits, validity depends on careful wording Focus groups: Somewhat reliable, rich data gives validity Interviews: Somewhat reliable (individually), not reliable when collated, valid because of deep meaning Personal interactions: No reliability, valid because of deep meaning Issues of survey quality Question bias and error Sampling bias and error Response bias Change: A series of steps Theory Knowledge Attitudes Intentions (Skills) Behaviors Practice Know your audience Plan your campaign-Message-Media-Timing...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/11/2008 for the course COMM 1101 taught by Professor Lewenstein,b. during the Fall '07 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 3

Comm 101 Final Review - Comm 101 Final Review Research...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online