This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Scott Hughes 5 February 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics 8.022 Spring 2004 Lecture 2: Electric fields & flux; Gausss law 2.1 The electric field Last time, we learned that Coulombs law plus the principle of superposition allowed us to write down fairly simple formulas for the force that a swarm of N charges exerts on a test charge Q : ~ F = N X i =1 Qq i r i r 2 i . We found another simple formula for the force that a blob of charged material with charge density exerts on a test charge: ~ F = Z QdV r i r 2 i . And, of course, similar formulas exist if the charge is smeared out over a surface with surface density , or over a line with line density . In all of these cases, the force ends up proportional to the test charge Q . We might as well factor it out. Doing so, we define the electric field : ~ E ~ F Q = N X i =1 q i r i r 2 i ( N Point charges) = Z dV r i r 2 i (Charge continuum) . Given an electric field, we can figure out how much force will be exerted on some point charge q in the obvious way: ~ F = q ~ E . In cgs units, the electric field is measured in units of dynes/esu, or esu/cm 2 , or stat volts/cm all of these choices are equivalent. (Well learn about statvolts in about a week.) In SI units, first of all, we must multiply all of the above formulae by 1 / 4 . The units of electric field are then given in Newtons/Coulomb, or Coulomb/meter 2 , or Volts/meter. Lets look at a couple of examples. 2.1.1 Example: Electric field at center of charged ring Take a ring of radius R with uniform charge per unit length = Q/ 2 R . What is the electric field right at its center? Well, if we dont think about it too carefully, we want to do something like this: ~ E = Z r r 2 ds, where the integral will be take around the ring; ds will be a path length element on the ring, r is the radius of the ring, and r is a unit vector pointing from each length element on the ring to the rings center ... But wait a minute! You should quickly notice that for each contribution due to a little length element on the ring, there is an equal contribution from the rings opposite side pointing in the opposite direction . Each contribution to the ~ E field at the center of the ring is precisely canceled by its opposite contribution: So the field at the center of the ring is zero. 2.1.2 Example: Electric field on rings axis Suppose we move off along the rings axis to some coordinate z above the disks center. The field does not cancel in this case, at least not entirely: Considering the contribution of pieces of the ring, we see that there is a component in the radial direction, and a component along z . The radial component cancels by the same symmetry argument as we used above. The z component, however, definitely does not cancel: Radius R Height above ring z cancels in radial direction, does not cancel in z direction....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 04/11/2008 for the course PHYSICS 8.022 taught by Professor Hughes during the Spring '08 term at MIT.
 Spring '08
 Hughes
 Electric Fields, Mass

Click to edit the document details