KW_Macro_Ch_17_Sec_02_The_Great_Depression_and_the_Keynesian_Revolution

KW_Macro_Ch_17_Sec_02_The_Great_Depression_and_the_Keynesian_Revolution

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: >> The Making of Modern Macroeconomics Section 2: The Great Depression and the Keynesian Revolution chapter 17 The Great Depression demonstrated, once and for all, that economists cannot safely ignore the short run. Not only was the economic pain severe; it threatened to desta- bilize societies and political systems. In particular, the economic plunge helped Adolf Hitler rise to power in Germany. The whole world wanted to know how this economic disaster could be happening and what should be done about it. But because there was no widely accepted theory of the business cycle, economists gave conflicting and, we now believe, often harm- ful advice. Some believed that only a huge change in the economic systemsuch as having the government take over much of private industry and replace markets with central planningcould end the slump. Others argued that slumps were natural even beneficialand that nothing should be done. Some economists, however, argued that the slump both could and should be curedwithout giving up on the basic idea of a market economy. In 1930 the British 2 C H A P T E R 1 7 S E C T I O N 2 : THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE KEYNESIAN REVOLUTION economist John Maynard Keynes compared the problems of the U.S. and British economies to those of a car with a defective alternator. Getting the economy running, he argued, would require only a modest repair, not a complete overhaul. Nice metaphor. But what was the nature of the trouble? Keyness Theory In 1936 Keynes presented his analysis of the Great Depressionhis explanation of what was wrong with the economys alternatorin a book titled The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. In 1946 the great American economist Paul Samuelson wrote that it is a badly written book, poorly organized. . . . Flashes of insight and intuition intersperse tedious algebra . . . We find its analysis to be obvi- ous and at the same time new. In short, it is a work of genius. The General Theory isnt easy reading, but it stands with Adam Smiths The Wealth of Nations as one of the most influential books on economics ever written.the most influential books on economics ever written....
View Full Document

Page1 / 5

KW_Macro_Ch_17_Sec_02_The_Great_Depression_and_the_Keynesian_Revolution

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online