Coffman, Putman, Adkisson,Kriner, and Monaghan(2016)Garcia and Yao (2019)Inouye and McAlpine(2017)Has peer review interaction through for the communication of practiceDoctoral Social identity development Giving independent feedback to those staffs throughout the agency Doctoral identity for social construction Peer & faculty feedback and the transformation process afterwardsResearching the journey and development of those doctoral students identity Covers the transition stages from student to Doctor Beating imposter syndrome Covers the transition learning stages as a Doctor Research skills improveMerging and connecting multiple identities Combining multiple identities Faculty corresponding to learn the development of self efficacy Having validation and show the struggle of doctoral students identityImproving ones research and writing skills Peer and faulty private relationship for the growth of the doctoral student Theme 1: The socialization growth and feedback throughout the development of a doctoral student and finding their identity The development and identity of a doctoral student as they face challengesin the transformation from getting faculty feedback. Theme 2:The mastery of research and writing skills for doctoral students in am agency To improve a doctoral skills one must delving self efficacy to resolve any conflicts during the phases as a student
Finding Evidence to Support ThemeTheme One:The socialization growth and feedback throughout the development of a doctoral student and finding their identity Coffman, Putman, Adkisson, Kriner, and Monaghan (2016)Has peer review interaction through for the communication of practice to become successful and finding that doctoral identity for social constructionCovers the transition stages from student to a licensed doctor as they continue to merge and connect with their multiple identities.Having validation and show the struggle of doctoral students identity.Garcia and Yao (2019)Doctoral Social identity development as they face being online students facing multiple challenges. Peer and faulty feedback allows the students to be independent making their transitions process easier.Improving their skills and self actualized doctoral research. Inouye and McAlpine (2017)Giving independent feedback to those staffs throughout the agency’s their research their journey and development for those doctoral identity.