Lecture2010 - Lecture 10: Risk and Return Theories I I :...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Lecture 10: Risk and Return Theories I I : Why do some financial assets have historically higher returns than others? Over the past 10 years, Microsoft has enjoyed a higher return GM Differences like Microsoft/GM are not the result of picking winners and comparing them to losers with the benefit of hindsight. Even large well-diversified indexes exhibit differences in return that are too large and persistent to be the result of lucky runs. Over the past 50 years, stocks have consistently outperformed bonds and certain stock indexes such as the NASDAQ have outperformed other stock indexes (S&P 500, DJIA) How do we explain persistent differences in return? Why do investors hold stocks with low expected returns? The answer is risk. II. Risk and Return Let r n denote the net return on asset n. (n = 1,2) Let n denote the standard deviation of asset n. If investors are risk-averse we say asset 1 stochastically dominates asset 2 if: E[r 1 ] > E[r 2 ] and 1 < 2 with at least one inequality If a risk-averse investor were forced to invest in only one asset, she would not choose a stochastically dominated asset....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/12/2008 for the course ECON 435 taught by Professor Chabot during the Winter '08 term at University of Michigan.

Page1 / 3

Lecture2010 - Lecture 10: Risk and Return Theories I I :...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online