Kant - Kant principles handout page 1 A fundamental...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
February 18, 2008 Kant principles handout page 1 A fundamental question in ethics is, “Why should I do the right thing?” Suppose you show someone that giving to charity is the right thing to do. What if the person says, “So what? I think I would like to do the wrong thing. What do I care whether what I do is right or wrong?” In very broad outline, Plato’s conception of ethics was the following: There is an objective Good, which is part of the natural order, that is, the structure of the world. The good life for human beings, and right ethical behavior, is living in accordance with this objective Good. The human good, the good of the “essential human,” the soul is objectively well-off to the extent that its actions are in accord with this Good. Consider two issues about the good life: 1) What is the objective basis for the goodness of the good life? Plato answers this question by a metaphysics that makes Goodness part of the structure of the universe. 2) How can you convince a person to do the right thing, to live in accord with justice? Plato’s strategy is to try to establish that doing the right thing is in a person’s best interests. The idea is that everyone naturally tries to act in their own best interests, so, if Plato can show that doing the right thing coincides with acting in your own interests, he will have a convincing argument. Unfortunately, for that argument to work in every case, even in extreme situations in which a person is threatened with death if the person does the right thing, Plato requires that there be an afterlife. Also, Plato requires a metaphysical background which could be doubted. There is another way to try to show that a person ought to do the right thing. If you could show that a person who does wrong things is acting irrationally, you would show that a person logically ought to do the right thing. This would treat the “ought” of ethics as the “ought” of logic and math. That is, just as you ought to believe that if it is raining and cold, then it is raining, so you ought to act in the right way. The right way to act will fall out of an analysis of what it is to act on purpose, just as the reasonableness of believing a logical truth falls out of the analysis of what it is to believe. In both cases, action and belief, rationality, that is, logic, requires coherence. So, this strategy tries to establish that acting wrongly is incoherent, irrational. Kant is the paradigm example of this strategy for showing that a person ought to do the right thing. Outline: I Introduction: Ethical Principles II Who Kant is; Kant’s general project in Metaphysics: III Kant’s Project in Ethics A) Kant on the TRUTH question B) Kant on the MOTIVATION question I Ethical Principles Historically, the model for how ethical thinking reaches conclusions has pictured ethics as a system of universal laws or principles. The ethical principles are applied by a more or less deductive procedure: given a situation, the principle tell you what the right thing to do is in that
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/14/2008 for the course PHIL 104 taught by Professor Bontly during the Spring '08 term at UConn.

Page1 / 9

Kant - Kant principles handout page 1 A fundamental...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online