Ch.1 Axelrod---Hobbes

Ch.1 Axelrod---Hobbes - Phil 104 secs 2-12 Hobbesian Egoism...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
March 17, 2008 Phil 104 secs 2-12 Hobbesian Egoism page 1 Hobbesian Egoism I background II materialism III people as mechanical systems a) sensation, thinking b) action c) equality d) natural laws about people VI “rights” and covenants: transfer of rights V Sovereignty I background Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) lived in England during a period when there was a civil war, a brief period when a “Commonwealth” was instituted, a king beheaded, another king installed. Generally, it was a time of turmoil and uncertainty about the legitimacy of various kinds of government. These turmoils along with others in Europe (the Thirty Years War) were partly over religion and its relation to politics. Among the issues that were actively being discussed was the nature and justification of government. The theory that had been in place for several centuries, the Divine Right theory that kings are God’s representatives on Earth, was being called into question. Hobbes constructed a purely secular argument for absolute monarchy. [The “divine right” theory of political leadership is just one version of a very ancient tradition that goes back to the earliest civilizations. In Sumeria of 2500 bc, and later in Babylonia, the King was the representative of the gods or of the chief god. In Egypt, Pharaoh was himself a god as well as a representative of the higher gods. In Israel, King Saul and King David are appointed by Samuel, acting on God’s orders. The idea is just transferred to Medieval and Early modern Europe.] Hobbes, when about 50 years old, decided to write a complete system of the world and how people and politics fitted into the world. His book, Leviathan , was universally condemned as atheistic, heretical, and insulting to human nature. These accusations are by and large true. It is also true that this book, and the position it takes on politics and human nature, strikes most people as coming embarrassingly close to the truth on many points. So it has been enormously influential. Every political thinker since has directly or indirectly addressed the challenge of Hobbes. Hobbes proposes to figure out the nature of government by considering what things would be like if there were no government, and seeing why it would make sense to institute government. The hypothetical condition in which there is no government is termed the “state of nature,” the pre-institutional condition of human beings. Hobbes argues that in the state of nature, everyone will have good reason to institute an absolute dictator, above the law, with the power of life or death over everyone. (This is an important contrast between political theory since the 1600’s and Plato’s thought. Plato took the existence and legitimacy of some kind of government for granted. Hobbes, Locke, and all their successors tried to give reasons why government arose and why government power was legitimate. The core contrast here is that Locke,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/14/2008 for the course PHIL 104 taught by Professor Bontly during the Spring '08 term at UConn.

Page1 / 7

Ch.1 Axelrod---Hobbes - Phil 104 secs 2-12 Hobbesian Egoism...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online