3620-presentation - This research is a study of talk in...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This research is a study of talk in organisational settings. It analyses differences between the ways in which men and women use language in real work settings. this study aims to extend and explore the assertion that men and women talk differently at work. The literature suggests that the ritual nature of men’s and women’s conversations is such that they speak different languages that they assume are the same, using similar words to encode disparate experiences of self and social relationships Since, these languages share an overlapping vocabulary, they contain a propensity for systematic mistranslation, creating impasses, which impede communication and limit the potential for cooperation in decision, making and advancement Interaction in the workplace is characterized by a unique constellation of constraints: an institutional structure in which individuals are hierarchically ranked; a history of greater male participation in most work settings, especially at the higher ranking levels; a still existing, though recently permeated pattern of participation along gender lines; periodic external evaluation in the form of raises, promotions, task assignments, and performance reviews; and a situation in which participants are required to interact regularly with others who are neither kin nor chosen affiliates Talk is at the heart of all organisations. Through it, the everyday business of organizations is accomplished If talk is the lifeblood of all organisations (Boden, 1994), then, it both feeds into and is shaped by the structure of the organisation itself. Language plays a critical role in generating and propagating gendered identities and social patterns in interaction. For example, it has been asserted in previous research, that the basic uses of conversation by women are to establish and support intimacy; for men it is to establish status (Tannen, 1994). It has also been found that that men tend to interrupt more and are more resistant to asking questions (Tannen, 1994; Coates, 1996; Lackoff, 1990). These kinds of communication differences can lead to misunderstanding and frustrations between the sexes and may ultimately impact decision making. The lens through which this paper is being viewed is one that clearly accepts that women are at a disadvantage on entering organisations with a view to impending hierarchical advancement (Catalyst, 2000; ILO, 1997; IBEC, 2002). It clearly recognizes that the existence of a glass ceiling is a reality for most women, in most professions, across most cultures (Catalyst, 2000). It also recognises that there is a difference between men’s and women’s roles at work; it is unquestionable that vertical and horizontal job segregation is a workplace phenomenon women have achieved higher levels of education than ever before and today represent 50 per cent of the global workforce. Yet their representation in management positions remains unacceptably slim, with only a minute proportion succeeding in breaking through the glass ceiling. There is ample evidence in the literature to show that organizations typically cultivate speech
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/14/2008 for the course ECON 3310 taught by Professor Dix during the Spring '08 term at York University.

Page1 / 5

3620-presentation - This research is a study of talk in...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online