Unformatted text preview: incapable of performing the action that it was created for, from this point of view it can be seen as a defective and waste of a product. On the other hand I choose to see Google’s driverless car as simply a product in development. It’s main purpose is to be able to transport it’s users from one location to another without the supervision of another human, likewise it should do this in a more efficient and safer manner. Although Google’s driverless car is currently unable to perform the duties that it has been assigned I believe that in time, and with further development, the driverless car will shift from its current view as a potentially defective product to a successful one. Currently Google will not be able to see any of these driverless cars but when it reaches its final development I believe it will no longer be classified as a defective product....
View Full Document
- Spring '12
- Business Law, Driverless car, EUREKA Prometheus Project, Personal rapid transit, defective product