Callicott Contemprary Moral Problems

Callicott Contemprary Moral Problems - Blake Yancey...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Blake Yancey 11-13-07 Prof. Daley Contemporary Moral Problems Callicott Response Callicotts response to the issue of environmentalism and animal liberation is what he calls the Land Ethic. He first starts his argument by saying that there is no precise definition of environmental ethics. He then says that the only close definition of environmental ethics is explained through Leopolds paradigm. He then tells us that although Leopolds paradigm most closely resembles what our modern day environmental ethics are, there is something about it that seems absurd. Regardless, he says that the animal liberation movement and those of the Leopoldian land ethic may even turn out to have a lot of common interests. He then talks about Humanism and Humane moralism. He says that Humane Moralists believe that sentience is the only relevant item that a being needs to be morally regarded. Besides this, Humane Moralist, he says, they do create a distinct cut-off point between those who are regarded as...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/16/2008 for the course PHIL 1318 taught by Professor None during the Fall '08 term at SMU.

Page1 / 2

Callicott Contemprary Moral Problems - Blake Yancey...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online