Course Hero Logo

Bullets Was Ford to Blame in the Pinto Case.edited.docx - 1...

Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.

1Running head: Was Ford to Blame in the Pinto Case?Was Ford to Blame in the Pinto Case?Mary LinSeptember 29, 2021
2Running head: Was Ford to Blame in the Pinto Case?1.Ford was not to blame in the Pinto Case. Ford was following a cost-benefitanalysis. Which is a monetary study of the projected costs and advantages ofdoing something2.Even though the cost of these safety upgrades was anticipated to be between $5and $8 per car, Ford concluded that the higher expense exceeded the benefits of anew tank design. Further, even at $11 per car, this did not give enough benefits forthe cost.3.Further, he was following the rules of not making any more changes to design.Ford was simply following the protocols.4.Rhe "Fatalities" study advises against making any changes–a suggestion Fordfollowed.
End of preview. Want to read all 2 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Fall
Professor
NoProfessor
Tags
Ford Pinto

Newly uploaded documents

Show More

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture