PS7_answers - Legal Studies 145 - Law and Economics I...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Legal Studies 145 - Law and Economics I Answers to P ROBLEM S ET #7 1. Economists probably determined that the social cost of reducing the legal alcohol limit for drivers was less than the social cost of reducing the speed limit. There is more value in faster transportation than in the freedom to drink more before driving. The efficient standard of care balances the marginal benefit of additional care (reduced accidents) with the marginal cost. Mr. Johnson was probably negligent because the value of his being able to drink before driving was probably less than the likely cost of additional accidents he might cause. Ms. Smith may also have been negligent if running elsewhere, earlier and with more reflective clothing would cost her less than the likely cost of accidents avoided. Of course, the likelihood of such accidents might be very low if negligence such as Johnson's is extremely rare. 2. The cost of an injury may be much higher for an athlete than for an ordinary person.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This homework help was uploaded on 04/16/2008 for the course LEGALST 145 taught by Professor Rubenfield during the Spring '08 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online