Lecture_1 - 1 PS121 Lecture 1 The Region Geography Demography Society and Politics Thinking of the Middle East in political terms familiar to

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 PS121 Lecture 1 The Region: Geography, Demography, Society and Politics Thinking of the Middle East in political terms familiar to Europeans and Americans risks missing important differences between this region and others. Early in the last century, the British traveler, writer, and archeologist Gertrude Bell made two observations about the peculiar role of religion and tribalism in the Middle East that remain worth noting at the outset, especially because they help explain the problem the U.S. now faces in confronting radical Islam and pacifying Iraq. As she stressed, 1) religious belief is peculiarly important there, to an extent that can override political boundaries and makes nationalism less of a force , and 2) in Iraq tribalism works against national unity: Islam is the bond that unites the western and central parts of the continent, as it is the electric current by which the transmission of sentiment is effected, and its potency is increased by the fact that there is little or no sense of territorial nationality to counterbalance it. A Turk or Persian does not think or speak of “my country” in the way that an Englishman or Frenchman thinks and speaks; his patriotism is confined to the town of which he is a native, or at most to the district in which that town lies. If you ask him to what nationality he belongs he will reply: “I am a man of Isfahan,” or “I am a man of Konia,” as the case may be, just as the Syrian will reply that he is a native of Damascus or Aleppo—I have already indicated that Syria is merely a geographical term corresponding to no national sentiment in the breasts of the inhabitants. (Wallach, Desert Queen, p. 78.) And: A variety of groups was needed to form a consensus for Faisal [as King of Iraq while it would be under British mandate]. The Sunni townsmen, the Jews, the Christians and Armenian Orthodox were all important in Baghdad, the Kurds in Mosul and Kirkuk, but in the provinces it was the predominantly Shiite tribes that made up most of the population. Each tribal nation had to be approached and won over. Yet the very idea of a centralized state was anathema to them. Their major concern was the tribe, their leader the chosen head of the tribe, their immediate interest, grazing land for the herds of the tribe. They had no wish for a king. Only a dynamic personality could convince them otherwise. ( (In 1921 on the creation of a unified Iraq, quoted in Wallach, Desert Queen, 315) As these observations indicate, traditional patterns persist in the Middle East and make efforts to introduce change especially hard. An Israeli joke current some years ago had the late Menachem Begin as Prime Minister emulating Moses by visiting a burning bush to converse with God. Begin asks God, “Will the PLO ever recognize Israel’s right to exist?” God answers: Not in your lifetime. Begin asks a second question: “Will the other Arab and Muslim-majority states ever
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2 follow Egypt’s example and make peace with and recognize Israel diplomatically?” Again God
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/16/2008 for the course POLS 121 taught by Professor Lackoff during the Winter '08 term at UCSD.

Page1 / 17

Lecture_1 - 1 PS121 Lecture 1 The Region Geography Demography Society and Politics Thinking of the Middle East in political terms familiar to

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online