Course Hero Logo

Trial by Ordeal- questions Laura.docx - Trial by Ordeal 1....

Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.

Trial by Ordeal1. Define the term Trial by Ordeal.Trial by ordeal is an act of submitting a person whowas accused of a crime into a dangerous situation to let the outcome decide if they areinnocent or guilty. The accused is being judged by God!
2. Why was this method of determining guilt and innocence used during the Middle Ages.It was said to be a trial before God. The person who is accused is being judged by God.3. Give an example of how trial by ordeal was used in the Bible.In the book of numbersthere is a story of a wife who is instructed to drink contaminated water as a test before herhusband, priest and God. If the water didn’t harm her this declared that she was innocentbut if she became sick, she would be proved guilty and would be executed.4. What role did the Coroner play in these trials?The medieval coroner had to be presentat some barbaric rites connected with the law. They would need to be present at theseordeals. The coroner was always present to record the happenings of the ordeals.5. Describe the ordeal trial method of fire explained in the article.The suspect had tocarry a bar of red-hot iron in his hands as he walked to nine marked spots. If there wereno burns on his hands this means that he was judged innocent because God helped thesuspect. If there was burn it showed that they were guilty and were hanged. A variation ofthis was licking the hot iron with the tongue or running barefoot on nine red-hotploughshares.6. Do you think this method of trial proves guilt or innocence? why or why not.No, I donot think that this method proves guilt or innocence because everyone is going to get aburn if they touch an insanely hot iron.7. Explain the ordeal trial method of water.This is when the accused were thrown intoand if they sank, they were proved innocent but if they floated it meant they were guiltyand hung.8. Was this trial method fair and reasonable? why or why not?No, I do not think thewater method was fair because it all depends on the persons body and if they are able tokeep themselves above water.9. Why do you think these practices were forbidden in 1215?Maybe because the rulers atthat time started to realize that they were inaccurate and were unnecessarily harmful.New measures about how to determine if someone was guilty or not must have been putin place.10. What is the trial by Bier? What was the role of the Coroner during this trial?The slaindead could indicate their killer. The way of testing this in England was to have theaccused approach the bier where the corpse lays. If the corpses wounds bled again it
meant the person in front of the body was guilty. During this the Coroner would record
End of preview. Want to read all 2 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Fall
Professor
N/A
Tags
Bier, Trial by ordeal, Trial by combat

Newly uploaded documents

Show More

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture