philo journal 3

philo journal 3 - exists through something about motion. I...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1. Honestly, I have no idea what Anselm was saying in order to say that God can’t logically not exist. Taking a wild stab at it, it sounded something along of the lines of the fact that we believe that God exists because we understand that God is the greatest power, and therefore since we understand that He exists, we must accept that as a reality. 2. I feel like the only thing in common between the two is they both make us believe God
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: exists through something about motion. I really don’t know honestly. I did read everything you told us to, but these things make absolutely no sense to me so I’m really just taking wild guesses here. 3. Basically, this argument says how different things come together more often then not, and how can there not be a God if these things are happening. They aren’t random, so someone has to be up there doing something....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/17/2008 for the course PHI 110 taught by Professor Skelley during the Fall '08 term at Hartford.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online