Intentional TortsASSAULT:(BRING UP ANY TIME BATTERY IS PRESENT)Interest Protected: Freedom from apprehension that you are going to be batteredElements(1)Intent, or knowledge with substantial certaintya.Transferred intent appliesb.“Rude or angry manner” attitude of the actor mattersc.Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill, 1933(TOWT guy who wanted to “fix her clock”, p.39)(2)Affirmative Act(3)Causing Reasonable Apprehensiona.No assault if plaintiff is unawareb.Reasonable apprehension causes mental harm, therefore no actual harm required for thiscause of action(4)The defendant has the Present Apparent Ability to commit a battery,a.Present apparent abilityto commit battery from the perspective of the plaintiff is essentialb.Threats of future harm are insufficient(5)A Battery is ImminentDamages: No proof of harm requiredBATTERY:Interests Protected: Personal dignity and bodily integrityElements(1)Intent or knowledge with substantial certaintya.Must either intend to make bodily contact or know with substantial certainty it will resultfrom your actionsi.You do not have to intend the contact to be harmfulii.Good faith excuses do not matter if the contact made is harmful or offensive andwas intentionally doneb.Transferred intent applies(2)Harmful or Offensive contacta.To make harmful or offensive contact with the body of anotherb.Distinguish between offensive and harmfulc.Offensive to personal dignityi.See Restatement (Third) Torts§ 103: By a person of ordinary sensibilities(someone not unduly sensitive)1.Wallace v. Rosen, 2002(TOWT school firedrill, pg. 32)d.Mental state of the actor can be a factori.Cole v. Turner, 1704(TOWT touching “in anger is a battery”, p. 31)e.Contextvery important in determining what is offensivei.Cole v. Turner, 1704(TOWT King’s Court explanation of some touching beinginevitable in life, p. 31)ii.Vosburg v. Putney, 1890(TOWT kicking in the classroom, p. XX)(3)Harmful or Offensive contact