Limited - 1-1Dr. ShepherdPOLS 310-US Foreign Relations22...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 1-1Dr. ShepherdPOLS 310-US Foreign Relations22 February 2008Power to the People?Niccolo Machiavelli once wrote that “the way men live is so far removed from the way they ought to live that anyone who abandons what is for what should be pursues his downfall rather than his preservation (Machiavelli 61-62).” While Machiavelli was writing about the behavior of princes in a kingdom, the principle of that statement can also be applied to the role of democracy in formation of United States foreign policy. While it may seem that as a free nation we ought to have a completely democratic foreign policy process, for reasons of practicality this cannot be so. Just as Machiavelli suggests, we must set aside some of our democratic ideals in order to preserve ourselves as a nation. In some aspects of foreign policy, the United States must limit democracy to an extent, for reasons relating to both security and efficiency.The idea of limiting democracy can be very dangerous, because it could become easy to increase the limits to a level where the society cannot be called a democracy anymore. For example, the idea of an ignorant public can be stretched to the level of vanguardship and censorship found in the former USSR. A lack of government accountability to its citizens in foreign affairs is also problematic, as illustrated most vividly by the Bay of Pigs intervention in 1961 (Jentleson 107). These examples, paired obviously with the very ideals on which the United States was founded, make it clear that we cannot abandon democratic involvement in the foreign policy process. Whenever there is talk of limiting democracy, there is also a fear of losing democracy. We must 2ensure that this fear never becomes a reality, and seek to protect democracy, even when necessity limits it. While there is strong reasoning for the limitation of democracy in the foreign policy process, we must never lose so many democratic ideals that the nation we are seeking to protect is no longer the America we knew.A general assumption about decision making is that those who are making the decisions have a sufficient amount of knowledge about their decision and the implications surrounding it. If this were not the case, then an education, especially a college education, would not seem so necessary for success in the United States today. If we have such an attitude toward everyday affairs, then how much more should we employ it towards something as critical to our nation as foreign affairs? employ it towards something as critical to our nation as foreign affairs?...
View Full Document

This essay was uploaded on 04/17/2008 for the course POLS 310 taught by Professor Shepherd during the Spring '08 term at Samford.

Page1 / 6

Limited - 1-1Dr. ShepherdPOLS 310-US Foreign Relations22...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online