ppt_02 - Pascals Wager January 25 2006 For Catching Up...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–11. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Pascal’s Wager January 25 2006
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
For Catching Up Website http://brian.weatherson.net/101/ Includes these Powerpoints, syllabus and will include assignments when they are due
Background image of page 2
Background Many theologians thought we could offer a proof of God’s existence The most popular were versions of the cosmological argument, which says that the universe must have a first cause, i.e. God
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Arguments for God’s existence Pascal rejects all such arguments It appears that he thinks we cannot reason about things we can’t comprehend And God is too great for us to really comprehend, so we cannot reason about Him
Background image of page 4
Arguments for God’s existence Pascal’s reasoning here seems quite weak The totality of life on the planet is too diverse for me to comprehend Yet I can have beliefs about it E.g. I think it would be a bad thing if it all went away
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Pragmatic vs Intellectual Arguments One way to argue that you should believe p is to provide evidence that p is true Another way is to argue you’d be better off believing that p Pascal offers the second kind of argument
Background image of page 6
Pascal’s First Argument Look at what you have to gain and lose by coming to believe that God exists, or that He doesn’t Pascal says there are 2 things to consider Reason Happiness
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Since reason cannot tell one way or the other with respect to God, there is nothing to be gained or lost here So it all comes down to getting the most happiness Pascal’s First Argument
Background image of page 8
Pascal’s First Argument We cannot be certain what will get us the most happiness But that does not mean we cannot act In everyday life we all the time have to make decisions in the presence of uncertainty
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Here’s a simplified example to make Pascal’s point Imagine you have to get from Ithaca to New York, and all you care about is getting there as quickly as possible There are two possibilities, bus and plane Uncertainty
Background image of page 10
Image of page 11
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/19/2008 for the course PHIL 1101 taught by Professor Weatherson,b during the Spring '06 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 33

ppt_02 - Pascals Wager January 25 2006 For Catching Up...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 11. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online