Hist. Modern Philo notes

Hist. Modern Philo notes - August 28, 2006 Start w/...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
August 28, 2006 Start w/ Descartes- influential works, on geometry Augustine- god made #’s, how important they were Pathagoras- influence on Plato, Augustine Plato big point- ideal objects which exist eternally, are better known than actual existence, this is because we can’t completely grasp. Starting point for Descartes. Rationalism- to become a key feature in early philosophy. Aristotle gives us basis for scientific approach Picture- Plato points up to the eternal #, Aristotle points outwards for experience Atomists- that there are tiny little particles underneath everything—atoms Explanations of physical things by the behaviors of their inner parts, the parts you can’t see. Decisive break from ancients to moderns. Skepticism resurfaces during the renaissance and different peeps take it in two ways. Either pro-skept or anti-skept This is not just within philosophy Responses to the change- Phidaism- I know what I believe don’t confuse me w/ your facts Descartes needs to find some place where people could come together and find truth. Locke, Hume, Kant, and others. Reading Group- Rousseau’s Dog- August 30, 2006 Main concern Cosmopolis- the way modernism has been typically characterized. Argued against the current philosophers interpretation of modernity. Rorty- pg 12- Harvard Professor- decided that the only thing philosophy could do is make sure you talk in correct sentences. You cant know things, its all relative. More or less says all we can do is critique cultures, and all you can do is talk out of your own context, we just need to make sure we are communicating. Credits Descartes and Gaileo Pg. 13- The unanimity… the problem w/ people building upon other’s research w/o going back to the original texts themselves. This problem was dealt w/ by Descartes and the rise of rationalism. Toulman believes that Descartes life was important to understand his thought. The western mindset says every discipline has its own sect, in universities the programs are all separate, instead of eastern thoughts- where everything is pulled together. Modernity emphasizes the individual. The back and forth b/w Spinoza and Descartes and others is a build up of ideas, it is also a way of seeing the skepticism that modernity brought about. Kuhn- brings out how, you think of Newton as coming up w/ something, but when you look at it, you find out that he was wrong, and then say this was wrong that was wrong. Kuhn instead says that there is fluidity, a paradigm of information. Toulmin- says that you can’t have Descartes and the other Modernity w/o previous events pushing them into the thought processes. Toulmin says we lose something w/ the rational process.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
T. brings up the idea that the modern movement may have been a rebellion against the religion and other zealots. Pilgrams Progress, Paradise Lost, Robinson Caruso- books represent allegory and
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/17/2008 for the course PHIL taught by Professor Kinlaw during the Fall '05 term at McMurry.

Page1 / 19

Hist. Modern Philo notes - August 28, 2006 Start w/...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online